journal article·2025-12Open access

Improving the thermal stability of fly ash-based geopolymer materials through cellulose nanocrystal reinforcement

Rishen Roopchund, Lanrewaju Fajimi, Naadhira Seedat, Jerome Andrew

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 45

Abstract

Prior to this study, the thermal stability of fly ash-based geopolymer (FAG) construction materials as a function of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) concentration and the optimal CNC dosage leading to thermal stability have not been investigated. This study investigates the influence of CNC reinforcement and curing duration on the thermal stability of FAG geopolymer. A series of samples incorporating CNC dosages ranging from 0 to 1.86 wt.% were prepared and subjected to 24- and 48-h curing regimes to evaluate their thermal degradation behaviors. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed that 24-h-cured samples exhibited steeper weight losses compared to 48-h-cured ones, particularly in the 100–600 ℃ range. This trend was attributed to incomplete stabilization of organics in shorter curing times. Among all dosages, the 48-h-cured 1.7 wt.% CNC sample demonstrated the lowest total weight loss (~ 9.6% lower than the control), indicating enhanced thermal resistance. Derivative weight analysis further confirmed this, showing the lowest peak weight change rate (0.105%/℃) for the 1.7 wt.% CNC sample cured for 48 h, compared to 0.304%/℃ for the unreinforced control. Additionally, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) indicated reduced exothermic heat flow in 48-h-cured samples, especially in the 1.7 wt.% CNC formulation, suggesting minimal phase transitions and improved thermal reliability. The novelty of this work lies in demonstrating the synergistic enhancement of thermal resistance through CNC addition and extended curing. Unlike prior studies that primarily focused on mechanical reinforcement, this research establishes an optimal CNC dosage (1.7 wt%) that minimizes thermal degradation, offering critical insights for thermally stable, bio-reinforced geopolymer development. These findings support the application of CNC–geopolymer composites in fire-resistant, sustainable construction materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Clay minerals and soil interactions · Fire effects on concrete materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhuang XY et al (2016) Fly ash-based geopolymer: clean production, properties and applications. J Clean Prod 125:253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.01910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.019 ↗
2. Huntzinger DN, Eatmon TD (2009) A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. J Clean Prod 17(7):668–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.00710.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.007 ↗
3. Singh GVPB, Prasad VD (2024) Evaluating the performance and environmental impact of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer in comparison to OPC-based concrete. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31(59):66892–66910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35715-310.1007/s11356-024-35715-3 ↗
4. Shi X et al (2021) Life cycle assessment and impact correlation analysis of fly ash geopolymer concrete. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1423737510.3390/ma14237375 ↗
5. Pratap B, Kumar P (2023) Effect of the elevated temperature on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete using fly ash and ground granulated blast slag. J Struct Fire Eng 15(3):409–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-06-2023-002810.1108/JSFE-06-2023-0028 ↗
6. Usman Kankia M, Baloo L, Danlami N, Zawawi NA, Bello A, Muhammad SI (2023) Microstructural analysis and compressive strength of fly ash and petroleum sludge ash geopolymer mortar under high temperatures. Sustainability 15(12):9846. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1512984610.3390/su15129846 ↗
7. Roopchund R (2021) Cellulose nanocrystals: plant design for up-scaled production and applications in green construction materials," PhD, Chemical Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College. [Online]. Available: https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10413/20356/Roopchund_Rishen_2021.pdf
8. Rovnaník P, Šafránková K (2016) Thermal behaviour of metakaolin/fly ash geopolymers with chamotte aggregate. Materials 9(7):53510.3390/ma9070535 ↗
9. Javed U, Shaikh FUA, Sarker PK (2024) Thermal stability and strength degradation of lithium slag geopolymer containing fly ash and silica fume. Constr Build Mater 425:135976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13597610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135976 ↗
10. Wang R, Zhou X, Zhang W, Ye J, Wang J (2024) Transport mechanism of uranyl nitrate in nanopore of geopolymer with different Si/Al ratios: molecular dynamics simulation. J Solid State Chem 331:12454210.1016/j.jssc.2023.124542 ↗
11. Diab MA (2022) Enhancing class F fly ash geopolymer concrete performance using lime and steam curing. J Eng Appl Sci 69(1):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00111-610.1186/s44147-022-00111-6 ↗
12. Saludung A, Azeyanagi T, Ogawa Y, Kawai K (2023) Mechanical and microstructural evolutions of fly ash/slag-based geopolymer at high temperatures: effect of curing conditions. Ceram Int 49(2):2091–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.17510.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.175 ↗
13. Roopchund R, Andrew J, Sithole B (2023) Using a systematic review to develop a cellulose nanocrystals production framework for use as a design baseline and optimization tool. S Afr J Chem Eng 44:345–355
