Review: Foam geopolymer synthesis macro- to micro-properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Yan D, Shi Y, Zhang Y, Wang W, Qian H, Chen S, Liu Y, Ruan S (2024) A comparative study of porous geopolymers synthesized by pre-foaming and H2O2 foaming methods: strength and pore structure characteristics. Ceram Int 50:17807–17817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.02.27010.1016/j.ceramint.2024.02.270 ↗
2. Dong C, Shao N, Yan F, Ji R, Wei X, Zhang Z (2022) A novel integration strategy for the foaming and hydrophobization of geopolymer foams. Cem Concr Res 160:106919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.10691910.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106919 ↗
3. Zhang X, Zhang X, Ma M, Cheng R, Hao C, Zhang L, Zhang J (2024) A multifunctional barium-modified geopolymer foam for the efficient and flexible treatment of high-sulfate coal mine drainage. Chem Eng J 496:154302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.15430210.1016/j.cej.2024.154302 ↗
4. Benkhirat S, Plantard G, Ribeiro E, Glenat H, Gorand Y, Nouneh K (2024) A way to macroporous and alveolar geopolymer foams elaboration: Influence of operating parameters on porosity characteristics. Results in Materials 24:100613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2024.10061310.1016/j.rinma.2024.100613 ↗
5. Li Y, Shen J, Lin H (2024) An innovative intelligent design method of alkali-activated foamed geopolymer: mixture optimization and performance prediction. J Build Eng 89:109344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10934410.1016/j.jobe.2024.109344 ↗
6. Le TA, Le SH, Nguyen TN, Nguyen KT (2021) Assessment of the rheological and mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete comprising fly ash and fluid catalytic cracking residue as aluminosilicate precursor. Appl Sci 11:3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1107303210.3390/app11073032 ↗
7. Candamano S, Coppola G, Mazza A, Caicho Caranqui JI, Bhattacharyya S, Chakraborty S, Alexis F, Algieri C (2023) Batch and fixed bed adsorption of methylene blue onto foamed metakaolin-based geopolymer: a preliminary investigation. Chem Eng Res Des 197:761–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.08.01410.1016/j.cherd.2023.08.014 ↗
8. Liu Y, Zhao S, Qiu X, Meng Y, Wang H, Zhou S, Qiao Q, Yan C (2023) Clinoptilolite based zeolite-geopolymer hybrid foams: potential application as low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. J Environ Manage 330:117167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11716710.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117167 ↗
9. Lori AR, Novais RM, Ascensão G, Fernandes F, Ranjbar N, Spangenberg J (2025) Chemically foamed geopolymers for 3D printing applications. Cement Concr Compos 161:106116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.10611610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.106116 ↗
10. Zoude C, Gremillard L, Prud’Homme E (2023) Combination of chemical foaming and direct ink writing for lightweight geopolymers. Open Ceram 16:100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2023.10047810.1016/j.oceram.2023.100478 ↗
11. Yu Y, Perumal P, Corfe IJ, Paul T, Illikainen M, Luukkonen T (2023) Combined granulation–alkali activation–direct foaming process: a novel route to porous geopolymer granules with enhanced adsorption properties. Mater Des 227:111781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11178110.1016/j.matdes.2023.111781 ↗
12. Rakngan W, Williamson T, Ferron RD, Sant G, Juenger MCG (2018) Controlling workability in alkali-activated class C fly ash. Constr Build Mater 183:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.17410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.174 ↗
13. Walbrück K, Witzleben S, Stephan D (2024) Design and characterization of geopolymer foams reinforced with Miscanthus x giganteus fibres. Heliyon 10:e35947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3594710.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35947 ↗
14. Yang X, Wu S, Xu S, Chen D, Zhao Z, Chen B, Liang X (2024) Development of a novel emulsified asphalt enhanced steel slag-based geopolymer foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 456:139287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13928710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139287 ↗
15. Wu Y, Pan D, Liu X, Dan J, Bian S, Li Y, Wang J, Yang X (2024) Effect of shell-modified EPS particles on foam geopolymer properties. J Build Eng 96:110582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11058210.1016/j.jobe.2024.110582 ↗
