Evaluating elastic modulus and energy absorption efficiency of composite metal foam using computational and experimental approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study evaluates the mechanical performance of steel composite metal foams (CMFs) under various temperatures to assess their potential for use in thermally demanding environments. Steel CMFs, composed of hollow steel spheres embedded in a stainless steel matrix, were subjected to quasi-static compression tests at 23 °C, 400 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C. The primary objectives were to assess the temperature-dependent changes in elastic modulus, plateau strength, energy absorption efficiency, and structural integrity under compression. Experimental results revealed characteristic stress–strain behavior comprising linear elastic, plateau, and densification regions, with significant mechanical degradation observed at temperatures beyond 600 °C. To account for the volumetric changes in steel CMF, a correction factor (K) related to porosity (ϕ) was introduced, relating true and engineering stress. Curve fitting at room temperature yielded K = 0.6, closely matching the CMF porosity (ϕ = 0.6), highlighting porosity’s dual physical and mathematical significance in governing the compressive response of CMFs. Finite element simulations in ABAQUS were used to complement experimental findings, incorporating a crushable foam plasticity model and temperature-dependent material properties. The model accurately predicted the mechanical behavior of steel CMF up to the densification phase, with discrepancies remaining below 4% compared to experimental results. Computational analysis also validated the assumption of a constant Poisson’s ratio at elevated temperatures. Results indicate that steel CMFs maintain substantial energy absorption and mechanical stability up to 600 °C, making them suitable for applications such as crash absorbers and thermal shields. However, performance deteriorates significantly at 700 °C and 800 °C due to thermal softening and oxidation, ultimately leading to structural disintegration. This study underscores the promise of steel CMFs in thermally demanding applications while identifying key areas for future research, including the refinement of computational damage models and the experimental validation of temperature-dependent material parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Ashby MF, Evans A, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams. Elsevier, Amsterdam
2. Banhart J (2013) Light-metal foams—history of innovation and technological challenges. Adv Eng Mater 15:82–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20120021710.1002/adem.201200217 ↗
3. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (2014) Cellular solids: structure and properties, second edition
4. Banhart J (2001) Manufacture, characterisation and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Prog Mater Sci 46:559–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-510.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
5. Zhu X, Ai S, Lu X, Ling X, Zhu L, Liu B (2014) Thermal conductivity of closed-cell aluminum foam based on the 3D geometrical reconstruction. Int J Heat Mass Transf 72:242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.01.00610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.01.006 ↗
6. Rajak DK, Kumaraswamidhas LA, Das S (2016) Investigation and characterisation of aluminium alloy foams with TiH2 as a foaming agent. Mater Sci Technol 32:1338–1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2015.112384610.1080/02670836.2015.1123846 ↗
7. Paul A, Ramamurty U (2000) Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng A 281:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00750-910.1016/S0921-5093(99)00750-9 ↗
8. Tavares M, Weigand JM, Vieira LCM, Almeida SJC, Szyniszewski S (2020) Mechanical behavior of steel and aluminum foams at elevated temperatures. Local buckling based approach toward understanding of the material system behavior. Int J Mech Sci 181:105754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10575410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105754 ↗
9. Harshit K, Gupta P (2020) Advanced research developments and commercialization of light weight metallic foams. In: Kharissova OV, martínez L, kharisov bi (eds) handbook of nanomaterials and nanocomposites for energy and environmental applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11155-7_7-110.1007/978-3-030-11155-7_7-1 ↗
10. Movahedi N, Linul E, Marsavina L (2018) The temperature effect on the compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum-alloy foams. J Mater Eng Perform 27:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-3098-410.1007/s11665-017-3098-4 ↗
