journal article·2025-10-14Open access

Impact of Surface Treatments on the Transport Properties of Germanium 2DHGs

Nikunj Sangwan, Eric Jutzi, Christian Olsen, Sarah Vogel, Arianna Nigro, Ilaria Zardo, Andrea Hofmann

ACS Applied Electronic Materials· Volume 7· Issue 19

Abstract

Holes in planar germanium (Ge) heterostructures show promise for quantum applications, particularly in superconducting and spin qubits, due to strong spin-orbit interaction, low effective mass, and the absence of valley degeneracies. However, charge traps cause issues such as gate hysteresis and charge noise. This study examines the effect of surface treatments on the accumulation behavior and transport properties of Ge-based two-dimensional hole gases (2DHGs). Oxygen plasma treatment reduces conduction in a setting without applied top gate voltage, improves the mobility, and lowers the percolation density, while hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching provides no benefit. The results suggest that interface traps from the partially oxidized silicon (Si) cap pin the Fermi level and that oxygen plasma reduces the trap density by fully oxidizing the Si cap. Therefore, optimizing surface treatments is crucial for minimizing the charge traps and thereby enhancing the device's performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Semiconductor materials and devices · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, 4056 Basel, Switzerland

Swiss Nanoscience Institute, Klingelbergstrasse 82, 4056 Basel, Switzerland

Funding

National Center of Competence in Research Spin Qubit in Silicon · Basel QCQT PhD School, University of Basel

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41534-023-00721-910.1038/s41534-023-00721-9 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467-024-50763-610.1038/s41467-024-50763-6 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0077010.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00770 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-018-06418-410.1038/s41467-018-06418-4 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41563-021-01022-210.1038/s41563-021-01022-2 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-021-03332-610.1038/s41586-021-03332-6 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41578-020-00262-z10.1038/s41578-020-00262-z ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.19531410.1103/PhysRevB.84.195314 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41565-020-00828-610.1038/s41565-020-00828-6 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.12520110.1103/PhysRevB.103.125201 ↗
11. 10.1002/smsc.20220009410.1002/smsc.202200094 ↗
12. 10.1063/5.008316110.1063/5.0083161 ↗
13. 10.1088/2633-4356/abcd8210.1088/2633-4356/abcd82 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.06620110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.066201 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41565-023-01491-310.1038/s41565-023-01491-3 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-020-17211-710.1038/s41467-020-17211-7 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0427510.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04275 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.07543510.1103/PhysRevB.99.075435 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L02200510.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L022005 ↗
20. 10.1038/s43246-023-00351-w10.1038/s43246-023-00351-w ↗
21. 10.1038/s43246-024-00563-810.1038/s43246-024-00563-8 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0349310.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03493 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41565-017-0014-x10.1038/s41565-017-0014-x ↗
24. 10.1038/nphys268810.1038/nphys2688 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.490116210.1063/1.4901162 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsaelm.4c0065410.1021/acsaelm.4c00654 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.216269910.1063/1.2162699 ↗
28. 10.1116/1.479839010.1116/1.4798390 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.498497510.1063/1.4984975 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00438-810.1016/S0040-6090(02)00438-8 ↗
31. 10.1021/cm030454610.1021/cm0304546 ↗
32. 10.1149/1.307614310.1149/1.3076143 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.497903510.1063/1.4979035 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41598-022-09054-710.1038/s41598-022-09054-7 ↗
35. Paghi, A.; Battisti, S.; Tortorella, S.; De Simoni, G.; Giazotto, F. Cryogenic Behavior of High-Permittivity Gate Dielectrics: The Impact of the Atomic Layer Deposition Temperature and the Lithographic Patterning Method. arXiv:2407.04501. 10.48550/arXiv.2407.0450110.48550/arXiv.2407.04501 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.241024110.1063/1.2410241 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.34718110.1063/1.347181 ↗
38. 10.1007/s12633-015-9366-810.1007/s12633-015-9366-8 ↗
39. 10.1063/5.008857610.1063/5.0088576 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14888910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148889 ↗
41. Benick, J.; Richter, A.; Li, T.T. A.; Grant, N. E.; McIntosh, K. R.; Ren, Y.; Weber, K. J.; Hermle, M.; Glunz, S. W. Effect of a post-deposition anneal on Al2O3/Si interface properties. In 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. Honolulu, HI, USA, 2010; pp. 000891–000896.10.1109/PVSC.2010.5614148 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.354431010.1063/1.3544310 ↗
43. 10.1038/srep3995310.1038/srep39953 ↗
44. 10.1038/nnano.2015.7010.1038/nnano.2015.70 ↗
45. Martinez, B.; de Franceschi, S.; Niquet, Y.M. Variability mitigation in epitaxial-heterostructure-based spin qubit devices via gate layout optimization. arXiv:2402.18991 [cond-mat], 2024; 10.48550/arXiv.2402.18991.10.48550/arXiv.2402.18991 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.04460110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.044601 ↗
47. 10.1116/1.58647110.1116/1.586471 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.214208410.1063/1.2142084 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.23530710.1103/PhysRevB.79.235307 ↗