Performance of composite metal foams under cyclic loading at elevated temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the fatigue behavior of steel-steel composite metal foams (S–S CMFs) subjected to uniaxial compression–compression cyclic loading at 23, 400, and 600 °C to identify temperature-dependent deformation mechanisms and endurance thresholds. The S–S CMFs consist of stainless-steel hollow spheres embedded within a 316L stainless-steel matrix, designed to provide lightweight strength and thermal resistance for extreme environments. Fatigue tests of S–S CMF demonstrated a three-stage strain evolution pattern including the initial gradual strain accumulation, extended strain stability, and abrupt failure. Notably, the longest fatigue life was observed at 400 °C, where specimens remained in Stage II for over 1.3 million cycles at 60% of plateau strength (S pl), a phenomenon primarily attributed to dynamic strain aging (DSA), evidenced by serrated flow. At 600 °C, similar DSA-driven serrations occurred; however, thermal softening, dynamic recovery, and oxidation-induced damage significantly reduced fatigue life above a critical stress threshold. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) revealed that the matrix porosity collapse and associated structural rearrangements played a critical role in fatigue deformation at all temperatures, contributing to the serrated features observed. Additionally, twinning observed at 600 °C suggests a thermally assisted cyclic hardening mechanism. In contrast, room-temperature fatigue was dominated by slip-driven deformation and structural porosity collapse, with smoother strain evolution. These findings highlight the complex interplay between structural (matrix porosity collapse) and dislocation-based mechanisms (DSA) in governing the fatigue response of S–S CMFs, underscoring their temperature-dependent deformation mechanisms and defining a practical endurance boundary around 50% of plateau strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Parveez B, Jamal NA, Anuar H, Ahmad Y, Aabid A, Baig M (2022) Microstructure and mechanical properties of metal foams fabricated via melt foaming and powder metallurgy technique: a review. Materials 15:5302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1515530210.3390/ma15155302 ↗
2. Murali AP, Duraisamy S, Samuthiram S, Vijay R (2025) Current and emerging methods for manufacturing of closed pore metal foams and its characteristics: a review. J Mater Sci 60:1187–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-10318-y10.1007/s10853-024-10318-y ↗
3. Liu PS, Ma XM (2020) Property relations based on the octahedral structure model with body-centered cubic mode for porous metal foams. Mater Des 188:108413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10841310.1016/j.matdes.2019.108413 ↗
4. Stanev L, Kolev M, Drenchev B, Drenchev L (2017) Open-cell metallic porous materials obtained through space holders: Part II—structure and properties. A review. J Manuf Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403444010.1115/1.4034440 ↗
5. Gibson LJ (2000) Mechanical behavior of metallic foams. Annu Rev Mater Sci 30:191–227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.19110.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.191 ↗
6. Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46:559–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-510.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
7. Du R, Jin X, Hübner R, Fan X, Hu Y, Eychmüller A (2020) Engineering self-supported noble metal foams toward electrocatalysis and beyond. Adv Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20190194510.1002/aenm.201901945 ↗
8. Oriňaková R, Gorejová R, Králová ZO, Petráková M, Oriňak A (2021) Novel trends and recent progress on preparation methods of biodegradable metallic foams for biomedicine: a review. J Mater Sci 56:13925–13963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06163-y10.1007/s10853-021-06163-y ↗
9. Yang X, Huang X, Qiu X, Guo Q, Zhang X (2024) Supramolecular metallic foams with ultrahigh specific strength and sustainable recyclability. Nat Commun 15:4553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49091-610.1038/s41467-024-49091-6 ↗
10. Guo H, Zhang J (2023) Expansion of sandwich tubes with metal foam core under axial compression. J Appl Mech. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405668610.1115/1.4056686 ↗
11. García-Moreno F (2016) Commercial applications of metal foams: their properties and production. Materials 9:85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma902008510.3390/ma9020085 ↗
12. Sun G, Chen D, Zhu G, Li Q (2022) Lightweight hybrid materials and structures for energy absorption: a state-of-the-art review and outlook. Thin-Walled Struct 172:108760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.10876010.1016/j.tws.2021.108760 ↗
