DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2025-06

Enhanced photoresponse in Mn-doped CuO/ZnO heterojunction photodiodes

Megha Rana, Ankur Rana, Riya Malik, Suraj P. Khanna, R. Srivastava, C. K. Suman

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 24
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Ouyang W, Teng F, He J, Fang X (2019) Enhancing the photoelectric performance of photodetectors based on metal oxide semiconductors by charge-carrier engineering. Adv Funct Mater 29:1807672–1807692. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180767210.1002/adfm.201807672 ↗
2. Sosna-Głębska A, Szczecińska N, Znajdek K, Sibiński M (2019) Review on metallic oxide nanoparticles and their application in optoelectronic devices. Acta Innov. 30:5–15. https://doi.org/10.32933/ActaInnovations.30.110.32933/ActaInnovations.30.1 ↗
3. Abdelazeez AAA, Hadia NMA, Alzaid M et al (2022) Development of CuO nanoporous material as a highly efficient optoelectronic device. Appl Phys A 128:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-05447-710.1007/s00339-022-05447-7 ↗
4. Velsankar K, Parvathy G, Mohandoss S et al (2022) Green synthesis and characterization of CuO nanoparticles using Panicum sumatrense grains extract for biological applications. Appl Nanosci 12:1993–2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02441-610.1007/s13204-022-02441-6 ↗
5. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Felpin F-X et al (2016) Cu and Cu-based nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis. Chem Rev 116:3722–3811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0048210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00482 ↗
6. Woźniak-Budych MJ, Staszak K, Staszak M (2023) Copper and copper-based nanoparticles in medicine—perspectives and challenges. Molecules 28:6687–6702. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2818668710.3390/molecules28186687 ↗
7. Maliki M, Ifijen IH, Ikhuoria EU et al (2022) Copper nanoparticles and their oxides: optical, anticancer and antibacterial properties. Int. Nano Lett. 12:379–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40089-022-00380-210.1007/s40089-022-00380-2 ↗
8. Malook K, Khan H, Ali M, Ihsan-Ul-Haque (2020) Investigation of room temperature humidity sensing performance of mesoporous CuO particles. Mater Sci Semicond Process 113:105021–105030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2020.10502110.1016/j.mssp.2020.105021 ↗
9. Kambale SV, Lokhande BJ (2023) Morphologically modified CuO nanorod structure @ stainless steel as high performing supercapacitor electrode prepared by spray pyrolysis. Mater Chem Phys 295:127166–127177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12716610.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127166 ↗
10. Chang C-J, Lai C-W, Jiang W-C et al (2022) Fabrication and characterization of P-type semiconducting copper oxide-based thin-film photoelectrodes for solar water splitting. Coatings 12:1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1208120610.3390/coatings12081206 ↗
11. Langmar O, Ganivet CR, De La Torre G et al (2016) Optimizing CuO p-type dye-sensitized solar cells by using a comprehensive electrochemical impedance spectroscopic study. Nanoscale 8:17963–17975. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR05507A10.1039/C6NR05507A ↗
12. Shariffar A, Salman H, Siddique TA, Manasreh MO (2021) Effects of high-temperature annealing on the performance of copper oxide photodetectors. Appl Phys A 127:750–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04906-x10.1007/s00339-021-04906-x ↗
13. Jana R, Dey A, Das M et al (2018) Improving performance of device made up of CuO nanoparticles synthesized by hydrothermal over the reflux method. Appl Surf Sci 452:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.26210.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.262 ↗
14. Huang LS, Yang SG, Li T et al (2004) Preparation of large-scale cupric oxide nanowires by thermal evaporation method. J Cryst Growth 260:130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.08.01210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.08.012 ↗
15. Castrejón-Sánchez V-H, Solís AC, López R et al (2019) Thermal oxidation of copper over a broad temperature range: towards the formation of cupric oxide (CuO). Mater. Res. Express 6:075909–075918. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab166210.1088/2053-1591/ab1662 ↗
16. Muthe KP, Vyas JC, Narang SN et al (1998) A study of the CuO phase formation during thin film deposition by molecular beam epitaxy. Thin Solid Films 324:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(97)01203-010.1016/S0040-6090(97)01203-0 ↗
17. Panda R, Patel M, Thomas J, Joshi HC (2022) Pulsed laser deposited Cu2O/CuO films as efficient photocatalyst. Thin Solid Films 744:139080–139087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2022.13908010.1016/j.tsf.2022.139080 ↗
18. Kothiyal GP, Muthe KP, Vyas JC et al (1994) Electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis studies on electron beam evaporated CuOx thin films. Thin Solid Films 249:140–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(94)90751-X10.1016/0040-6090(94)90751-X ↗
19. Jordan MJ, Lechevalier MP (1975) Effects of zinc-smelter emissions on forest soil microflora. Can J Microbiol 21:1855–1865. https://doi.org/10.1139/m75-26910.1139/m75-269 ↗
