DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2026-04

Piezoresistive strain monitoring sensors for structural health monitoring of fibre-reinforced composites

Sudhanshu Singh, Zunjarrao Kamble

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 61· Issue 16
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Composites

OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Singh S, Kamble Z, Neje G (2024) Textile-reinforced composite structural-health monitoring systems. Text Prog 56:415–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405167.2024.242274910.1080/00405167.2024.2422749 ↗
2. Gao K, Zhang Z, Weng S et al (2022) Review of flexible piezoresistive strain sensors in civil structural health monitoring. Appl Sci 12:9750. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1219975010.3390/app12199750 ↗
3. Zazoum B, Batoo KM, Khan MAA (2022) Recent advances in flexible sensors and their applications. Sensors 22:4653. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2212465310.3390/s22124653 ↗
4. Hsissou R, Seghiri R, Benzekri Z et al (2021) Polymer composite materials: a comprehensive review. Compos Struct 262:113640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11364010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113640 ↗
5. Abramovich H (2017) Introduction to composite materials. In: Stability and Vibrations of Thin Walled Composite Structures. Elsevier, pp 1–4710.1016/B978-0-08-100410-4.00001-6 ↗
6. Boller C, Chang F, Fujino Y (2009) Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring. Wiley10.1002/9780470061626 ↗
7. Egbo MK (2021) A fundamental review on composite materials and some of their applications in biomedical engineering. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 33:557–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2020.07.00710.1016/j.jksues.2020.07.007 ↗
8. Hassani S, Mousavi M, Gandomi AH (2021) Structural health monitoring in composite structures: a comprehensive review. Sensors 22:153. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2201015310.3390/s22010153 ↗
9. Jeremy Jeba Samuel J, Ramadoss R, Gunasekaran KN et al (2021) Studies on mechanical properties and characterization of carbon fiber reinforced hybrid composite for aero space application. Mater Today: Proc 47:4438–4443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.30410.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.304 ↗
10. The Future of Materials: How Composites Are Replacing Steel to Improve Performance and Efficiency
11. Yang Y, Boom R, Irion B et al (2012) Recycling of composite materials. Chem Eng Process 51:53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2011.09.00710.1016/j.cep.2011.09.007 ↗
12. Li N, Li Y, Jelonnek J et al (2017) A new process control method for microwave curing of carbon fibre reinforced composites in aerospace applications. Compos Part B Eng 122:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.009 ↗
13. Siengchin S (2017) Potential use of “green” composites in automotive applications. Express Polym Lett 11:600–600. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.5710.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.57 ↗
14. Wang C, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV, Chen Z (2017) Modelling of damage evolution in braided composites: recent developments. Mech Adv Mater Mod Process 3:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40759-017-0030-410.1186/s40759-017-0030-4 ↗
15. Binner J, Porter M, Baker B et al (2020) Selection, processing, properties and applications of ultra-high temperature ceramic matrix composites, UHTCMCs—a review. Int Mater Rev 65:389–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2019.165200610.1080/09506608.2019.1652006 ↗
16. Sun J, Ye D, Zou J et al (2023) A review on additive manufacturing of ceramic matrix composites. J Mater Sci Technol 138:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.06.03910.1016/j.jmst.2022.06.039 ↗
17. Zhang C (2014) Understanding the wear and tribological properties of ceramic matrix composites. In: Advances in Ceramic Matrix Composites. Elsevier, pp 312–33910.1533/9780857098825.2.312 ↗
18. König W, Dauw DF, Levy G, Panten U (1988) EDM-future steps towards the machining of ceramics. CIRP Ann 37:623–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60759-810.1016/S0007-8506(07)60759-8 ↗
19. Sumithra G, Reddy RN, Dheeraj Kumar G et al (2023) Review on composite classification, manufacturing, and applications. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.63710.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.637 ↗