14. Rickard WD, Riessen AV, Walls P (2010) Thermal character of geopolymers synthesized from class F fly ash containing high concentrations of iron and α-quartz. Int J Appl Ceramic Technol 7(1):81–8810.1111/j.1744-7402.2008.02328.x ↗
15. Rosas-Casarez CA et al (2014) Experimental study of XRD, FTIR and TGA techniques in geopolymeric materials. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 4(4):221–226
16. Caballero LR, Paiva MD, Fairbairn ED, Toledo Filho RD (2019) Thermal, mechanical and microstructural analysis of metakaolin based geopolymers. Mater Res 22(02):e2018071610.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0716 ↗
17. Lemougna PN et al (2020) Thermal stability of one-part metakaolin geopolymer composites containing high volume of spodumene tailings and glass wool. Cement Concr Compos 114:10379210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103792 ↗
18. He R, Dai N, Wang Z (2020) Thermal and mechanical properties of geopolymers exposed to high temperature: a literature review. Adv Civil Eng 2020(1):753270310.1155/2020/7532703 ↗
19. Zhao J, Wang K, Wang S, Wang Z, Yang Z, Shumuye ED, Gong X (2021) Effect of elevated temperature on mechanical properties of high-volume fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, mortar and paste cured at room temperature. Polymers 13(9):1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1309147310.3390/polym13091473 ↗
20. Liu W, Ju S (2024) Tunable thermal conductivity of sustainable geopolymers by the Si/Al ratio and moisture content: insights from atomistic simulations. J Phys Chem B 128(12):2972–2984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c0744510.1021/acs.jpcb.3c07445 ↗
21. Pulidori E et al (2025) Thermal behavior of Sicilian clay-based geopolymers. J Ther Anal Calorimet 150(9):6663–6675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13226-010.1007/s10973-024-13226-0 ↗
22. Xie Y, Wang C, Guo Y, Cui H, Xue J (2025) Improved mechanical and thermal properties of sustainable ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete with cellulose nanofibres. J Build Eng 102:112068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.11206810.1016/j.jobe.2025.112068 ↗
23. Yildirim N, Shaler S (2017) A study on thermal and nanomechanical performance of cellulose nanomaterials (CNs). Materials 10(7):718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1007071810.3390/ma10070718 ↗
24. Liu Y, Wei Y, He Y, Qian Y, Wang C, Chen G (2023) Large-scale preparation of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals and their application for stabilizing pickering emulsions. ACS Omega 8(17):15114–15123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c0823910.1021/acsomega.2c08239 ↗
25. Motloung MP, Zungu S, Ojijo V, Bandyopadhyay J, Ray SS (2020) Morphological, thermal, and thermomechanical properties of cellulose nanocrystals reinforced polylactide/poly [(butylene succinate)-co-adipate] blend composite foams. Funct Compos Mater 1(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42252-020-00011-z10.1186/s42252-020-00011-z ↗
26. Alzoubi HH, Albiss BA (2020) Performance of cementitious composites with nano PCMs and cellulose nano fibers. Constr Build Mater 10(236):117483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11748310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117483 ↗
27. Liu W, Qin L, Zhao CY, Ju S (2023) Microscopic mechanism of tunable thermal conductivity in carbon nanotube-geopolymer nanocomposites. J Phys Chem B 127(10):2267–2276. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c0896210.1021/acs.jpcb.2c08962 ↗
28. Tran NP, Nguyen TN, Black JR, Ngo TD (2024) High-temperature stability of ambient-cured one-part alkali-activated materials incorporating graphene nanoplatelets for thermal energy storage. Dev Built Environ 18:10044710.1016/j.dibe.2024.100447 ↗
29. He Y, Liu L, He L, Cui X (2016) Characterization of chemosynthetic H3PO4–Al2O3–2SiO2 geopolymers. Ceram Int 42(9):10908–1091210.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.224 ↗
30. Cao Y et al (2015) The influence of cellulose nanocrystals on the microstructure of cement paste. Cement Concr Compos 74:164–17310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.09.008 ↗
31. Cao Y, Zavattieri P, Youngblood J, Moon R, Weiss J (2016) The relationship between cellulose nanocrystal dispersion and strength. Constr Build Mater 119:71–7910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.077 ↗
32. Lee H-J, Kim S-K, Lee H-S, Kim W (2019) A study on the drying shrinkage and mechanical properties of fiber reinforced cement composites using cellulose nanocrystals. Int J Concr Struct Mater 13:1–1110.1186/s40069-019-0351-2 ↗
33. Graytee A, Sanjayan JG, Nazari A (2018) Development of a high strength fly ash-based geopolymer in short time by using microwave curing. Ceram Int 44(7):8216–822210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.001 ↗
34. Kastiukas G, Ruan S, Liang S, Zhou X (2020) Development of precast geopolymer concrete via oven and microwave radiation curing with an environmental assessment. J Clean Prod 255:12029010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120290 ↗
35. Rawlinson C (2006) "Differential scanning calorimetry “cooking with chemicals. Poisons, Pills Potions
36. Yildirim N, Shaler S (2017) A study on thermal and nanomechanical performance of cellulose nanomaterials (CNs). Materials 10(7):71810.3390/ma10070718 ↗
37. Ansar EN, Biutty MN, Kim KS, Yoo S, Huh P, Yoo SI (2024) Sustainable polyamide composites reinforced with nanocellulose via melt mixing process. J Compos Sci. 8(10):419. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs810041910.3390/jcs8100419 ↗
38. Nasir M et al (2022) Engineered cellulose nanocrystals-based cement mortar from office paper waste: flow, strength, microstructure, and thermal properties. J Build Eng 51:104345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10434510.1016/j.jobe.2022.104345 ↗