Aluminum/SmCo5 composites for structural and magnetic applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal-bonded magnetic composites (MBMCs) present a promising alternative to dense sintered magnets, particularly for intricate components. Compared to polymer-based bonded magnets, MBMCs have wider applicability in harsh environments. In this paper, we demonstrate a solid-state shear-based manufacturing technique to introduce localized magnetization into a paramagnetic aluminum matrix by embedding SmCo5 permanent magnet particles. Our magnetic composites display hard magnetic behavior with a coercivity of 13 kOe and a remanent magnetization of 4.32 emu/g. In addition to magnetization, we also report a 9% improvement in Young’s modulus. Despite the local temperature rise during processing, the magnetic phases didn’t decompose into unwanted phases, preserving the composite’s hard magnetic properties. Creation of an interfacial metallurgical bond with the matrix ensured the suitability of the composites for structural applications. Our study investigates the mechanical, and functional properties of composites, paving the way for lightweight structural magnetic composites with a transformative potential in the aerospace, nuclear, and automotive applications. This work underscores the potential for further optimization and development to drive innovations in magnet and equipment design. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Coey JMD (2020) Engineering 6:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.03410.1016/j.eng.2018.11.034 ↗
2. Coey JMD, Iriyama T (2022) Modern permanent magnets. In: Ormerod J (ed) Croat J. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 305–342
3. Pallapa M, Yeow JTW (2015) Smart Mater Struct 24:025007–025018. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/2/02500710.1088/0964-1726/24/2/025007 ↗
4. Benedyk JC (2010) Materials, design and manufacturing for lightweight vehicles. In: Mallick PK (ed) Woodhead Publishing. Cambridge, pp 79–113
5. Shin J, Kim T, Kim D, Kim D, Kim K (2017) J Alloy Compd 698:577–59010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.269 ↗
6. Cui J, Roven HJ (2010) Transact Nonferrous Metals Soc China 20:2057–2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60417-910.1016/S1003-6326(09)60417-9 ↗
7. Luo C, Qiu X, Su J, Xu Y, Zhao X, Xing F (2021) J Manuf Processes 67:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.01610.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.016 ↗
8. Berbon PB, Bingel WH, Mishra RS, Bampton CC, Mahoney MW (2001) Scripta Mater 44:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00578-910.1016/S1359-6462(00)00578-9 ↗
9. Mishra RS, Ma ZY, Charit I (2003) Mater Sci Eng: A 341:307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00199-510.1016/S0921-5093(02)00199-5 ↗
10. Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, Murch MG, Temple-Smith P, Dawes CJ (1995) Google Patents.
11. Rodewald W, Wall B, Katter M, Velicescu M, Schrey P (1993) J Appl Phys 73:5899–5901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.35351510.1063/1.353515 ↗
12. Huang MQ, Zhang LY, Ma BM, Zheng Y, Elbicki JM, Wallace WE, Sankar SG (1991) J Appl Phys 70:6027–6029. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.35008210.1063/1.350082 ↗
13. Otani Y, Moukarika A, Sun H, Coey JMD, Devlin E, Harris IR (1991) J Appl Phys 69:6735–6737. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34890010.1063/1.348900 ↗
14. Kelhar L, Zavašnik J, McGuiness P, Kobe S (2016) J Magn Magn Mater 419:171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.06.03510.1016/j.jmmm.2016.06.035 ↗
15. Brett RL, Rowlinson N, Ashraf MM, Harris IR, Bowen P (1990) J Appl Phys 67:4622–4624. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.34483210.1063/1.344832 ↗
16. Chuang S-F, Lee S-L, Lin F-J, Lin J-C (2006) Powder Metall 49:328–333. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329006x12832210.1179/174329006x128322 ↗
17. Ashrafi N, Ariff AHM, Sarraf M, Sulaiman S, Hong TS (2021) Mater Chem Phys 258:123895–123908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12389510.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123895 ↗
18. Maleki A, Taherizadeh AR, Issa HK, Niroumand B, Allafchian AR, Ghaei A (2018) Ceram Int 44:15079–15085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.14110.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.141 ↗
19. Elsayd A, Shash AY, Mattar H, Löthman PA, Mitwally ME (2023) Heliyon 9:e16887–e16897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1688710.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16887 ↗