16. Chen YX, Klima KM, Brouwers HJH, Yu Q (2022) Effect of silica aerogel on thermal insulation and acoustic absorption of geopolymer foam composites: the role of aerogel particle size. Compos Part B Eng 242:110048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11004810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110048 ↗
17. Moutaoukil G, Sobrados I, Gökçe HS, Alehyen S (2025) Effect of thermal treatment, foaming and stabilizing agents on the synthesis of fly ash-based geopolymer foams using raman spectroscopy and 29Si and 27Al MAS NMR. Sustain Chem Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scenv.2025.10025710.1016/j.scenv.2025.100257 ↗
18. Ahmed DA, El-Apasery MA, Ragai SM (2023) Development of an antimicrobial inorganic polymer based on fly ash and metakaolin incorporated by nano-TiO2 for reactive dye removal. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47032-910.1038/s41598-023-47032-9 ↗
19. Sun Y, Zhang P, Sun X, Gao Z, Lai C (2025) Mechanical-fracture behavior of steel fibre/nano-SiO2 reinforced geopolymer recycled concrete. Int J Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.11078510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110785 ↗
20. Feng Z, Zhang P, Guo J, Zheng Y, Hu S (2025) Single and synergistic effects of nano-SiO2 and hybrid fiber on rheological property and compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 472:140945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14094510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140945 ↗
21. Wang W, Zhang P, Guo J, Wang F (2025) Abrasion resistance assessment of geopolymer concrete reinforced with nano-SiO2 and steel-polyvinyl alcohol hybrid fiber. Constr Build Mater 487:142071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14207110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142071 ↗
22. Gao Z, Zhang P, Dai X, Zheng Y, Feng H (2025) Assessment of bonding behavior of hybrid fiber alkali-activated concrete for tunnel lining concrete restoration. J Clean Prod 514:145803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.14580310.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145803 ↗
23. Ababneh A, Al-shouha A, Al-Akhras N, Matalkah F (2025) Nano-silica for enhancing corrosion resistance of kaolin-based geopolymer concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 22:e04210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0421010.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04210 ↗
24. Adesina A, de Azevedo ARG, Amin M, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Agwa IS, Zeyad AM, Tayeh BA (2022) Fresh and mechanical properties overview of alkali-activated materials made with glass powder as precursor. Clean Mater 3:100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2021.10003610.1016/j.clema.2021.100036 ↗
25. Marvila MT, de Garcez Azevedo AR, Tostes Linhares Júnior JA, Fontes Vieira CM (2023) Activated alkali cement based on blast furnace slag: effect of curing type and concentration of Na20. J Mater Res Technol 23:4551–4565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.08810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.088 ↗
26. Soares GA, Luz AP (2026) Novel solid activator derived from rice husk ash for the synthesis of one-part geopolymers. Mater Lett 402:139322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2025.13932210.1016/j.matlet.2025.139322 ↗
27. Zaland S, Wang J, Li K, Sadat SI, Akhunzada K (2026) Geopolymers as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement: synthesis, durability, applications, environmental impacts, and cost analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 225:116157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.11615710.1016/j.rser.2025.116157 ↗
28. Wang W, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Shi Y, Chen D, Mao J, Wang Z, Chen S, Liu Y, Yan D (2025) Mechanical behaviors of metakaolin-based foamed geopolymer (MKFG) under dynamics loading. Int J Impact Eng 195:105106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10510610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105106 ↗
29. Zhao Z, Qu X, Li Z, He T, Li F (2024) Preparation and characterization of geopolymer foamed concrete based on coal gangue and slag. Constr Build Mater 455:139187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13918710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139187 ↗
