Designing nickel-based superalloys with high creep life and low thermal expansion coefficient using machine learning assisted by multi-objective optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang ZB, Yang ZB, Lu S, Harte A, Morana R, Preuss M (2020) Strain localisation and failure at twin-boundary complexions in nickel-based superalloys. Nat Commun 11:4890–4891. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18641-z10.1038/s41467-020-18641-z ↗
2. Wu XX, Makineni SK, Liebscher CH et al (2020) Unveiling the Re effect in Ni-based single crystal superalloys. Nat Commun 11:389–391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14062-910.1038/s41467-019-14062-9 ↗
3. Wei BS, Lin Y, Huang ZW, Huang L, Zhou KC, Zhang LF, Zhang LJ (2022) A novel Re-free Ni-based single-crystal superalloy with enhanced creep resistance and microstructure stability. Acta Mater 240:118336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11833610.1016/j.actamat.2022.118336 ↗
4. Liu P, Huang HY, Jiang X, Zhang Y, Omori T, Lookman T, Su YJ (2022) Evolution analysis of γ’precipitate coarsening in Co-based superalloys using kinetic theory and machine learning. Acta Mater 235:118101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11810110.1016/j.actamat.2022.118101 ↗
5. Yuan Y, Gu YF, Osada T, Zhong ZH, Yokokawa T, Harada H (2012) A new method to strengthen turbine disc superalloys at service temperatures. Scripta Mater 66:884–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.02510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.025 ↗
6. Knowles DM, Chen QZ (2003) Superlattice stacking fault formation and twinning during creep in γ/γ′ single crystal superalloy CMSX-4. Mat Sci Eng A 340:88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00172-710.1016/S0921-5093(02)00172-7 ↗
7. Smith TM, Rao Y, Wang Y, Ghazisaeidi M, Mills MJ (2017) Diffusion processes during creep at intermediate temperatures in a Ni-based superalloy. Acta Mater 141:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.02710.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.027 ↗
8. Viswanathan GB, Sarosi PM, Henry MF, Whitis DD, Milligan WW, Mills MJ (2005) Investigation of creep deformation mechanisms at intermediate temperatures in René 88 DT. Acta Mater 53:3041–3057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.01710.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.017 ↗
9. Xu YJ, Du K, Cui CY, Ye HQ (2014) Deformation twinning with zero macroscopic strain in a coarse-grained Ni–Co-based superalloy. Scripta Mater 77:71–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.030 ↗
10. Yuan SY, Jiang ZH, Liu JZ, Tang Y, Zhang Y (2018) Nano-twinning in a γ′ precipitate strengthened Ni-based superalloy. Mater Res Lett 6:683–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2018.153802110.1080/21663831.2018.1538021 ↗
11. Barik RK, Singh AK (2021) Accelerated discovery of the valley-polarized quantum anomalous hall effect in MXenes. Chem Mater 33:6311–6317. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0079810.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00798 ↗
12. Pilania G, Wang CC, Jiang X, Rajasekaran S, Ramprasad R (2013) Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Sci rep 3:2810. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0281010.1038/srep02810 ↗
13. Ramprasad R, Batra R, Pilania G, Kanakkithodi AM (2017) Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. NPJ Comput Mater 3:54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-017-0056-510.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
14. Liu Y, Zhao TL, Ju WW, Shi SQ (2017) Materials discovery and design using machine learning. J Materiomics 3:159–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.00210.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.002 ↗
15. Jiang X, Yin HQ, Zhang C, Zhang RJ, Zhang KQ, Deng ZH, Liu GQ, Qu XH (2018) An materials informatics approach to Ni-based single crystal superalloys lattice misfit prediction. Comp Mater Sci 143:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.06110.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.061 ↗
16. Taylor PL, Conduit G (2022) Machine learning predictions of superalloy microstructure. Comp Mater Sci 201:110916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11091610.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110916 ↗
17. Han HY, Li WD, Antonov S, Li LF (2022) Mapping the creep life of nickel-based SX superalloys in a large compositional space by a two-model linkage machine learning method. Comp Mater Sci 205:111229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11122910.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111229 ↗
18. Crudden DJ, Raeisinia B, Warnken N, Reed RC (2013) Analysis of the chemistry of Ni-base turbine disk superalloys using an alloys-by-design modeling approach. Metall Mater Trans A 44:2418–2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1569-710.1007/s11661-012-1569-7 ↗
19. Wang ZP, Shen Z, Liu Y et al (2024) The effect of LPSO phase on the high-temperature oxidation of a stainless Mg-Y-Al alloy. J Magnes Alloy 12(10):4045–4052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2024.07.00910.1016/j.jma.2024.07.009 ↗
20. Zhou YH, Chen K, Ferreirós PA et al (2025) Printed cellular structure enhancing re-passivation of stress corrosion cracking in high-temperature water. Corros Sci 244:112636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2024.11263610.1016/j.corsci.2024.112636 ↗
