DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2024-08

Comparative analysis of substrate and superstrate configurations in Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells by numerical modelling

Wan Norhisyam Abd Rashid, Megat Mohd Izhar Sapeli, Yoganash Putthisigamany, Kazi Sajedur Rahman, Norasikin Ahmad Ludin, Mohd Adib Ibrahim, Puvaneswaran Chelvanathan

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 32
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Doroody C et al (2023) Incorporation of magnesium-doped zinc oxide (MZO) HRT layer in cadmium telluride (CdTe) solar cells. Results Phys 47:106337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.10633710.1016/j.rinp.2023.106337 ↗
2. Maalouf A, Okoroafor T, Jehl Z, Babu V, Resalati S (2023) A comprehensive review on life cycle assessment of commercial and emerging thin-film solar cell systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 186:113652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.11365210.1016/j.rser.2023.113652 ↗
3. Green MA et al (2024) Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 63). Prog Photovolt Res Appl 32(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.375010.1002/pip.3750 ↗
4. Almora O et al (2023) Device performance of emerging photovoltaic materials (Version 3). Adv Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20220331310.1002/aenm.202203313 ↗
5. Efaz ET et al (2021) A review of primary technologies of thin-film solar cells. Eng Res Express 3(3):032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ac235310.1088/2631-8695/ac2353 ↗
6. Seroka NS, Taziwa R, Khotseng L (2022) Solar energy materials-evolution and niche applications: a literature review. Materials (Basel) 15(15):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1515533810.3390/ma15155338 ↗
7. Farhana MA, Manjceevan A, Bandara J (2023) Recent advances and new research trends in Sb2S3 thin film based solar cells. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 8(1):100533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2023.10053310.1016/j.jsamd.2023.100533 ↗
8. Chen Z, Chen G (2020) The effect of absorber thickness on the planar Sb2S3 thin film solar cell: trade-off between light absorption and charge separation. Sol Energy 201(February):323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.07410.1016/j.solener.2020.02.074 ↗
9. Kondrotas R, Chen C, Tang J (2018) Sb2S3 solar cells. Joule 2(5):857–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.00310.1016/j.joule.2018.04.003 ↗
10. Savadogo O, Mandal KC (1993) Low-cost technique for preparing N-Sb2S3-p-Si heterojunction solar-cells. Appl Phys Lett 63(2):228–230. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.11034910.1063/1.110349 ↗
11. Itzhaik Y, Niitsoo O, Page M, Hodes G (2009) Sb2S3-sensitized nanoporous TiO2 solar cells. J Phys Chem C 113(11):4254–4256. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp900302b10.1021/jp900302b ↗
12. Moon S-J, Itzhaik Y, Yum J-H, Zakeeruddin SM, Hodes G, Grätzel M (2010) Sb2S3-based mesoscopic solar cell using an organic hole conductor. J Phys Chem Lett 1(10):1524–1527. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz100308q10.1021/jz100308q ↗
13. Chang JA et al (2010) High-performance nanostructured inorganic-organic heterojunction solar cells. Nano Lett 10(7):2609–2612. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl101322h10.1021/nl101322h ↗
14. Im SH et al (2011) Toward interaction of sensitizer and functional moieties in hole-transporting materials for efficient semiconductor-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 11(11):4789–4793. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl202618410.1021/nl2026184 ↗
15. Choi YC, Lee DU, Noh JH, Kim EK, Seok SI (2014) Highly improved Sb2S3 sensitized-inorganic–organic heterojunction solar cells and quantification of traps by deep-level transient spectroscopy. Adv Funct Mater 24(23):3587–3592. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20130423810.1002/adfm.201304238 ↗
16. Qiao S, Liu J, Li Z, Wang S, Fu G (2017) Sb2S3 thickness-dependent lateral photovoltaic effect and time response observed in glass/FTO/CdS/Sb2S3/Au structure. Opt Express 25(16):19583–19594. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.01958310.1364/OE.25.019583 ↗
