Nanoparticle-based impregnation coatings for wood: improving hydrophobicity, mechanical properties, and blue stain fungi resistance through structure–property relationship
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Wood is an organic material that is highly susceptible to moisture, which compromises its performance, accelerates decay, and promotes mould growth, thereby reducing its service life. This study presents a comparative assessment of cost-effective solutions for enhancing the hydrophobicity, mechanical properties, and blue-stain resistance of wood surfaces by evaluating the effects of silicon dioxide (SiO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), and titanium dioxide (TiO2) particle coatings on Scots pine wood. Low-concentration particles were applied via an impregnation coating method, resulting in the formation of a nanocomposite between the wood and the particles. The coated and uncoated samples were then exposed to blue-stain fungi. To further analyse the effects, the exposed samples were characterised using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to analyse particle morphology and observe fungal colonisation, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to determine elemental distribution. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to confirm interactions between the nanoparticles and wood components. Mechanical and physical tests were conducted to evaluate the durability and resistance of the coated wood against blue-stain fungi. The results showed a significant improvement in surface hydrophobicity following coating application, which remained stable even after exposure to fungi. Moreover, distinct differences in fungal resistance were observed among the nanoparticle types, with ZnO showing the highest effectiveness. A new approach was also introduced to assess the mechanical performance of the coatings. This study offers insight into nanoparticle coatings as a sustainable strategy for enhancing wood surfaces in construction and outdoor furniture applications. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Building materials and conservation · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Xue M, Dai M, Li H et al (2024) Understanding the benefits and challenges of harvested wood products in response to climate change. Resour Conserv Recycl 209:107739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.10773910.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107739 ↗
2. Siau JF (1984) Wood structure and chemical composition. Transport processes in wood. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 35–7210.1007/978-3-642-69213-0_2 ↗
3. Rowell RM (2005) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Fla10.1201/9780203492437 ↗
4. Pettersen RC (1984) The chemical composition of wood. In: The chemistry of solid wood. american chemical society, pp 57–12610.1021/ba-1984-0207.ch002 ↗
5. Bardage S, Westin M, Fogarty HA, Trey S (2014) The effect of natural product treatment of southern yellow pine on fungi causing blue stain and mold. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 86:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.09.00110.1016/j.ibiod.2013.09.001 ↗
6. Humar M, Vek V, Buar B (2008) Properties of blue-stained wood. Drvna Ind 59(2):75–79
7. Petrič M (2013) Surface modification of wood. Rev Adhes Adhes 1:216–247. https://doi.org/10.7569/RAA.2013.09730810.7569/RAA.2013.097308 ↗
8. Chang H-T, Chang S-T (2002) Moisture excluding efficiency and dimensional stability of wood improved by acylation. Bioresour Technol 85:201–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00085-810.1016/S0960-8524(02)00085-8 ↗
9. Kanokwijitsilp T, Traiperm P, Osotchan T, Srikhirin T (2016) Development of abrasion resistance SiO2 nanocomposite coating for teak wood. Prog Org Coat 93:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.12.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.12.004 ↗
10. Xie Y, Krause A, Mai C et al (2005) Weathering of wood modified with the N-methylol compound 1,3-dimethylol-4,5-dihydroxyethyleneurea. Polym Degrad Stab 89:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.01710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.08.017 ↗
11. Srinivas K, Pandey KK (2012) Effect of heat treatment on color changes, dimensional stability, and mechanical properties of wood. J Wood Chem Technol 32:304–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2012.67417010.1080/02773813.2012.674170 ↗
12. Jirouš-Rajković V, Miklečić J (2021) Enhancing weathering resistance of wood—a review. Polymers 13:1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1312198010.3390/polym13121980 ↗
13. Gérardin P (2016) New alternatives for wood preservation based on thermal and chemical modification of wood— a review. Ann For Sci 73:559–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-015-0531-410.1007/s13595-015-0531-4 ↗
14. Yildiz S, Gezer ED, Yildiz UC (2006) Mechanical and chemical behavior of spruce wood modified by heat. Build Environ 41:1762–1766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.01710.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.017 ↗
15. Xie Y, Fu Q, Wang Q et al (2013) Effects of chemical modification on the mechanical properties of wood. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 71:401–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-013-0693-410.1007/s00107-013-0693-4 ↗
16. Davis K, Leavengood S, Morrell JJ (2021) Performance of exterior wood coatings in temperate climates. Coatings 11:325. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1103032510.3390/coatings11030325 ↗
