journal article·2026-06Open access

Radiation shielding performance of PbO–B2O3–SiO2 glass–ceramics: insights from molecular dynamics, theoretical analyses, and Monte Carlo simulations

Nuray Yavuzkanat, Turan Şahmaran, Neslihan Sel Özbey, Fatih Ahmet Celik

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 61· Issue 22

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates twelve PbO–B 2 O 3 –SiO 2 (PBS) glass–ceramic systems with varying boron and lead oxide ratios for radiation shielding applications. An integrated framework combining theoretical calculations, Monte Carlo simulations, and molecular dynamic was employed to evaluate their performance against gamma rays, neutrons, electrons, protons, and alpha particles and to link composition, atomic structure, and shielding efficiency. Radial distribution function analysis confirms the amorphous structure of the all glasses and reveals composition-dependent Pb dispersion. PBS6 exhibits a more uniform Pb–Pb environment, with peaks at 0.10, 0.25, and 0.41 Å. In addition, the position of the first Pb–Pb peak shifts from 0.05 Å (PBS1) to 0.10 Å (PBS6), consistent with a more homogeneous Pb dispersion. Shielding calculations show that Pb-rich, denser glasses provide superior photon and neutron protection. In particular, PBS6 exhibits the best overall performance, with the highest attenuation and the highest fast-neutron removal capability (~ 0.093 cm −1 ), compared with PBS12 (~ 0.050 cm −1 ). Consistently, the GATE-XCOM deviation decreases systematically with increasing photon energy across all representative compositions, confirming strong agreement in the medium to high energy region. Shielding behavior was primarily governed by bulk density and PbO content, while atomic-scale structure influenced isotropic response. This integrated approach provides a quantitative framework for optimizing glass-based shielding materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis · Glass properties and applications · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Amirabadi EA, Salimi M, Ghal-Eh N, Etaati GR, Asadi H (2013) Int J Innov Appl Stud 3:1079–1085
2. Mansouri E, Mesbahi A, Malekzadeh R, Mansouri A (2020) Radiat Environ Biophys 59:583–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-020-00865-810.1007/s00411-020-00865-8 ↗
3. Kalkornsuranee E, Intom S, Lehman N, Johns J, Kothan S, Sengloyluan K, Chaiphaksa W, Kaewkhao J (2022) Mater Res Innov 26:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14328917.2020.185338310.1080/14328917.2020.1853383 ↗
4. Nambiar S, Yeow JTW (2012) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:5717–5726. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300783d10.1021/am300783d ↗
5. Agar O (2018) Cumhur. Sci. J. 39:983–990. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.45177010.17776/csj.451770 ↗
6. AbuAlRoos NJ, Baharul Amin NA, Zainon R (2019) Radiat Phys Chem 165:108439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.10843910.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108439 ↗
7. Kurtulus R, Kavas T (2020) Radiat Phys Chem 176:109090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.10909010.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109090 ↗
8. McAlisterDR, Gamma ray attenuation properties of common shielding materials (Eichrom Technologies, 2018), https://www.eichrom.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Gamma-Ray-Attenuation-White-Paper-by-D-M-rev-6-1-002.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2026
9. Lim-aroon P, Wimolmala E, Sombatsompop N, Saenboonruang K (2019) IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 526:012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/526/1/01201510.1088/1757-899X/526/1/012015 ↗
10. Akkurt I, El-Khayatt AM (2013) Ann Nucl Energy 51:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.02610.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.026 ↗
11. Al-Hadeethi Y, Sayyed MI, Mohammed H, Rimondini L (2020) Ceram Int 46:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.25810.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.258 ↗
12. Ozturk S, Ilik E, Kilic G, Issever UG (2020) Appl Phys A 126:844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-04041-z10.1007/s00339-020-04041-z ↗
13. Muthamma MV, Bubbly SG, Gudennavar SB (2020) J Appl Polym Sci 137:49366. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4936610.1002/app.49366 ↗
