Effects of roughness pitch of surfaces on their wettability
Source abstract
Abstract
The surface roughness factors, such as the Wenzel roughness factor and so on, are very interrelated to each other. Therefore, it makes a precise discussion difficult on how the surface roughness affects the wettability. We already reported the effect of the surface roughness on the wettability at a constant Wenzel roughness factor using two kinds of models, the hemisphere close packing model and the hemiround rod close lining model. Nevertheless, the pitch is proportional to the height in these models. Therefore, we could not independently discuss the influence of roughness height and roughness pitch on the wettability. We developed our new models which can independently describe the influence of the surface roughness height and the roughness pitch on the wettability. We simulated loose packing sphere models by periodically placing small ball bearings and the loose lining round rod models by winding fine wires. The wettability was measured by the sessile drop method for the non-wetting system using paraffin coated samples and aqueous solutions. These results show that there is a critical pitch which determines the maximum contact angle in both systems. These results can be explained by the ratio of the solid/liquid/vapor and liquid/vapor line length at the three phase line.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. R. N. WENZEL, Industr. Eng. Chem. 28 (1936) 988.10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
2. R. SHUTTLEWORTH and G. L. BAILEY, Discuss. Farady Soc. 3 (1948) 16.10.1039/df9480300016 ↗
3. R. E. JOHNSON, JR. and R. H. DETTRE, Surf. Colloid Sci. 2 (1969) 85.
4. A. B. D. CASSIE and S. BAXTER, Trans. Faraday Soc. 40 (1944) 546.10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
5. A. B. D. CASSIE, Discuss. Fraday Soc. 3 (1948) 11.10.1039/df9480300011 ↗
6. J. DRELICH, J. L. WILBUR, J. D. MILLER and G. M. WHITESIDES, Langmuir 12 (1996) 1913.10.1021/la9509763 ↗
7. H. NAKAE, R. INUI, Y. HIRATA and H. SAITO, Acta Mater 46 (1998) 2313.10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00387-X ↗
8. J. DRELICH, J. D. MILLER, A. KUMAR and G. M. WHITESIDES, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochemi. Engng. Asp. 93 (1994) 1.10.1016/0927-7757(94)02940-7 ↗
9. J. DRELICH and J. D. MILLER, Langumuir 9 (1993) 619.10.1021/la00026a043 ↗
10. N. MORI, M. UKITA and K. OHGI, J. Japan Inst. Metals. 55 (1991) 820.10.2320/jinstmet1952.55.7_820 ↗
11. S. J. HITCHCOCK, N. T. CARROLL and M. G. NICHOLAS, J. Mater. Sci. 16 (1981) 714.10.1007/BF02402789 ↗
12. A. KAWAI and H. NAGATA, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33 (1994) Pt.2, No.9A, L1283.
13. X. B. ZHOU and TH. M. DE HOSSON, J. Mater. Res. 10 (1995) 1984.10.1557/JMR.1995.1984 ↗
14. F. E. BARTELL and J. W. SHEPARD, J. Phys. Chem. 57 (1953) 211, 455, 458.10.1021/j150503a017 ↗
15. S. ASAHARA and K. GOTO, KOGYOKAGAKU 58 (1955) 864.
16. G. NAVASCUES, Rep. Prog. Phys. 42 (1979) 1131.10.1088/0034-4885/42/7/002 ↗
17. H. FUJII, H. NAKAE and K. OKADA, Acta Metall. Mater. 41 (1993) 2963.10.1016/0956-7151(93)90111-5 ↗
18. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 4th ed., edited by A. W. Adamson (John Willey & Sons, 1982) p. 7.
19. R. E. JOHNSON, JR. and R. H. DETTRE, Contact Angle, Wettability, and Adhesion, Advances in Chemistry Series 43, American Chemical Soc. (1964) p. 112.10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch007 ↗