journal article·2026-04

Study on the influence of Ag nanoparticles on the nonlinear optical properties of TiO2 films excited by femtosecond pulsed lasers

Suying Yu, Zitong Wang, Jiaxiang Mu, Zikun Yang, Zhicong Yu, Sijia Du, Yuhan Li, Wenjun Sun, Li Zhao

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 61· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Laser Material Processing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Hu P, Han N, Zhang D et al (2012) Highly formaldehyde-sensitive, transition-metal doped ZnO nanorods prepared by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Sens Actuators B Chem 169:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.03.03510.1016/j.snb.2012.03.035 ↗
2. Yang X, Wan H, Zhou S et al (2023) Synergistic enhancement of hydrogen storage properties in MgH2 using LiNbO3 catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48:27726–27736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.02210.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.022 ↗
3. Jiang Z, Sarruf BJM, El-kharouf A, Steinberger-Wilckens R (2024) Preparation of gadolinium-doped ceria barrier layer for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells by spin coating and evaluation of performance degradation by impedance analysis. Ceram Int 50:23222–23231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.04610.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.046 ↗
4. Renuga V, Manikandan A, Neela Mohan C et al (2017) Imidazolium based ionic liquids’ structure and optical properties influenced by semiconductor metal oxide thin films. J Mol Liq 244:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.06.13210.1016/j.molliq.2017.06.132 ↗
5. Liu J, Zuo S, Lin S et al (2023) Promoting the performance of Nb2O5 by doping transition metal oxide for catalytic degradation of monochlorobenzene and toluene. J Mater Res Technol 25:3642–3653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.17810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.178 ↗
6. He J, Wu P, Lu L et al (2019) Lattice-refined transition-metal oxides via ball milling for boosted catalytic oxidation performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:36666–36675. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1206310.1021/acsami.9b12063 ↗
7. Zheng J, Meng D, Guo J et al (2024) Defect engineering for enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen reaction on transition metal oxides: the role of metal defects. Adv Mater 36:2405129. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20240512910.1002/adma.202405129 ↗
8. Cao D, Zheng L, Li Q et al (2021) Crystal phase-controlled modulation of binary transition metal oxides for highly reversible Li–O2 batteries. Nano Lett 21:5225–5232. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0127610.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01276 ↗
9. Kan D, Aso R, Sato R et al (2016) Tuning magnetic anisotropy by interfacially engineering the oxygen coordination environment in a transition metal oxide. Nat Mater 15:432–437. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat458010.1038/nmat4580 ↗
10. Lin X-J, Sun T-Q, Yang L-P et al (2019) A facile synthetic strategy for the creation of hollow noble metal/transition metal oxide nanocomposites. Chem Commun 55:1076–1079. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CC06650G10.1039/C8CC06650G ↗
11. Moreno Fernández H, Adabifiroozjaei E, Nathanael TMM et al (2025) Influence of the metal support─catalyst contact on the performance of NiO-based O2 evolution electrocatalysts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 17:52037–52050. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5c0986810.1021/acsami.5c09868 ↗
12. Yuan C, Li J, Zhou X (2024) Microscopic characterization and interfacial properties of the Ag/CuO interface: structure and binding properties of the interface based on first-principles calculations. Mater Chem Phys 315:128952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.12895210.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.128952 ↗
13. Zhu K, Zhu Q, Jiang M et al (2022) Modulating Ti t2g orbital occupancy in a Cu/TiO2 composite for selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO. Angew Chem Int Ed 61:e202207600. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20220760010.1002/anie.202207600 ↗
14. Liu S, Zhou Q, Wen D et al (2024) Particle size-dependent charge transfer dynamics for boosting CO2 photoreduction over Ag/TiO2 heterojunction. ACS Catal 14:8105–8115. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c0154410.1021/acscatal.4c01544 ↗
