journal article·2008-01

Changes in microfibril angle in cyclically deformed dry coir fibers studied by in-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction

Klaus J. Martinschitz, Peter Boesecke, Christopher J. Garvey, Wolfgang Gindl, Jozef Keckes

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Dry coir fibers are characterized by wide-angle X-ray scattering coupled with tensile tests. The fibers exhibit elastic and plastic behavior with the yield point at a strain of about 2%. In-situ experiments document that the cyclic loading and unloading beyond the yield point does not reduce the stiffness of the fibres, since they recover their initial stiffness by every increase of the strain. The diffraction data show that the microfibril angle (MFA) of cellulose fibrils in the coir fibre cells is inversely proportional to the magnitude of the applied strain. In average, the relatively high MFA of about 45° in the unstrained state decreases linearly upon straining until the fibers break at about 35% strain. When the strain is released during the tensile experiment the MFA tends to recover its original magnitude. No significant differences in the dependence of MFA on strain are detected in elastic and plastic regions, respectively. The results demonstrate that the tissue with helical architecture does not have to be saturated with water in order to exhibit the effect of the recovery of the mechanical function when cyclically loaded. This indicates differences in the architecture of the coir cell wall in comparison with that of compression wood with high MFA whereby similar phenomena were observed in the wet state.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Bismarck A, Mishra S, Lampke T (2005) In: Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (eds) Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, pp 37
2. Kulkarni AG, Satyanarayana KG, Sukumaran K, Rohatgi PK (1981) J Mater Sci 16:90510.1007/BF00542734 ↗
3. Pavithran C, Gopakumar K, Prasad SV, Rohatgi PK (1981) J Mater Sci 16:154810.1007/BF02396872 ↗
4. Roe PJ, Ansell MP (1985) J Mater Sci 20:401510.1007/BF00552393 ↗
5. Bisanda ETN, Ansell MP (1992) J Mater Sci 27:169010.1007/BF00542934 ↗
6. Geethamma VG, Reethamma J, Sabu T (1995) J Appl Pol Sci 55:58310.1002/app.1995.070550405 ↗
7. Roy SC, Das S (1965) J Appl Pol Sci 9:342710.1002/app.1965.070091020 ↗
8. Mahato DN, Mathur BK, Bhattacherjee S (1993) J Mater Sci 28:231510.1007/BF01151659 ↗
9. Meylan BA, Butterfield BG (1978) Wood Sci Technol 12:21910.1007/BF00372867 ↗
10. Navi P, Rastogi PK, Gresse V, Tolou A (1995) Wood Sci Technol 29:41110.1007/BF00194199 ↗
11. Reiterer A, Lichtenegger H, Tschegg S, Fratzl P (1999) Philos Mag A 79:217310.1080/01418619908210415 ↗
12. Keckes J, Burgert I, Frühmann K, Müller M, Kölln K, Hamilton M, Burghammer M, Roth SV, Stanzl-Tschegg S, Fratzl P (2003) Nat Mater 2:81010.1038/nmat1019 ↗
13. Astley OM, Donald AM (2001) Biomacromol 2:67210.1021/bm005643l ↗
14. Astley OM, Chanliaud E, Donald AM, Gidley MJ (2003) Int J Biol Macromol 1636:1
15. Crawshaw J, Bras W, Mant GR, Cameron RE (2002) J Appl Pol Sci 83:120910.1002/app.2287 ↗
16. Kamiyama T, Suzuki H, Sugiyama J (2005) J Struct Biol 151:110.1016/j.jsb.2005.04.007 ↗
17. http://www.rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/
18. Lichtenegger H, Reiterer A, Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Fratzl P (1998) In: Microfibril angle in wood, proceedings of the IAWA/IUFRO international workshop on the significance of microfibril angle to wood quality, Westport, New Zealand, p 140