Microstructure and martensite transformation in aged Ti-25Ni-25Cu shape memory melt spun ribbons
Source abstract
Abstract
The phase transformations and microstructure of Ti-25at.%Ni-25at.%Cu alloy melt-spun at 26 m/s (50 μm thick, 3 mm wide) were investigated using DSC and TEM. The as received ribbon was nearly fully amorphous with a few spherical β phase grains (of size up to 15 μm). The heating (20°C°min.) of this ribbon resulted first in restart of growth of existing large grains and later in homogenous nucleation and growth of new small β phase crystallites within the amorphous matrix. The crystallization peak temperature of amorphous parts in this ribbon was determined to be 460°C. Further heating with the same rate to higher temperatures causes precipitation predominantly at grain boundaries with maximum of its thermal effect around 600°C. Isothermal aging of crystallized ribbon cause precipitation of thin plates of a tetragonal phase. The size and density of these plate-like precipitates depends on local microstructure and differs most drastically within large primary grains. The in situ TEM experiments confirmed the presence of only B2–B19 martensite transformation in the investigated ribbon. However, in situ TEM observations showed also that this transformation was significantly retarded in areas with small grains and even more in areas of high dislocation density as compared to primary large grains. Therefore, the delay in martensitic transformation caused by differences in the microstructure was the reason for the peak splitting in DSC curves.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. T. SABURI, in Proc. ICOMAT 92, edited by C. M. Wayman and J. Perkins (MontereyInst. of Advanced Studies, 1993) p. 857.
2. T. H. NAM, T. SABURI, Y. NAKATA and K. SHIMIZU,Mat. Trans. JIM 31 (1990) 1050.10.2320/matertrans1989.31.1050 ↗
3. O. MERCIER and K. N. MELTON, Met. Trans. 10A(1979) 387.10.1007/BF02658353 ↗
4. Y. FURUYA, M. MATSUMOTO, H. KIMURA and T. MASUMOTO, Mat. Sci. Eng.A 147 (1991) L7.10.1016/0921-5093(91)90814-4 ↗
5. T. ZHANG, A. INOUNE and T. MASUMOTO, ibid. 181/A182 (1994) 1423.10.1016/0921-5093(94)90877-X ↗
6. Y. FURUYA, M. MATSUMOTO, H. KIMURA, K. AOKI and T. MASUMOTO, Mat. Trans. JIM 31 (1990) 504.10.2320/matertrans1989.31.504 ↗
7. Y. FURUYA, M. MATSUMOTO and T. MASUMOTO, in Proc. ICOMAT 92, edited by C. M. Wayman and J. Perkins (Monterey Inst. of Advanced Studies, 1993) p. 905.
8. M. N. MATVEEVA, V. A. LOBODJUK, V. I. KOLOMYCEV and I. D. LOVCOVA,Metally (1991) 164.
9. Z. L. XIE, J. VAN HUMBEECK, Y. LIU and L. DELAEY, ScriptaMaterialia 379 (1997) 363.
10. J. DUTKIEWICZ, J. MORGIEL and T. CZEPPE, in Proc. Conf. onEl. Microscopy, Cancun, 1998, edited by H. A. Calderon and M. J. Yacaman, p. 29.
11. H. RÖSNER, A.V. SHELYAKOV, A. M. GLEZER, K. FEIT and P. SCHLOßMACHER, Mat. Sci. and Eng. A 273–275 (1999) 733.10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00406-2 ↗
12. H. RÖSNER, P. SCHLOßMACHER, A. V. SHELYAKOV and A. M. GLEZER,Scripta Mat. 43 (2000) 871.10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00541-8 ↗
13. L. LITYŃSKA, PH. VERMAUT, J. MORGIEL, J. DUTKIEWICZ, P. OCHIN and R. PORTIER, J. Phys. IV France 11 (2001) Pr8-357.10.1051/jp4:2001860 ↗
14. H. RÖSNER, A. V. SHELYAKOV, A. M. GLEZER and P. SCHLOßMACHER, Mat. Sci. and Eng.A 307 (2001) 188. Received 30 April 2001 and accepted 29 March 2002 532510.1016/S0921-5093(00)01957-2 ↗