15. Li Z, Li Z, Zuo C, Fang X (2022) Application of nanostructured TiO2 in UV photodetectors: a review. Adv Mater 34:2109083. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20210908310.1002/adma.202109083 ↗
16. Ng S, Yam FK, Sohimee SN et al (2018) Photoelectrochemical ultraviolet photodetector by anodic titanium dioxide nanotube layers. Sens Actuators A Phys 279:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.06.03010.1016/j.sna.2018.06.030 ↗
17. Sohail M, Shen X, Alam I et al (2024) Enhanced nonlinear absorption, refraction, and optical limiting properties of CsPbI3/TiO2 nanocomposites for innovative nonlinear optical devices. ACS Appl Nano Mater 7:22766–22778. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c0383210.1021/acsanm.4c03832 ↗
18. Sharma R, Roopak S, Pathak NK et al (2017) Study of surface plasmon resonances of core-shell nanosphere: a comparison between numerical and analytical approach. Plasmonics 12:977–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-016-0349-410.1007/s11468-016-0349-4 ↗
19. Sui M, Kunwar S, Pandey P, Lee J (2019) Strongly confined localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) bands of Pt, AgPt, AgAuPt nanoparticles. Sci Rep 9:16582. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53292-110.1038/s41598-019-53292-1 ↗
20. Domingues RP, Rodrigues MS, Lopes C et al (2019) Thin films composed of metal nanoparticles (Au, Ag, Cu) dispersed in AlN: the influence of composition and thermal annealing on the structure and plasmonic response. Thin Solid Films 676:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2019.02.04710.1016/j.tsf.2019.02.047 ↗
21. Elango E, Kannan VP, Madangurusamy S et al (2023) Magnetron-sputtered silver nanoparticles for surface plasmons for terahertz sensors. J Electron Mater 52:4289–4294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-023-10211-510.1007/s11664-023-10211-5 ↗
22. Jiang X, Xu W, Yu L (2019) Photocatalytic decomposition of gaseous HCHO over Ag modified TiO2 nanosheets at ambient temperature. Nanomaterials 9:338. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano903033810.3390/nano9030338 ↗
23. Wu L, Pei X, Mei M et al (2022) Study on photocatalytic performance of Ag/TiO2 modified cement mortar. Materials 15:4031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1511403110.3390/ma15114031 ↗
24. Rostas AM, Suciu R-C, Roşu M-C et al (2025) Annealing temperature, a key factor in shaping Ag-decorated TiO2 aerogels as efficient visible-light photocatalysts. Mater Chem Phys 337:130557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.13055710.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130557 ↗
25. Astinchap B, Laelabadi KG (2019) Effects of substrate temperature and precursor amount on optical properties and microstructure of CVD deposited amorphous TiO2 thin films. J Phys Chem Solids 129:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.01.01210.1016/j.jpcs.2019.01.012 ↗
26. Prasai B, Cai B, Underwood MK et al (2012) Properties of amorphous and crystalline titanium dioxide from first principles. J Mater Sci 47:7515–7521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6439-610.1007/s10853-012-6439-6 ↗
27. Zhang Y, Wu W, Zhang K et al (2016) Raman study of 2D anatase TiO2 nanosheets. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:32178–32184. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP05496J10.1039/C6CP05496J ↗
28. Ren Y, Shi X, Xia P et al (2020) In situ raman investigation of TiO2 nanotube array-based ultraviolet photodetectors: effects of nanotube length. Molecules 25:1854. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2508185410.3390/molecules25081854 ↗
29. Rizzuto C, Barberi RC, Castriota M (2022) Tungsten and titanium oxide thin films obtained by the sol-gel process as electrodes in electrochromic devices. Front Mater 9:912013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.91201310.3389/fmats.2022.912013 ↗
30. Hossain R, Uddin MA, Khan MA (2023) Mechanistic understanding in manipulating energetics of TiO2 for photocatalysis. J Phys Chem C 127:10897–10912. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0698110.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06981 ↗
31. Wang C-T, Wu S-W, Kuo C-C (2022) Silver nanoparticle-embedded titania nanobelts with tunable electronic band structures and plasmonic resonance for photovoltaic application. Mater Sci Semicond Process 138:106317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10631710.1016/j.mssp.2021.106317 ↗
