Investigation of MWCNT dispersion in epoxy-based shape memory polymer using probe ultrasonication: characterization and mechanical properties evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Polymer composites and self-healing · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Honkala M (2006) Introduction to shape memory materials. In: Mattila HR (ed) Intelligent Textiles and Clothing, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 85–10310.1533/9781845691622.2.85 ↗
2. Yadav A, Singh SK, Das S et al (2025) Shape memory polymer and composites for space applications: a review. Polym Compos. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2970710.1002/pc.29707 ↗
3. Safranski DL, Laffoon SL, Sycks DG, Gall K (2017) Material Selection. In: Safranski DL, Griffis JC (eds) Shape-Memory Polymer Device Design, 1st edn. William Andrew Publishing, New York, pp 77–11210.1016/B978-0-323-37797-3.00003-8 ↗
4. Gall K, Dunn ML, Liu Y et al (2004) Internal stress storage in shape memory polymer nanocomposites. Appl Phys Lett 85:290–292. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.176908710.1063/1.1769087 ↗
5. Zare M, Prabhakaran MP, Parvin N, Ramakrishna S (2019) Thermally-induced two-way shape memory polymers: mechanisms, structures, and applications. Chem Eng J 374:706–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.16710.1016/j.cej.2019.05.167 ↗
6. Li J, Duan Q, Zhang E, Wang J (2018) Applications of shape memory polymers in kinetic buildings. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018(1):745369810.1155/2018/7453698 ↗
7. Stanford T, Barvosa-Carter W, Browne AL (2008) Johnson NL (2008) Active material reversible attachments: shape memory polymer based. Ind Commer Appl Smart Struct Technol 6930:693003. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.77196610.1117/12.771966 ↗
8. Gök MO, Bilir MZ, Gürcüm BH (2015) Shape-Memory Applications in Textile Design. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 195:2160–2169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.28310.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.283 ↗
9. Zhao W, Liu L, Zhang F et al (2019) Shape memory polymers and their composites in biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 97:864–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.05410.1016/j.msec.2018.12.054 ↗
10. Li T, Wang Y, Liu K et al (2018) Thermal actuation performance modification of coiled artificial muscle by controlling annealing stress. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 56:383–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.2455110.1002/polb.24551 ↗
11. Lantada AD (2017) Systematic development strategy for smart devices based on shape-memory polymers. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym910049610.3390/polym9100496 ↗
12. Jojibabu P, Zhang YX, Prusty BG (2020) A review of research advances in epoxy-based nanocomposites as adhesive materials. Int J Adhes Adhes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10245410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102454 ↗
13. Bhanushali H, Amrutkar S, Mestry S, Mhaske ST (2022) Shape memory polymer nanocomposite: a review on structure–property relationship. Polym Bull 79:3437–3493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03686-x10.1007/s00289-021-03686-x ↗
14. Singh SK, Singh S, Kumar A, Jain A (2017) Thermo-mechanical behavior of TiO2 dispersed epoxy composites. Eng Fract Mech 184:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.005 ↗
15. Hager MD, Bode S, Weber C, Schubert US (2015) Shape memory polymers: Past, present and future developments. Prog Polym Sci 49–50:3–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.04.002 ↗
16. Singh SK, Yadav A, Singh S et al (2025) Enhancement of mechanical and viscoelastic properties of epoxy and epoxy-nano silica composites using self-healing microcapsules. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11174110.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.111741 ↗
17. Yadav A, Das S, Badardinni R et al (2024) Effect of dual dispersion of carbon fiber and silica nanoparticles on recovery performance of shape memory epoxy. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ad4d3710.1088/1361-665X/ad4d37 ↗
18. Herath HMCM, Epaarachchi JA, Islam MM, Leng J (2019) Carbon fibre reinforced shape memory polymer composites for deployable space habitats. Eng J Inst Eng Sri Lanka 52:1. https://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v52i1.732310.4038/engineer.v52i1.7323 ↗
19. Bhola L, Mujumdar PM, Guruprasad PJ (2021) Thermo-mechanical analysis of shape memory polymer composite. Lect Notes Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8315-5_1910.1007/978-981-15-8315-5_19 ↗
20. Atta MM, Zakaly HMH, Almousa N et al (2023) Nitrogen plasma synthesis of flexible supercapacitors based on reduced graphene oxide/aloe vera/carbon nanotubes nanocomposite. Carbon Lett 33:1639–1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-023-00548-610.1007/s42823-023-00548-6 ↗
21. Madbouly SA, Lendlein A (2009) Shape-Memory Polymer Composites. In: Lendlein A (ed) Springer. Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 41–95
22. Sumio I (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–5810.1038/354056a0 ↗
23. Kumar A, Ghosh PK, Yadav KL, Kumar K (2017) Thermo-mechanical and anti-corrosive properties of MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposite fabricated by innovative dispersion technique. Compos Part B Eng 113:291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.046 ↗
24. Ali A, Rahimian Koloor SS, Alshehri AH, Arockiarajan A (2023) Carbon nanotube characteristics and enhancement effects on the mechanical features of polymer-based materials and structures—A review. J Mater Res Technol 24:6495–6521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.07210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.072 ↗