20. Borgohain C, Acharyya K, Sarma S, Senapati KK, Sarma KC, Phukan P (2013) J Mater Sci 48:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6724-410.1007/s10853-012-6724-4 ↗
21. Mahmoud ERI, Tash MM (2016) Materials 9:505–517.10.3390/ma9070505 ↗
22. Bailey G, Orefice M, Sprecher B, Önal MAR, Herraiz E, Dewulf W, Van Acker K (2021) J Clean Prod 286:125294–125302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12529410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125294 ↗
23. Samin AJ (2018) J Nucl Mater 503:42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.02.02910.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.02.029 ↗
24. Luo H, Sheng H, Zhang H, Wang F, Fan J, Du J, Ping Liu J, Szlufarska I (2019) Nat Commun 10:3587–3594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11505-110.1038/s41467-019-11505-1 ↗
25. Zhao Z, Zhao H, Luo H, Liu L, Ding Y, Zhang X, Yao X, Zhang J (2022) Mater Today Commun 31:103676–103683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10367610.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103676 ↗
26. Cui B, Liu X, King AH, Ouyang G, Nlebedim CI, Cui J (2020) Acta Mater 196:528–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.05810.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.058 ↗
27. Gursoy D, De Carlo F, Xiao X, Jacobsen C (2014) J Synchrotron Radiat 21:1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057751401393910.1107/S1600577514013939 ↗
28. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
29. P.J.H. W.J. Arbegast, In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on trends in welding research, (Pine Mountain, GA, USA, June 1–5, 1998).
30. Escobar J, Gwalani B, Olszta M, Silverstein J, Ajantiwalay T, Overman N, Fu W, Li Y, Bergmann L, Maawad E, Klusemann B, dos Santos JF, Devaraj A (2022) J Alloy Compd 928:167007–167015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16700710.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167007 ↗
31. Cavaliere P (2005) Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 36:1657–1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.016 ↗
32. Malakar A, Suresh KS, Pancholi V, Brokmeier H-G, Schell N (2020) Mater Charact 167:110525–110535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11052510.1016/j.matchar.2020.110525 ↗
33. Fonda RW, Bingert JF (2007) Scripta Mater 57:1052–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.06810.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.068 ↗
34. Escobar J, Silverstein J, Ishrak F, Li L, Soulami A, Li S, Yu A, Mathaudhu S, Ortiz A, Koch C, Devaraj A, Efe M, Gwalani B (2023) Mater Sci Eng: A 886:145715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.14571510.1016/j.msea.2023.145715 ↗
35. Sarkari Khorrami M, Saito N, Miyashita Y, Kondo M (2019) Mater Sci Eng: A 744:349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.110.1016/j.msea.2018.12.1 ↗
36. Shafiei-Zarghani A, Kashani-Bozorg SF, Zarei-Hanzaki A (2009) Mater Sci Eng: A 500:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.06410.1016/j.msea.2008.09.064 ↗
37. Chen CH, Knutson SJ, Shen Y, Wheeler RA, Horwath JC, Barnes PN (2011) Appl Phys Lett 99:(012504-1)-(012504-3). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.360795810.1063/1.3607958 ↗
38. I. Alloys International, "Aluminum 1100", https://alloysintl.com/inventory/aluminum-alloys-supplier/aluminum-1100/. Accessed 04/04 2024.
39. Singh RK, Kamat SV, Mathur RP (2015) J Magn Magn Mater 379:300–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.12.01610.1016/j.jmmm.2014.12.016 ↗
40. Ajay Kumar P, Yadav D, Perugu CS, Kailas SV (2017) Mater Des 113:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.10110.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.101 ↗
41. Cui GR, Ma ZY, Li SX (2009) Acta Mater 57:5718–5729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.06510.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.065 ↗
42. Movahedi M, Kokabi AH, Seyed Reihani SM (2011) Mater Des 32:3143–3149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.05710.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.057 ↗
43. Seri O, Furumata K (2002) Mater Corros 53:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4176(200202)53:210.1002/1521-4176(200202)53:2 ↗
44. Stollenwerk T, Ulumuddin NZZ, Sun P-L, Lee S-H, Seehaus M, Skokov K, Gutfleisch O, Xie Z, Korte-Kerzel S (2024) Acta Mater 266:119669–119682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2024.11966910.1016/j.actamat.2024.119669 ↗