17. Tang R et al (2018) n-type doping of Sb2S3 light-harvesting films enabling high-efficiency planar heterojunction solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(36):30314–30321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0896510.1021/acsami.8b08965 ↗
18. Han J et al (2020) Synergistic effect through the introduction of inorganic zinc halides at the interface of TiO2 and Sb2S3 for High-performance Sb2S3 planar thin-film solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12(39):44297–44306. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c1155010.1021/acsami.0c11550 ↗
19. Pan G et al (2019) Substrate structured Sb2S3 thin film solar cells fabricated by rapid thermal evaporation method. Sol Energy 182:64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.01410.1016/j.solener.2019.02.014 ↗
20. Wang S et al (2022) A novel multi-sulfur source collaborative chemical bath deposition technology enables 8%-efficiency Sb2S3 planar solar cells. Adv Mater 34(41):2206242. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20220624210.1002/adma.202206242 ↗
21. Bao X, Bai Y, Zhao S (2024) High performance near ultraviolet ray detector by cluster-wrapped surface structure in ferroelectrics. Chem Eng J 490:151630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.15163010.1016/j.cej.2024.151630 ↗
22. Zhao P, He C, Su Y, Zou Y, Bai Y, Zhao S (2024) Probing ballistic photovoltaic currents in Bi6-xPrxTi3Fe2O18 multiferroics. J Eur Ceram Soc 44(10):5752–5764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.03.04410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.03.044 ↗
23. Kravchenko EA, Orlov VG, Sergeev GS (2020) Magnetic properties of Sb2S3 and Bi2S3 as evidenced by 121,123Sb and 209Bi NQR spectra. J Exp Theor Phys 131(5):761–767. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377612010006410.1134/S1063776120100064 ↗
24. Wang R et al (2023) Optimisation of Sb2S3 thin-film solar cells via Sb2S3 post-treatment. J Power Sour 556:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23245110.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232451 ↗
25. Li H et al (2023) Sputtering of molybdenum as a promising back electrode candidate for superstrate structsured Sb2S3 solar cells. Adv Sci 2303414:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20230341410.1002/advs.202303414 ↗
26. Xie Y et al (2022) Fabrication of Sb2S3 solar cells by close space sublimation and enhancing the efficiency via co-selenization. Mater Sci Semicond Process 142:106451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2022.10645110.1016/j.mssp.2022.106451 ↗
27. Escorcia-García J, Becerra D, Nair MTS, Nair PK (2014) Heterojunction CdS/Sb2S3 solar cells using antimony sulfide thin films prepared by thermal evaporation. Thin Solid Films 569(C):28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.08.02410.1016/j.tsf.2014.08.024 ↗
28. Yuan S et al (2016) Efficient planar antimony sulfide thin film photovoltaics with large grain and preferential growth. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 157:887–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.07.05010.1016/j.solmat.2016.07.050 ↗
29. Yuan S et al (2017) Postsurface selenization for high performance Sb2S3 planar thin film solar cells. ACS Photonics 4(11):2862–2870. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0085810.1021/acsphotonics.7b00858 ↗
30. Chen Y et al (2020) Importance of interfacial passivation in the high efficiency of Sb2Se3 thin-film solar cells: numerical evidence. ACS Appl Energy Mater 3(11):10415–10422. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c0120310.1021/acsaem.0c01203 ↗
31. Pan G et al (2019) Substrate structured Sb2S3 thin film solar cells fabricated by rapid thermal evaporation method. Sol Energy 182(February):64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.01410.1016/j.solener.2019.02.014 ↗
32. Liu YZL, Zhang S, Wu J, Wang W, Liu W, Wu L (2020) Current improvement of substrate structured Sb2S3 solar cells with MoSb2 interlayer. Chin Phys B 29(5):05880110.1088/1674-1056/ab8220 ↗