32. Ma J, Guo X, Zhang Y, Ge H (2014) Catalytic performance of TiO2@Ag composites prepared by modified photodeposition method. Chem Eng J 258:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.12010.1016/j.cej.2014.06.120 ↗
33. Song J, Long J, Liu Y et al (2021) Highly efficient plasmon induced hot-electron transfer at Ag/TiO2 interface. ACS Photonics 8:1497–1504. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0032110.1021/acsphotonics.1c00321 ↗
34. Astinchap B, Moradian R, Gholami K (2017) Effect of sputtering power on optical properties of prepared TiO2 thin films by thermal oxidation of sputtered Ti layers. Mater Sci Semicond Process 63:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.02.00710.1016/j.mssp.2017.02.007 ↗
35. Li H, Deng Y, Brüning R et al (2023) Steaming‐assisted conversion: a new strategy for the synthesis of anatase TiO2, Nb, and W‐doped anatase TiO2 2D inverse opal films. Adv Materials Inter 10:2300497. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20230049710.1002/admi.202300497 ↗
36. Cui Z, Li E, Ke X et al (2017) Adsorption of alkali-metal atoms on GaN nanowires photocathode. Appl Surf Sci 423:829–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.23310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.233 ↗
37. Gao P, Yang L, Xiao S et al (2019) Effect of Ru, Rh, Mo, and Pd adsorption on the electronic and optical properties of anatase TiO2(101): a DFT investigation. Materials 12:814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1205081410.3390/ma12050814 ↗
38. Ahmed F, Kanoun MB, Awada C et al (2021) An experimental and theoretical study on the effect of silver nanoparticles concentration on the structural, morphological, optical, and electronic properties of TiO2 nanocrystals. Crystals 11:1488. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1112148810.3390/cryst11121488 ↗
39. Mao L, Jiang W, He L, Fang P (2011) Photocatalytic activity of TiO2 sensitized by CdS quantum dots under visible-light irradiation. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 16:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-011-0756-510.1007/s11859-011-0756-5 ↗
40. Tahir M, Amin NAS (2017) Photo-induced CO2 reduction by hydrogen for selective CO evolution in a dynamic monolith photoreactor loaded with Ag-modified TiO2 nanocatalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:15507–15522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.03910.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.039 ↗
41. Prakash J, Kumar P, Harris RA et al (2016) Synthesis, characterization and multifunctional properties of plasmonic Ag–TiO2 nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 27:355707. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/35/35570710.1088/0957-4484/27/35/355707 ↗
42. Ren Y, Xing S, Wang J et al (2022) Weak-light-driven Ag–TiO2 photocatalyst and bactericide prepared by coprecipitation with effective Ag doping and deposition. Opt Mater 124:111993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2022.11199310.1016/j.optmat.2022.111993 ↗
43. Daniel LS, Joseph MT, Uahengo V, Hedimbi M (2024) Antibacterial activity of visible light responsive‐silver‐nanoparticle/titania composite thin films with unprecedently higher amounts of silver. Adv Mater Interfaces 11:2400035. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20240003510.1002/admi.202400035 ↗
44. Liang Y-C, Kuo C-C (2024) Enhanced dual function of Ag nanoparticles decorated one-dimensional polymorphic TiO2 composites for sustainable environmental applications. J Sci: Adv Mater Devices 9:100696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2024.10069610.1016/j.jsamd.2024.100696 ↗
45. Yu H-L, Zhou Y-W, Liu L-Q et al (2021) Simple development of Kelvin probe using a pA meter and its application to study the photocatalytic activities of Ag/TiO2 and Ag2O/TiO2 coated polyester fabrics. Appl Surf Sci 535:147653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14765310.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147653 ↗
46. Yang H, Wang B, Kou S et al (2021) Mott-Schottky heterojunction of Co/Co2P with built-in electric fields for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis and zinc-air battery. Chem Eng J 425:131589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13158910.1016/j.cej.2021.131589 ↗