25. Hossain MK, Chowdhury MMR, Salam MBA et al (2015) Enhanced mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites by incorporating XD-grade carbon nanotube. J Compos Mater 49:2251–2263. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831454518610.1177/0021998314545186 ↗
26. Huang YY, Terentjev EM (2012) Dispersion of carbon nanotubes: Mixing, sonication, stabilization, and composite properties. Polymers (Basel) 4:275–295. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym401027510.3390/polym4010275 ↗
27. Kadlec M, Hron R, Guadagno L (2016) Mechanical properties of a carbon fabric-reinforced epoxy composite with carbon nanotubes and a flame retardant. Int J Struct Integr 7:630–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-09-2015-002910.1108/IJSI-09-2015-0029 ↗
28. Yadav A, Nayak BA, Fulmali AO, Prusty RK (2022) Synergetic impact of both fiber surface grafting and matrix modification by carbon nanotubes and functionalized carbon nanotubes on the flexural behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: An assessment at cryo-, room-, and elevated- in situ t. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5310410.1002/app.53104 ↗
29. Yin Z, Yuan J, Xu W et al (2019) Improvement in microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti(C, N) cermet prepared by two-step spark plasma sintering. Ceram Int 45:752–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.24110.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.241 ↗
30. Wang J, Jin X, Wu H, Guo S (2017) Polyimide reinforced with hybrid graphene oxide @ carbon nanotube: toward high strength, toughness, electrical conductivity. Carbon N Y 123:502–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.05510.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.055 ↗
31. Gkikas G, Barkoula NM, Paipetis AS (2012) Effect of dispersion conditions on the thermo-mechanical and toughness properties of multi walled carbon nanotubes-reinforced epoxy. Compos Part B Eng 43:2697–2705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.07010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.070 ↗
32. Erdogan G, Bilisik K (2018) Compression after low-velocity impact (CAI) properties of multistitched composites. Mech Adv Mater Struct 25:623–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2017.130860110.1080/15376494.2017.1308601 ↗
33. Bal S (2007) Influence of dispersion states of carbon nanotubes on mechanical and electrical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. J Sci Ind Res (India) 66:752–756
34. Song YS, Youn JR (2005) Influence of dispersion states of carbon nanotubes on physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon N Y 43:1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.00710.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.007 ↗
35. Lu X, La P, Guo X, Wei Y (2012) Study on microstructure and mechanical properties of epoxy resin/carbon black composites prepared by in situ polymerization. Appl Mech Mater 109:156–160. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.109.15610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.109.156 ↗
36. Kundalwal SI, Rathi A (2020) Improved mechanical and viscoelastic properties of CNT-composites fabricated using an innovative ultrasonic dual mixing technique. J Mech Behav Mater 29:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2020-000810.1515/jmbm-2020-0008 ↗
37. Rathi A, Kundalwal SI (2022) Synergistic effect of ultrasonically assisted exfoliated MWCNTs by ZrO2 nanoparticles on thermo-mechanical and anti-corrosive properties of epoxy nanocomposites. J Compos Mater 56:1633–1649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998322108477010.1177/00219983221084770 ↗
38. Liu S, Zhang J, Fan X et al (2024) Enhanced mechanical, thermal properties and thermal conductivities of epoxy composites via incorporating graphene oxide-grafted carbon nanotubes hybrids. Polym Compos. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2885710.1002/pc.28857 ↗
39. Ali Z, Yaqoob S, D’Amore A (2024) Impact of dispersion methods on mechanical properties of carbon nanotube (CNT)/Iron oxide (Fe3O4)/epoxy composites. C 10:66. https://doi.org/10.3390/c1003006610.3390/c10030066 ↗
40. Gunes IS, Cao F, Jana SC (2008) Evaluation of nanoparticulate fillers for development of shape memory polyurethane nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 49:2223–2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.03.02110.1016/j.polymer.2008.03.021 ↗
41. Li F, Qi L, Yang J et al (2000) Polyurethane/conducting carbon black composites: Structure, electric conductivity, strain recovery behavior, and their relationships. J Appl Polym Sci 75:68–7710.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000103)75:1<68::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
42. Wang Z, Liu J, Guo J et al (2017) The study of thermal, mechanical and shape memory properties of chopped carbon fiber-reinforced TPI shape memory polymer composites. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym911059410.3390/polym9110594 ↗
43. Mondal S, Hu JL (2006) Shape memory studies of functionalized MWNT-reinforced polyurethane copolymers. Iran Polym J English Ed 15:135–142
44. Kim M, Bin Kim Y, Chun HJ (2024) Effects of iron oxide and carbon nanotube contents on mechanical properties and shape memory behavior of biocompatible and biodegradable shape memory polymers. Polym Adv Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.625710.1002/pat.6257 ↗
45. Zhang Y, Yu Y, Wang Y et al (2025) Self-recovery and self-conducting epoxy-based shape memory polymer microactuator. Sensors Actuators B Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.13656210.1016/j.snb.2024.136562 ↗
46. Singh SK, Kumar A, Jain A (2021) Mechanical and viscoelastic properties of SiO2/epoxy nanocomposites post-cured at different temperatures. Plast Rubber Compos 50:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14658011.2020.184020310.1080/14658011.2020.1840203 ↗