33. Luo J et al (2020) Fabrication of Sb2S3 thin films by magnetron sputtering and post-sulfurization/selenization for substrate structured solar cells. J Alloys Compd 826:154235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15423510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154235 ↗
34. Deng H et al (2023) Flexible substrate-structured Sb2S3 solar cells with back interface selenization. Adv Funct Mater 33(12):2212627. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADFM.20221262710.1002/ADFM.202212627 ↗
35. Wang Z et al (2024) Self-assembled growth of quasi-vertically oriented Sb2S3 thin films for substrate structured solar cells. Ceram Int 50(3):4729–4736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.11.21710.1016/j.ceramint.2023.11.217 ↗
36. Gao C et al (2019) Fabrication of Sb2S3 thin films by sputtering and post-annealing for solar cells. Ceram Int 45(3):3044–3051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.15510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.155 ↗
37. Di Luo Y et al (2020) An effective combination reaction involved with sputtered and selenized Sb precursors for efficient Sb2Se3 thin film solar cells. Chem Eng J 393:124599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12459910.1016/j.cej.2020.124599 ↗
38. Zhou Y et al (2017) Buried homojunction in CdS/Sb2Se3 thin film photovoltaics generated by interfacial diffusion. Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.499153910.1063/1.4991539 ↗
39. Liu L et al (2020) Current improvement in substrate structured Sb2S3 solar cells with MoSe2 interlayer. Chin Phys B 29(5):058801. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ab822010.1088/1674-1056/ab8220 ↗
40. Mamta et al (2021) Sb2Se3 versus Sb2S3 solar cell: a numerical simulation. Sol Energy 228(August):540–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.08010.1016/j.solener.2021.09.080 ↗
41. Basak A, Singh UP (2021) Numerical modelling and analysis of earth abundant Sb2S3 and Sb2Se3 based solar cells using SCAPS-1D. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 230:111184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11118410.1016/j.solmat.2021.111184 ↗
42. Ghahremanirad E, Almora O, Suresh S, Drew AA, Chowdhury TH, Uhl AR (2023) Beyond protocols: understanding the electrical behavior of perovskite solar cells by impedance spectroscopy. Adv Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20220437010.1002/aenm.202204370 ↗
43. Buehler K, Kaufmann K, Patzold M, Sprenger M, Schoenfelder S (2023) Identifying defects on solar cells using magnetic field measurements and artificial intelligence trained by a finite-element-model. EPJ Photovoltaics 14:872–1064. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/202300510.1051/epjpv/2023005 ↗
44. Kedir N, Nguyen PHD, Citlaly P, Ponce P (2023) Photovoltaic solar energy: opportunities, challenges, and guidance for implementation. Energies 16:379510.3390/en16093795 ↗
45. Ahmad O, Rashid A, Ahmed MW, Nasir MF, Qasim I (2021) Performance evaluation of Au/p-CdTe/Cs2TiI6/n-TiO2/ITO solar cell using SCAPS-1D. Opt Mater (Amst) 117(April):111105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2021.11110510.1016/j.optmat.2021.111105 ↗
46. Lucaßen J, Sedaghat S, Schmid M (2023) Realistic multidimensional optoelectrical modeling guide for copper indium gallium diselenide solar cells. Sol RRL 7(4):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.20220086710.1002/solr.202200867 ↗
47. Maurya KK, Singh VN et al (2021) Efficient Sb2Se3 solar cell with a higher fill factor: a theoretical approach based on thickness and temperature. Sol Energy 230:803–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.11.00210.1016/j.solener.2021.11.002 ↗
48. Mahmoud KH, Alsubaie AS, Anwer AH, Ansari MZ (2023) Comparative analysis of perovskite solar cells for obtaining a higher efficiency using a numerical approach. Micromachines 14(6):1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1406112710.3390/mi14061127 ↗
49. Basyoni MSS et al (2021) On the investigation of interface defects of solar cells: lead-based vs lead-free perovskite. IEEE Access 9:130221–130232. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.311438310.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114383 ↗