14. Şahmaran T, Yavuzkanat N (2024) Radiat Eff Defects Solids 179:489–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2023.229403110.1080/10420150.2023.2294031 ↗
15. Yavuzkanat N, Şahmaran T, Saraç K (2024) Radiat Phys Chem 221:111732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.11173210.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111732 ↗
16. Issa SAM (2016) Radiat Phys Chem 120:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.11.02510.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.11.025 ↗
17. Karataş Ö, Ünal Ercan H, Altın M, Oğul H, Bulut F (2025) Radiat Phys Chem 227:112396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.11239610.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112396 ↗
18. Wani AL, Ara A, Usmani JA (2015) Interdiscip Toxicol 8(2):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/intox-2015-000910.1515/intox-2015-0009 ↗
19. Flora G, Gupta D, Tiwari A (2012) Interdiscip Toxicol 5(2):47–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-012-0009-210.2478/v10102-012-0009-2 ↗
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC updates blood lead reference value (CDC, Atlanta, 2024) https://www.cdc.gov/lead-prevention/php/news-features/updates-blood-lead-reference-value.html. Accessed 5 Feb 2026
21. World Health Organization, Lead poisoning and health (WHO, 2024), https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health. Accessed 5 Feb 2026
22. Matori KA, Sayyed MI, Sidek HAA, Zaid MHM, Singh VP (2017) J Non-Cryst Solids 457:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.11.02910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.11.029 ↗
23. Çelikbilek M, Ersundu AE, Aydin S (2013) J Non-Cryst Solids 378:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.07.02010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.07.020 ↗
24. Kaur S, Singh KJ (2014) Ann Nucl Energy 63:350–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.01210.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.012 ↗
25. Perişanoğlu U, El-Agawany FI, Kavaz E, Al-Buriahi M, Rammah YS (2020) Ceram Int 46:3190–3202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.02310.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.023 ↗
26. Almuqrin AH, Rashad M, More CV, Sayyed MI, Elsafi M (2024) Radiat Phys Chem 222:111824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.11182410.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111824 ↗
27. Mostaf AMA, Issa SAM, Zakaly HMH, Alotaibi BM, Gharghar F, Al-Zaibani M, El Agammy EF (2023) Radiat Phys Chem 202:110566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.11056610.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110566 ↗
28. Urata S, Takato Y, Maeda K (2019) J Am Ceram Soc 102:5138–5148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1639910.1111/jace.16399 ↗
29. Hong NV, Ha NTT, Hung PK, Iitaka T (2019) Mater Chem Phys 236:121839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12183910.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121839 ↗
30. Zhong C, Yan J, Jiang Q, Chen C, Yuan S, Zeng H, Du J (2022) J Non-Cryst Solids 576:121252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.12125210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.121252 ↗
31. SCIGRESS—desktop molecular modeling software package, https://www.fqs.pl/en/chemistry/products/scigress. Accessed 10 Oct 2024
32. Hila FC, Asuncion-Astronomo A, Dingle CAM, Jecong JFM, Javier-Hila AMV, Gili MBZ, Balderas CV, Lopez GEP, Guillermo NRD, Amorsolo AV (2021) Radiat Phys Chem 182:109331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.10933110.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109331 ↗
33. Taylor ML, Smith RL, Dossing F, Franich RD (2012) Med Phys 39:1769–1778. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.368981010.1118/1.3689810 ↗
34. Berger MJ, Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM, Chang J, Coursey JS, Sukumar R, Zucker DS, Olsen K (2010) XCOM: photon cross sections database (version 1.5) (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD), http://physics.nist.gov/xcom. Accessed 1 Oct 2025
35. El-Samrah MG, El-Mohandes AM, El-Khayatt AM, Chidiac SE (2021) Radiat Phys Chem 182:109356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.10935610.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109356 ↗