20. Sajan S, Philip Selvaraj D (2021) A review on polymer matrix composite materials and their applications. Mater Today Proc 47:5493–5498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.03410.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.034 ↗
21. Yashas Gowda TG, Sanjay MR, Subrahmanya Bhat K et al (2018) Polymer matrix-natural fiber composites: an overview. Cogent Eng 5:1446667. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.144666710.1080/23311916.2018.1446667 ↗
22. Singh L, Singh B, Saxena KK (2020) Manufacturing techniques for metal matrix composites (MMC): an overview. Adv Mater Process Technol 6:441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.172960310.1080/2374068X.2020.1729603 ↗
23. Mavhungu ST, Akinlabi ET, Onitiri MA, Varachia FM (2017) Aluminum matrix composites for industrial use: advances and trends. Proc Manuf 7:178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.04510.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.045 ↗
24. Rajak DK, Pagar DD, Kumar R, Pruncu CI (2019) Recent progress of reinforcement materials: a comprehensive overview of composite materials. J Mater Res Technol 8:6354–6374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.06810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.068 ↗
25. EL Etri H, Polat MZ, Özyılmaz EB (2024) Classification, applications, and impact behavior of composite materials: a review. Mech Adv Mater Struct 31:12592–12635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.232666510.1080/15376494.2024.2326665 ↗
26. Boursier Niutta C, Tridello A, Paolino DS, Belingardi G (2021) Residual properties in damaged laminated composites through nondestructive testing: a review. Materials Basel 14:4513. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1416451310.3390/ma14164513 ↗
27. Singh S, Kamble Z, Neje G (2025) Investigation on piezoresistive properties of reduced graphene oxide treated glass textiles based multifunctional sensors. Polym Compos 46:3705–3719. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2920010.1002/pc.29200 ↗
28. Mognhod Bezzie Y, Paramasivam V, Tilahun S, Selvaraj SK (2021) A review on failure mechanisms and analysis of multidirectional laminates. Mater Today Proc 46:7380–7388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.112110.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1121 ↗
29. Nagarajan B, Arshad M, Ullah A et al (2019) Additive manufacturing ferromagnetic polymers using stereolithography – materials and process development. Manuf Lett 21:12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.06.00310.1016/j.mfglet.2019.06.003 ↗
30. Nobile MR (2011) Rheology of polymer–carbon nanotube composites melts. In: Polymer–Carbon Nanotube Composites. Elsevier, pp 428–48110.1533/9780857091390.2.428 ↗
31. Zhou W, Kou Y, Yuan M et al (2019) Polymer composites filled with core@double-shell structured fillers: effects of multiple shells on dielectric and thermal properties. Compos Sci Technol 181:107686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10768610.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107686 ↗
32. Venkateshwaran N, Elayaperumal A (2010) Banana fiber reinforced polymer composites—a review. J Reinf Plast Compos 29:2387–2396. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168440936057810.1177/0731684409360578 ↗
33. Swolfs Y, Gorbatikh L, Verpoest I (2014) Fibre hybridisation in polymer composites: a review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 67:181–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.027 ↗
34. Lee LS, Jain R (2009) The role of FRP composites in a sustainable world. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11:247–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-009-0253-010.1007/s10098-009-0253-0 ↗
35. Yang G, Park M, Park S-J (2019) Recent progresses of fabrication and characterization of fibers-reinforced composites: a review. Compos Commun 14:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2019.05.00410.1016/j.coco.2019.05.004 ↗
36. Imon IH (2024) Sustainable Natural Fiber Based Composites Materials: A Review10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-4tcbv ↗
37. Gangil B, Ranakoti L, Verma S, et al (2020) Natural and Synthetic Fibers for Hybrid Composites. In: Hybrid Fiber Composites. Wiley, pp 1–1510.1002/9783527824571.ch1 ↗
38. Jeff Jomboh K, Dzikwi Garkida A, Majiyebo Alemaka E et al (2024) Properties and applications of natural, synthetic and hybrid fiber reinforced polymer composite: a review. AIMS Mater Sci 11:774–801. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.202403810.3934/matersci.2024038 ↗