47. Zhang Z, Yates JT (2012) Band bending in semiconductors: chemical and physical consequences at surfaces and interfaces. Chem Rev 112:5520–5551. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300062610.1021/cr3000626 ↗
48. Baitimirova M, Andzane J, Viter R et al (2019) Improved crystalline structure and enhanced photoluminescence of ZnO nanolayers in Bi2Se3/ZnO heterostructures. J Phys Chem C 123:31156–31166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0841710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08417 ↗
49. Xiang Q, Lv K, Yu J (2010) Pivotal role of fluorine in enhanced photocatalytic activity of anatase TiO2 nanosheets with dominant (001) facets for the photocatalytic degradation of acetone in air. Appl Catal B Environ 96:557–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.03.02010.1016/j.apcatb.2010.03.020 ↗
50. Chen Y, Li W, Wang J et al (2016) Microwave-assisted ionic liquid synthesis of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 hollow nanocrystals with enhanced visible-light photoactivity. Appl Catal B Environ 191:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.02110.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.021 ↗
51. Chen SF, Li JP, Qian K et al (2010) Large scale photochemical synthesis of M@TiO2 nanocomposites (M = Ag, Pd, Au, Pt) and their optical properties, CO oxidation performance, and antibacterial effect. Nano Res 3:244–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-010-1027-z10.1007/s12274-010-1027-z ↗
52. Nakajima H, Mori T, Watanabe M (2004) Influence of platinum loading on photoluminescence of TiO2 powder. J Appl Phys 96:925–927. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.175764910.1063/1.1757649 ↗
53. Pang C, Li R, Huang J et al (2021) Ultrafast electron transfer dynamics in Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite for tailoring of optical nonlinearity. Appl Surf Sci 539:148258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14825810.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148258 ↗
54. Valligatla S, Haldar KK, Patra A, Desai NR (2016) Nonlinear optical switching and optical limiting in colloidal CdSe quantum dots investigated by nanosecond Z-scan measurement. Opt Laser Technol 84:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.05.00910.1016/j.optlastec.2016.05.009 ↗
55. Banerjee D, Moram SSB, Byram C et al (2021) Plasmon-enhanced ultrafast and tunable thermo-optic nonlinear optical properties of femtosecond laser ablated TiO2 and Silver-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 569:151070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15107010.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151070 ↗
56. Wu K, Wang Z, Yang J, Ye H (2019) Large optical nonlinearity of ITO/Ag/ITO sandwiches based on Z-scan measurement. Opt Lett 44:2490. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.00249010.1364/OL.44.002490 ↗
57. Mayer A, Keilmann F (1986) Far-infrared nonlinear optics. II. χ(3) contributions from the dynamics of free carriers in semiconductors. Phys Rev B 33:6962–6968. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.33.696210.1103/PhysRevB.33.6962 ↗
58. Gurudas U, Brooks E, Bubb DM et al (2008) Saturable and reverse saturable absorption in silver nanodots at 532 nm using picosecond laser pulses. J Appl Phys 104:073107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.299005610.1063/1.2990056 ↗
59. Hua L, Guang Y, Ai-Ping C et al (2008) Multilayer Au/TiO2 composite films with ultrafast third-order nonlinear optical properties. Chin Phys Lett 25:4135–4138. https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/25/11/08110.1088/0256-307X/25/11/081 ↗
60. Rahulan KM, Padmanathan N, Vinitha G, Kanakam CC (2013) Investigation on the structural and nonlinear optical properties of Pt doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Mater Res Bull 48:3037–3042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.05510.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.055 ↗
61. Wei R, Tian X, Hu Z et al (2016) Vertically standing layered MoS2 nanosheets on TiO2 nanofibers for enhanced nonlinear optical property. Opt Express 24:25337. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.02533710.1364/OE.24.025337 ↗
62. Jabbar BA, Tahir KJ, Hussein BM et al (2021) Investigations on the nonlinear optical properties of Eu3+: TiO2 nanoparticles via Z-scan technique. MSF 1039:245–252. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1039.24510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1039.245 ↗