Isolated effects of reverted austenite and precipitates on the mechanical properties of an additive-manufactured 18Ni maraging steel
Source abstract
Abstract
The main characteristic of maraging steels is the combination of high strength with high toughness, which can be achieved through heat treatment cycles. Heat treatment of maraging steels is critical due to their high fraction of alloying elements such as nickel, molybdenum, cobalt, and titanium. When heated, this super-saturated solid solution system undergoes intermetallic precipitation by spinodal reaction or nucleation, growth, and martensite-to-austenite transformation. However, the literature is unclear about the predominant effect of intermetallic precipitates or reversed austenite transformation on the properties: a drop in toughness due to intermetallic precipitation or an increase in toughness and ductility due to austenite reversion. This work proposes a study to distinguish the effects of quick posterior solubilization after heat treatments on the tensile and toughness properties, obtaining a martensitic matrix with reverted austenite but without intermetallic precipitates of an additive-manufactured 18Ni maraging steel. Therefore, this study offers a novel approach to isolating the effects of intermetallic precipitates and reverted austenite by applying a rapid solubilization treatment. Furthermore, X-ray diffraction was performed before and after the tensile tests to study the austenite-to-martensite transformation after plastic deformation. The present study's findings reveal that reverted austenite is relevant for toughening and increasing ductility of the steel without intermetallic precipitates, leading to ultimate strength near 1100 MPa and 13.5% strain. Furthermore, 480 °C/3 h peak aged condition presented a CTOD value of 3.3 µm, as-built of 25 µm, contrasting to¿~¿90 µm from quick solubilized samples. However, when the microstructure is subjected to heat treatments that develop fine intermetallics, the precipitates play the major and leading role in the mechanical strength of maraging steels, dominating all the aspects of the mechanical behavior of the part, even in the presence of reverted austenite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Decker RF, Novak CJ, Landig TW (1967) Developments and projected trends in maraging steels. J Met. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0337865710.1007/BF03378657 ↗
2. Decker RF, Eash JTT, Goldman AJJ (1962) 18% Nickel Maraging Steel. Transaction of ASM 55:58–76
3. ASM Handbook Committee, ASM Handbook. Heat Treating. Vol 4., ASM International, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0576(03)90166-8.10.1016/S0026-0576(03)90166-8 ↗
4. Sha W, Guo Z (2009) Maraging steels: Modelling of microstructure, properties and applications. Woodhead Publishing limited10.1533/9781845696931 ↗
5. Dementyev VB, Sukhikh AA, Makhneva TM (2015) On problem of increasing the structural strength of maraging steels. Inorg Mater Appl Res 6:343–349. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207511331504006110.1134/S2075113315040061 ↗
6. Viswanathan UK, Kishore R, Asundi MK (1996) Effect of thermal cycling on the mechanical properties of 350-grade maraging steel. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 27A:757–76110.1007/BF02648963 ↗
7. Viswanathan UK, Dey GK, Sethumadhavan V (2005) Effects of austenite reversion during overageing on the mechanical properties of 18 Ni (350) maraging steel. Mater Sci Eng A 398:367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.03.07410.1016/j.msea.2005.03.074 ↗
8. Viswanathan UK, Dey GK, Asundi MK (1993) Precipitation hardening in 350 grade maraging steel. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 24:2429–2442. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264652210.1007/BF02646522 ↗
9. Sukhikh AA, Makhneva TM, Dement’ev VB (2019) Austenite in nanostructured maraging steel. Inorg Mater Appl Res 10:966–973. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207511331904041510.1134/S2075113319040415 ↗
10. Moshka O, Pinkas M, Brosh E, Ezersky V, Meshi L (2015) Addressing the issue of precipitates in maraging steels - unambiguous answer. Mater Sci Eng A 638:232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.06710.1016/j.msea.2015.04.067 ↗
11. Makhneva TM, Sukhikh AA, Dement’ev VB (2017) Inverse martensitic α → γ transformation in nanostructured maraging steels. Met Sci Heat Treat 59:473–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11041-017-0174-110.1007/s11041-017-0174-1 ↗
12. de Carvalho LG, Andrade MS, Plaut RL, Souza FM, Padilha AF (2013) A dilatometric study of the phase transformations in 300 and 350 steels during continuous heating rates. Mater Res 16:740–744. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-1439201300500006910.1590/S1516-14392013005000069 ↗