30. Mamatha BS, Sujatha D, Uday DN, Kiran MC (2023) Properties of flyash based wood geopolymer composite. Low-Carbon Mater Green Constr 1:29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44242-023-00030-610.1007/s44242-023-00030-6 ↗
31. Santana HA, Amorim Júnior NS, Ribeiro DV, Cilla MS, Dias CMR (2021) Vegetable fibers behavior in geopolymers and alkali-activated cement based matrices: a review. J Build Eng 44:103291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10329110.1016/j.jobe.2021.103291 ↗
32. Nadesan MS, Dinakar P (2017) Structural concrete using sintered flyash lightweight aggregate: a review. Constr Build Mater 154:928–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.005 ↗
33. Ojha A, Aggarwal P (2023) Durability performance of low calcium flyash-based geopolymer concrete. Structures 54:956–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.11510.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.115 ↗
34. Alomayri T, Amir MT, Ali B, Raza SS, Hamad M (2023) Mechanical, tidal erosion, and drying shrinkage behaviour of high performance seawater concrete incorporating the high volume of GGBS and polypropylene fibre. J Build Eng 76:107377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10737710.1016/j.jobe.2023.107377 ↗
35. Ali HA, Xuan D, Lu J-X, Poon CS (2022) Enhancing the resistance to microbial induced corrosion of alkali-activated glass powder/GGBS mortars by calcium aluminate cement. Constr Build Mater 341:127912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12791210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127912 ↗
36. Bouteiller V, Cremona C, Baroghel-Bouny V, Maloula A (2012) Corrosion initiation of reinforced concretes based on Portland or GGBS cements: chloride contents and electrochemical characterizations versus time. Cem Concr Res 42:1456–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.07.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2012.07.004 ↗
37. Hussan A, Levacher D, Mezazigh S, Jardin L (2023) Co-valorization of sediments incorporating high and low organic matter with alkali-activated GGBS and hydraulic binder for use in road construction. J Build Eng 66:105848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10584810.1016/j.jobe.2023.105848 ↗
38. Jayanthi V, Avudaiappan S, Amran M, Arunachalam KP, Qader DN, Delgado MC, Saavedra Flores EI, Rashid RSM (2023) Innovative use of micronized biomass silica-GGBS as agro-industrial by-products for the production of a sustainable high-strength geopolymer concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 18:e01782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0178210.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01782 ↗
39. Gopalakrishna B, Dinakar P (2023) Mix design development of fly ash-GGBS based recycled aggregate geopolymer concrete. J Build Eng 63:105551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10555110.1016/j.jobe.2022.105551 ↗
40. Unnikrishnan S (2023) Mechanical Strength and Microstructure of GGBS-SCBA based Geopolymer Concrete. J Mater Res Technol 24:7816–7831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.05110.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.051 ↗
41. Asaad MA, Huseien GF, Memon RP, Ghoshal SK, Mohammadhosseini H, Alyousef R (2022) Enduring performance of alkali-activated mortars with metakaolin as granulated blast furnace slag replacement. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:e00845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0084510.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00845 ↗
42. Borçato AG, Thiesen M, Medeiros-Junior RA (2023) Mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers modified with different contents of quarry dust waste. Constr Build Mater 400:132854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13285410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132854 ↗
43. Bowen F, Jiesheng L, Jing W, Yaohua C, Tongtong Z, Xiaoming T, Zhengguang S (2022) Investigation on the impact of different activator to solid ratio on properties and micro-structure of metakaolin geopolymer. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:e01127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0112710.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01127 ↗
44. Alyami M, Nassar R-U-D, Khan M, Hammad AW, Alabduljabbar H, Nawaz R, Fawad M, Gamil Y (2024) Estimating compressive strength of concrete containing rice husk ash using interpretable machine learning-based models. Case Stud Constr Mater 20:e02901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0290110.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02901 ↗