39. Ecotextiles O (2010) Man-made synthetic fibers [Internet].
40. Mallick PK (2007) Fiber-reinforced composites. CRC Press10.1201/9781420005981 ↗
41. Aleshkevich VV, Bulgakov BA, Lipatov YV et al (2022) High performance carbon–carbon composites obtained by a two-step process from phthalonitrile matrix composites. Mendeleev Commun 32:327–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2022.05.01110.1016/j.mencom.2022.05.011 ↗
42. Lei J, Shi C, Zhou S et al (2018) Enhanced corrosion and wear resistance properties of carbon fiber reinforced Ni-based composite coating by laser cladding. Surf Coat Tech 334:274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.11.05110.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.11.051 ↗
43. Yin JJ, Li SL, Yao XL et al (2016) Lightning strike ablation damage characteristic analysis for carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminate with fastener. Appl Compos Mater 23:821–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-016-9487-210.1007/s10443-016-9487-2 ↗
44. Zhang X, Fan X, Yan C et al (2012) Interfacial microstructure and properties of carbon fiber composites modified with graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1021/am201757v10.1021/am201757v ↗
45. Tzounis L, Kirsten M, Simon F et al (2014) The interphase microstructure and electrical properties of glass fibers covalently and non-covalently bonded with multiwall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 73:310–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.06910.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.069 ↗
46. Sathishkumar T, Satheeshkumar S, Naveen J (2014) Glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites—a review. J Reinf Plast Compos 33:1258–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441453079010.1177/0731684414530790 ↗
47. Gu W, Wu H, Kampe S, Lu G-Q (2000) Volume fraction effects on interfacial adhesion strength of glass-fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Mater Sci Eng A 277:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00528-610.1016/S0921-5093(99)00528-6 ↗
48. Fredi G, Dorigato A, Pegoretti A (2018) Multifunctional glass fiber/polyamide composites with thermal energy storage/release capability. Express Polym Lett 12:349–364. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.3010.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.30 ↗
49. Lei Z, Pan R, Sun W et al (2024) Fatigue damage mechanisms and evolution of residual tensile strength in CFRP composites: stacking sequence effect. Compos Struct 330:117818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11781810.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117818 ↗
50. Cheng Z-Q, Tan W, Xiong J-J (2021) Progressive damage modelling and fatigue life prediction of Plain-weave composite laminates with Low-velocity impact damage. Compos Struct 273:114262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11426210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114262 ↗
51. Post NL, Lesko JJ, Case SW (2020) Residual strength fatigue theories for composite materials. In: Fatigue Life Prediction of Composites and Composite Structures. Elsevier, pp 77–9710.1016/B978-0-08-102575-8.00003-6 ↗
52. Liu PF, Chu JK, Liu YL, Zheng JY (2012) A study on the failure mechanisms of carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates using acoustic emission. Mater Des 37:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.01510.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.015 ↗
53. Schwab M, Todt M, Wolfahrt M, Pettermann HE (2016) Failure mechanism based modelling of impact on fabric reinforced composite laminates based on shell elements. Compos Sci Technol 128:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2016.03.025 ↗
54. Chandra N, Ghonem H (2001) Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: theory and experiments. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 32:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00051-810.1016/S1359-835X(00)00051-8 ↗
55. Gayathri P, Umesh K, Ganguli R (2010) Effect of matrix cracking and material uncertainty on composite plates. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:716–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.02.00410.1016/j.ress.2010.02.004 ↗
56. Craven R, Pindoria S, Olsson R (2009) Finite element study of compressively loaded fibres fractured during impact. Compos Sci Technol 69:586–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.03410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.034 ↗
57. Berbinau P, Soutis C, Guz IA (1999) Compressive failure of 0° unidirectional carbon-fibre-reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminates by fibre microbuckling. Compos Sci Technol 59:1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00181-X10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00181-X ↗
58. Wind JL, Steffensen S, Jensen HM (2014) Comparison of a composite model and an individually fiber and matrix discretized model for kink band formation. Int J Non Linear Mech 67:319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.10.00510.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.10.005 ↗
59. Argüelles A, Viña J, Canteli AF, Bonhomme J (2010) Fatigue delamination, initiation, and growth, under mode I and II of fracture in a carbon-fiber epoxy composite. Polym Compos 31:700–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2085510.1002/pc.20855 ↗