36. Fluegel A (2008) J Am Ceram Soc 90(8):2622–2625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01751.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01751.x ↗
37. Fluegel A Room temperature glass density calculation (downloadable Excel tool), Glassproperties.com. https://glassproperties.com/density/room-temperature/. Accessed 10 Jan 2025
38. Belashchenko DK (1997) Russ Chem Rev 66(9):733–762. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC1997v066n09ABEH00023610.1070/RC1997v066n09ABEH000236 ↗
39. Feuston BP, Garofalini SH (1988) J Chem Phys 89(9):5818–5824. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.45553110.1063/1.455531 ↗
40. Hirao K, Kawamura K (1994) Materials design using personal computer. Shokabo, Tokyo, p 52
41. Delaye JM, Louis-Achille V, Ghaleb D (1997) J Non-Cryst Solids 210(2–3):232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(96)00604-710.1016/S0022-3093(96)00604-7 ↗
42. Nosé S (1984) J Chem Phys 81(1):511–519. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.44733410.1063/1.447334 ↗
43. Rapaport DC (2004) The art of molecular dynamics simulation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051181658110.1017/CBO9780511816581 ↗
44. Ftahi W, Al-Shaeri N, Yang Y, Tang Y, Liu Q, Ni Y (2026) Appl Surf Sci 716:164654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.16465410.1016/j.apsusc.2025.164654 ↗
45. Levine BG, Stone JE, Kohlmeyer A (2011) J Comput Phys 230:3556–3569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.01.04810.1016/j.jcp.2011.01.048 ↗
46. Yavuzkanat N, Şahmaran T (2024) Radiat Eff Defects Solids 179(11–12):1697–1710. https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2024.239174510.1080/10420150.2024.2391745 ↗
47. Erkoyuncu İ, Maroc FZ, Yılmaz M, Torun TR, Özdemir HG, Oğul H, Akman F (2026) Radiat Phys Chem 239:113248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.11324810.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113248 ↗
48. Yavuzkanat N (2024) Bitlis Eren Univ. J. Sci. 13(4):1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.155820810.17798/bitlisfen.1558208 ↗
49. Manohara SR, Hanagodimath SM, Thind KS, Gerward L (2008) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 266:3906–3912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.06.03410.1016/j.nimb.2008.06.034 ↗
50. Alzahrani JS, Lebedev AV, Avanesov SA, Hammoud A, Alrowaili ZA, Mahmoud ZMM, Olarinoye IO, Sriwunkum C, Al-Buriahi MS (2022) Optik 261:169167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.16916710.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169167 ↗
51. Alım B, Şakar E, Han İ, Sayyed MI (2020) Radiat Phys Chem 166:108454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.10845410.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108454 ↗
52. Akkoyun S, Bayram T, Yildiz N (2016) Cumhur. Sci. J. 37:59–65. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.8751910.17776/csj.87519 ↗
53. Turner JE (2007) Atoms, radiation, and radiation protection. Wiley, New York10.1002/9783527616978 ↗
54. Wood J (1982) Computational methods in reactor shielding. Pergamon Press, New York
55. Kaplan MF (1989) Concrete radiation shielding. Wiley, New York
56. El-Khayatt AM, El-Sayed Abdo A (2009) Ann Nucl Energy 36:832–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.01.01310.1016/j.anucene.2009.01.013 ↗
57. Seltzer SM (1993) Stopping-powers and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions, NIST standard reference database 124 (NIST)
58. Ziegler JF, Ziegler MD, Biersack JP (2010) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 268:1818–1823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.09110.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 ↗
59. Sayyed MI, Dwaikat N, Mhareb MHA, D’Souza AN, Almousa N, Alajerami YSM, Almasoud F, Naseer KA, Kamath SD, Khandaker MU, Osman H, Alamri S (2022) J Mater Res Technol 18:1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.13010.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.130 ↗
60. Al Huwayz M, Albarkaty KS, Alrowaili ZA, Olarinoye IO, Elqahtani ZM, Al-Buriahi MS (2023) J Radiat Res Appl Sci 16:100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2023.10074210.1016/j.jrras.2023.100742 ↗
61. Mesquita AZ, Reis IC, de Almeida VF, Rodrigues RR (2019) Ann Nucl Energy 132:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.04.02310.1016/j.anucene.2019.04.023 ↗