20. Chiang C-Y, Aroh K, Ehrman SH (2012) Copper oxide nanoparticle made by flame spray pyrolysis for photoelectrochemical water splitting—part I. CuO nanoparticle preparation. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:4871–4879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.03310.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.033 ↗
21. Yuan G-Q, Jiang H-F, Lin C, Liao S-J (2007) Shape- and size-controlled electrochemical synthesis of cupric oxide nanocrystals. J Cryst Growth 303:400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.12.04710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.12.047 ↗
22. Gençyılmaz O, Taşköprü T (2017) Effect of pH on the synthesis of CuO films by SILAR method. J Alloys Compd 695:1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.24710.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.247 ↗
23. Rahnama A, Gharagozlou M (2012) Preparation and properties of semiconductor CuO nanoparticles via a simple precipitation method at different reaction temperatures. Opt. Quantum Electron. 44:313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-011-9540-110.1007/s11082-011-9540-1 ↗
24. Wang Y, Jiang T, Meng D et al (2014) Fabrication of nanostructured CuO films by electrodeposition and their photocatalytic properties. Appl Surf Sci 317:414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.14410.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.144 ↗
25. Aparna Y, Enkateswara Rao KV, Srinivasa Subbarao P (2012) Synthesis and characterization of CuO nano particles by novel sol–gel method. Int. Proc. Chem. Biol. Environ. Eng. 48:156–160. https://doi.org/10.7763/IPCBEE.2012.V48.3010.7763/IPCBEE.2012.V48.30 ↗
26. Anderson TR, Slotkin TA (1975) Maturation of the adrenal medulla–IV. Effects of morphine. Biochem Pharmacol 24:1469–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(75)90020-910.1016/0006-2952(75)90020-9 ↗
27. Rana A, Rana M, Malik R et al (2024) Effect of Cd-doping on optoelectronic properties of ZnO thin films and their application for MAPbI 3 photodetector. Nano Express 5:045005–045017. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-959X/ad846710.1088/2632-959X/ad8467 ↗
28. Durai G, Kuppusami P, Viswanathan K (2018) Investigation on microstructure and improved supercapacitive performance of Mn doped CuO thin films prepared by reactive radio frequency magnetron sputtering. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:2051–2058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8118-510.1007/s10854-017-8118-5 ↗
29. Gülen Y, Bayansal F, Şahin B et al (2013) Fabrication and characterization of Mn-doped CuO thin films by the SILAR method. Ceram Int 39:6475–6480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.07710.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.077 ↗
30. Mote VD, Lokhande SD, Kathwate LH et al (2023) Structural, optical and magnetic properties of Mn-doped CuO nanoparticles by coprecipitation method. Mater Sci Eng B 289:116254–116263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11625410.1016/j.mseb.2022.116254 ↗
31. Wang Y, Jiang T, Meng D et al (2015) Synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic property of feather-like Cd-doped CuO nanostructures by hydrothermal method. Appl Surf Sci 355:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.12210.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.122 ↗
32. Chao Y, Jin Z, Wang A-J et al (2023) Facile synthesis of Mn-doped CuO nanoflower spheres and their enhanced sensing performance for isopropanol. IEEE Sens J 23:9067–9076. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.325841010.1109/JSEN.2023.3258410 ↗
33. Dhaouadi M (2018) Physical properties of copper oxide thin films prepared by sol-gel spin–coating method. Am. J. Phys. Appl. 6:43–50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20180602.1310.11648/j.ajpa.20180602.13 ↗
34. Kim SY, Ahn CH, Lee JH et al (2013) p-Channel oxide thin film transistors using solution-processed copper oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2417–2421. https://doi.org/10.1021/am302251s10.1021/am302251s ↗
35. Akgul FA, Akgul G, Yildirim N et al (2014) Influence of thermal annealing on microstructural, morphological, optical properties and surface electronic structure of copper oxide thin films. Mater Chem Phys 147:987–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.06.04710.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.06.047 ↗
36. Dirar M, Omer FE, Abdelgani R et al (2018) Effect of temperature on I-V characteristic for ZnO/CuO. World J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 08:128–135. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnst.2018.8301110.4236/wjnst.2018.83011 ↗
37. Rana A, Rana M, Malik R et al (2024) Effect of Cd-doping on optoelectronic properties of ZnO thin films and their application for MAPbI3 photodetector. Nano Express 5:045005–045017. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-959X/ad846710.1088/2632-959X/ad8467 ↗
38. Babu MH, Podder J (2021) Bond length controlling opto-structural properties of Mn doped CuO thin films: an experimental and theoretical study. Mater Sci Semicond Process 129:105798–105812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10579810.1016/j.mssp.2021.105798 ↗
39. Tamam N, Aadil M, Hassan W et al (2022) Surfactant assisted synthesis of nanostructured Mn-doped CuO: an efficient photocatalyst for environmental remediation. Ceram Int 48:29589–29600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.21310.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.213 ↗