50. Mamta, Maurya KK, Singh VN (2021) Sb2Se3 versus Sb2S3 solar cell: a numerical simulation. Sol Energy 228:540–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.08010.1016/j.solener.2021.09.080 ↗
51. Marí Soucase B, Baig F, Hameed Khattak Y, Vega E, Mollar M (2022) Numerical analysis for efficiency limits of experimental perovskite solar cell. Sol Energy 235(March):200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.02.05110.1016/j.solener.2022.02.051 ↗
52. Shah UA, Chen S, Khalaf GMG, Jin Z, Song H (2021) Wide bandgap Sb2S3 solar cells. Adv Funct Mater 31(27):2100265. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210026510.1002/adfm.202100265 ↗
53. Cui Z et al (2021) Phase transition mechanism and bandgap engineering of Sb2S3 at gigapascal pressures. Commun Chem 4(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-021-00565-410.1038/s42004-021-00565-4 ↗
54. Versavel MY, Haber JA (2007) Structural and optical properties of amorphous and crystalline antimony sulfide thin-films. Thin Solid Films 515(18):7171–7176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.04310.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.043 ↗
55. Suthar J, Shah V, Zala D, Zala P, Vemuri SK, Ray A (2024) Fractal microstructure of semiconducting Sb2S3 by surfactant-assisted spin coating and its advantage in optoelectronic properties. Results Opt 14:100588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rio.2023.10058810.1016/j.rio.2023.100588 ↗
56. Abraham P, Shaji S, Avellaneda DA, Aguilar-Martínez JA, Krishnan B (2023) Sb2S3 thin films: From first principles to in situ crystalline thin film growth by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. Mater Sci Semicond Process 156:107269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2022.10726910.1016/j.mssp.2022.107269 ↗
57. Li ZQ, Ni M, Feng XD (2019) Simulation of the Sb2Se3 solar cell with a hole transport layer. Mater Res Express 7(1):016416. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab5fa710.1088/2053-1591/ab5fa7 ↗
58. Tobbeche S, Kalache S, Elbar M, Kateb MN, Serdouk MR (2019) Improvement of the CIGS solar cell performance: structure based on a ZnS buffer layer. Opt Quantum Electron. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-019-2000-z10.1007/s11082-019-2000-z ↗
59. Mahbub R, Saidul Islam M, Anwar F, Sarwar Satter S, Mahmud Ullah S (2016) Simulation of CZTS thin film solar cell for different buffer layers for high efficiency performance. South Asian J Eng Technol 2(52):1–10
60. Kumar M, Raj A, Kumar A, Anshul A (2020) An optimized lead-free formamidinium Sn-based perovskite solar cell design for high power conversion efficiency by SCAPS simulation. Opt Mater (Amst) 108:110213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.11021310.1016/j.optmat.2020.110213 ↗
61. Et-taya L, Ouslimane T, Benami A (2020) Numerical analysis of earth-abundant Cu2ZnSn(SxSe1-x)4 solar cells based on spectroscopic ellipsometry results by using SCAPS-1D. Sol Energy 201:827–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.07010.1016/j.solener.2020.03.070 ↗
62. Maurya KK, Singh VN (2021) Enhancing the performance of an Sb2Se3-based solar cell by dual buffer layer. Sustainability 13(21):1232010.3390/su132112320 ↗
63. Augusto A, Herasimenka SY, King RR, Bowden SG, Honsberg C (2017) Analysis of the recombination mechanisms of a silicon solar cell with low bandgap-voltage offset. J Appl Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.498407110.1063/1.4984071 ↗
64. Bencherif H, Dehimi L, Mahsar N, Kouriche E, Pezzimenti F (2022) Modeling and optimization of CZTS kesterite solar cells using TiO2 as efficient electron transport layer. Mater Sci Eng B 276:115574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2021.11557410.1016/j.mseb.2021.115574 ↗
65. Bencherif H (2022) Towards a high efficient Cd-free double CZTS layers kesterite solar cell using an optimized interface band alignment. Sol Energy 238:114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.04.04010.1016/j.solener.2022.04.040 ↗