45. Chaitanya MSK, Nagaraju TV, Gadhiraju LVKR, Madepalli VR, Narayana S, Jampana R (2023) Strength and micro-structural performance of geopolymer concrete using highly burned rice husk ash. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.61710.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.617 ↗
46. Santana HA, Andrade Neto JS, Ribeiro DV, Cilla MS, Dias CMR (2021) Accelerated alkaline attack of 3D printing polymers to assess their durability in geopolymer-based matrices. J Mater Civ Eng 33:04021327. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000396010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003960 ↗
47. Zhang F, Wang J, Tian Y, Liu C, Zhang S, Cao L, Zhou Y, Zhang S (2023) Effective removal of tetracycline antibiotics from water by magnetic functionalized biochar derived from rice waste. Environ Pollut 330:121681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.12168110.1016/j.envpol.2023.121681 ↗
48. Accelerated Alkaline Attack of 3D Printing Polymers to Assess Their Durability in Geopolymer-Based Matrices | Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering | Vol 33, No 11, (2023). https://ascelibrary.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0003960 (accessed August 22, 2023).10.1061/%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0003960 ↗
49. Tchakouté HK, Rüscher CH, Kong S, Kamseu E, Leonelli C (2016) Geopolymer binders from metakaolin using sodium waterglass from waste glass and rice husk ash as alternative activators: a comparative study. Constr Build Mater 114:276–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.18410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.184 ↗
50. Abdelaal A, Elkatatny S, Abdel Fattah AM (2024) Perlite incorporation for sedimentation reduction and improved properties of high-density geopolymer cement for oil well cementing. Sci Rep 14:9707. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60587-510.1038/s41598-024-60587-5 ↗
51. Alloul A, Amar M, Benzerzour M, Abriak N-E (2023) A comparative analysis of ambient-cured metakaolin geopolymer mortar and flash-calcined soil geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 409:134085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13408510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134085 ↗
52. Hosan A, Haque S, Shaikh F (2016) Compressive behaviour of sodium and potassium activators synthetized fly ash geopolymer at elevated temperatures: a comparative study. J Build Eng 8:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.10.00510.1016/j.jobe.2016.10.005 ↗
53. Zhao J, Wang X, Li S, Tang Y (2024) Development and performance evaluation of ultra-lightweight geopolymer foam insulation material. J Build Eng 98:111222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11122210.1016/j.jobe.2024.111222 ↗
54. Gao M, Luo Z, Zhang M, Liu X, Liu L, Ye J, Zhang X, Yang Y, Ge M, Yang H, Rong S, Wang Z (2025) Effect of triethanolamine on the properties and hydration of fly ash-based geopolymer foam. Waste Manag 198:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2025.02.04510.1016/j.wasman.2025.02.045 ↗
55. Shilar FA, Shilar M (2025) Performance based evaluation of black cotton soil geopolymer mortar on fresh properties, mechanical strength, durability, and molecular dynamics correlation. Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, 8(9):38510.1007/s41939-025-00983-0 ↗
56. Abdellatief M, Hassan YM, Elnabwy MT, Wong LS, Chin RJ, Mo KH (2024) Investigation of machine learning models in predicting compressive strength for ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete: a comparative study. Constr Build Mater 436:136884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13688410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136884 ↗
57. Alnahhal AM, Alengaram UJ, Yusoff S, Darvish P, Srinivas K, Sumesh M (2022) Engineering performance of sustainable geopolymer foamed and non-foamed concretes. Constr Build Mater 316:125601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12560110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125601 ↗
58. Majdoubi H, Haddaji Y, Bourzik O, Nadi M, Ziraoui J, Alomayri TS, Oumam M, Manoun B, Alami J, Tamraoui Y, Hannache H (2023) Enhancing thermal insulation with phosphate washing sludge waste as an inorganic foaming agent in porous acid-based geopolymers: formulation and processing optimization. Constr Build Mater 407:133486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13348610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133486 ↗