40. Krafnick RC, García AE (2015) Efficient Schmidt number scaling in dissipative particle dynamics. J Chem Phys 143:243106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493092110.1063/1.4930921 ↗
41. Huang H, Liu Q, Zhang W, Chen Y (2016) Novel π -type vortex in a nanoscale extreme type-II superconductor: induced by quantum-size effect. Phys B Condens Matter 500:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2016.07.01510.1016/j.physb.2016.07.015 ↗
42. Al S, Arikan N, Demir S, Iyigör A (2018) Lattice dynamic properties of Rh 2 XAl (X=Fe and Y) alloys. Phys B Condens Matter 531:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2017.12.02010.1016/j.physb.2017.12.020 ↗
43. Chavent A, Iurchuk V, Tillie L et al (2020) A multifunctional standardized magnetic tunnel junction stack embedding sensor, memory and oscillator functionality. J Magn Magn Mater 505:166647–166653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16664710.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166647 ↗
44. Mariammal RN, Ramachandran K, Kalaiselvan G et al (2013) Effect of magnetism on the ethanol sensitivity of undoped and Mn-doped CuO nanoflakes. Appl Surf Sci 270:545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.08410.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.084 ↗
45. Deepa K, Venkatesha TV (2017) Synthesis and generation of CuO and Mn doped CuO composites and its corrosion behaviour. Mater. Today Proc. 4:12045–12053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.12910.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.129 ↗
46. Oruç Ç, Altındal A (2017) Structural and dielectric properties of CuO nanoparticles. Ceram Int 43:10708–10714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.00610.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.006 ↗
47. Sadiq ZM, Hassan MA, Hassoon KI (2022) Preparation and characterization of CuO nanostructured thin films by chemical bath deposition. J Phys Conf Ser 2322:012088–012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2322/1/01208810.1088/1742-6596/2322/1/012088 ↗
48. Faisal AD, Khalef WK (2017) Morphology and structure of CuO nanostructures grown via thermal oxidation on glass, silicon, and quartz at different oxidation temperatures. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:18903–18912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7844-z10.1007/s10854-017-7844-z ↗
49. Shaaban ER, Hassaan MY, Moustafa MG et al (2020) Sheet resistance–temperature dependence, thermal and electrical analysis of As40S60−xSex thin films. Appl Phys A 126:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-3217-110.1007/s00339-019-3217-1 ↗
50. Daimary S, Ashok P, Dhar JC (2024) GLAD synthesized ZnO nanoparticles decorated CuO thin film for high performance UV detection. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 35:413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-12194-310.1007/s10854-024-12194-3 ↗
51. Wang S-B, Hsiao C-H, Chang S-J et al (2013) ZnO branched nanowires and the p-CuO/n-ZnO heterojunction nanostructured photodetector. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol 12:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNANO.2013.224391610.1109/TNANO.2013.2243916 ↗
52. Pathak P, Chimerad M, Borjian P, Cho HJ (2024) In-situ fabrication of CuO/ZnO heterojunctions at room temperature for a self-powered UV sensor. Mater. Today Commun. 39:109038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10903810.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109038 ↗
53. Rana A, Lalita KSP et al (2023) Investigation of structural, optical, and photo-response properties of photochemical UV assisted CBD-grown CdS thin films. J Electron Mater 52:7302–7314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-023-10638-w10.1007/s11664-023-10638-w ↗
54. Yakout SM, El-Sayed AM (2019) Enhanced ferromagnetic and photocatalytic properties in Mn or Fe doped p-CuO/n-ZnO nanocomposites. Adv Powder Technol 30:2841–2850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2019.08.03310.1016/j.apt.2019.08.033 ↗
55. Yu Z, Moussa H, Liu M et al (2019) Development of photocatalytically active heterostructured MnO/ZnO and CuO/ZnO films via solution precursor plasma spray process. Surf Coat Technol 371:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.02.05310.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.02.053 ↗
56. Li Q, Meng J, Huang J, Li Z (2022) Plasmon-induced pyro-phototronic effect enhancement in self-powered UV–Vis detection with a ZnO/CuO p–n junction device. Adv Funct Mater 32:2108903–2108911. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210890310.1002/adfm.202108903 ↗
57. Fu Q-M, He D-C, Yao Z-C et al (2018) Self-powered ultraviolet photodetector based on ZnO nanorod arrays decorated with sea anemone-like CuO nanostructures. Mater Lett 222:74–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.14710.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.147 ↗
58. Yin Z, Zeng Y, Yang D et al (2023) Multifunctional optoelectronic device based on CuO/ZnO heterojunction structure. J Lumin 257:119762–119772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2023.11976210.1016/j.jlumin.2023.119762 ↗
59. Hasach GA, Al-Salman HS (2024) Influence of the annealing temperature on the self-powered CuO/ZnO NRs heterojunction photodetector. Phys Scr 99:115014–115023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad827910.1088/1402-4896/ad8279 ↗