13. Ji C, Huang H, Wang T, Huang Q (2023) Recent advances and future trends in processing methods and characterization technologies of aluminum foam composite structures: a review. J Manuf Process 93:116–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.03.01510.1016/j.jmapro.2023.03.015 ↗
14. Srinath G, Vadiraj A, Balachandran G, Sahu SN, Gokhale AA (2010) Characteristics of aluminium metal foam for automotive applications. Trans Indian Inst Met 63:765–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-010-0117-710.1007/s12666-010-0117-7 ↗
15. Hanssen AG, Girard Y, Olovsson L, Berstad T, Langseth M (2006) A numerical model for bird strike of aluminium foam-based sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng 32:1127–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.004 ↗
16. Yan XP, Zhang NM, Liang WM, Zhao YG, Yang GT (2010) Mechanical behaviours of open-cell and closed-cell Aluminium foams against spherical-nosed projectile penetration. Appl Mech Mater 29:321–325. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.29-32.32110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.29-32.321 ↗
17. Liu Y, He X, Deng C (2017) Self-piercing riveting of metal foam sandwich structures. Mater Trans 58:1532–1537. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M201718710.2320/matertrans.M2017187 ↗
18. Benedetti M, du Plessis A, Ritchie RO, Dallago M, Razavi N, Berto F (2021) Architected cellular materials: a review on their mechanical properties towards fatigue-tolerant design and fabrication. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 144:100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2021.10060610.1016/j.mser.2021.100606 ↗
19. Atwater MA, Guevara LN, Darling KA, Tschopp MA (2018) Solid state porous metal production: a review of the capabilities, characteristics, and challenges. Adv Eng Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170076610.1002/adem.201700766 ↗
20. Rabiei A (2012) Composite metal foam and methods of preparation thereof. US8110143B2. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
21. Neville BP, Rabiei A (2008) Composite metal foams processed through powder metallurgy. Mater Des 29:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.02610.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.026 ↗
22. Rabiei A, Vendra L, Reese N, Young N, Neville BP (2006) Processing and characterization of a new composite metal foam. Mater Trans 47:2148–2153. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.47.214810.2320/matertrans.47.2148 ↗
23. Rabiei A, Vendra LJ (2009) A comparison of composite metal foam’s properties and other comparable metal foams. Mater Lett 63:533–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2008.11.00210.1016/j.matlet.2008.11.002 ↗
24. Vendra L, Neville B, Rabiei A (2009) Fatigue in aluminum–steel and steel–steel composite foams. Mater Sci Eng A 517:146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.07510.1016/j.msea.2009.03.075 ↗
25. Gu J, Wang X, Gao Y, Chen Y, Zhang Z, Wen J, Gong J (2024) Effect of surface modification on the high temperature low cycle fatigue performance of LPBF 316L austenitic steel. Eng Fract Mech 302:110094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11009410.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110094 ↗
26. Mao J, Cao C, Yang J, Hua M, Cai Y, Wang W, Zhong F (2023) Research on multi-scale failure mechanism of gradient nanostructured 316L steel under strain-controlled fatigue at 650 °C. Int J Fatigue 177:107970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10797010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107970 ↗
27. Chen Y, Wang X, shen J, Peng Y, Jiang Y, Yang X, Leen SB, Gong J (2022) Deformation mechanisms of selective laser melted 316L austenitic stainless steel in high temperature low cycle fatigue. Mater Sci Eng A 843:143123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14312310.1016/j.msea.2022.143123 ↗
28. Wang E, Yao R, Luo Q, Li Q, Lv G, Sun G (2022) High-temperature and dynamic mechanical characterization of closed-cell aluminum foams. Int J Mech Sci 230:107548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10754810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107548 ↗
29. Movahedi N, Linul E (2021) Radial crushing response of ex-situ foam-filled tubes at elevated temperatures. Compos Struct 277:114634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11463410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114634 ↗
30. Linul E, Pietras D, Sadowski T, Marşavina L, Rajak DK, Kovacik J (2021) Crashworthiness performance of lightweight composite metallic foams at high temperatures. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 149:106516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10651610.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106516 ↗
31. Linul E, Khezrzadeh O (2021) Axial crashworthiness performance of foam-based composite structures under extreme temperature conditions. Compos Struct 271:114156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11415610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114156 ↗