13. Viswanathan UK, Kutty TRG, Ganguly C (1993) Dilatometric technique for evaluation of the kinetics of solid-state transformation of maraging steel. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 24:2653–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0265948910.1007/BF02659489 ↗
14. Souza Filho IR, Kwiatkowski da Silva A, Sandim MJR, Ponge D, Gault B, Sandim HRZ, Raabe D (2019) Martensite to austenite reversion in a high-Mn steel: Partitioning-dependent two-stage kinetics revealed by atom probe tomography, in-situ magnetic measurements and simulation. Acta Mater 166:178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.04610.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.046 ↗
15. Raabe D, Ponge D, Dmitrieva O, Sander B (2009) Designing ultrahigh strength steels with good ductility by combining transformation induced plasticity and martensite aging. Adv Eng Mater 11:547–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20090006110.1002/adem.200900061 ↗
16. Antolovich SD, Risbeck TR, Saxena A, Kawabe Y (1980) The effect of microstructure on the fracture toughness of 300 and 350 grade maraging steels. Eng Fract Mech 13:717–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(80)90004-110.1016/0013-7944(80)90004-1 ↗
17. Dmitrieva O, Ponge D, Inden G, Millán J, Choi P, Sietsma J, Raabe D (2011) Chemical gradients across phase boundaries between martensite and austenite in steel studied by atom probe tomography and simulation. Acta Mater 59:364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.04210.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.042 ↗
18. Conde FF, Escobar JD, Oliveira JP, Jardini AL, Bose Filho WW, Avila JA (2019) Austenite reversion kinetics and stability during tempering of an additively manufactured maraging 300 steel. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10080410.1016/j.addma.2019.100804 ↗
19. Shirazi H, Miyamoto G, Hossein Nedjad S, Chiba T, Nili Ahmadabadi M, Furuhara T (2018) Microstructure evolution during austenite reversion in Fe-Ni martensitic alloys. Acta Mater 144:269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.06810.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.068 ↗
20. Niessen F (2018) Austenite reversion in low-carbon martensitic stainless steels–a CALPHAD-assisted review. Mater Sci Technol 34:1401–1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2018.144917910.1080/02670836.2018.1449179 ↗
21. Takata N, Ito Y, Nishida R, Suzuki A, Kobashi M, Kato M (2023) Austenite reversion behavior of maraging steel additive-manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. ISIJ Int. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-04510.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-045 ↗
22. Jägle EA, Choi P, Van Humbeeck J, Raabe D (2014) Precipitation and austenite reversion behavior of a maraging steel produced by selective laser melting. J Mater Res 29:2072–2079. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2014.20410.1557/jmr.2014.204 ↗
23. Kuzmina M, Ponge D, Raabe D (2015) Grain boundary segregation engineering and austenite reversion turn embrittlement into toughness: example of a 9 wt.% medium Mn steel. Acta Mater 86:182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.02110.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.021 ↗
24. Feitosa ALM, Escobar J, Ribamar GG, Avila JA, Padilha AF (2022) Direct Observation of Austenite Reversion During Aging of 18Ni (350 Grade) Maraging Steel Through In-Situ Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 53:420–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-021-06496-y10.1007/s11661-021-06496-y ↗
25. Conde FF, Escobar JD, Rodriguez J, Afonso CRM, Oliveira MF, Avila JA (2021) Effect of combined tempering and aging in the austenite reversion, precipitation, and tensile properties of an additively manufactured maraging 300 steel. J Mater Eng Perform 30:4925–4936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05553-210.1007/s11665-021-05553-2 ↗
26. Casati R, Lemke JN, Tuissi A, Vedani M (2016) Aging behaviour and mechanical performance of 18-Ni 300 steel processed by selective laser melting. Metals 6:218. https://doi.org/10.3390/met609021810.3390/met6090218 ↗
27. Jägle EA, Sheng Z, Kürnsteiner P, Ocylok S, Weisheit A, Raabe D, Conventionally NP, Manufacturing LA (2017) Comparison of maraging steel micro- and nanostructure produced conventionally and by laser additive manufacturing. Materials 10:8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1001000810.3390/ma10010008 ↗
28. Conde FF, Escobar JD, Oliveira JP, Béreš M, Jardini AL, Bose WW, Bose Filho WW, Avila JA (2019) Effect of thermal cycling and aging stages on the microstructure and bending strength of a selective laser melted 300-grade maraging steel. Mater Sci Eng A 758:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.03.12910.1016/j.msea.2019.03.129 ↗
29. Vylezhnev VP, Kokovyakina SA, Simonov YN, Sukhikh AA (2011) Elevation of Reliability Characteristics of Maraging Steel 03N18K9M5T by Creating a “Nanotriplex”-Type Structure. Metal Science 52:550–557