11. Taherishargh M, Linul E, Broxtermann S, Fiedler T (2018) The mechanical properties of expanded perlite-aluminium syntactic foam at elevated temperatures. J Alloys Compd 737:590–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.08310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.083 ↗
12. Movahedi N, Linul E (2021) Radial crushing response of ex-situ foam-filled tubes at elevated temperatures. Compos Struct 277:114634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11463410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114634 ↗
13. Xiao S, Wen T, Qu Z, Duan S, Wang P, Lei H, Fang D (2025) High temperature in-situ 3D monitor of microstructure evolution and heat transfer performance of metal foam. Appl Therm Eng 259:124864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.12486410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124864 ↗
14. Liang X, Luo H, Mu Y, Chen M, Ye J, Chi D (2019) Quasi-static and dynamic compression of aluminum foam at different temperatures. J Mater Eng Perform 28:4952–4963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04207-810.1007/s11665-019-04207-8 ↗
15. Marx J, Rabiei A (2017) Overview of composite metal foams and their properties and performance. Adv Eng Mater 19:1600776. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20160077610.1002/adem.201600776 ↗
16. Neville BP, Rabiei A (2008) Composite metal foams processed through powder metallurgy. Mater Des 29:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.02610.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.026 ↗
17. Vendra L, Rabiei A (2010) Evaluation of modulus of elasticity of composite metal foams by experimental and numerical techniques. Mater Sci Eng A 527:1784–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.00410.1016/j.msea.2009.11.004 ↗
18. Rabiei A, Vendra L, Reese N, Young N, Neville BP (2006) Processing and characterization of a new composite metal foam. Mater Trans 47:2148–2153. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.47.214810.2320/matertrans.47.2148 ↗
19. Brown JA, Vendra LJ, Rabiei A (2010) Bending properties of Al-steel and steel-steel composite metal foams. Metall Mater Trans A 41:2784–2793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0343-y10.1007/s11661-010-0343-y ↗
20. Alvandi-Tabrizi Y, Rabiei A (2014) Use of composite metal foam for improving absorption of collision forces. Proc Mater Sci 4:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.57710.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.577 ↗
21. Chen S, Marx J, Rabiei A (2016) Experimental and computational studies on the thermal behavior and fire retardant properties of composite metal foams. Int J Therm Sci 106:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.03.00510.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2016.03.005 ↗
22. Rabiei A, Karimpour K, Basu D, Janssens M (2020) Steel-steel composite metal foam in simulated pool fire testing. Int J Therm Sci 153:106336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.10633610.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106336 ↗
23. Amoafo-Yeboah N, Rabiei A (2023) Thermal response of steel-steel composite metal foams under small-scale torch-fire conditions. Adv Eng Mater 25(19):2370064. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20237006410.1002/adem.202370064 ↗
24. Chacko Z, Amoafo-Yeboah N, Cance J, Rabiei A (2023) A computational and experimental approach to evaluate thermal conductivity and diffusivity of steel composite metal foam. J Therm Anal Calorim 148:11589–11606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12515-410.1007/s10973-023-12515-4 ↗
25. Amoafo-Yeboah N, Rabiei A (2024) Thermal emissivity and heat capacity of composite metal foam. J Compos Sci 8(6):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs806020210.3390/jcs8060202 ↗
26. Afshan S, Arrayago Luquin I, Gardner L, Gedge G, Jandera M, Real Saladrigas E, Rossi B, Stranghoner N, Zhao O (2017) Design manual for structural stainless steel. Steel Construction Institute publications
27. Gardner L, Ng KT (2006) Temperature development in structural stainless steel sections exposed to fire. Fire Saf J 41:185–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.11.00910.1016/j.firesaf.2005.11.009 ↗
28. Augustin C, Hungerbach W (2009) Production of hollow spheres (HS) and hollow sphere structures (HSS). Mater Lett 63:1109–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.01.01510.1016/j.matlet.2009.01.015 ↗
29. Rabiei A (2012) Composite metal foam and methods of preparation thereof. U.S. Patent US8110143B2. US Patent and Trademark Office.