60. Zhao Y, Yan C, Xu H et al (2022) In-situ structural health self-monitoring and diagnosing of glass fiber reinforced plastics with embedded nickel coated carbon fiber. Compos Part B Eng 228:109440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10944010.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109440 ↗
61. Fernandes H, Zhang H, Figueiredo A et al (2016) Carbon fiber composite inspection and defect characterization using active infrared thermography: numerical simulations and experimental results. Appl Opt 55:D46. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.000D4610.1364/AO.55.000D46 ↗
62. Yuan S, Yu X (2020) Ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation of selectively laser-sintered polymeric nanocomposites. Polym Test 90:106705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10670510.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106705 ↗
63. Maia NMM, Ribeiro AMR, Fontul M et al (2007) Using the detection and relative damage quantification indicator (DRQ) with transmissibility. Key Eng Mater 347:455–460. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.347.45510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.347.455 ↗
64. Zhang Z, He M, Liu A et al (2018) Vibration-based assessment of delaminations in FRP composite plates. Compos Part B Eng 144:254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.003 ↗
65. Pereira G, Frias C, Faria H et al (2013) On the improvement of strain measurements with FBG sensors embedded in unidirectional composites. Polym Test 32:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.09.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.09.010 ↗
66. Ussorio M, Wang H, Ogin SL et al (2006) Modifications to FBG sensor spectra due to matrix cracking in a GFRP composite. Constr Build Mater 20:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.04610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.046 ↗
67. Todoroki A (2002) Delamination identification of cross-ply graphite/epoxy composite beams using electric resistance change method. Compos Sci Technol 62:629–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00013-110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00013-1 ↗
68. Pegorin F, Pingkarawat K, Mouritz AP (2018) Electrical-based delamination crack monitoring in composites using z-pins. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 104:120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.025 ↗
69. Naghashpour A, Van Hoa S (2013) A technique for real-time detection, location and quantification of damage in large polymer composite structures made of electrically non-conductive fibers and carbon nanotube networks. Nanotechnology 24:455502. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/24/45/45550210.1088/0957-4484/24/45/455502 ↗
70. Boztepe S, Liu H, Heider D, Thostenson ET (2018) Novel carbon nanotube interlaminar film sensors for carbon fiber composites under uniaxial fatigue loading. Compos Struct 189:340–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.033 ↗
71. Hao B, Ma Q, Yang S et al (2016) Comparative study on monitoring structural damage in fiber-reinforced polymers using glass fibers with carbon nanotubes and graphene coating. Compos Sci Technol 129:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.012 ↗
72. Montalvao D (2006) A review of vibration-based structural health monitoring with special emphasis on composite materials. Shock Vib Dig 38:295–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310240606589810.1177/0583102406065898 ↗
73. Seo J, Hu JW, Lee J (2016) Summary review of structural health monitoring applications for highway bridges. J Perform Constr Facil 30:04015072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000082410.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000824 ↗
74. Ooijevaar TH, Rogge MD, Loendersloot R et al (2015) Nonlinear dynamic behavior of an impact damaged composite skin–stiffener structure. J Sound Vib 353:243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.05.01110.1016/j.jsv.2015.05.011 ↗
75. Ooijevaar TH, Loendersloot R, Warnet LL et al (2010) Vibration based structural health monitoring of a composite T-beam. Compos Struct 92:2007–2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.12.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.12.007 ↗
76. Li C, Cao M, Wang R et al (2003) Fiber-optic composite cure sensor: monitoring the curing process of composite material based on intensity modulation. Compos Sci Technol 63:1749–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00118-010.1016/S0266-3538(03)00118-0 ↗
77. Meemary B, Vasiukov D, Deléglise-Lagardère M, Chaki S (2025) Sensors integration for structural health monitoring in composite pressure vessels: a review. Compos Struct 351:118546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11854610.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118546 ↗
78. Alexopoulos ND, Bartholome C, Poulin P, Marioli-Riga Z (2010) Structural health monitoring of glass fiber reinforced composites using embedded carbon nanotube (CNT) fibers. Compos Sci Technol 70:260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.017 ↗
79. Nauman S, Cristian I, Koncar V (2011) Simultaneous application of fibrous piezoresistive sensors for compression and traction detection in glass laminate composites. Sensors 11:9478–9498. https://doi.org/10.3390/s11100947810.3390/s111009478 ↗
80. Zuluaga-Ramírez P, Arconada Á, Frövel M et al (2015) Optical sensing of the fatigue damage state of CFRP under realistic aeronautical load sequences. Sensors 15:5710–5721. https://doi.org/10.3390/s15030571010.3390/s150305710 ↗
81. Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Accornero F et al (2013) Influence of damage in the acoustic emission parameters. Cem Concr Compos 44:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.08.00110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.08.001 ↗
82. Aggelis DG, Barkoula N-M, Matikas TE, Paipetis AS (2012) Acoustic structural health monitoring of composite materials : damage identification and evaluation in cross ply laminates using acoustic emission and ultrasonics. Compos Sci Technol 72:1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.10.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2011.10.011 ↗
83. Sharma A, Sharma S, Sharma S, Mukherjee A (2015) Ultrasonic guided waves for monitoring corrosion of FRP wrapped concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 96:690–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.08410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.084 ↗
84. De Baere I, Van Paepegem W, Degrieck J (2010) Electrical resistance measurement for in situ monitoring of fatigue of carbon fabric composites. Int J Fatigue 32:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.04410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.044 ↗
85. Dong W, Sheng K, Huang B et al (2024) Stretchable self-powered TENG sensor array for human-robot interaction based on conductive ionic gels and LSTM neural network. IEEE Sens J 24:37962–37969. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.346463310.1109/JSEN.2024.3464633 ↗
86. Dong W, Sheng K, Chen C, Qiu X (2025) Machine learning-assisted flexible dual modal sensor for multi-sensing detection and target object recognition in the grasping process. Lab Chip 25:2247–2255. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5LC00020C10.1039/D5LC00020C ↗
87. Zou X, Zhu R, Chen X et al (2024) PVDF piezoelectric sensor based on solution blow spinning fibers for structural stress/strain health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct 33:045006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ad2d6a10.1088/1361-665X/ad2d6a ↗
88. Zhao Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Hao Q (2020) Development and application of resistance strain force sensors. Sensors 20:5826. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2020582610.3390/s20205826 ↗
89. Herbers M, Richter B, Gebauer D et al (2023) Crack monitoring on concrete structures: comparison of various distributed fiber optic sensors with digital image correlation method. Struct Concr 24:6123–6140. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20230006210.1002/suco.202300062 ↗
90. Tang J, Wu Y, Ma S et al (2022) Sensing mechanism of a flexible strain sensor developed directly using electrospun composite nanofiber yarn with ternary carbon nanomaterials. iScience 25:105162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.10516210.1016/j.isci.2022.105162 ↗
91. POWER HM, SHENTON HW (2023) INVESTIGATION OF RETROREFLECTIVE SHEETING MATERIALS RESPONSE TO INDUCED STRAIN WHILE MOUNTED TO COMMON CIVIL SUBSTRATES FOR USE AS PASSIVE STRAIN SENSORS FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Destech Publications, Inc.10.12783/shm2023/36746 ↗
92. D’Alessandro A, Ubertini F, García-Macías E et al (2017) Static and dynamic strain monitoring of reinforced concrete components through embedded carbon nanotube cement-based sensors. Shock Vib 2017:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/364840310.1155/2017/3648403 ↗
93. Bai Y, Zhou Y, Wu X et al (2025) Flexible strain sensors with ultra-high sensitivity and wide range enabled by crack-modulated electrical pathways. Nano-Micro Lett 17:64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01571-610.1007/s40820-024-01571-6 ↗
94. Meng W, Bachilo SM, Weisman RB, Nagarajaiah S (2024) A review: non-contact and full-field strain mapping methods for experimental mechanics and structural health monitoring. Sensors 24:6573. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2420657310.3390/s24206573 ↗
95. Tan Y, Zhu J, Ren L (2019) A two-dimensional wireless and passive sensor for stress monitoring. Sensors 19:135. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1901013510.3390/s19010135 ↗
96. Caldara M, Colleoni C, Guido E et al (2016) Optical monitoring of sweat pH by a textile fabric wearable sensor based on covalently bonded litmus-3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane coating. Sens Actuators B Chem 222:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.08.07310.1016/j.snb.2015.08.073 ↗
97. Windmiller JR, Wang J (2013) Wearable electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Electroanalysis 25:29–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.20120034910.1002/elan.201200349 ↗
98. Seyedin S, Zhang P, Naebe M et al (2019) Textile strain sensors: a review of the fabrication technologies, performance evaluation and applications. Mater Horiz 6:219–249. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8MH01062E10.1039/C8MH01062E ↗
99. Ahmed S, Nauman S, Khan ZM (2023) Electrospun nanofibrous yarn based piezoresistive flexible strain sensor for human motion detection and speech recognition. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 36:2459–2481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705722109585310.1177/08927057221095853 ↗
100. Hwang M-Y, Han D-H, Kang L-H (2019) Piezoresistive multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy strain sensor with pattern design. Materials (Basel) 12:3962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1223396210.3390/ma12233962 ↗