47. Kumar Singh S, Gunwant D, Vedrtnam A et al (2022) Synthesis, characterization, and modelling the behavior of in-situ ZrO2 nanoparticles dispersed epoxy nanocomposite. Eng Fract Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10830010.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108300 ↗
48. Yadav A, Kumar Singh S, Das S et al (2023) Shape recovery and mechanical properties investigation of carbon fiber dispersed bisphenol-A based epoxy composite. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aceb2710.1088/1361-665X/aceb27 ↗
49. Gantayat S, Sarkar N, Rout D, Swain SK (2017) Design of carbon nanofiber embedded conducting epoxy resin. Mater Chem Phys 186:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.09.02010.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.09.020 ↗
50. Ngoma MM, Mathaba M, Moothi K (2021) Effect of carbon nanotubes loading and pressure on the performance of a polyethersulfone (PES)/carbon nanotubes (CNT) membrane. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03042-z10.1038/s41598-021-03042-z ↗
51. Prince JeyaLal L, Ramesh S, Parasuraman S et al (2019) Compression after impact behaviour and failure analysis of nanosilica-toughened thin epoxy/gfrp composite laminates. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1219305710.3390/ma12193057 ↗
52. Mohit H, Selvan VAM (2019) Physical and thermomechanical characterization of the novel aluminum silicon carbide-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Iran Polym J 28:823–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-019-00746-y10.1007/s13726-019-00746-y ↗
53. Darıcık F, Topcu A, Aydın K, Çelik S (2023) Carbon nanotube (CNT) modified carbon fiber/epoxy composite plates for the PEM fuel cell bipolar plate application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48:1090–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.29710.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.297 ↗
54. Johan MR, Meriam Suhaimy SH, Yusof Y (2014) Physico-chemical studies of cuprous oxide (Cu 2 O) nanoparticles coated on amorphous carbon nanotubes (α-CNTs). Appl Surf Sci 289:450–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.00210.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.002 ↗
55. Yaragalla S, Anilkumar G, Vineeshkumar TV et al (2015) Preparation of epoxy graphene and its structural and optical properties. Adv Mater Lett 6:848–852. https://doi.org/10.5185/amlett.2015.591410.5185/amlett.2015.5914 ↗
56. Çiplak Z, Yildiz N, Cąlimli A (2015) Investigation of graphene/Ag nanocomposites synthesis parameters for two different synthesis methods. Fullerenes Nanotub Carbon Nanostructures 23:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2014.89402510.1080/1536383X.2014.894025 ↗
57. Guo Y, Lv Z, Huo Y et al (2019) A biodegradable functional water-responsive shape memory polymer for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B 7:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tb02462f10.1039/c8tb02462f ↗
58. Abdullah OG, Aziz SB, Omer KM, Salih YM (2015) Reducing the optical band gap of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) based nanocomposite. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 26:5303–5309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-3067-310.1007/s10854-015-3067-3 ↗
59. Rasana N, Jayanarayanan K, Deeraj BDS, Joseph K (2019) The thermal degradation and dynamic mechanical properties modeling of MWCNT/glass fiber multiscale filler reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol 169:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.027 ↗
60. Chee SS, Jawaid M, Sultan MTH et al (2019) Thermomechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of bamboo/woven kenaf mat reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Compos Part B Eng 163:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.039 ↗
61. Fulmali AO, Sen B, Ray BC, Prusty RK (2020) Effects of carbon nanotube/polymer interfacial bonding on the long-term creep performance of nanophased glass fiber/epoxy composites. Polym Compos 41:478–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2538110.1002/pc.25381 ↗
62. Singh SK, Singh D, Kumar A, Jain A (2020) An analysis of mechanical and viscoelastic behaviour of Nano-SiO2 dispersed epoxy composites. SILICON 12:2465–2477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00335-x10.1007/s12633-019-00335-x ↗
63. Jumahat A, Soutis C, Abdullah SA, Kasolang S (2012) Tensile properties of nanosilica/epoxy nanocomposites. Procedia Eng 41:1634–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.36110.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.361 ↗
64. Al-Saleh MH, Sundararaj U (2011) Review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber/polymer composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42:2126–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.08.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2011.08.005 ↗
65. De Greef N, Gorbatikh L, Lomov SV, Verpoest I (2011) Damage development in woven carbon fiber/epoxy composites modified with carbon nanotubes under tension in the bias direction. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42:1635–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.013 ↗
66. Cha J, Jun GH, Park JK et al (2017) Improvement of modulus, strength and fracture toughness of CNT/Epoxy nanocomposites through the functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Compos Part B Eng 129:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.07010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.070 ↗
67. Gall K, Dunn ML, Liu Y et al (2002) Shape memory polymer nanocomposites. Acta Mater 50:5115–5126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00368-310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00368-3 ↗