59. Zhou H, Wang Z, Chen H, Wang W, Yan D, Zhao K, He Y (2025) Experimental and theoretical investigation on the dynamic response of foam-geopolymer sandwich cylindrical structure under long-duration plane load. Eng Struct 336:120407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.12040710.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120407 ↗
60. Zhou H, Li H, Wang Z, Yan D, Wang W, Zhang G, Cheng Z, Sun S, Wang M (2025) Experimental investigation on the anti-detonation performance of composite structure containing foam geopolymer backfill material. Def Technol 43:304–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2024.08.01110.1016/j.dt.2024.08.011 ↗
61. Zawrah MF, Badr HA, Khattab RM, Sadek HEH, Abo Sawan SE, El-Kheshen AA (2021) Fabrication and characterization of non-foamed and foamed geopolymers from industrial waste clays. Ceram Int 47:29320–29327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.09710.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.097 ↗
62. Amran M, Debbarma S, Ozbakkaloglu T (2021) Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: a critical review of the long-term durability properties. Constr Build Mater 270:121857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12185710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857 ↗
63. Tay CH, Mazlan N, Wayayok A, Basri MS, Albakri Abdullah MM (2025) Zeolite based foamed geopolymer concrete reinforced with cellulose nanofibril prepared in low concentration alkaline solution: porosity, compressive strength, and water permeability. J Clean Prod 489:144609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14460910.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144609 ↗
64. Rashad AM, Refaie FAZ, Mokhtar MM (2024) Waste marble powder as a promising candidate for use as a foaming agent for metakaolin geopolymer activated with H3PO4. Constr Build Mater 450:138583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13858310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138583 ↗
65. Luukkonen T, Bhuyan M, Hokajärvi A-M, Pitkänen T, Miettinen IT (2022) Water disinfection with geopolymer–bentonite composite foam containing silver nanoparticles. Mater Lett 311:131636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13163610.1016/j.matlet.2021.131636 ↗
66. Chen Y, Zou C, Yeo JS, Lin J, Tan TH, Mo KH (2025) Valorization of high-volume crushed waste glass as fine aggregate in foamed geopolymer. Case Stud Constr Mater 22:e04202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0420210.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04202 ↗
67. Rashad AM, Gharieb M, Shoukry H, Mokhtar MM (2022) Valorization of sugar beet waste as a foaming agent for metakaolin geopolymer activated with phosphoric acid. Constr Build Mater 344:128240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12824010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128240 ↗
68. dos Santos MNG, dos Santos CM, de Souza MTG, de Vasconcelos EA, da Nóbrega ACV, Marinho ÉP (2023) Use of sodium metasilicate as silica source and stabilizing agent in two-part metakaolin–H2O2 geopolymer foams. Constr Build Mater 391:131907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13190710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131907 ↗
69. Jin P, Li L, Li Z, Du W, Khan M, Li Z (2024) Using recycled brick powder in slag based geopolymer foam cured at ambient temperature: strength, thermal stability and microstructure. Constr Build Mater 452:139008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13900810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139008 ↗
70. Moutaoukil G, Sobrados I, Alehyen S, Taibi M (2024) Understanding the thermomechanical behavior of geopolymer foams: influence of rate and type of foaming agent and stabilizer. Chem Data Collect 50:101111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2023.10111110.1016/j.cdc.2023.101111 ↗
71. Han L, Wang X, Wu B, Zhu S, Wang J, Zhang Y (2022) In-situ synthesis of zeolite X in foam geopolymer as a CO2 adsorbent. J Clean Prod 372:133591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13359110.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133591 ↗
72. Kovářík T, Hájek J, Deshmukh K, Beneš J, Svoboda M, Kadlec J, Vála L, Strejcová K, Tišler Z (2024) Geopolymer composite foams reinforced with refractory filler: the effect of curing regime on microstructure, porosity and thermomechanical properties. Ceram Int 50:8397–8408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.12.17510.1016/j.ceramint.2023.12.175 ↗