21. Chen YW, Ma S, Ju J et al (2025) Phase transformation-mediated high-temperature oxidation in an AlCrFeCoNi2. 1 EHEA alloy at elevated temperature. Corros Sci 245:112674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2025.11267410.1016/j.corsci.2025.112674 ↗
22. Li SJ, Tong ZF, Cheng S et al (2025) Resistance to embrittlement in ferritic/martensitic steel with TaWVCr coating in oxygen-saturated lead-bismuth eutectic at 350° C. Surf Coat Tech 497:131729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2025.13172910.1016/j.surfcoat.2025.131729 ↗
23. Gao DX, Shen Z, Chen K et al (2024) Review of progress in calculation and simulation of high-temperature oxidation. Prog Mater Sci 147:101348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.10134810.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101348 ↗
24. Menou E, Rame J, Desgranges C, Ramstein G, Franck T (2019) Computational design of a single crystal nickel-based superalloy with improved specific creep endurance at high temperature. Comp Mater Sci 170:109194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10919410.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109194 ↗
25. Liu Y, Wu JM, Wang ZC et al (2020) Predicting creep rupture life of Ni-based single crystal superalloys using divide-and-conquer approach based machine learning. Acta Mater 195:454–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.00110.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.001 ↗
26. Tang YF, Zhu GL, Tan QB, Kong DC, Cao YF, Wang R (2024) Discovery of a Ni-based superalloy with low thermal expansion via machine learning. Mater Lett 372:137047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2024.13704710.1016/j.matlet.2024.137047 ↗
27. Singh SK, Mahanta BK, Rawat P, Kumar S (2024) Machine learning-assisted design of high-entropy alloys for optimal strength and ductility. J Alloy Comp 1007:176282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17628210.1016/j.jallcom.2024.176282 ↗
28. Zhou HF, Wang XQ, Zhu RR (2022) Feature selection based on mutual information with correlation coefficient. Appl Intell 52:5457–5474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02524-x10.1007/s10489-021-02524-x ↗
29. Piras D, Peiris HV, Pontzen A, Smith LL, Guo NY, Nord B (2023) A robust estimator of mutual information for deep learning interpretability. Mach Learn-Sci Techn 4:025006. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/acc44410.1088/2632-2153/acc444 ↗
30. Sun L, Yin TY, Ding WP, Qian YH, Xu JC (2020) Multilabel feature selection using ML-ReliefF and neighborhood mutual information for multilabel neighborhood decision systems. Inform Sci 537:401–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.10210.1016/j.ins.2020.05.102 ↗
31. Kusdhany MIM, Lyth SM (2021) New insights into hydrogen uptake on porous carbon materials via explainable machine learning. Carbon 179:190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.03610.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.036 ↗
32. Rodríguez-Pérez R, Bajorath J (2020) Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values: application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions. J comput aid mol Des 34:1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-020-00314-010.1007/s10822-020-00314-0 ↗
33. Zhao YN, Guo QY, Ma ZQ, Yu LM (2020) Comparative study on the microstructure evolution of selective laser melted and wrought IN718 superalloy during subsequent heat treatment process and its effect on mechanical properties Mater. Sci Eng A 791:139735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13973510.1016/j.msea.2020.139735 ↗
34. Zhang MH, Zhang BC, Wen YJ, Qu XH (2022) Research progress on selective laser melting processing for nickel-based superalloy. Int l J Min Met Mater 29:369–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-021-2331-110.1007/s12613-021-2331-1 ↗
35. Sun B, Zhang TB, Song L, Zhang L (2023) Correlation between secondary γ′ and high-temperature tensile behavior of a powder metallurgy nickel-based superalloy EP962NP. Mate Sci Eng A 866:144687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.14468710.1016/j.msea.2023.144687 ↗
36. Chen BQ, Zhuo LC, Xie YX, Huang S, Wang TY, Yan TQ, Gong XF, Wang YL (2024) Comparative study on microstructure, mechanical and high temperature oxidation resistant behaviors of SLM IN718 superalloy before and after heat treatment. J Mater Res Technol 31:1535–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.16310.1016/j.jmrt.2024.06.163 ↗
37. Jebli I, Belouadha FZ, Kabbaj MI, Tilioua A (2021) Prediction of solar energy guided by pearson correlation using machine learning. Energy 224:120109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.12010910.1016/j.energy.2021.120109 ↗
38. Alhowaide A, Alsmadi I, Tang J (2020) Random-forest and pearson correlation for dimensionality reduction in IoT IDS. In: 2020 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS), pp 1–610.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216388 ↗
39. Huang JX, Ando D, Sutou YJ (2024) Heat-resistant aluminum alloy design using explainable machine learning. Mater Design 243:113057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11305710.1016/j.matdes.2024.113057 ↗