30. Chacko Z, Amoafo-Yeboah N, Rabiei A (2025) A study on thermal expansion and thermo-mechanical behavior of composite metal foams. Adv Eng Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20240287110.1002/adem.202402871 ↗
31. Kirby RK (1992) Methods of measuring thermal expansion. In: Maglić KD, Cezairliyan A, Peletsky VE (eds) Compendium of thermophysical property measurement methods. Springer US, Boston, pp 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3286-6_1910.1007/978-1-4615-3286-6_19 ↗
32. Vendra LJ, Rabiei A (2007) A study on aluminum–steel composite metal foam processed by casting. Mater Sci Eng A 465:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.03710.1016/j.msea.2007.04.037 ↗
33. Alvandi-Tabrizi Y, Whisler DA, Kim H, Rabiei A (2015) High strain rate behavior of composite metal foams. Mater Sci Eng A 631:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.02710.1016/j.msea.2015.02.027 ↗
34. Xu Z, La Mendola I, Razavi N, Bagherifard S (2023) Additive manufactured triply periodical minimal surface lattice structures with modulated hybrid topology. Eng Struct 289:116249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11624910.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116249 ↗
35. Kristoffersen M, Minoretti A, Børvik T (2019) On the internal blast loading of submerged floating tunnels in concrete with circular and rectangular cross-sections. Eng Fail Anal 103:462–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.07410.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.074 ↗
36. Liović D, Kršćanski S, Franulović M, Kozak D, Turkalj G, Vaglio E, Sortino M, Totis G, Scalzo F, Gubeljak N (2024) A study on the compressive behavior of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg lattice structures. Materials 17:5188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1721518810.3390/ma17215188 ↗
37. Sawada M, Suzuki S (2024) Prediction of macroscopic deformation bands in porous metals with unidirectional through-pores. Adv Eng Mater 26(15):2301001. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20230100110.1002/adem.202301001 ↗
38. Greco L, Buccino F, Xu Z, Vergani L, Berto F, Guagliano M, Razavi N, Bagherifard S (2023) Design and analysis of energy absorbent bioinspired lattice structures. J Bionic Eng 20:1670–1686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-023-00358-610.1007/s42235-023-00358-6 ↗
39. Rabiei A, Garcia-Avila M (2013) Effect of various parameters on properties of composite steel foams under variety of loading rates. Mater Sci Eng A 564:539–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.10810.1016/j.msea.2012.11.108 ↗
40. Kaushik A, Rabiei A (2024) An interactive fluid-solid approach for numerical modeling of composite metal foam behavior under compression. Adv Eng Mater 26:2401267. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20240126710.1002/adem.202401267 ↗
41. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. J Mech Phys Solids 48(6–7):1253–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-410.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
42. Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C, Everson R (2013) Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting. Mater Des 1980–2015(52):638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.07010.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.070 ↗
43. Deng D, Kiyoshima S (2010) Numerical simulation of residual stresses induced by laser beam welding in a SUS316 stainless steel pipe with considering initial residual stress influences. Nucl Eng Des 240:688–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.11.04910.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.11.049 ↗
44. Chacko Z, Rabiei A (2025). Thermo-mechanical performance of composite metal foams. In: TMS 2025 154th annual meeting & exhibition supplemental proceedings. TMS 2025. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80748-0_11710.1007/978-3-031-80748-0_117 ↗
45. Mameka N, Wang K, Markmann J, Lilleodden ET, Weissmüller J (2016) Nanoporous gold—testing macro-scale samples to probe small-scale mechanical behavior. Mater Res Lett 4:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2015.109467910.1080/21663831.2015.1094679 ↗
46. Brieland-Shoultz A, Tawfick S, Park SJ, Bedewy M, Maschmann MR, Baur JW, Hart AJ (2014) Scaling the stiffness, strength, and toughness of ceramic-coated nanotube foams into the structural regime. Adv Funct Mater 24:5728–5735. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20140085110.1002/adfm.201400851 ↗
47. Yang E, Leary M, Lozanovski B, Downing D, Mazur M, Sarker A, Khorasani A, Jones A, Maconachie T, Bateman S, Easton M, Qian M, Choong P, Brandt M (2019) Effect of geometry on the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V Gyroid structures fabricated via SLM: a numerical study. Mater Des 184:108165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10816510.1016/j.matdes.2019.108165 ↗
48. Evans A (1998) Multifunctionality of cellular metal systems. Prog Mater Sci 43:171–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00004-810.1016/S0079-6425(98)00004-8 ↗