32. Khezrzadeh O, Mirzaee O, Emadoddin E, Linul E (2020) Anisotropic compressive behavior of metallic foams under extreme temperature conditions. Materials 13:2329. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1310232910.3390/ma13102329 ↗
33. Krupp U, Ohrndorf A, Guillén T, Christ H-J, Demiray S, Becker W, Hohe J (2006) Isothermal and thermomechanical fatigue behavior of open-cell metal sponges: experimental analysis and homogenization modeling. Adv Eng Mater 8:821–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20060008110.1002/adem.200600081 ↗
34. Chen S, Marx J, Rabiei A (2016) Experimental and computational studies on the thermal behavior and fire retardant properties of composite metal foams. Int J Therm Sci 106:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.03.00510.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.03.005 ↗
35. Amoafo-Yeboah N, Rabiei A (2024) Thermal emissivity and heat capacity of composite metal foam. J Compos Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs806020210.3390/jcs8060202 ↗
36. Chacko Z, Amoafo-Yeboah N, Cance J, Rabiei A (2023) A computational and experimental approach to evaluate thermal conductivity and diffusivity of steel composite metal foam. J Therm Anal Calorim 148:11589–11606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12515-410.1007/s10973-023-12515-4 ↗
37. Amoafo-Yeboah N, Rabiei A (2023) Thermal response of Steel-Steel composite metal foams under small-scale torch-fire conditions. Adv Eng Mater 25:2300217. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20230021710.1002/adem.202300217 ↗
38. Rabiei A, Karimpour K, Basu D, Janssens M (2020) Steel-steel composite metal foam in simulated pool fire testing. Int J Therm Sci 153:106336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.10633610.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106336 ↗
39. Chacko Z, Yeboah NA, Rabiei A (2025) A study on thermal expansion and thermomechanical behavior of composite metal foams. Adv Eng Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20240287110.1002/adem.202402871 ↗
40. Chacko Z, Cance J, Rabiei A (2025) Evaluating elastic modulus and energy absorption efficiency of composite metal foam using computational and experimental approaches. J Mater Sci 60:7942–7964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-025-10905-710.1007/s10853-025-10905-7 ↗
41. Afshan S, Arrayago Luquin I, Gardner L, Gedge G, Jandera M, Real Saladrigas E, Rossi B, Stranghoner N, Zhao O (2017) Design manual for structural stainless steel. Steel construction Institute publications
42. Gardner L, Ng KT (2006) Temperature development in structural stainless steel sections exposed to fire. Fire Saf J 41:185–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.11.00910.1016/j.firesaf.2005.11.009 ↗
43. Zhao MD, Fan X, Fang Q-Z, Wang TJ (2015) Experimental investigation of the fatigue of closed-cell aluminum alloy foam. Mater Lett 160:68–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.04010.1016/j.matlet.2015.07.040 ↗
44. McCullough F (2000) The stress–life fatigue behaviour of aluminium alloy foams. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 23:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00261.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00261.x ↗
45. Zhao M, Fan X, Wang TJ (2016) Fatigue damage of closed-cell aluminum alloy foam: modeling and mechanisms. Int J Fatigue 87:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.02.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.02.009 ↗
46. Taherishargh M, Katona B, Fiedler T, Orbulov IN (2017) Fatigue properties of expanded perlite/aluminum syntactic foams. J Compos Mater 51:773–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831665430510.1177/0021998316654305 ↗
47. International Organization for Standardization (2011) ISO 13314:2011 Mechanical testing of metals: ductility testing—compression test for porous and cellular metals (ISO standard No. 13314:2011(E)). In: international organization for standardization 2011
48. Sugimura Y, Rabiei A, Evans AG, Harte AM, Fleck NA (1999) Compression fatigue of a cellular Al alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 269:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00147-110.1016/S0921-5093(99)00147-1 ↗
49. Hill AC, Hales R (1978) The oxidation of type 316 stainless steel in low pressure oxygen at temperatures between 873 and 1223 K. Mater Corros 29:172–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.1978029030310.1002/maco.19780290303 ↗
50. Huang X, Xiao K, Fang X, Xiong Z, Wei L, Zhu P, Li X (2020) Oxidation behavior of 316L austenitic stainless steel in high temperature air with long-term exposure. Mater Res Express 7:066517. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab96fa10.1088/2053-1591/ab96fa ↗
51. Pumps S (2010) Materials and corrosion. Centrifugal pump handbook. Elsevier, London, pp 227–25010.1016/B978-0-7506-8612-9.00008-5 ↗
