journal article·2008-03

Microstructure and magnetic properties of electrodeposited cobalt films

M. S. Bhuiyan, B. J. Taylor, M. Paranthaman, J. R. Thompson, J. W. Sinclair

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Cobalt films were electrodeposited onto both iron and copper substrates from an aqueous solution containing a mixture of cobalt sulfate, boric acid, sodium citrate, and vanadyl sulfate. The structural, intermetallic diffusion and magnetic properties of the electrodeposited films were studied. Cobalt electrodeposition was carried out in a passively divided cell aided by addition of vanadyl sulfate to keep the counter electrode clean. The divided electrolytic cell with very negative current densities cause the electrodeposited Co to adopt a face-centered cubic (fcc) structure, which is more magnetically reversible than the hexagonally close-packed (hcp) structured Co. The coercive field is also significantly less in the fcc-electrodeposited cobalt than in the hcp. SEM images show dense, uniform Co films without any cracks or porosity. Beside the deposition current, thickness of the film was also found to affect the crystal orientation particularly on iron substrates. Diffusion of cobalt film into the iron substrate was studied under reduced environment and a fast process was observed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Barrera E, Palomar Pardavé M, Batina N, González I (2000) J Electrochem Soc 147(5):178710.1149/1.1393435 ↗
2. Pfeifer F, Raddeloff C (1980) J Magn Magn Mater 19:19010.1016/0304-8853(80)90592-2 ↗
3. Yu RH, Basu S, Zhang Y, Xiao JQ (1999) J Appl Phys 85:603410.1063/1.369073 ↗
4. Li L (1996) J Appl Phys 79:457810.1063/1.361732 ↗
5. Major RV, Samadian V (1989) J Mater Eng 11(1):2710.1007/BF02833750 ↗
6. Yu RH, Basu S, Zhang Y, Parvizi-Majidi A, Xiao JQ (1999) J Appl Phys 85:665510.1063/1.370175 ↗
7. Kakuno EM, Mosca DH, Mazzaro I, Mattoso N, Schreiner WH, Gomes MAB (1997) J Electrochem Soc 144(9):322210.1149/1.1837987 ↗
8. Fontana RE (1995) IEEE Trans Magn MAG-31:257910.1109/20.490062 ↗
9. Grochowski E, Scranton RA, Croll I (1994) In: Romankiw LT, Herman DA Jr (eds) Magnetic materials, processes, and devices III, vol PV 94-6. The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ, p 3
10. Liao SH (1990) IEEE Trans Magn MAG-26:32810.1109/20.50562 ↗
11. Croll IM (1980) Advances in X-ray analysis, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, p 151
12. Croll IM, May BA (1987) In: Romanikiw LT, Turner DR (eds) Electrodeposition technology, theory and practice, vol PV 87-17. The Electrochemical Society Proceeding Series, Pennington, NJ, p 295
13. Brossared L (1991) Mater Chem Phys 27:23510.1016/0254-0584(91)90121-A ↗
14. Cui CQ, Jiang SP, Tseung ACC (1991) J Electrochem Soc 138:100110.1149/1.2085705 ↗
15. Nishizawa T, Ishida K (1986) Met Prog 129(2):57
16. Yu RH, Basu S, Ren L, Zhang Y, Parvizi-Majidi A, Unruh KM, Xiao JQ (2000) IEEE Trans Magn 36(5):338810.1109/20.908809 ↗
17. Bozorth RM (1991) Ferromagnetism. IEEE, New York
18. Ashby JA, Flower HM, Rawling RD (1977) Met Sci 11:9110.1179/msc.1977.11.3.91 ↗
19. Pitt CD, Rawling RD (1981) Met Sci 15:36910.1179/030634581790426912 ↗
20. Yu RH, Zhu J (2005) J Appl Phys 97:5390510.1063/1.1857057 ↗