On estimating Weibull modulus by the linear regression method
Source abstract
Abstract
Statistical models were developed to estimate the bias of the shape parameter of a 2-parameter Weibull distribution where the shape parameter was estimated using a linear regression. These models were formulated for 27 sample sizes from 5 to 100 and for 35 probability estimators, $$ P = {(i - a)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{i - a} {n + b}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {(n + b)} $$ , by varying “a” and “b”. In each simulation, 20,000 trials were used. From these models, a class of unbiased estimators were developed for each sample size. The standard deviation and coefficient of variation of these estimators were compared to the bias of the estimators. The standard deviation increased while the coefficient of variation decreased with increasing bias of the shape parameter. Also, the Anderson–Darling statistics was used to determine that the normal, log-normal, 3-parameter Weibull, and 3-parameter log-Weibull distributions did not provide good fit to the estimator of the shape parameter.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Khalili A, Kromp K (1991) J Mater Sci 26:674110.1007/BF02402669 ↗
2. Langlois R (1991) J Mater Sci Lett 10:104910.1007/BF00720121 ↗
3. Trustrum K, Jayatilaka AdeS (1979) J Mater Sci 14:108010.1007/BF00561290 ↗
4. Hazen A (1914) Trans ASCE 77:1547
5. Weibull W (1939) Ingeniörsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar Nr 151
6. Benard A, Bosi-Levenbach ED (1953) Statistica 7:16310.1111/j.1467-9574.1953.tb00821.x ↗
7. Blom G (1958) Statistical estimates of transformed beta variables. Wiley, NY, pp 68–75, 143–146
8. Gringorten II (1963) J Geophysical Res 68:81310.1029/JZ068i003p00813 ↗
9. Adamowski K (1981) Water Resources Bull 17:19710.1111/j.1752-1688.1981.tb03922.x ↗
10. Cunane C (1978) J Hydrology 37:20510.1016/0022-1694(78)90017-3 ↗
11. Tukey JW (1962) Annals of Math Stat 33:110.1214/aoms/1177704711 ↗
12. Beard LR (1943) Trans ASCE 69:1110
13. Wu D, Zhoua J, Li Y (2006) J Eur Cer Soc 26:109910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.01.044 ↗
14. Tiryakioğlu M (2006) J Mater Sci 41:501110.1007/s10853-006-0123-7 ↗
15. Davies IJ (2001) J Mater Sci Lett 20:99710.1023/A:1010983602277 ↗
16. Gong J (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19:82710.1023/A:1006712809728 ↗
17. Ritter J, Bandyopadhyay N, Jakus K (1981) Am Cer Soc Bull 60:788
18. Bergman B (1984) J Mater Sci Lett 3:68910.1007/BF00719924 ↗
19. Gong J, Wang J (2002) Key Eng Mater 224–226:77910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.224-226.779 ↗
20. Barbero E, Fernandez-Saez J, Navarro C (2000) Composites: Part B 31:37510.1016/S1359-8368(00)00027-5 ↗
21. Barbero E, Fernandez-Saez J, Navarro C (2001) J Mater Sci Lett 20:84710.1023/A:1010918914783 ↗
22. Tiryakioğlu M (2007) J Mater Sci, doi:10.1007/s10853-007-2095-710.1007/s10853-007-2095-7 ↗
23. Anderson TW, Darling DA (1954) J Am Stat Assoc 49:76510.1080/01621459.1954.10501232 ↗
24. Stephens MA (1974) J Am Stat Assoc 69:73010.1080/01621459.1974.10480196 ↗
25. Stephens MA (1986) In: D’Agostino RB, Stephens MA (eds) Goodness of fit techniques. Marcel Dekker, p 97