Microstructure and nanoindentation measurement of residual stress in Fe-based coating by laser cladding
Source abstract
Abstract
Laser cladding is a surface modification technique for improving surface properties. However, high residual tensile stress is always originated, which can create cracks in cladding coatings. The through-thickness residual stresses in Fe-based coating prepared by laser cladding were measured using a non-destructive nanoindentation technique. The cladding coating with a thickness of 1 mm exhibited a uniform appearance, and no crack or defect was observed. An excellent metallurgic bond was obtained between the coating and the substrate. The XRD pattern implied that the coating was mainly composed of α(Fe, Cr) solid solution, Cr7C3 hard phase and Fe2B stable phase. The residual tensile stress in the cladding coating was found to increase as the increasing of the distance from coating surface. Although the tensile residual stress reaches the highest magnitude of 700 MPa up to the depth of 600 μm, no dehiscence happened. The prepared cladding coating has good plasticity and toughness, as well as low crack sensitivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Entropy Alloys Studies · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Zheng BJ, Chen XM, Lian JS (2010) Opt Lasers Eng 48:52610.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.01.001 ↗
2. Volovitch P, Masse JE, Fabre A, Barrallier L, Saikaly W (2008) Surf Coat Technol 202:490110.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.04.052 ↗
3. Xu G, Kutsuna M, Liu Z, Zhang H (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 417:6310.1016/j.msea.2005.08.192 ↗
4. Bendeich P, Alam N, Brandt M, Carr D, Short K, Blevins R, Curfs C, Kirstein O, Atkinson G, Holden T, Rogge R (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 437:7010.1016/j.msea.2006.04.065 ↗
5. de Oliveira U, Ocelík V, De Hosson JThM (2006) Surf Coat Technol 201:53310.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.12.011 ↗
6. Palumbo G, Pinto S, Tricarico L (2006) J Mater Process Technol 155(156):1443
7. Xu Z-H, Li X (2006) Philos Mag 86:283510.1080/14786430600627277 ↗
8. Jang J, Son D, Lee Y-H, Choi Y, Kwon D (2003) Scripta Mater 48:74310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00537-7 ↗
9. Suresh S, Giannakopoulos AE (1998) Acta Mater 46:575510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-2 ↗
10. Zhu L, Xu B, Wang H, Wang C (2010) Mater Charact 61:135910.1016/j.matchar.2010.09.006 ↗
11. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
12. Lee Y-H, Kwon D (2004) Acta Mater 52:155510.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.006 ↗
13. Bolshakov A, Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1996) J Mater Res 11:75210.1557/JMR.1996.0091 ↗