journal article·2025-11

First-principles calculation study on the segregation behaviors and strengthening effect of multiple solutes at the grain boundary of aluminum

Xuan Zhang, Liang Zhang, Xiaoxu Huang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 42
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Huang X, Hansen N, Tsuji N (2006) Hardening by annealing and softening by deformation in nanostructured metals. Science 312(5771):249–25110.1126/science.1124268 ↗
2. Liu Q, Huang X, Lloyd DJ, Hansen N (2002) Microstructure and strength of commercial purity aluminium (AA 1200) cold-rolled to large strains. Acta Mater 50(15):3789–380210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00174-X ↗
3. Ovid’ko IA, Valiev RZ, Zhu YT (2018) Review on superior strength and enhanced ductility of metallic nanomaterials. Prog Mater Sci 94:462–54010.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.002 ↗
4. Meyers MA, Mishra A, Benson DJ (2006) Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 51(4):427–55610.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
5. Zhang L, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Huang X (2022) Computational simulation of grain boundary segregation of solute atoms in nanocrystalline metals. J Mater Res Technol 21:161–18510.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.174 ↗
6. Masuda T, Sauvage X, Hirosawa S, Horita Z (2020) Achieving highly strengthened Al–Cu–Mg alloy by grain refinement and grain boundary segregation. Mater Sci Eng, A 793:13966810.1016/j.msea.2020.139668 ↗
7. Chen X, Wang W, Yang H, Huang G, Xia D, Tang A, Jiang B, Han HN, Pan F (2022) Microstructure evolution, mechanical properties and deformation characteristics of ultrafine-grained annealed pure aluminum. Mater Sci Eng, A 846:14332010.1016/j.msea.2022.143320 ↗
8. Weertman JR (2012) Retaining the nano in nanocrystalline alloys. Science 337(6097):921–92210.1126/science.1226724 ↗
9. Hu J, Shi YN, Sauvage X, Sha G, Lu K (2017) Grain boundary stability governs hardening and softening in extremely fine nanograined metals. Science 355(6331):1292–129610.1126/science.aal5166 ↗
10. Iii CEK, Ehrhardt H, Birringer R (2005) Thermodynamic stabilization of nanocrystallinity. Int J Mater Res 96(10):1134–114110.1515/ijmr-2005-0196 ↗
11. Liu F, Kirchheim R (2004) Nano-scale grain growth inhibited by reducing grain boundary energy through solute segregation. J Cryst Growth 264(1):385–39110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.12.021 ↗
12. Detor AJ, Schuh CA (2007) Microstructural evolution during the heat treatment of nanocrystalline alloys. J Mater Res 22(11):3233–324810.1557/JMR.2007.0403 ↗
13. Detor AJ, Schuh CA (2007) Grain boundary segregation, chemical ordering and stability of nanocrystalline alloys: atomistic computer simulations in the Ni–W system. Acta Mater 55(12):4221–423210.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.024 ↗
14. Raabe D, Herbig M, Sandlöbes S, Li Y, Tytko D, Kuzmina M, Ponge D, Choi PP (2014) Grain boundary segregation engineering in metallic alloys: a pathway to the design of interfaces. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 18(4):253–26110.1016/j.cossms.2014.06.002 ↗
15. Zhang L, Mao W, Liu M, Shibuta Y (2020) Mechanical response and plastic deformation of coherent twin boundary with perfect and defective structures. Mech Mater 141:10326610.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103266 ↗
16. Li Y, Raabe D, Herbig M, Choi PP, Goto S, Kostka A, Yarita H, Borchers C, Kirchheim R (2014) Segregation stabilizes nanocrystalline bulk steel with near theoretical strength. Phys Rev Lett 113(10):10610410.1103/PhysRevLett.113.106104 ↗
17. Yang A, Liu Y-J, Wang C, Gao Y, Chen P, Ju H, Guo W-J, Ning H, Guan K, Wang H-Y (2024) Enhanced grain boundary cohesion mediated by solute segregation in a dilute Mg alloy with improved crack tolerance and strength. Int J Plast 176:10395010.1016/j.ijplas.2024.103950 ↗
18. Zhou K, Wang L, Zhao Y, Jin S, Mao Q, Shi S, Ma L, Zhang R, Liu J (2025) Strong and thermally stable nanocrystalline Cu–Al alloy via Al segregation. Int J Extreme Manuf 7(2):02510110.1088/2631-7990/ad9367 ↗
