Characterization of deformation mechanisms during low cycle fatigue of a single crystal nickel-based superalloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The deformation and fracture mechanisms of a single crystal nickel-based superalloy CMSX-4 have been investigated during low cycle fatigue (LCF) tests at temperatures of 750, 850, and 950 °C under strain-controlled R = 0. It was found that LCF lives at 750 and 850 °C were similar and longer than those at 950 °C. The specimens tested at 750 and 850 °C showed fatigue crack initiation at internal pores, and their failure occurred by cracking at persistent {111} slip bands. On the other hand, at 950 °C the crack initiated at the oxide-layered surface and propagated along γ channel until fracture. At the two lower temperatures, a/2 dislocations with low density was rarely present within γ channels, and a/3 partial dislocations were occasionally seen to shear γ′ leaving superlattice stacking faults behind. At 950 °C, homogeneous deformation was produced by perfect dislocation movements of cross-slip and climb in the γ channel and a limited γ′ shearing by superdislocation was observed. At total strain range lower than 0.6%, well-developed polygonal dislocation network formed at rafted γ′ interface. Comparison of dislocation structures revealed that load-controlled LCF tests lead to more severe deformation to specimens than strain-controlled tests.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Anton DL (1984) Acta Metall 32:166910.1016/0001-6160(84)90223-2 ↗
2. Fleury E, Rémy L (1993) Mater Sci Eng A 167:2310.1016/0921-5093(93)90332-9 ↗
3. Ott M, Mughrabi H (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 272:2410.1016/S0921-5093(99)00453-0 ↗
4. Brien V, Décamps B (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 316:1810.1016/S0921-5093(01)01235-7 ↗
5. Zhou H, Ro Y, Harada H, Aoki Y, Arai M (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 381:2010.1016/j.msea.2004.04.051 ↗
6. MacLachlan DW, Knowles DM (2001) Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 24:50310.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00392.x ↗
7. Whan CM, Rae CMF (2003) In: Strang A et al (eds) Proceedings of the 6th international Charles Parsons turbine conference (PARSONS 2003). Maney publishing for the institute of materials, minerals and mining, Dublin, Ireland, pp 789–801
8. Charles CM, Drew GA, Bagnall S, Rae CMF (2007) Mater Sci Forum 546–549:121110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.546-549.1211 ↗
9. Suresh S (2001) Fatigue of materials, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
10. Sakaguchi M, Okazaki M (2006) JSME Int J 49:34510.1299/jsmea.49.345 ↗
11. Hong HU, Kang JG, Choi BG, Kim IS, Yoo YS, Jo CY (2010) Int J Fatigue (under review)
12. Völkl R, Glatzel U, Feller-Kniepmeier M (1998) Acta Mater 46:439510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00085-8 ↗
13. Nathal MV, Mackay RA, Garlick RG (1985) Mater Sci Eng 75:19510.1016/0025-5416(85)90189-2 ↗
14. Zhang JX, Ro Y, Zhou H, Harada H (2006) Scripta Mater 54:65510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.030 ↗
15. Caron P, Khan T, Veyssière (1988) Philos Mag A 57:85910.1080/01418618808204522 ↗
16. Condat M, Décamps B (1987) Scripta Metall 21:60710.1016/0036-9748(87)90369-3 ↗
17. Milligan WW, Antolovich SD (1991) Metall Tans A 22:230910.1007/BF02664997 ↗
18. Matan N, Cox DC, Rae CMF, Reed RC (1999) Acta Mater 47:203110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00093-2 ↗