Shock and release of polycarbonate under one-dimensional strain
Source abstract
Abstract
The behaviour of the thermoplastic polycarbonate has been investigated using manganin stress gauges in both longitudinal and lateral orientations. These have been used to determine the shock stress, shock velocity, particle velocity, release velocity and shear strength. The relationship between shock velocity and particle velocity has been shown to be linear, with the value of c0 (the zero particle velocity intercept of shock velocity) equating to the measured bulk sound speed. This behaviour is more commonly observed in metals. Shear strength has been observed to increase behind the shock front, a feature observed in other polymers such as PMMA or PEEK. It also increases with stress amplitude, although the projected intercept with the calculated elastic response indicates that the Hugoniot elastic limit (HEL) is lower than in other polymers, for example PMMA (ca. 0.75GPa) or PEEK (ca. 1.0GPa). This further suggests that the yield strength of polycarbonate does not obey a Mohr-Coloumb criterion, and hence is not as strongly pressure dependent as other polymers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. L. DAVISON and R. A. GRAHAM, Phy. Rept. 55 (1979) 255.10.1016/0370-1573(79)90026-7 ↗
2. M. U. ANDERSON, in “Shock Compression of Condensed Matter – 1991,“ edited by S. C. Schmidt, R. D. Dick, J. W. Forbes and D. G. Tasker (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992), p. 875.10.1016/B978-0-444-89732-9.50201-6 ↗
3. J. N. JOHNSON, J. J. DICK and R. S. HIXSON, J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998) 2520.10.1063/1.368413 ↗
4. J. C. F. MILLETT, N. K. BOURNE and J. AKHAVAN, ibid. 95 (2004) 4722.10.1063/1.1689758 ↗
5. W. RIEDEL, H. NAHME and K. THOMA, in “Shock Compression of Condensed Matter – 2003,“ edited by M. D. Furnish, Y. M. Gupta and J. W. Forbes (AIP Press, Melville, NY, 2004), p. 701.
6. D. E. MUNSON and R. P. MAY, J. Appl. Phys. 43 (1972) 962.10.1063/1.1661315 ↗
7. J. C. F. MILLETT, N. K. BOURNE and N. R. BARNES, ibid. 92 (2002) 6590.10.1063/1.1506389 ↗
8. L. M. BARKER and R. E. HOLLENBACH, ibid. 41 (1970) 4208.10.1063/1.1658439 ↗
9. W. J. CARTER and S. P. MARSH, “Hugoniot Equation of State of Polymers” LA-12006-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, (1995).10.2172/95183 ↗
10. V. A. KARGIN, G. P. ANDRIANOVA, I. Y. TSAREVSKAYA, V. I. GOLDANSKII and P. A. YAMPOLSKII, J. Poly. Sci. A-2 9 (1971) 1061.10.1002/pol.1971.160090605 ↗
11. D. R. CURRAN, D. A. SHOCKEY and L. SEAMAN, J. Appl. Phys. 44 (1973) 4025.10.1063/1.1662891 ↗
12. T. DE RESSEGUIER and M. DELEIGNIES, Shock Waves. 7 (1997) 319.10.1007/s001930050086 ↗
13. N. K. BOURNE, Meas. Sci. Technol. 14 (2003) 273.10.1088/0957-0233/14/3/304 ↗
14. Z. ROSENBERG, D. YAZIV and Y. PARTOM, J. Appl. Phys. 51 (1980) 3702.10.1063/1.328155 ↗
15. S. P. MARSH, LASL Shock Hugoniot Data, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1980.
16. Z. ROSENBERG and Y. PARTOM, J. Appl. Phys. 58 (1985) 3072.10.1063/1.335833 ↗
17. J. C. F. MILLETT, N. K. BOURNE and Z. ROSENBERG, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phy. 29 (1996) 2466.10.1088/0022-3727/29/9/035 ↗
18. Z. ROSENBERG, N. K. BOURNE and J. C. F. MILLETT, J. Appl. Phys. (2005) Submitted.
19. N. J. MILLS, Plastics: Microstructure and Engineering Applications, Second (Arnold, London, 1993).
20. Y. MORI and K. NAGAYAMA, SPIE 3516 (1999) 241.
21. J. C. F. MILLETT and N. K. BOURNE, J. Phys. D. App. Phy. 37 (2004) 2901.10.1088/0022-3727/37/20/018 ↗
22. J. C. F. MILLETT and N. K. BOURNE, J. Appl. Phys. 88 (2000) 7037.10.1063/1.1324699 ↗
23. J. C. F. MILLETT, N. K. BOURNE and G. T. GRAY III J. Phys. D. App. Phy. 37 (2004) 942.10.1088/0022-3727/37/6/021 ↗
24. S. C. GUPTA and Y. M. GUPTA, J. Appl. Phys. 57 (1985) 2464.10.1063/1.335430 ↗
25. D. L. GOBLE and E. G. WOLFF, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 5989.10.1007/BF00365009 ↗
26. N. K. BOURNE and J. C. F. MILLETT, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459 (2003) 567.10.1098/rspa.2002.1043 ↗
27. A. R. CHAMPION, J. Appl. Phys. 42 (1971) 5546.10.1063/1.1659978 ↗
28. J. C. F. MILLETT and N. K. BOURNE, ibid. 89 (2001) 2576.10.1063/1.1340006 ↗
29. J. C. F. MILLETT, N. K. BOURNE and G. T. GRAY III, ibid. 96 (2004) 5500.10.1063/1.1805193 ↗
30. J. C. F. MILLETT, N. K. BOURNE, G. T. GRAY III and I. P. JONES, Acta Mater. 50 (2002) 4801.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00345-2 ↗
31. Z. ROSENBERG and Y. PARTOM, J. Appl. Phys. 76 (1994) 1935.10.1063/1.357680 ↗
32. S. RABINOWITZ, I. M. WARD and J. S. C. PARRY, J. Mater. Sci. 5 (1970) 29.10.1007/BF02427181 ↗