Carbon felt modified with copper sulfide nanoflowers as a high-performance electrode for polysulfide–ferrocyanide redox flow batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA et al (2009) Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325:270–271. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.117797010.1126/science.1177970 ↗
2. Hu J, Tang Q, Wu Z et al (2023) Optimization and assessment method for total energy system retrofit in the petrochemical industry considering clean energy substitution for fossil fuel. Energy Convers Manage 284:116967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.11696710.1016/j.enconman.2023.116967 ↗
3. Gür TM (2018) Review of electrical energy storage technologies, materials and systems: challenges and prospects for large-scale grid storage. Energy Environ Sci 11:2696–2767. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01419A10.1039/C8EE01419A ↗
4. Chu S, Cui Y, Liu N (2017) The path towards sustainable energy. Nature Mater 16:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat483410.1038/nmat4834 ↗
5. Ager JW, Lapkin AA (2018) Chemical storage of renewable energy. Science 360:707–708. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat791810.1126/science.aat7918 ↗
6. Zantye MS, Arora A, Hasan MMF (2021) Renewable-integrated flexible carbon capture: a synergistic path forward to clean energy future. Energy Environ Sci 14:3986–4008. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE03946B10.1039/D0EE03946B ↗
7. Kebede AA, Kalogiannis T, Van Mierlo J, Berecibar M (2022) A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 159:112213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.11221310.1016/j.rser.2022.112213 ↗
8. Zantye MS, Gandhi A, Wang Y et al (2022) Optimal design and integration of decentralized electrochemical energy storage with renewables and fossil plants. Energy Environ Sci 15:4119–4136. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE00771A10.1039/D2EE00771A ↗
9. Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon J-M (2011) Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334:928–935. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
10. Yang Z, Zhang J, Kintner-Meyer MCW et al (2011) Electrochemical energy storage for green grid. Chem Rev 111:3577–3613. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100290v10.1021/cr100290v ↗
11. Zhu Z, Jiang T, Ali M et al (2022) Rechargeable batteries for grid scale energy storage. Chem Rev 122:16610–16751. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0028910.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289 ↗
12. Han M, Zheng K, Hu H et al (2025) Long-duration energy-storage technologies: a stabilizer for new power systems. Innov Energy 2(2):100077. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.10007710.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100077 ↗
13. Choi C, Kim S, Kim R et al (2017) A review of vanadium electrolytes for vanadium redox flow batteries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.18810.1016/j.rser.2016.11.188 ↗
14. Jiang HR, Sun J, Wei L et al (2020) A high power density and long cycle life vanadium redox flow battery. Energy Storage Mater 24:529–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.00510.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.005 ↗
15. Weber AZ, Mench MM, Meyers JP et al (2011) Redox flow batteries: a review. J Appl Electrochem 41:1137–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-011-0348-210.1007/s10800-011-0348-2 ↗
16. Leung P, Li X, Ponce De León C et al (2012) Progress in redox flow batteries, remaining challenges and their applications in energy storage. RSC Adv 2:10125. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra21342g10.1039/c2ra21342g ↗
17. Wei X, Xia G-G, Kirby B et al (2016) An aqueous redox flow battery based on neutral alkali metal ferri/ferrocyanide and polysulfide electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 163:A5150–A5153. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0221601jes10.1149/2.0221601jes ↗
18. Long Y, Xu Z, Wang G et al (2021) A neutral polysulfide/ferricyanide redox flow battery. iScience 24:103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.10315710.1016/j.isci.2021.103157 ↗
19. Chen Y, Zhou M, Xia Y et al (2019) A stable and high-capacity redox targeting-based electrolyte for aqueous flow batteries. Joule 3:2255–2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.00710.1016/j.joule.2019.06.007 ↗
20. Yan S, Huang S, Xu H et al (2023) Redox targeting-based neutral aqueous flow battery with high energy density and low cost. Chemsuschem 16:e202300710. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20230071010.1002/cssc.202300710 ↗
21. Li Z, Weng G, Zou Q et al (2016) A high-energy and low-cost polysulfide/iodide redox flow battery. Nano Energy 30:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.04310.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.043 ↗
22. Li Z, Lu Y-C (2021) Polysulfide-based redox flow batteries with long life and low levelized cost enabled by charge-reinforced ion-selective membranes. Nat Energy 6:517–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00804-x10.1038/s41560-021-00804-x ↗
23. Lei J, Yao Y, Huang Y, Lu Y-C (2023) A highly reversible low-cost aqueous sulfur–manganese redox flow battery. ACS Energy Lett 8:429–435. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0252410.1021/acsenergylett.2c02524 ↗
24. Ding M, Fu H, Lou X et al (2023) A stable and energy-dense polysulfide/permanganate flow battery. ACS Nano 17:16252–16263. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c0627310.1021/acsnano.3c06273 ↗
