DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2024-11

Exploring the influencing factors of the electrochemical reduction process on the PEC water splitting performance of rutile TiO2

Yibo Ding, Jiayu Lin, Chenfeng Jiang, Yi Sun, Xiaoyan Zhang, Xiaoqing Ma

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 41
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang Y-Y, Chen Y-X, Barakat T, Zeng Y-J, Liu J, Siffert S, Su B-L (2022) Recent advances in non-metal doped titania for solar-driven photocatalytic/photoelectrochemical water-splitting. J Energy Chem 66:529–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.03810.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.038 ↗
2. Koyale PA, Delekar SD (2023) A review on practical aspects of CeO2 and its composites for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy 51:515–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.25110.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.251 ↗
3. Xu F, Weng B (2023) Photocatalytic hydrogen production: an overview of new advances in structural tuning strategies. J Mater Chem A 11:4473–4486. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA09614E10.1039/D2TA09614E ↗
4. Nandy S, Hisatomi T, Takata T, Setoyama T, Domen K (2023) Recent advances in photocatalyst sheet development and challenges for cost-effective solar hydrogen production. J Mater Chem A 11:20470–20479. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3TA04353C10.1039/D3TA04353C ↗
5. Yang B, Wang M, Hu X, Zhou T, Zang Z (2019) Highly efficient semitransparent CsPbIBr2 perovskite solar cells via low-temperature processed In2S3 as electron-transport-layer. Nano Energy 57:718–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.09710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.097 ↗
6. Wang H, Li H, Cai W, Zhang P, Cao S, Chen Z, Zang Z (2020) Challenges and strategies relating to device function layers and their integration toward high-performance inorganic perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale 12:14369–14404. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR03408H10.1039/D0NR03408H ↗
7. Xu Z, Zhuang Q, Zhou Y, Lu S, Wang X, Cai W, Zang Z (2023) Functional layers of inverted flexible perovskite solar cells and effective technologies for device commercialization. Small Struct 4:2200338. https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.20220033810.1002/sstr.202200338 ↗
8. Yang M-Q, Gao M, Hong M, Ho GW (2018) Visible-to-NIR photon harvesting: progressive engineering of catalysts for solar-powered environmental purification and fuel production. Adv Mater 30:1802894. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180289410.1002/adma.201802894 ↗
9. Zhao L, Qi Y, Song L, Ning S, Ouyang S, Hua X, Ye J (2019) Solar‐driven water–gas shift reaction over CuO/Al2O3 with 1.1 % of light‐to‐energy storage. Angew Chem Int Ed 58:7708–7712. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20190232410.1002/anie.201902324 ↗
10. Wang Y, Zhang J, Balogun MS, Tong Y, Huang Y (2022) Oxygen vacancy–based metal oxides photoanodes in photoelectrochemical water splitting. Mater Today Sustain 18:100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.10011810.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100118 ↗
11. Xie G, Guo B, Gong JR (2023) Metal oxide/graphene/metal sandwich structure for efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Adv Funct Mater 33:2210420. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20221042010.1002/adfm.202210420 ↗
12. Zhang X, Zhang S, Cui X, Zhou W, Cao W, Cheng D, Sun Y (2022) Recent advances in TiO2-based photoanodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem-Asian J 17:e202200668. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.20220066810.1002/asia.202200668 ↗
13. Lin J-H, Yan Y-T, Qi J-L, Zha C-Y (2024) Atomic tailoring-induced deficiency in tungsten oxides for high-performance energy-related devices. Tungsten 6:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42864-023-00232-210.1007/s42864-023-00232-2 ↗
14. Zeng J, Xu L, Luo X, Chen T, Tang S-H, Huang X, Wang L-L (2022) Z-scheme systems of ASi2N4 (A = Mo or W) for photocatalytic water splitting and nanogenerators. Tungsten 4:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42864-021-00116-310.1007/s42864-021-00116-3 ↗
15. Guo M-L, Wan S-P, Li C-L, Zhang K (2022) Graphene oxide as a hole extraction layer loaded on BiVO4 photoanode for highly efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Rare Met 41:3795–3802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-022-02014-010.1007/s12598-022-02014-0 ↗
16. Sun J-P, Zhao Z, Li J, Li Z-Z, Meng X-C (2023) Recent advances in electrocatalytic seawater splitting. Rare Met 42:751–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-022-02168-x10.1007/s12598-022-02168-x ↗
17. Han Y, Wu J, Li Y et al (2022) Carbon dots enhance the interface electron transfer and photoelectrochemical kinetics in TiO2 photoanode. Appl Catal B 304:120983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12098310.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120983 ↗