40. Fatriansyah JF, Satrio MRR, Federico A, Suhariadi I, Dhaneswara D, Gasconin N (2024) Machine learning-based forward and inverse designs for prediction and optimization of fracture toughness of aluminum alloy. Results in Eng 23:102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10271710.1016/j.rineng.2024.102717 ↗
41. Bakr M, Syarif J, Hashem IAT (2022) Prediction of phase and hardness of HEAs based on constituent elements using machine learning models. Mater Today Commun 31:103407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10340710.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103407 ↗
42. Rao ZY, Tung PY, Xie RW et al (2022) Machine learning–enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science 378:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo494010.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
43. Gen M, Lin L (2023) Genetic algorithms and their applications. Springer handbook of engineering statistics, London, pp 635–674
44. Kim C, Batra R, Chen LH, Tran H, Ramprasad R (2021) Polymer design using genetic algorithm and machine learning. Comput Mater Sci 186:110067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.11006710.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110067 ↗
45. Wirsansky E (2020) Hands-on genetic algorithms with Python: applying genetic algorithms to solve real-world deep learning and artificial intelligence problems. Packt Publishing Ltd
46. Sterkenburg TF, Grünwald PD (2021) The no-free-lunch theorems of supervised learning. Synth 199:9979–10015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03233-110.1007/s11229-021-03233-1 ↗
47. Liu YQ, Mu Y, Chen KY, Li YM, Guo JH (2020) Daily activity feature selection in smart homes based on pearson correlation coefficient. Neural process Lett 51:1771–1787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10185-810.1007/s11063-019-10185-8 ↗
48. Jebarathinam C, Home D, Sinha U (2020) Pearson correlation coefficient as a measure for certifying and quantifying high-dimensional entanglement. Phy Rev A 101:022112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.02211210.1103/PhysRevA.101.022112 ↗
49. Chen PT, Li F, Wu CW (2021) Research on intrusion detection method based on Pearson correlation coefficient feature selection algorithm. J Phys: Confer Series. IOP Publish 1757:012054
50. Beraha M, Metelli AM, Papini M, Tirinzoni A. Restelli M (2019) Feature selection via mutual information: New theoretical insights. In: 2019 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pp 1–9.10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8852410 ↗
51. Soper DS (2021) Greed is good: Rapid hyperparameter optimization and model selection using greedy k-fold cross validation. Electr 10:1973. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics1016197310.3390/electronics10161973 ↗
52. Tchakoucht TA, Elkari B, Chaibi Y, Kousksou T (2024) Random forest with feature selection and K-fold cross validation for predicting the electrical and thermal efficiencies of air based photovoltaic-thermal systems. Energy Rep 12:988–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.07.00210.1016/j.egyr.2024.07.002 ↗
53. Xiong Z, Cui YX, Liu ZH, Zhao Y, Hu M, Hu JJ (2020) Evaluating explorative prediction power of machine learning algorithms for materials discovery using k-fold forward cross-validation. Comput Mater Sci 171:109203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10920310.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109203 ↗
54. Zan X, Wu Z, Guo C, Yu Z (2020) A Pareto-based genetic algorithm for multi-objective scheduling of automated manufacturing systems. Adv Mech Eng 12:168781401988529410.1177/1687814019885294 ↗
55. Su MS, Yuan JL, Yang LX, Chen XY (2024) Three-objective optimization of micromixer with Cantor fractal structure based on Pareto genetic algorithm. Int J Chem React Eng 22:1021–1037. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2023-023710.1515/ijcre-2023-0237 ↗
56. Costa-Carrapiço I, Raslan R, González JN (2020) A systematic review of genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimisation for building retrofitting strategies towards energy efficiency. Energ Buildings 210:109690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.10969010.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109690 ↗
57. Nohara Y, Matsumoto K, Soejima H, Nakashima N (2022) Explanation of machine learning models using shapley additive explanation and application for real data in hospital. Comput Meth Prog Bio 214:106584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.10658410.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106584 ↗
58. Luo Q, Cai Q, Gu QF et al (2023) Negative thermal expansion and phase transition of low-temperature Mg2NiH4. J Magn Alloy 11:3338–3349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2022.09.01210.1016/j.jma.2022.09.012 ↗
59. Song YZ, Shi NK, Deng QS, Xing XR, Chen J (2021) Negative thermal expansion in magnetic materials. Prog Mater Sci 121:100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10083510.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100835 ↗
60. Jadhav MS, Sahane D, Verma A, Singh S (2021) Thermal stability and thermal expansion behavior of FeCoCrNi2Al high entropy alloy. Adv Powder Technol 32:378–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.12.01910.1016/j.apt.2020.12.019 ↗