17. Paul D, Gaff M, Tesařová D et al (2023) Recent advancements in nanotechnology application on wood and bamboo materials: A review. Nanotechnol Rev 12:20220528. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-052810.1515/ntrev-2022-0528 ↗
18. Li J, Yu H, Sun Q et al (2010) Growth of TiO2 coating on wood surface using controlled hydrothermal method at low temperatures. Appl Surf Sci 256:5046–5050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.05310.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.053 ↗
19. Dong Y, Yan Y, Ma H et al (2017) In-situ chemosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles to endow wood with antibacterial and UV-resistance properties. J Mater Sci Technol 33:266–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.03.01810.1016/j.jmst.2016.03.018 ↗
20. Keplinger T, Wittel FK, Rüggeberg M, Burgert I (2021) Wood derived cellulose scaffolds—processing and mechanics. Adv Mater 33:2001375. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200137510.1002/adma.202001375 ↗
21. Petric M, Levanic J, Paul D (2023) Investigations of surface-treated wood by a micro-indentation approach: a short review and a case study. Bull Transilv Univ Brasov Ser II For Wood Ind Agric Food Eng. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2023.16.65.3.1310.31926/but.fwiafe.2023.16.65.3.13 ↗
22. Kuroda A, Joly P, Shibata N et al (2008) An organic-inorganic hybrid composite as a coating agent. J Am Oil Chem Soc 85:549–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-008-1230-110.1007/s11746-008-1230-1 ↗
23. Miyafuji H, Saka S (1997) Fire-resisting properties in several TiO2 wood-inorganic composites and their topochemistry. Wood Sci Technol 31:449–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0070256710.1007/BF00702567 ↗
24. Jiang F, Li T, Li Y et al (2018) Wood-based nanotechnologies toward sustainability. Adv Mater 30:1703453. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170345310.1002/adma.201703453 ↗
25. Liu Y, Fu Y, Yu H, Liu Y (2013) Process of in situ forming well-aligned Zinc Oxide nanorod arrays on wood substrate using a two-step bottom-up method. J Colloid Interface Sci 407:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.06.04310.1016/j.jcis.2013.06.043 ↗
26. Sofiaturizkiyah N, Priadi T (2023) The blue stain attack and its effect on the mechanical properties of five light-colour woods. BIO Web Conf 77:01007. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/2023770100710.1051/bioconf/20237701007 ↗
27. Humar M, Viljem V, Bojan B (2008) Properties of blue-stained wood. Drv Ind 59:75–79
28. Millers M, Magaznieks J, Gžibovska Z (2017) Blue stain development of scots pine (pinus sylvestris l) roundwood and its influencing factors, pp 120–12610.22616/rrd.23.2017.018 ↗
29. Dong X, Zhuo X, Wei J et al (2017) Wood-based nanocomposite derived by in situ formation of organic-inorganic hybrid polymer within wood via a sol-gel method. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:9070–9078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0117410.1021/acsami.7b01174 ↗
30. Mishra R (2018) Materials chemistry and the futurist eco-friendly applications of nanocellulose: status and prospect. J Saudi Chem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2018.02.00510.1016/j.jscs.2018.02.005 ↗
31. Setyawati MI, Tay CY, Leong DT (2015) Mechanistic investigation of the biological effects of SiO2, TiO2, and ZnO nanoparticles on intestinal cells. Small Weinh Bergstr Ger 11:3458–3468. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20140323210.1002/smll.201403232 ↗
32. Arpanaei A, Fu Q, Singh T (2024) Nanotechnology approaches towards biodeterioration-resistant wood: a review. J Bioresour Bioprod 9:3–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2023.09.00110.1016/j.jobab.2023.09.001 ↗
33. Raspor P, Smole-Možina S, Podjavoršek J, et al (1995) ZIM: Collection of industrial microorganisms
34. Schmidt O (2006) Wood cell wall degradation. Wood and tree fungi: biology, damage, protection, and use. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 87–107
35. Wickham H, François R, Henry L et al (2023) dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1(1):2
36. Allaire JJ RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R
37. Chu BTT, Tobias G, Salzmann CG et al (2008) Fabrication of carbon-nanotube-reinforced glass–ceramic nanocomposites by ultrasonic in situ sol–gel processing. J Mater Chem 18:5344–5349. https://doi.org/10.1039/B809369E10.1039/B809369E ↗
38. Wang Y-Y, Wang X-Q, Zhang B-Z et al (2024) SiO2 decorated wood nanocomposite with enhanced mechanical performance, flame and water resistance. Nano Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2024.09.00510.1016/j.nanoms.2024.09.005 ↗
39. Wang B, Feng M, Zhan H (2014) Improvement of wood properties by impregnation with TiO2 via ultrasonic-assisted sol–gel process. RSC Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA04852K10.1039/C4RA04852K ↗
40. Kartal SN, Green F, Clausen CA (2009) Do the unique properties of nanometals affect leachability or efficacy against fungi and termites? Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 63:490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.01.00710.1016/j.ibiod.2009.01.007 ↗
41. Hübert T, Unger B, Bücker M (2010) Sol–gel derived TiO2 wood composites. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 53:384–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-009-2107-y10.1007/s10971-009-2107-y ↗
42. Tshabalala MA, Sung L-P (2007) Wood surface modification by in-situ sol-gel deposition of hybrid inorganic–organic thin films. J Coat Technol Res 4:483–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-007-9033-010.1007/s11998-007-9033-0 ↗