18. Maurya O, Khaladkar SR, Sinha B, Bhanage BM, Deshmukh RR, Kim JH, Kalekar A (2023) Effective transformation of hydrothermally grown TiO2 nanorods to nanotube arrays for improved PEC hydrogen evolution. Electrochim Acta 471:143391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14339110.1016/j.electacta.2023.143391 ↗
19. Zhang S, Zhang X, Sun Y, Zhou W, Cao W, Cheng D (2023) Investigation of the annealing treatment on the performance of TiO2 photoanode. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48:29996–30005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.19610.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.196 ↗
20. Ding Y, Ma X, Zhang X (2023) Flame-assisted hydrolysis synthesis as a green combustion alternative for the preparation of metal oxide photocatalysts: reactions and opportunities. J Alloys Compd 959:170540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17054010.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170540 ↗
21. Tong M-H, Chen Y-X, Lin S-W et al (2023) Synchronous electrochemical anodization: a novel strategy for preparing cerium doped TiO2 nanotube arrays toward visible-light PEC water splitting. Electrochim Acta 463:142793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14279310.1016/j.electacta.2023.142793 ↗
22. Ruan X, Li S, Huang C, Zheng W, Cui X, Ravi SK (2024) Catalyzing artificial photosynthesis with TiO2 heterostructures and hybrids: emerging trends in a classical yet contemporary photocatalyst. Adv Mater 36:2305285. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20230528510.1002/adma.202305285 ↗
23. Wolcott A, Smith WA, Kuykendall TR, Zhao Y, Zhang JZ (2009) Photoelectrochemical water splitting using dense and aligned TiO2 nanorod arrays. Small 5:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20080090210.1002/smll.200800902 ↗
24. Arifin K, Yunus RM, Minggu LJ, Kassim MB (2021) Improvement of TiO2 nanotubes for photoelectrochemical water splitting: review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:4998–5024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.06310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.063 ↗
25. Li D, Wang J, Xu F, Zhang N, Men Y (2021) Mesoporous (001)-TiO2 nanocrystals with tailored Ti3+ and surface oxygen vacancies for boosting photocatalytic selective conversion of aromatic alcohols. Catal Sci Technol 11:2939–2947. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CY00053E10.1039/D1CY00053E ↗
26. Xiu Z, Guo M, Zhao T, Pan K, Xing Z, Li Z, Zhou W (2020) Recent advances in Ti3+ self-doped nanostructured TiO2 visible light photocatalysts for environmental and energy applications. Chem Eng J 382:123011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12301110.1016/j.cej.2019.123011 ↗
27. Na S, Seo S, Lee H (2020) Recent developments of advanced Ti3+-self-doped TiO2 for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Catalysts 10:679. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1006067910.3390/catal10060679 ↗
28. Li H, Chen J, Xia Z, Xing J (2015) Microwave-assisted preparation of self-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Mater Chem A 3:699–705. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA05021E10.1039/C4TA05021E ↗
29. Wu C, Gao Z, Gao S et al (2016) Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting and photoelectrocatalytic pollutant degradation. J Energy Chem 25:726–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2016.04.00910.1016/j.jechem.2016.04.009 ↗
30. Si H, Zou L, Huang G, Liao J, Lin S (2023) An effective strategy for promoting charge separation by integrating heterojunctions and multiple homojunctions in TiO2 nanorods to enhance photoelectrochemical oxygen evolution. J Colloid Interface Sci 630:888–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.06610.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.066 ↗
31. Su J, Zou X, Chen J-S (2014) Self-modification of titanium dioxide materials by Ti3+ and/or oxygen vacancies: new insights into defect chemistry of metal oxides. RSC Adv 4:13979–13988. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA47757F10.1039/C3RA47757F ↗
32. Zhu W-D, Wang C-W, Chen J-B, Li Y, Wang J (2014) Enhanced field emission from Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays synthesized by a facile cathodic reduction process. Appl Surf Sci 301:525–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.11610.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.116 ↗
33. Vequizo JJM, Kato K, Amano F, Yamakata A (2023) Unfolding the impact of H2-reduction treatment in enhancing the photocatalytic activity of rutile TiO2 based on photocarriers dynamics. J Phys Chem C 127:10411–10418. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0085510.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00855 ↗
34. Xu Y, Ahmed R, Klein D, Cap S, Freedy K, McDonnell S, Zangari G (2019) Improving photo-oxidation activity of water by introducing Ti3+ in self-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays treated with Ar/NH3. J Power Sources 414:242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.083 ↗