52. Chung ON, Chung S (2003) Scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy studies of the oxide nanofilms on the stainless steel surface. J Vac Sci Technol B Microelectron Nanometer Struct Process Meas Phenom 21:1297–1300. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.158084110.1116/1.1580841 ↗
53. Cho B, Moon S, Chung S, Kim K, Kang T, Koo B (2001) Characterization of the diffusion properties of chromium in stainless-steel oxides by photoemission spectroscopy. J Vac Sci Technol A: Vac Surf Films 19:998–1003. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.136883710.1116/1.1368837 ↗
54. Gerland M, Alain R, Ait Saadi B, Mendez J (1997) Low cycle fatigue behaviour in vacuum of a 316L-type austenitic stainless steel between 20 and 600 °C: part II—dislocation structure evolution and correlation with cyclic behaviour. Mater Sci Eng, A 229:68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(96)10560-810.1016/S0921-5093(96)10560-8 ↗
55. Yin P, Zhang W, Yang Q, Chen X, Liang F, Chang L, Zhou C (2024) Insight into the role of thermal on the thermomechanical fatigue properties and microstructural damage mechanism of 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 900:146382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2024.14638210.1016/j.msea.2024.146382 ↗
56. Weiss J, Pineau A (1993) Fatigue and creep-fatigue damage of austenitic stainless steels under multiaxial loading. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 24:2247–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264859910.1007/BF02648599 ↗
57. Hong S-G, Lee S-B, Byun T-S (2007) Temperature effect on the low-cycle fatigue behavior of type 316L stainless steel: cyclic non-stabilization and an invariable fatigue parameter. Mater Sci Eng A 457:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.03510.1016/j.msea.2006.12.035 ↗
58. Alain R, Violan P, Mendez J (1997) Low cycle fatigue behavior in vacuum of a 316L type austenitic stainless steel between 20 and 600 °C part I: fatigue resistance and cyclic behavior. Mater Sci Eng A 229:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(96)10558-X10.1016/S0921-5093(96)10558-X ↗
59. Valsan M, Nagesha A (2010) Low cycle fatigue and creep-fatigue interaction behaviour of 316L(N) stainless steel and its welds. Trans Indian Inst Met 63:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-010-0029-610.1007/s12666-010-0029-6 ↗
60. Gao N, Brown MW, Miller KJ (1995) Crack growth morphology and microstructural changes in 316 stainless steel under creep-fatigue cycling. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 18:1407–1422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00865.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00865.x ↗
61. Yin P, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Yang Q, Liang F, Chang L, Zhou C (2023) Cyclic deformation mechanism and fracture behaviour of 316L stainless steel under thermomechanical fatigue loading. J Mater Res Technol 24:4484–4499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.11310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.113 ↗
62. Levaillant C, Pineau A (1982) Assessment of high-temperature low-cycle fatigue life of austenitic stainless steels by using intergranular damage as a correlating parameter. In: low-cycle fatigue and life prediction. ASTM international100 barr harbor drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959, pp 169–19310.1520/STP32428S ↗
63. Li B, Zheng Y, Shi S, Liu Y, Li Y, Chen X (2019) Microcrack initiation mechanisms of 316LN austenitic stainless steel under in-phase thermomechanical fatigue loading. Mater Sci Eng, A 752:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.02.07710.1016/j.msea.2019.02.077 ↗
64. Yang W, Cheng P, Li Y, Wang R, Liu G, Xin L, Zhang J, Li D, Zhang H, Sun J (2023) Dynamic strain aging-mediated temperature dependence of ratcheting behavior in a 316LN austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 862:144503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14450310.1016/j.msea.2022.144503 ↗
65. Jozaghi T, Samimi P, Chumlyakov Y, Karaman I (2022) Role of thermally-stable deformation twins on the high-temperature mechanical response of an austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 845:143199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14319910.1016/j.msea.2022.143199 ↗
66. Pham MS, Dovgyy B, Hooper PA (2017) Twinning induced plasticity in austenitic stainless steel 316L made by additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Eng A 704:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.08210.1016/j.msea.2017.07.082 ↗
67. Mariappan K, Shankar V, Sandhya R, Bhaduri AK, Laha K (2016) A comparative evaluation of the effect of low cycle fatigue and creep-fatigue interaction on surface morphology and tensile properties of 316L(N) stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A 47:1575–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-3270-010.1007/s11661-015-3270-0 ↗