73. Yatsenko EA, Goltsman BM, Izvarin AI, Kurdashov VM, Ryabova AV (2024) Influence of foaming additives on the porous structure and properties of lightweight geopolymers based on ash–slag waste. Constr Build Mater 443:137629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13762910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137629 ↗
74. Chen D, Chen M, Zhou X, Wu Y, Jiang Q, Yang X, Zhao Y, Zhang J (2024) Effects of waste cooking oil derivatives as a foam stabilizer on properties of foam and foamed geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 450:138675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13867510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138675 ↗
75. Cho S, van Rooyen A, Kearsley E, van Zijl G (2022) Foam stability of 3D printable foamed concrete. J Build Eng 47:103884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10388410.1016/j.jobe.2021.103884 ↗
76. Horvat B, Knez N, Hribar U, König J, Mušič B (2024) Thermal insulation and flammability of composite waste polyurethane foam encapsulated in geopolymer for sustainable building envelope. J Clean Prod 446:141387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14138710.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141387 ↗
77. Alnahhal AM, Alengaram UJ, Ibrahim MSI, Yusoff S, Metselaar HSC, Johnson PG (2022) Synthesis of ternary binders and sand-binder ratio on the mechanical and microstructural properties of geopolymer foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 349:128682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12868210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128682 ↗
78. Zawrah MF, Sadek HEH, Ngida REA, Sawan SEA, El-Kheshen AA (2022) Effect of low-rate firing on physico-mechanical properties of unfoamed and foamed geopolymers prepared from waste clays. Ceram Int 48:11330–11337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.35610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.356 ↗
79. Bupesh Raja VK, Selvarani V, Kannan S, Sujan S, Sahas S, Padmapriya R, Kumar VG, Baalamurugan J (2023) Geopolymer based foams from steel slag—a green technology. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.15610.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.156 ↗
80. Matalkah F, Ababneh A, Aqel R (2023) Synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer foam: assessment of mechanical properties, thermal insulation, and elevated temperature stability. Ceram Int 49:9967–9977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.17410.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.174 ↗
81. Ahıskalı A, Benli A, Ahıskalı M, Bayraktar OY, Kaplan G (2025) Sustainable geopolymer foam concrete with recycled crumb rubber and dual fiber reinforcement of polypropylene and glass fibers: a comprehensive study. Constr Build Mater 474:141137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14113710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141137 ↗
82. Bayraktar OY, Özel HB, Benli A, Yılmazoğlu MU, Türkel İ, Dal BB, Şevik H, Kaplan G (2024) Sustainable foam concrete development: enhancing durability and performance through pine cone powder and fly ash incorporation in alkali-activated geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 457:139422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13942210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139422 ↗
83. Song Y, Xue C, Guo W, Bai Y, Shi Y, Zhao Q (2024) Foamed geopolymer insulation materials: research progress on insulation performance and durability. J Clean Prod 444:140991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14099110.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140991 ↗
84. Bąk A, Pławecka K, Bazan P, Łach M (2023) Influence of the addition of phase change materials on thermal insulation properties of foamed geopolymer structures based on fly ash. Energy 278:127624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.12762410.1016/j.energy.2023.127624 ↗
85. Joelle Nadia NF, Gharzouni A, Nait-Ali B, Ouamara L, Ndassa IM, Bebga G, Elie K, Rossignol S (2023) New laterite-based geopolymer foam resistance under drastic conditions: a comparative study with a metakaolin model. Ceram Int 49:13050–13057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.17910.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.179 ↗
86. Yan S, Ren X, He C, Wang W, Zhang M, Xing P (2023) Microstructure evolution and properties of red mud/slag-based cenosphere/geopolymer foam exposed to high temperatures. Ceram Int 49:34362–34374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.06.17110.1016/j.ceramint.2023.06.171 ↗