19. Zha M, Zhang H-M, Meng X-T, Jia H-L, Jin S-B, Sha G, Wang H-Y, Li Y-J, Roven HJ (2021) Stabilizing a severely deformed Al–7Mg alloy with a multimodal grain structure via Mg solute segregation. J Mater Sci Technol 89:141–14910.1016/j.jmst.2021.01.086 ↗
20. Feng M, Wu Q, Xue J, Luo Z, Wang Z, An X, Liao X, Li J, Jin S, Sha G (2024) High-pressure-torsion-induced segregation, precipitation and grain refinement of Al-(Si, Mg and Cu) binary alloys. J Mater Sci Technol 199:102–11310.1016/j.jmst.2024.02.046 ↗
21. Xu J-Y, Zhang C, Liu L-X, Guo R, Sun M-J, Liu L (2023) Achieving high strength in laser powder-bed fusion processed AlFeCuZr alloy via dual-nanoprecipitations and grain boundary segregation. J Mater Sci Technol 137:56–6610.1016/j.jmst.2022.07.033 ↗
22. Yang R, Feng Z, Huang T, Wu G, Godfrey A, Huang X (2022) Unprecedented age-hardening and its structural requirement in a severely deformed Al–Cu–Mg alloy. Scripta Mater 206:11424010.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114240 ↗
23. Liu Y, Liu M, Chen X, Cao Y, Roven HJ, Murashkin M, Valiev RZ, Zhou H (2019) Effect of Mg on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Mg alloys produced by high pressure torsion. Scripta Mater 159:137–14110.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.09.033 ↗
24. Shuai L, Huang T, Yu T, Wu G, Hansen N, Huang X (2021) Segregation and precipitation stabilizing an ultrafine lamellar-structured Al-0.3% Cu alloy. Acta Mater 206:11659510.1016/j.actamat.2020.116595 ↗
25. Chen Y, Gao N, Sha G, Ringer SP, Starink MJ (2016) Microstructural evolution, strengthening and thermal stability of an ultrafine-grained Al–Cu–Mg alloy. Acta Mater 109:202–21210.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.050 ↗
26. Jiang DM, Wang CL, Yu J, Gao ZZ, Shao YT, Hu ZM (2003) Cleavage and intergranular fracture in Al–Mg alloys. Scripta Mater 49(5):387–39210.1016/S1359-6462(03)00304-X ↗
27. Liu Z, Luo Z, Zhang X, Feng Y, Yang J (2025) Study on Mg segregation, microstructure evolution and fracture behavior of hot-press sintered (TiC+B4C)/6061Al composites after T4 heat treatment. J Mater Res Technol 34:311–32710.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.038 ↗
28. Song RG, Tseng MK, Zhang BJ, Liu J, Jin ZH, Shin KS (1996) Grain boundary segregation and hydrogen-induced fracture in 7050 aluminium alloy. Acta Mater 44(8):3241–324810.1016/1359-6454(95)00406-8 ↗
29. Zhang L, Lu C, Tieu K (2016) A review on atomistic simulation of grain boundary behaviors in face-centered cubic metals. Comput Mater Sci 118:180–19110.1016/j.commatsci.2016.03.021 ↗
30. Wang F, Wu H-H, Zhou X, Bai P, Shang C, Wang S, Wu G, Gao J, Zhao H, Zhang C, Mao X (2024) First-principle study on the segregation and strengthening behavior of solute elements at grain boundary in BCC iron. J Mater Sci Technol 189:247–26110.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.005 ↗
31. Wang F, Zhang X, Zhang C, Zhou X, Wu H-H, Dong L, Zhu Y, Wang S, Gao J, Zhao H, Huang Y, Lu H, Guo A, Mao X (2024) Effect of alloy element on hydrogen-induced grain boundary embrittlement in BCC iron. J Mater Res Technol 33:9439–944710.1016/j.jmrt.2024.11.264 ↗
32. Zhang L, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Shibuta Y, Huang X (2024) Structural evolution and mechanical response of multiple Al Σ5(210) grain boundaries with segregation of solute atoms: first-principles study. Materialia 37:10219310.1016/j.mtla.2024.102193 ↗
33. Li H, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Huang Y, Liu Y (2022) Co-segregation behavior and weakening effect of the major elements in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu series alloys on Al Σ3(111)[110] symmetrical tilt grain boundary: a first-principles study. J Mater Res Technol 18:3158–317210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.161 ↗
34. Liao Z, Zhang L, Hou X, Huang X (2025) Grain boundary segregation of solutes and associated plastic deformation mechanisms in nanocrystalline Al–Cu and Al–Mg alloys: a molecular dynamics study. J Mater Res Technol 35:25–3610.1016/j.jmrt.2025.01.018 ↗
