Numerical modelling of transient liquid phase bonding and other diffusion controlled phase changes
Source abstract
Abstract
Diffusion in material of inhomogeneous composition can induce phase changes, even at a constant temperature. A transient liquid phase (TLP), in which a liquid layer is formed and subsequently solidifies, is one example of such an isothermal phase change. This phenomenon is exploited industrially in TLP bonding and sintering processes. Successful processing requires an understanding of the behaviour of the transient liquid layer in terms of both diffusion-controlled phase boundary migration and capillarity-driven flow. In this paper, a numerical model is presented for the simulation of diffusion-controlled dissolution and solidification in one dimension. The width of a liquid layer and time to solidification are studied for various bonding conditions. A novel approach is proposed, which generates results of a high precision even with coarse meshes and high interface velocities. The model is validated using experimental data from a variety of systems, including solid/solid diffusion couples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. W. MACDONALD and T. W. EAGAR, Ann. Rev. Mat. Sci. 22 (1992) 23.10.1146/annurev.ms.22.080192.000323 ↗
2. Y. ZHOU and T. H. NORTH, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1(4) (1993) 505.10.1088/0965-0393/1/4/012 ↗
3. J. Crank, Free and Moving Boundary Problems (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984).
4. Y. ZHOU, J. Mat. Sci. Let., 20(9) (2001) 841.10.1023/A:1010914813875 ↗
5. S. LIU, D. L. OLSON, G. P. MARTIN and G. R. EDWARDS, Welding J. 70(8) (1991) S207.
6. R. M. Furzeland, J. Inst. Maths Appl. 26 (1980) 411.10.1093/imamat/26.4.411 ↗
7. Y. ZHOU, W. F. GALE and T. H. NORTH, Int. Mat. Rev. 40 (1995) 181.10.1179/imr.1995.40.5.181 ↗
8. H. NAKAGAWA, C. H. LEE and T. H. NORTH, Met. Trans. A 22(2) (1991) 543.10.1007/BF02656822 ↗
9. S. R. CAIN, J. R. WILCOX and R. VENKATRAMAN, Acta Mat. 45(2) (1997) 701.10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00188-7 ↗
10. T. SHINMURA, K. OHSASA and T. NARITA, Mat. Trans. JIM 42(2) (2001) 292.10.2320/matertrans.42.292 ↗
11. C. W. SINCLAIR, G. R. PURDY and J. E. MORRAL, Met. Mat. Trans. A 31(4) (2000) 1187.10.1007/s11661-000-0114-2 ↗
12. C. E. CAMPBELL and W. J. BOETTINGER, Met. Mat. Trans. A 31(2) (2000) 2835.10.1007/BF02830355 ↗
13. R. A. TANZILLI and R. W. HECKEL, Trans A.I.M.E. 242 (1968) 2312.
14. M. KAJIHARA and M. KIKUCHI, Acta Met. Mat., 41(7) (1993) 2045.10.1016/0956-7151(93)90374-2 ↗
15. M. RAPPAZ, M. BELLET and M. DEVILLE, “Numerical Modeling in Materials Science and Engineering,” (Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003).10.1007/978-3-642-11821-0 ↗
16. A. A. SAMARSKII and P. N. VABISHEVICH, “Computational heat transfer. V.1. Mathematical Modelling” (Chichester, Wiley, 1995).
17. J. C. TANNEHILL, D. A. ANDERSON and R. H. PLETCHER, “Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer,” 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1997).
18. R. W. HECKEL, A. J. HICKL, R. J. ZAEHRING and R. A. TANZILLI, Met. Trans. 3 (1972) 2565.10.1007/BF02644230 ↗
19. C. J. SMITHELL, “Smithell’s Metals Reference Book,” 7th ed. (Butterworth, London, 1993).