25. Zhou H, Zhang H, Zhao P, Yi B (2006) A comparative study of carbon felt and activated carbon based electrodes for sodium polysulfide/bromine redox flow battery. Electrochim Acta 51:6304–6312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.10610.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.106 ↗
26. Hu H, Han M, Liu J et al (2025) Strategies for improving the design of porous fiber felt electrodes for all-vanadium redox flow batteries from macro and micro perspectives. Energy Environ Sci 18:3085–3119. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EE05556J10.1039/D4EE05556J ↗
27. Guo J, Pan L, Sun J et al (2024) Metal-free fabrication of nitrogen-doped vertical graphene on graphite felt electrodes with enhanced reaction kinetics and mass transport for high-performance redox flow batteries. Adv Energy Mater 14:2302521. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20230252110.1002/aenm.202302521 ↗
28. Cheng M, Yan R, Yang Z et al (2022) Polysulfide catalytic materials for fast-kinetic metal–sulfur batteries: Principles and active centers. Advanced Science 9:2102217. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20210221710.1002/advs.202102217 ↗
29. Ma D, Hu B, Wu W et al (2019) Highly active nanostructured CoS2/CoS heterojunction electrocatalysts for aqueous polysulfide/iodide redox flow batteries. Nat Commun 10:3367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11176-y10.1038/s41467-019-11176-y ↗
30. Reddy AE, Rao SS, Gopi CVVM et al (2017) Morphology controllable time-dependent CoS nanoparticle thin films as efficient counter electrode for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. Chem Phys Lett 687:238–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2017.09.00110.1016/j.cplett.2017.09.001 ↗
31. Yang Y, Zhu L, Sun H et al (2012) Composite counter electrode based on nanoparticulate PbS and carbon black: towards quantum dot-sensitized solar cells with both high efficiency and stability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:6162–6168. https://doi.org/10.1021/am301787q10.1021/am301787q ↗
32. Tachan Z, Shalom M, Hod I et al (2011) PbS as a highly catalytic counter electrode for polysulfide-based quantum dot solar cells. J Phys Chem C 115:6162–6166. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp112010m10.1021/jp112010m ↗
33. Yang W, Yang W, Dong L et al (2019) Enabling immobilization and conversion of polysulfides through a nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes/ultrathin MoS2 nanosheet core–shell architecture for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 7:13103–13112. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA03227D10.1039/C9TA03227D ↗
34. Cheng Z, Chen Y, Yang Y et al (2021) Metallic MoS2 nanoflowers decorated graphene nanosheet catalytically boosts the volumetric capacity and cycle life of lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 11:2003718. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200371810.1002/aenm.202003718 ↗
35. Wang Y, Lai Y, Chu J et al (2021) Tunable electrocatalytic behavior of sodiated MoS2 active sites toward efficient sulfur redox reactions in room-temperature Na–S batteries. Adv Mater 33:2100229. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20210022910.1002/adma.202100229 ↗
36. Lou X, Fu H, Xu J et al (2022) Cost-effective membrane and advanced electrode for stable polysulfide-ferricyanide flow battery. Energy Mater Adv. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/986561810.34133/2022/9865618 ↗
37. Gao M, Huang S, Zhang F et al (2020) Successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction–deposited copper sulfide electrocatalyst for high-power polysulfide-based aqueous flow batteries. Mater Today Energy 18:100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2020.10054010.1016/j.mtener.2020.100540 ↗
38. Mazurków JM, Kusior A, Partyka-Jankowska E, Radecka M (2024) Unraveling the role of sodium thiosulfate in copper sulfide synthesis. Cryst Growth Des 24:2475–2484. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.3c0144810.1021/acs.cgd.3c01448 ↗
39. Krylova V, Andrulevičius M (2009) Optical, XPS and XRD studies of semiconducting copper sulfide layers on a polyamide film. Int J Photoenergy 2009:304308. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/30430810.1155/2009/304308 ↗
40. Ortiz-Ramos DE, Martínez-Enríquez AI, González LA (2019) CuS films grown by a chemical bath deposition process with amino acids as complexing agents. Mater Sci Semicond Process 89:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.08.01610.1016/j.mssp.2018.08.016 ↗
41. Huang K-J, Zhang J-Z, Liu Y, Liu Y-M (2015) Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide wrapped-copper sulfide hollow spheres as electrode material for supercapacitor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:10158–10167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.15210.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.152 ↗
42. Kumar P, Nagarajan R, Sarangi R (2013) Quantitative X-ray absorption and emission spectroscopies: electronic structure elucidation of Cu2S and CuS. J Mater Chem C 1:2448. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tc00639e10.1039/c3tc00639e ↗
43. Nethravathi C, Ragesh Nath R, Rajamathi JT, Rajamathi M (2019) Microwave-assisted synthesis of porous aggregates of CuS nanoparticles for sunlight photocatalysis. ACS Omega 4:4825–4831. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0328810.1021/acsomega.8b03288 ↗
44. Adhikari S, Sarkar D, Madras G (2017) Hierarchical design of CuS architectures for visible light photocatalysis of 4-chlorophenol. ACS Omega 2:4009–4021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b0066910.1021/acsomega.7b00669 ↗