35. Razumovskiy VI, Ruban AV, Razumovskii IM, Lozovoi AY, Butrim VN, Vekilov YK (2011) The effect of alloying elements on grain boundary and bulk cohesion in aluminum alloys: an ab initio study. Scripta Mater 65(10):926–92910.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.014 ↗
36. Zhang S, Kontsevoi O, Freeman A, Olson G (2012) Cohesion enhancing effect of magnesium in aluminum grain boundary: a first-principles determination. Appl Phys Lett. 10010.1063/1.4725512 ↗
37. Zhang S, Kontsevoi OY, Freeman AJ, Olson GB (2010) Sodium-induced embrittlement of an aluminum grain boundary. Phys Rev B 82(22):22410710.1103/PhysRevB.82.224107 ↗
38. Zhao D, Løvvik OM, Marthinsen K, Li Y (2018) Segregation of Mg, Cu and their effects on the strength of Al Σ5 (210)[001] symmetrical tilt grain boundary. Acta Mater 145:235–24610.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.023 ↗
39. Hu J, Xiao Z, Huang Y (2021) Segregation of solute elements and their effects on the strength of Al Σ5 (210) [001] symmetrical tilt grain boundary in 2219 alloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 800:14026110.1016/j.msea.2020.140261 ↗
40. Xiao Z, Hu J, Zhang X, Huang Y (2020) Uncovering the Zr segregation behavior and its effect on the fracture strength of Al Σ5 (210) [100] symmetrical tilt grain boundary: insight from first principles calculation. Mater Today Commun 25:10126810.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101268 ↗
41. Yu X, Xie H, Zhao D, Shi C, He C, Liu E, Sha J, Zhao N (2022) On the affected strength of Al grain boundaries by Zn segregation: a first-principles interpretation. Comput Mater Sci 212:11160410.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111604 ↗
42. Zhang X, Wan Y, Chen C, Zhang L (2024) The effect of solute elements co-segregation on grain boundary energy and the mechanical properties of aluminum by first-principles calculation. Nanomaterials 14(22):180310.3390/nano14221803 ↗
43. Zhang X, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Huang X (2023) Effect of solute atoms segregation on Al grain boundary energy and mechanical properties by first-principles study. Mech Mater 185:10477510.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104775 ↗
44. Jiang S, Chen J, Lu T, Long Y, Sun K (2012) Correlation of the atomic and electronic structures and the optical properties of the Σ5(210)/[001] symmetric tilt grain boundary in yttrium aluminum garnet. Acta Mater 60(20):7041–705010.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.011 ↗
45. Zhang X, Zhang L, Wan Y, Shibuta Y, Huang X (2024) Predicting the grain boundary segregation energy of solute atoms in aluminum by first-principles calculation and machine learning. Mater Today Commun 41:11032610.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110326 ↗
46. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mater Sci 6(1):15–5010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
47. Blochl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 50:17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
48. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59(3):1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
49. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77(18):3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
50. Chadi JD (1977) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 16(4):1746–174710.1103/PhysRevB.16.1746 ↗
51. Blöchl PE, Jepsen O, Andersen OK (1994) Improved tetrahedron method for brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter 49(23):1622310.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
52. Rose JH, Ferrante J, Smith JR (1981) Universal binding energy curves for metals and bimetallic interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 47(9):675–67810.1103/PhysRevLett.47.675 ↗
53. Sha G, Yao L, Liao X, Ringer SP, Duan ZC, Langdon TG (2011) Segregation of solute elements at grain boundaries in an ultrafine grained Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Ultramicroscopy 111(6):500–50510.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.013 ↗