87. Chen M, Liang X, Hu W, Zhang L, Zhou L, Zhang C, Wang J, Meng C, Fang J, Yang H (2018) Precipitation polymerization in liquid crystals to prepare uniform epoxy microspheres. Polymer 154:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.00610.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.006 ↗
88. Jouin J, Nouping Fekoua JN, Ouamara L, Piolet E, Gharzouni A, Rossignol S (2023) Insulating phosphoric acid-based geopolymer foams with water and high temperature resistance. Constr Build Mater 398:132406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13240610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132406 ↗
89. Wang S, Zhang Z, Mao J, Lin J, Xiao F, Chen S, Liu Y, Qian H, Yan D (2025) Modeling the thermal conductivity of the ground granulated blast furnace slag-based foam geopolymer based on its multi-scale pore structure. J Build Eng 105:112487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.11248710.1016/j.jobe.2025.112487 ↗
90. Gao R, Zhou Z, Chen K, Hu X, Jia H, Zhang H, Han L (2025) Mechanisms of the effect of surfactant types on the pore structure feature and properties of geopolymer foams. Constr Build Mater 458:139696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13969610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139696 ↗
91. Karoui O, Andrejkovičová S, Pato P, Patinha C, Řimnáčová D, Perná I, Hajjaji W, Rocha F, Mlayah A (2024) Foamed phosphate by-product based geopolymers and dye adsorption efficiency. Appl Clay Sci 257:107446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2024.10744610.1016/j.clay.2024.107446 ↗
92. Yan S, Ren X, Li S, Wang W, He C, Xing P (2024) Optimization, synthesis, and properties of foamed graphene reinforced slag/fly ash-based geopolymer composites. Diamond Relat Mater 141:110518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.11051810.1016/j.diamond.2023.110518 ↗
93. Leão AS, Medeiros DL, Santiago MA, do Carmo Tavares AO, Maranduba HL, dos Santos Almeida E (2023) Rigorous environmental and energy life cycle assessment of blast furnace pig iron in Brazil: the role of carbon and iron sources, and co-product utilization. Sustain Mater Technol 36:e00607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e0060710.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00607 ↗
94. Demiral NC, Ozkan Ekinci M, Sahin O, Ilcan H, Kul A, Yildirim G, Sahmaran M (2022) Mechanical anisotropy evaluation and bonding properties of 3D-printable construction and demolition waste-based geopolymer mortars. Cem Concr Compos 134:104814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10481410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104814 ↗
95. Kaplan G, Öz A, Bayrak B, Aydın AC (2023) The effect of geopolymer slurries with clinker aggregates and marble waste powder on embodied energy and high-temperature resistance in prepacked concrete: ANFIS-based prediction model. J Build Eng 67:105987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10598710.1016/j.jobe.2023.105987 ↗
96. Zhu W, Huang B, Zhao J, Chen X, Sun C (2023) Impacts on the embodied carbon emissions in China’s building sector and its related energy-intensive industries from energy-saving technologies perspective: a dynamic CGE analysis. Energy Build 287:112926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.11292610.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112926 ↗
97. Liew Y-M, Heah C-Y, Mohd Mustafa AB, Kamarudin H (2016) Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: a review. Prog Mater Sci 83:595–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.002 ↗
98. Li Y, Shen J, Lin H, Lv J, Feng S, Ci J (2022) Properties and environmental assessment of eco-friendly brick powder geopolymer binders with varied alkali dosage. J Build Eng 58:105020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10502010.1016/j.jobe.2022.105020 ↗
99. Liu B, Gao Q, Jin H, Lei Y, Liu C (2022) System indeterminacy analysis in the embodied energy network of global construction industries. Energy 261:125216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.12521610.1016/j.energy.2022.125216 ↗
100. Singh A, Vaddy P, Biligiri KP (2020) Quantification of embodied energy and carbon footprint of pervious concrete pavements through a methodical lifecycle assessment framework. Resour Conserv Recycling 161:104953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10495310.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104953 ↗