30. Pardal JM, Tavares SSM, Terra VF, Silva MRD, Santos DRD (2005) Modeling of precipitation hardening during the aging and overaging of 18Ni-Co-Mo-Ti maraging 300 steel. J Alloys Compd 393:109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.09.04910.1016/j.jallcom.2004.09.049 ↗
31. Raabe D, Ponge D, Dmitrieva O, Sander B (2009) Nanoprecipitate-hardened 1.5 GPa steels with unexpected high ductility. Scr Mater 60:1141–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.06210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.062 ↗
32. Goldberg A (1968) Effects of Repeated Thermal Cycling on the Microstrcuture of 300-Grade Maraging Steel. Transaction of ASM 61:41–51
33. Hou W, Liu Q, Wen H, Gu J (2020) Effect of Cyclic Intercritical Tempering on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Low-Carbon Cu-Bearing 7Ni Steel. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 51:3981–3995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-05811-310.1007/s11661-020-05811-3 ↗
34. Vasudevan VK, Kim SJ, Wayman CM (1990) Precipitation reactions and strengthening behavior in 18 wt pct nickel maraging steels. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 21:2655–2668. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264606110.1007/BF02646061 ↗
35. ASM, ASM Handbook - Heat Treatment, ASM Handbook 4 (1991) 3470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0576(03)90166-8.10.1016/S0026-0576(03)90166-8 ↗
36. Simm TH, Sun L, Galvin DR, Gilbert EP, Alba Venero D, Li Y, Martin TL, Bagot PAJ, Moody MP, Hill P, Bhadeshia HKDH, Birosca S, Rawson MJ, Perkins KM (2017) A SANS and APT study of precipitate evolution and strengthening in a maraging steel. Mater Sci Eng A 702:414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.01310.1016/j.msea.2017.07.013 ↗
37. Feitosa ALM, Ribamar GG, Escobar J, Sonkusare R, Boll T, Coury F, Ávila J, Oliveira JP, Padilha AF (2024) Precipitation and reverted austenite formation in maraging 350 steel: competition or cooperation? Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2024.11986510.1016/j.actamat.2024.119865 ↗
38. ASTM, Standard Practice for X-Ray Determination of Retained Austenite in Steel with Near Random Crystallographic Orientation - ASTM E975–13, ASTM 03 (2009) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0975-13.10.1520/E0975-13 ↗
39. ASTM Standards, ASTM E975–22 Practice for X-Ray Determination of Retained Austenite in Steel with Near Random Crystallographic Orientation, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1520/E0975-22.10.1520/E0975-22 ↗
40. Conde FF, Avila JA, Oliveira JP, Schell N, Oliveira MF, Escobar JD (2021) Effect of the as-built microstructure on the martensite to austenite transformation in a 18Ni maraging steel after laser-based powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10212210.1016/j.addma.2021.102122 ↗
41. ASTM E92–16., Standard Test Methods for Vickers Hardness and Knoop Hardness of Metallic Materials, ASTM Book of Standards 82 (2017) 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0092-16.10.1520/E0092-16 ↗
42. ASTM, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, E8/E8M-24, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M-24.10.1520/E0008_E0008M-24 ↗
43. Qian F, Sharp J, Rainforth WM (2016) Microstructural evolution of Mn-based maraging steels and their influences on mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 674:286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.00610.1016/j.msea.2016.08.006 ↗
44. Li Y, Li W, Li J, Xin S, Min N, Liu W, Zhang C, Jin X (2021) Characterization and 3D finite element modelling of TRIP effect in a medium manganese steel with nano-precipitates. Mater Charact 172:110845. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2020.11084510.1016/J.MATCHAR.2020.110845 ↗
45. Serri J, Martiny M, Ferron G (2005) Finite element analysis of the effects of martensitic phase transformation in TRIP steel sheet forming. Int J Mech Sci 47:884–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMECSCI.2005.02.00110.1016/J.IJMECSCI.2005.02.001 ↗
46. Kannan R, Nandwana P (2020) Insights into the transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) effect in Ti-free grade 300 maraging steel manufactured by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). JOM 72:4187–4195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04425-910.1007/s11837-020-04425-9 ↗
47. Yin S, Chen C, Yan X, Feng X, Jenkins R, O’Reilly P, Liu M, Li H, Lupoi R (2018) The influence of aging temperature and aging time on the mechanical and tribological properties of selective laser melted maraging 18Ni-300 steel. Addit Manuf 22:592–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.00510.1016/j.addma.2018.06.005 ↗