35. Akshay VR, Arun B, Mukesh M, Chanda A, Vasundhara M (2021) Tailoring the NIR range optical absorption, band-gap narrowing and ferromagnetic response in defect modulated TiO2 nanocrystals by varying the annealing conditions. Vacuum 184:109955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10995510.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109955 ↗
36. Mao C, Zuo F, Hou Y, Bu X, Feng P (2014) In situ preparation of a Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 film with enhanced activity as photoanode by N2H4 reduction. Angew Chem 53:10485–10489. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20140601710.1002/anie.201406017 ↗
37. Lee J, Li Z, Zhu L, Xie S, Cui X (2018) Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 via facile catalytic reduction over Al(acac)3 with enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic activities. Appl Catal B 224:715–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.05710.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.057 ↗
38. Diaz-Real JA, Elsaesser P, Holm T, Mérida W (2020) Electrochemical reduction on nanostructured TiO2 for enhanced photoelectrocatalytic oxidation. Electrochim Acta 329:135162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13516210.1016/j.electacta.2019.135162 ↗
39. Zhou H, Zhang Y (2014) Electrochemically self-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for supercapacitors. J Phys Chem C 118:5626–5636. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp408288310.1021/jp4082883 ↗
40. Kim S, Ji S, Kim KH et al (2021) Revisiting surface chemistry in TiO2: a critical role of ionic passivation for pH-independent and anti-corrosive photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Chem Eng J 407:126929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12692910.1016/j.cej.2020.126929 ↗
41. Liu J, Dai M, Wu J et al (2018) Electrochemical hydrogenation of mixed-phase TiO2 nanotube arrays enables remarkably enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting performance. Sci Bull 63:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2017.12.02310.1016/j.scib.2017.12.023 ↗
42. Song J, Zheng M, Yuan X et al (2017) Electrochemically induced Ti3+ self-doping of TiO2 nanotube arrays for improved photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Mater Sci 52:6976–6986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0930-z10.1007/s10853-017-0930-z ↗
43. Dong Z, Cai Y, Zhang K, Chu Z, Han S, Li Z (2021) Electrochemical reduction induced self-doping of oxygen vacancies into Ti–Si–O nanotubes as efficient photoanode for boosted photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:3554–3564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.19710.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.197 ↗
44. Yan P, Liu G, Ding C, Han H, Shi J, Gan Y, Li C (2015) Photoelectrochemical water splitting promoted with a disordered surface layer created by electrochemical reduction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:3791–3796. https://doi.org/10.1021/am508738d10.1021/am508738d ↗
45. Yuan T, Lu H, Dong B, Zhao L, Wan L, Wang S, Xu Z (2015) Single-crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorod arrays with high surface area for enhanced conversion efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 26:1332–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-2543-510.1007/s10854-014-2543-5 ↗
46. Chen Z, Jaramillo TF, Deutsch TG et al (2010) Accelerating materials development for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production: Standards for methods, definitions, and reporting protocols. J Mater Res 25:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2010.002010.1557/JMR.2010.0020 ↗
47. Li G, Han Z, Wang Y, Xiong Y, Fang P (2022) Enhancement in photocatalytic H2 evolution utilizing the synergistic effect between dual cocatalysts and heterojunctions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:38185–38197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.01410.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.014 ↗
48. Li T, Ding D (2020) Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting performance of Ni/Si-doped TiO2 photoanode fabricated through electrochemical reduction in aqueous solutions. J Electrochem Soc 167:066514. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab83e810.1149/1945-7111/ab83e8 ↗
49. Liu X, Xu H, Grabstanowicz LR et al (2014) Ti3+ self-doped TiO2−x anatase nanoparticles via oxidation of TiH2 in H2O2. Catal Today 225:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.08.02510.1016/j.cattod.2013.08.025 ↗
50. Wang H, Zhang H, Wang Z et al (2020) In-situ hydrogen production and storage in (002) oriented TiO2 thin films. Appl Surf Sci 509:145366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14536610.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145366 ↗
51. Zhang Y, Gao Y, Xia XH, Deng QR, Guo ML, Wan L, Shao G (2010) Structural engineering of thin films of vertically aligned TiO2 nanorods. Mater Lett 64:1614–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2010.04.04810.1016/j.matlet.2010.04.048 ↗
52. Wang X, Sun M, Murugananthan M, Zhang Y, Zhang L (2020) Electrochemically self-doped WO3/TiO2 nanotubes for photocatalytic degradation of volatile organic compounds. Appl Catal B 260:118205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11820510.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118205 ↗
