Effect of chelating agents on the preferred orientation of ZnO films by sol-gel process
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of chelating agents of ZnO precursor solutions on crystallization behavior was investigated. Two different additives, monoethanolamine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA), and crystalline Pt (111)/Si and amorphous SiN x /Si substrates, were used for this study. ZnO film grown on SiN x /Si from a DEA-chelated precursor solution shows a poorly oriented microstructure with weak crystallization peaks, while ZnO film grown on Pt(111)/Si shows a c-axis preferred orientation. In the case of ZnO films prepared with a MEA-chelated precursor solution, all films show a strong preferred orientation irrespective of substrate type. This result clearly demonstrates the role of the chelating agent on the crystallographic orientation and crystallization behavior of sol-gel processed ZnO films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Nishino J, Ohshio S, Kamata K (1992) J Am Ceram Soc 75:3469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04452.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04452.x ↗
2. Lee JH, Park BO (2003) Thin Solid Films 426:94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00014-210.1016/S0040-6090(03)00014-2 ↗
3. Znaidi L, Illia GJAAS, Benyahia S, Sanchez C, Kanaev AV (2003) Thin Solid Films 428:257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(02)01219-110.1016/S0040-6090(02)01219-1 ↗
4. Jin M, Feng J, De-heng Z, Hong-lei M, Shu-ying L (1999) Thin Solid Films 357:98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00357-010.1016/S0040-6090(99)00357-0 ↗
5. Petrov I, Orlinov V, Misiuk A (1984) Thin Solid Films 120:55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(84)90173-110.1016/0040-6090(84)90173-1 ↗
6. Kim KH, Park KC, Ma DY (1997) J Appl Phys 81:7764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.36555610.1063/1.365556 ↗
7. Myoung JM, Yoon WH, Lee DH, Yun I, Bae SH, Lee SY (2002) Jpn J Appl Phys 41:28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.41.2810.1143/JJAP.41.28 ↗
8. Wessler B, Lange FF, Mader W (2002) J Mater Res 17:1644. doi:https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2002.024210.1557/JMR.2002.0242 ↗
9. Ohya Y, Saiki H, Tanaka T, Takahashi Y (1996) J Am Ceram Soc 79:825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08512.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08512.x ↗
10. Kim YS, Tai WP, Shu SJ (2005) Thin Solid Films 491:153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.06.01310.1016/j.tsf.2005.06.013 ↗
11. Ohya Y, Saiki H, Takahashi Y (1994) J Mater Sci 29:4099. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0035597710.1007/BF00355977 ↗
12. Ohyama M, Kozuka H, Yoko T, Sakka S (1996) J Ceram Soc Jpn 104:29610.2109/jcersj.104.296 ↗
13. Sanchez C, Livage J, Henry M, Babonneau F (1988) J Non-Cryst Solids 100:65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(88)90007-510.1016/0022-3093(88)90007-5 ↗
14. Yoon SH, Kim DJ (2007) J Cryst Growth 303:568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.11.35110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.11.351 ↗
15. Fujihara S, Sasaki C, Kimura T (2001) Appl Surf Sci 180:341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00367-110.1016/S0169-4332(01)00367-1 ↗
16. Ohyama M, Kozuka H, Yoko T (1997) Thin Solid Films 306:78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00231-910.1016/S0040-6090(97)00231-9 ↗
17. Ohyama M, Kozuka H, Yoko T (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81:162210.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02524.x ↗
18. Asmar RA, Atanas JP, Ajaka M, Zaatar Y, Ferblantier G, Sauvajol JL et al (2005) J Cryst Growth 279:394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.02.03510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.02.035 ↗
19. Huang Y, Liu M, Li Z, Zeng Y, Liu S (2003) Mater Sci Eng B 97:111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(02)00396-310.1016/S0921-5107(02)00396-3 ↗