Predictive modelling of the properties and toughness of polymeric materials Part I Why is polystyrene brittle and polycarbonate tough?
Source abstract
Abstract
The brittleness of polystyrene (PS) and the toughness but notch sensitivity of polycarbonate (PC) have been studied by the detailed finite element analyses of the stress and strain fields in a notched tensile bar with a minor defect. The defect represented a flaw or imperfection, generated during the test specimen prodn. The large-strain mech. responses of both materials were approximated by an accurate elasto-viscoplastic constitutive model with appropriate material parameters. It was assumed that failure occurs instantaneously once the dilative stress exceeds a certain crit. craze-initiation stress. The analyses show that the unstable post-yield mech. response of both materials results in localization of stresses and strains near the defect at a very low macroscopic strain (0.16%). As a result, a strong dilative stress concn. is formed just below the surface of the defect. For the polystyrene specimen, the crit. stress is reached at the defect. For the polycarbonate, however, the effect of the stress concg. defect was counteracted by a higher craze-initiation stress and stronger strain hardening. The PC craze-initiation resistance, however, did not suffice to overcome the dilative stress concn. raised by the notch tip
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Elasticity and Material Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. E. J. Kramer, in “Adv. in Polymer Sci., Vol. 52/53,” edited by H. H. Kausch (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983) Ch. 1.
2. C. S. Henkee and E. J. Kramer, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 22 (1984) 721.10.1002/pol.1984.180220414 ↗
3. E. J. Kramer and L. L. Berger, in “Adv. in Polymer Sci., Vol. 91/92,” edited by H. H. Kausch (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990) Ch. 1.
4. R. A. W. Fraser and I. M. Ward, J. Mater. Sci. 12 (1977) 459.10.1007/BF00540268 ↗
5. M. C. M. Van der sanden, J. M. M. Kok and MEIJER, Polymer 35 (1994) 2995.10.1016/0032-3861(94)90412-X ↗
6. M. C. M. Van der sanden, L. G. C. Buijs, F. O. De bie and H. E. H. Meijer, ibid. 35 (1994) 2783.10.1016/0032-3861(94)90307-7 ↗
7. M. C. M. Van der sanden, H. E. H. Meijer and P. J. Lemstra, ibid. 34 (1993) 2148.10.1016/0032-3861(93)90743-T ↗
8. B. J. P. Jansen, H. E. H. Meijer and P. J. Lemstra, Polymer, submitted.
9. A. M. L. MagalhÃes and R. J. M. Borggreve, Macromolecules 28 (1995) 5841.10.1021/ma00121a022 ↗
10. D. H. Ender and R. D. Andrews, Polymer Letters 36 (1965) 3057.
11. T. A. Tervoort, PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1996.
12. B. J. P. Jansen, PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1998.
13. R. J. M. Smit, W. A. M. Brekelmans and H. E. H. Meijer, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 155 (1998) 181.10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00139-4 ↗
14. W. A. M. Brekelmans Idem., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 47 (1999) 201.10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00089-1 ↗
15. W. A. M. BrekelmanS Idem., J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 2869.10.1023/A:1004763606229 ↗
16. W. A. M. Brekelmans Idem., ibid. 35 (2000) 2881.10.1023/A:1004715707138 ↗
17. O. A. Hasan, M. C. Boyce, X. S. Li and S. Berko, J. Polymer Sci.: Part B: Polymer Phys. 31 (1993) 185.10.1002/polb.1993.090310207 ↗
18. P. H. M. Timmermans, PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1997.
19. T. A. Tervoort, R. J. M. Smit, W. A. M. Brekelmans and L. E. Govaert, Mech. of Time Dep. Mat. 1 (1997) 269.10.1023/A:1009720708029 ↗
20. M. C. Boyce, D. M. Parks and A. S. Argon, Mechanics of Materials 7 (1988) 15.10.1016/0167-6636(88)90003-8 ↗
21. D. M. Parks and A. S. Argon Idem., Int. J. Plasticity 5 (1989) 593.10.1016/0749-6419(89)90003-X ↗
22. E. M. Arruda and M. C. Boyce, ibid. 9 (1993) 697.10.1016/0749-6419(93)90034-N ↗
23. P. D. Wu and E. Van der giessen, ibid. 35 (1993) 935.
24. T. A. Tervoort, E. T. J. Klompen and L. E. Govaert, J. Rheol. 40 (1996) 779.10.1122/1.550755 ↗
25. A. I. Leonov, Rheol. Acta 15 (1976) 85.10.1007/BF01517499 ↗
26. F. P. T. Baaijens, ibid. 30 (1991) 284.10.1007/BF00366642 ↗
27. Marc, “Programmer and User Manuals” (MARC Analysis Research Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1997).
28. R. J. M. SMIT, W. A. M. BREKELMANS and F. P. T. BAAIJENS, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., submitted.
29. G. M. Gusler and G. B. Mckenna, Polym. Eng. Sci. 37 (1997) 1442.10.1002/pen.11791 ↗
30. L. E. Govaert and T. Peijs, Mech. of Time Dep. Mat., submitted.
31. M. Ishikawa, H. Ogawa and I. Narisawa, J. Macromol. Sci.-Phys. B19 (1981) 421.10.1080/00222348108015312 ↗
32. I. Narisawa and A. F. Yee, in “Materials Science and Technology. A Comprehensive Treatment, Vol. 12,” edited by E. L. Thomas (VCH, Weinheim, 1993) p. 699.
33. I. Narisawa, M. Ishikawa and H. Ogawa, J. Mater. Sci. 15 (1980) 2059.10.1007/BF00550632 ↗
34. R. Hill, “The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity” (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1950).
35. R. P. Nimmer and J. T. Woods, Polym. Eng. Sci. 32 (1992) 1126.10.1002/pen.760321610 ↗
36. L. E. Govaert and T. A. Tervoort, in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Def., Yield and Fracture of Polymers, Churchill College, Cambridge (The Institute of Materials, London, 1994) P67/1.
37. C. J. G. Plummer and A. M. Donald. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 27 (1989) 325.10.1002/polb.1989.090270208 ↗
38. M. Ishikawa, Y. Sato and H. Higuchi, Polymer 37 (1996) 1177.10.1016/0032-3861(96)80844-5 ↗
39. S. Havriliak, C. A. Cruz and S. E. Slavin, Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 (1996) 2327.10.1002/pen.10631 ↗
40. J. C. Simo, in “Cracking and Damage: Strain Localization and Size Effect,” edited by J. Mazars and Z. P. Bažant (Elsevier, London 1989) p. 440.
41. J. Lai and E. Van der giessen. Mechanics of Materials 25 (1997) 183.10.1016/S0167-6636(97)00006-9 ↗