53. Prokes SM, Gole JL, Chen X, Burda C, Carlos WE (2005) Defect-related optical behavior in surface modified TiO2 nanostructures. Adv Funct Mater 15:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20030510910.1002/adfm.200305109 ↗
54. Jiang B, Tang Y, Qu Y et al (2015) Thin carbon layer coated Ti3+-TiO2 nanocrystallites for visible-light driven photocatalysis. Nanoscale 7:5035–5045. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR00032G10.1039/C5NR00032G ↗
55. Burungale VV, Satale VV, Teli AM, Kamble AS, Kim JH, Patil PS (2016) Surfactant free single step synthesis of TiO2 3-D microflowers by hydrothermal route and its photoelectrochemical characterizations. J Alloys Compd 656:491–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.27210.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.272 ↗
56. Zhang Y, Harris CX, Wallenmeyer P, Murowchick J, Chen X (2013) Asymmetric lattice vibrational characteristics of rutile TiO2 as revealed by laser power dependent raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 117:24015–24022. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp406948e10.1021/jp406948e ↗
57. Wang J, Yang P, Huang B (2015) Self-doped TiO2−x nanowires with enhanced photocatalytic activity: facile synthesis and effects of the Ti3+. Appl Surf Sci 356:391–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.02910.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.029 ↗
58. Mahadik MA, Anushkkaran P, Chae W-S, Lee HH, Cho M, Jang JS (2023) TiO2 nanorod/nanotube interface reconstruction and synergistic role of oxygen vacancies and gold in H-Au–TiO2 NR/NT for photoelectrochemical bacterial inactivation and water splitting. Chemosphere 341:139968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.13996810.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139968 ↗
59. Vásquez GC, Karazhanov SZ, Maestre D, Cremades A, Piqueras J, Foss SE (2016) Oxygen vacancy related distortions in rutile TiO2 nanoparticles: a combined experimental and theoretical study. Phys Rev B 94:235209. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.23520910.1103/PhysRevB.94.235209 ↗
60. Wang S, Liu G, Wang L (2019) Crystal facet engineering of photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Rev 119:5192–5247. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0058410.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00584 ↗
61. Momeni MM, Mahvari M, Ghayeb Y (2019) Photoelectrochemical properties of iron-cobalt WTiO2 nanotube photoanodes for water splitting and photocathodic protection of stainless steel. J Electroanal Chem 832:7–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.10.03510.1016/j.jelechem.2018.10.035 ↗
62. Zhu H, Zhao M, Zhou J et al (2018) Surface states as electron transfer pathway enhanced charge separation in TiO2 nanotube water splitting photoanodes. Appl Catal B 234:100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.04010.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.040 ↗
63. Luttrell T, Halpegamage S, Tao J, Kramer A, Sutter E, Batzill M (2014) Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films. Sci Rep-uk 4:4043. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0404310.1038/srep04043 ↗
64. Ma Y, Wang X, Jia Y, Chen X, Han H, Li C (2014) Titanium dioxide-based nanomaterials for photocatalytic fuel generations. Chem Rev 114:9987–10043. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500008u10.1021/cr500008u ↗
65. Xue C, Zhang T, Ding S, Wei J, Yang G (2017) Anchoring tailored low-index faceted BiOBr nanoplates onto TiO2 nanorods to enhance the stability and visible-light-driven catalytic activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:16091–16102. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0043310.1021/acsami.7b00433 ↗
66. Bourikas K, Kordulis C, Lycourghiotis A (2014) Titanium dioxide (anatase and rutile): surface chemistry, liquid-solid interface chemistry, and scientific synthesis of supported catalysts. Chem Rev 114:9754–9823. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300230q10.1021/cr300230q ↗
67. Ballestas-Barrientos A, Murdock AT, Liu H, Masters A, Maschmeyer T (2020) Understanding the link between solid/liquid interfaces and photoelectrochemical activity in novel thin-film photoanodes of preferentially oriented high-index rutile TiO2 facets – A work inspired by Michel Che’s research on surface chemistry. J Catal 392:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.09.02810.1016/j.jcat.2020.09.028 ↗
68. Anantharaj S, Sugime H, Noda S (2021) Why shouldn’t double-layer capacitance (Cdl) be always trusted to justify faradaic electrocatalytic activity differences? J Electroanal Chem 903:115842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.11584210.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115842 ↗
69. Zuo F, Wang L, Wu T, Zhang Z, Borchardt D, Feng P (2010) Self-doped Ti3+ enhanced photocatalyst for hydrogen production under visible light. J Am Chem Soc 132:11856–11857. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja103843d10.1021/ja103843d ↗