48. Gray V, Galvin D, Sun L, Gilbert EP, Martin T, Hill P, Rawson M, Perkins K (2017) Precipitation in a novel maraging steel F1E : a study of austenitization and aging using small angle neutron scattering. Mater Charact 129:270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.05.00210.1016/j.matchar.2017.05.002 ↗
49. Gray V, Galvin D, Hill P, Rawson M, Perkins K (2018) Impact of targeted chemistries on maraging steel precipitation evolution observed using SANS and APT. Mater Charact 139:208–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.02.04510.1016/j.matchar.2018.02.045 ↗
50. Jägle EA, Sheng Z, Wu L, Lu L, Risse J, Weisheit A, Raabe D (2016) Precipitation reactions in age-hardenable alloys during laser additive manufacturing. JOM 68:943–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1764-210.1007/s11837-015-1764-2 ↗
51. Bodziak S, Al-Rubaie KS, Valentina LD, Lafratta FH, Santos EC, Zanatta AM, Chen Y (2019) Precipitation in 300 grade maraging steel built by selective laser melting: aging at 510 °C for 2 h. Mater Charact 151:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.02.03310.1016/j.matchar.2019.02.033 ↗
52. Santos PLL, Avila JA, da Fonseca EB, Gabriel AHG, Jardini AL, Lopes ÉSN (2022) Plane-strain fracture toughness of thin additively manufactured maraging steel samples. Addit Manuf 49:102509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10250910.1016/j.addma.2021.102509 ↗
53. Tan C, Zhou K, Ma W, Zhang P, Liu M, Kuang T (2017) Microstructural evolution, nanoprecipitation behavior and mechanical properties of selective laser melted high-performance grade 300 maraging steel. Mater Des 134:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.02610.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.026 ↗
54. Santos PLL, Avila JA, da Fonseca EB, Gabriel AHG, Jardini AL, Lopes ÉSN (2022) Plane-strain fracture toughness of thin additively manufactured maraging steel samples. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10250910.1016/j.addma.2021.102509 ↗
55. Sukhikh AA, Dement’ev VB, Makhneva TM (2018) Properties of Austenite in Maraging Steel. Solid State Phenom 284:386–39110.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.284.386 ↗
56. Bhardwaj T, Shukla M (2018) Effect of laser scanning strategies on texture, physical and mechanical properties of laser sintered maraging steel. Mater Sci Eng A 734:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.08910.1016/j.msea.2018.07.089 ↗
57. Bai Y, Yang Y, Wang D, Zhang M (2017) Influence mechanism of parameters process and mechanical properties evolution mechanism of maraging steel 300 by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 703:116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.03310.1016/j.msea.2017.06.033 ↗
58. Cyr E, Lloyd A, Mohammadi M (2018) Tension-compression asymmetry of additively manufactured Maraging steel. J Manuf Process 35:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.01510.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.015 ↗
59. Lehnert R, Weidner A, Schimpf C, Wendler M, Biermann H (2019) Martensite formation during tensile deformation of high-alloy TRIP steel after quenching and partitioning route investigated by digital image correlation. Materialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10049810.1016/j.mtla.2019.100498 ↗
60. Hassanpour-Esfahani M, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi HR, Kim HS, Yim D (2019) The enhancement of transformation induced plasticity effect through preferentially oriented substructure development in a high entropy alloy. Intermetallics (Barking) 109:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2019.03.01310.1016/j.intermet.2019.03.013 ↗
61. Wang M-M, Tasan CC, Ponge D, Kostka A, Raabe D (2014) Smaller is less stable: Size effects on twinning vs. transformation of reverted austenite in TRIP-maraging steels. Acta Mater 79:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.02010.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.020 ↗
62. Wang MM, Tasan CC, Ponge D, Dippel AC, Raabe D (2015) Nanolaminate transformation-induced plasticity-twinning-induced plasticity steel with dynamic strain partitioning and enhanced damage resistance. Acta Mater 85:216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.01010.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.010 ↗
63. Escobar JD, Oliveira JP, Salvador CAF, Tschiptschin AP, Mei PR, Ramirez AJ (2019) Double-step inter-critical tempering of a supermartensitic stainless steel: evolution of hardness, microstructure and elemental partitioning. Mater Charact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.10999410.1016/j.matchar.2019.109994 ↗
64. Escobar JD, Faria GA, Maia EL, Oliveira JP, Boll T, Seils S, Mei PR, Ramirez AJ (2019) Fundamentals of isothermal austenite reversion in a Ti-stabilized 12Cr – 6 Ni – 2 Mo super martensitic stainless steel: thermodynamics versus experimental assessments. Acta Mater 174:246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.02610.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.026 ↗