54. Liu XY, Liu CL, Borucki LJ (1999) A new investigation of copper’s role in enhancing Al–Cu interconnect electromigration resistance from an atomistic view. Acta Mater 47(11):3227–323110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00186-X ↗
55. Sigle W, Richter G, Rühle M, Schmidt S (2006) Insight into the atomic-scale mechanism of liquid metal embrittlement. Appl Phys Lett. 89(12)10.1063/1.2356322 ↗
56. Cunningham WS, Shin J, Lei T, Rupert TJ, Gianola DS (2023) High-throughput assessment of the microstructural stability of segregation-engineered nanocrystalline Al–Ni–Y alloys. Materialia 32:10194010.1016/j.mtla.2023.101940 ↗
57. Wu YF, Zhong YM, Xu W, Li XY (2022) Deformation induced grain boundary segregation and thermal stability of nanolaminated Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater Lett 315:13193010.1016/j.matlet.2022.131930 ↗
58. Huang Z, Chen F, Shen Q, Zhang L, Rupert TJ (2018) Uncovering the influence of common nonmetallic impurities on the stability and strength of a Σ5 (310) grain boundary in Cu. Acta Mater 148:110–12210.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.058 ↗
59. Wu X, You Y-W, Kong X-S, Chen J-L, Luo GN, Lu G-H, Liu CS, Wang Z (2016) First-principles determination of grain boundary strengthening in tungsten: dependence on grain boundary structure and metallic radius of solute. Acta Mater 120:315–32610.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.048 ↗
60. Huang Z, Wang P, Chen F, Shen Q, Zhang L (2020) Understanding solute effect on grain boundary strength based on atomic size and electronic interaction. Sci Rep 10(1):1685610.1038/s41598-020-74065-1 ↗
61. Tang W, Sanville E, Henkelman G (2009) A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J Phys Condens Matter 21(8):08420410.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 ↗
62. Millett PC, Selvam RP, Saxena A (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations of grain size stabilization in nanocrystalline materials by addition of dopants. Acta Mater 54(2):297–30310.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.024 ↗
63. Millett PC, Selvam RP, Bansal S, Saxena A (2005) Atomistic simulation of grain boundary energetics–effects of dopants. Acta Mater 53(13):3671–367810.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.031 ↗
64. Messmer RP, Briant CL (1982) The role of chemical bonding in grain boundary embrittlement. Acta Metall 30(2):457–46710.1016/0001-6160(82)90226-7 ↗
65. Geng WT, Freeman AJ, Wu R, Geller CB, Raynolds JE (1999) Embrittling and strengthening effects of hydrogen, boron, and phosphorus on a Σ5 nickel grain boundary. Phys Rev B 60(10):7149–715510.1103/PhysRevB.60.7149 ↗
66. Thomson DI, Heine V, Payne MC, Marzari N, Finnis MW (2000) Insight into gallium behavior in aluminum grain boundaries from calculation on Σ=11 (113) boundary. Acta Mater 48(14):3623–363210.1016/S1359-6454(00)00175-0 ↗
67. Wang W, Pan Q, Lin G, Yu Y, Wang X, Liu Y, Sun Y, Ye J, Huang Z, Xiang S, Jiang F, Li J, Liu B (2021) Internal friction and heat resistance of Al, Al–Ce, Al–Ce–Zr and Al–Ce–(Sc)–(Y) aluminum alloys with high strength and high electrical conductivity. J Mater Res Technol 14:1255–127410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.054 ↗
68. Abd El-Aty A, Xu Y, Guo X, Zhang SH, Ma Y, Chen D (2018) Strengthening mechanisms, deformation behavior, and anisotropic mechanical properties of Al–Li alloys: a review. J Adv Res 10:49–6710.1016/j.jare.2017.12.004 ↗
69. Plotkowski A, Rios O, Sridharan N, Sims Z, Unocic K, Ott RT, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2017) Evaluation of an Al–Ce alloy for laser additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 126:507–51910.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.065 ↗
70. Michi RA, Sisco K, Bahl S, Yang Y, Poplawsky JD, Allard LF, Dehoff RR, Plotkowski A, Shyam A (2022) A creep-resistant additively manufactured Al–Ce–Ni–Mn alloy. Acta Mater 227:11769910.1016/j.actamat.2022.117699 ↗