43. Tshabalala MA, Gangstad JE (2003) Accelerated weathering of wood surfaces coated with multifunctional alkoxysilanes by sol-gel deposition. J Coat Technol 75:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0273009810.1007/BF02730098 ↗
44. Kim T, Lee J (2023) Silicon nanoparticles: fabrication, characterization, application and perspectives. Micro Nano Syst Lett 11:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40486-023-00184-910.1186/s40486-023-00184-9 ↗
45. Bazant P, Munster L, Machovsky M et al (2014) Wood flour modified by hierarchical Ag/ZnO as potential filler for wood–plastic composites with enhanced surface antibacterial performance. Ind Crops Prod 62:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.08.02810.1016/j.indcrop.2014.08.028 ↗
46. Poletto M, Zattera AJ, Santana RMC (2012) Structural differences between wood species: evidence from chemical composition, FTIR spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. J Appl Polym Sci 126:E337–E344. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3699110.1002/app.36991 ↗
47. Russo C, Stanzione F, Tregrossi A, Ciajolo A (2014) Infrared spectroscopy of some carbon-based materials relevant in combustion: qualitative and quantitative analysis of hydrogen. Carbon 74:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.01410.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.014 ↗
48. Shinozaki A, Arima K, Morita M et al (2003) FTIR-ATR evaluation of organic contaminant cleaning methods for SiO2 surfaces. Anal Sci 19:1557–1559. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.19.155710.2116/analsci.19.1557 ↗
49. Hirata T (1997) Evolution of the infra-red vibrational modes upon thermal oxidation of Si single crystals. J Phys Chem Solids 58:1497–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(97)00179-010.1016/S0022-3697(97)00179-0 ↗
50. Yao Q, Wang C, Fan B et al (2016) One-step solvothermal deposition of ZnO nanorod arrays on a wood surface for robust superamphiphobic performance and superior ultraviolet resistance. Sci Rep 6:35505. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3550510.1038/srep35505 ↗
51. Sun Q, Lu Y, Liu Y (2011) Growth of hydrophobic TiO2 on wood surface using a hydrothermal method. J Mater Sci 46:7706–7712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5750-y10.1007/s10853-011-5750-y ↗
52. Wang S, Liu C, Liu G et al (2011) Fabrication of superhydrophobic wood surface by a sol–gel process. Appl Surf Sci 258:806–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.08.10010.1016/j.apsusc.2011.08.100 ↗
53. Xing D, Zhang Y, Hu J, Yao L (2020) Highly hydrophobic and self-cleaning heat-treated Larix spp. prepared by TiO2 and ZnO particles onto wood surface. Coatings 10:986. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1010098610.3390/coatings10100986 ↗
54. Calovi M, Rossi S (2023) Impact of high concentrations of cellulose fibers on the morphology, durability and protective properties of wood paint. Coatings 13:721. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1304072110.3390/coatings13040721 ↗
55. Effect of ethylene oxide sterilization and accelerated ageing on the physical and mechanical properties of beech, oak, and elm wood: Part 1: BioResources. Accessed 20 Jan 2025
56. Nurul S, Trisna P (2023) The Blue Stain Attack and Its Effect on The Mechanical Properties of Five Light-Colour Woods. BIO Web Conf
57. Millers M (2017) Blue stain development of scots pine (pinus sylvestris l) roundwood and its influencing factors. Res Rural Dev 1:120–12610.22616/rrd.23.2017.018 ↗
58. Weththimuni ML, Capsoni D, Malagodi M (2019) Licchelli M Improving Wood Resistance to Decay by Nanostructured ZnO-Based Treatments. J Nanomater 1:6715756
59. Yu LL, Tang ZZ, Cao JZ, Yan L (2010) Properties of blue-stain masson pine after compression and thermal modification. Adv Mater Res 160–162:1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.160-162.119910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.160-162.1199 ↗
60. Wu Y, Wu X, Yang F et al (2020) Effect of Thermal Modification on the Nano-Mechanical Properties of the Wood Cell Wall and Waterborne Polyacrylic Coating. Forests 11:1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/f1112124710.3390/f11121247 ↗
61. Yin H, Ringman R, Moghaddam MS et al (2023) Susceptibility of surface-modified superhydrophobic wood and acetylated wood to mold and blue stain fungi. Prog Org Coat 182:107628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.10762810.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107628 ↗
62. Harandi D, Ahmadi H, Mohammadi Achachluei M (2016) Comparison of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles for the improvement of consolidated wood with polyvinyl butyral against white rot. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 108:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.12.01710.1016/j.ibiod.2015.12.017 ↗
63. Nosáľ E, Reinprecht L (2017) Anti-bacterial and anti-mold efficiency of ZnO nanoparticles present in melamine-laminated surfaces of particleboards. BioResources 12:7255–7267. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.4.7255-726710.15376/biores.12.4.7255-7267 ↗
64. Yonni F, Moreira MT, Fasoli H et al (2004) Simple and easy method for the determination of fungal growth and decolourative capacity in solid media. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 54:283–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.03.01710.1016/j.ibiod.2004.03.017 ↗
65. Van den Bulcke J, Van Acker J, Stevens M (2005) Image processing as a tool for assessment and analysis of blue stain discolouration of coated wood. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 56:178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.07.00410.1016/j.ibiod.2005.07.004 ↗