journal article·2001-10

Deformation and energy absorption of wood cell walls with different nanostructure under tensile loading

A. Reiterer, H. Lichtenegger, P. Fratzl, S. E. Stanzl-Tschegg

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 36· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

The nanostructure of the S2 cell wall layer in tracheids of Picea abies (Norwegian spruce), in particular the cellulose microfibril angle, has been shown to control not only the stiffness but also the extensibility of wood within a wide range. In order to further elucidate this effect, the deformation of wood under tensile load parallel to the longitudinal cell axis was studied in a contact-free way using a video extensometer. The combination of these measurements with small-angle X-ray scattering on the same microtome sections allowed us to establish a direct relationship between the microfibril angle and deformation behaviour. The microfibril angle was shown to influence not only the extensibility in longitudinal direction but also the deformation perpendicular to the applied load. Moreover, the results showed that the energy absorption capacity is higher for specimens with larger microfibril angle. SEM pictures of the fractured samples indicated clearly the differences in the fracture process as the fracture zones of samples with low microfibril angle were smooth and the fracture zones of samples with high microfibril angle were heavily torn and deformed indicating a more ductile behaviour.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Bamboo properties and applications · Tree Root and Stability Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. M. F. Ashby, Acta Metall. 37 (1984) 1273.10.1016/0001-6160(89)90158-2 ↗
2. D. Fengel and G. Wegener, “Wood—Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions” (De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1989).
3. I. D. Cave, Wood Sci.Technol. 3 (1969) 40.10.1007/BF00349983 ↗
4. A. Reiterer, H. Lichtenegger, S. Tschegg and P. Fratzl, Phil.Mag.A 79 (1999)2173.10.1080/01418619908210415 ↗
5. B. A. Meylan, Wood Sci.Technol. 6 (1972) 293.10.1007/BF00357051 ↗
6. J. M. Dinwoodie, “Wood—Nature's Cellular Polymeric Fibre-composite” (The Institute of Metals, 1989).
7. G. Sinn, A. Reiterer, S. E. Stanzl-Tschegg and E. K. Tschegg, Holz Roh-Werkstoff 59 (2001) 177.10.1007/s001070100197 ↗
8. H. F. Jakob, P. Fratzl and S. E. Tschegg, J.Struct. Biol. 113 (1994) 13.10.1006/jsbi.1994.1028 ↗
9. H. Lichtenegger, A. Reiterer, S. Tschegg and P. Fratzl, in “Microfibril Angle in Wood,” edited by B. J. Butterfield (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998) p.140.
10. H. Lichtenegger, A. Reiterer, S. Tschegg and P. Fratzl, J.Struct.Biol. 128 (1999) 257.10.1006/jsbi.1999.4194 ↗
11. A. Reiterer, H. F. Jakob, S. Tschegg and P. Fratzl, Wood Sci.Technol. 32 (1998) 335.10.1007/BF00702790 ↗
12. J. E. Gordon and G. Jeronimidis, Phil.Trans.R.Soc. Lond.A 294 (1982) 545.
13. D. H. Page, F. El-Hosseiny and K. Winkler, Nature 229 (1971) 252.10.1038/229252a0 ↗
14. D. H. Page and F. El-Hosseiny, J.PulpPaper Sci.9 (1983) TR99.
15. N. J. Pagano, J. C. Halpin and J. W. Whitney, J.Comp.Mat. 2 (1968) 154.10.1177/002199836800200204 ↗
16. J. E. Gordon and G. Jeronimidis, Nature 252 (1971) 116.10.1038/252116a0 ↗
17. P. Navi, P. K. Rastogi, V. Gresse and A. Tolou, Wood Sci.Technol. 29 (1995) 411.10.1007/BF00194199 ↗
18. L. Perez, V. Pittet and P. Navi, in Proc. Internat. Conf. Wood andWood Fibre Composites, edited by S. Aicher (University of Stuttgart, 2000) p.47.
19. A. P. Schniewind and J. D. Barrett, Wood Fiber 1 (1969) 205.
20. H.-CH. Spatz, L. KÖhler and K. J. Niklas, J.Exp. Bot.202 (1999) 3269.10.1242/jeb.202.23.3269 ↗
21. ASM International, “Engineered Materials Handbook Volume 1: Composites” (ASM International Ohio, 1987).
22. J. Bodig and B. A. Jayne, “Mechanics of Wood and Wood Composites” (Krieger Publishing Company, Florida, 1993).