journal article·2002-09

Experimental verification of the effects of friction and residual stress on the analysis of interfacial debonding and toughness in single fiber composites

BEN W. Kim, JOHN A. Nairn

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 37· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Single-fiber fragmentation tests were done on AS4 carbon fiber/epoxy and E-glass/epoxy specimens. Using a new interpretation of the photoelasticity fringes around fiber breaks we measured debonds that occurred instantaneously after each fiber break. The new techniques led to measured debond lengths that were longer than in prior studies. An energy balance analysis of the debond size when the breaks are far apart was used to investigate the interfacial fracture toughness. The best analysis was one that accounted for both residual stress effects and interfacial friction. It was not possible to determine all effects by debonding experiments alone and thus the most accurate results for interfacial toughness require supplemental experiments such as Raman spectroscopy or additional fragmentation observations. The best estimate for interfacial toughness was 220 J/m2 for carbon-fiber/epoxy and 120 J/m2 for glass-fiber/epoxy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. A. Kelly and W. R. Tyson, J.Mech.Phys.Solids 13 (1965) 329.10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
2. A. A. Fraser, F. H. Ancker and A. T. Dibenedetto, in Proc. 30th Conf. SPI Reinforced Plastics Div. Section 22-A (1975) p. 1.
3. L. T. Drzal, M. J. Rich and P. F. Lloyd, J.Adhesion 16 (1983) 1.10.1080/00218468308074901 ↗
4. W. D. Bascom and R. M. Jensen, ibid. 19 (1986) 219.10.1080/00218468608071225 ↗
5. B. Yavin, H. E. Gallis, J. Scherf, A. Eitan and H. D. Wagner Polym.Comp. 12 (1991) 436.10.1002/pc.750120609 ↗
6. H. D. Wagner and S. Ling, Adv.Comp.Letts. 2 (1993) 169.
7. H. D. Wagner, J. A. Nairn and M. Detassis, Applied Comp.Mater. 2 (1995) 107.10.1007/BF00569253 ↗
8. M. Detasses, E. Frydman, D. Vrieling, X. F. Zhou, J. A. Nairn and H. D. Wagner, Composites 27A(7) (1996) 69.
9. H. D. Wagner, X.-F. Zhou and J. A. Nairn, in First Hellenic Conference on Composite Materials and Structures, Xanthi, Greece, July 2–5 1997.
10. X.-F. Zhou, J. A. Nairn and H. D. Wagner, Composites 30 (1999) 1387.10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00043-3 ↗
11. N. Melanitis, C. Galiotis, P. L. Tetlow and C. K. L. Davies, J.Comp.Mat. 26 (1992) 574.10.1177/002199839202600407 ↗
12. A. Paipetis, Y. C. Liu, C. Galiotis and J. A. Nairn, ibid. 33 (1999) 377.10.1177/002199839903300404 ↗
13. B. W. Kim and J. A. Nairn,ibid., in press.
14. J. A. Nairn and Y. C. Liu, Comp.Interfaces 4 (1996) 241.10.1163/156855497X00028 ↗
15. J. A. Nairn and H. D. Wagner, Adv.Comp.Letts. 5 (1996) 131.
16. J. A. Nairn, Polym.Comp. 6 (1985) 123.10.1002/pc.750060211 ↗
17. H. D. Wagner and J. A. Nairn, Comp.Sci.& Tech. 57 (1997) 1289.10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00058-4 ↗
18. C. H. Liu and J. A. Nairn, J.Adhes.Adhesives. 19 (1999) 59.10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00057-8 ↗
19. J. A. Nairn, Int.J.Fract. 105 (2000) 243.10.1023/A:1007666426275 ↗
20. J. A. Nairn and Y. C. Liu, Int.J.Solids Structures 34 (1997) 1255.10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00065-0 ↗
21. T. Kislev, G. Marom, L. Berglund, R. Joffe, J. A. Nairn and H. D. Wagner, Adv.Comp.Letts, in press.
22. H. L. Cox, Brit.J.Appl.Phys. 3 (1952) 72.10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
23. A. H. Nayfeh, Fibre Sci.& Tech. 10 (1977) 195.10.1016/0015-0568(77)90020-3 ↗
24. B. Harris, J. Morley and D. C. Phillips, J.Mater.Sci. 10 (1975) 2050.10.1007/BF00557483 ↗