DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2025-02

Study on the mechanical properties and failure mechanism of polypropylene fiber–rubber-modified solid waste-based backfill

Xiangdong Zhang, Ji Yang, Yucheng Bing, Hongda Ding, Chunyu Zheng, Jie Geng, Yiqing Wu, Lu Zheng, Lijuan Su

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 8
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Mayer PM, Moran KD, Miller EL et al (2024) Where the rubber meets the road: Emerging environmental impacts of Tire Wear particles and their chemical cocktails. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.17115310.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171153 ↗
2. Guo Z, Qiu J, Kirichek A, Zhou H, Liu C, Yang L (2024) Recycling waste tyre polymer for production of fibre reinforced cemented tailings backfill in green mining. Sci Total Environ 908:168320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16832010.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168320 ↗
3. Sun L, Wen Y, Liu Q, Li D, Lyu L, Pei J, Zhang J, Li R (2021) A laboratory investigation into the effect of waste non-tire rubber particles on the performance properties of terminal blend rubberized asphalt binders. Constr Build Mater 313:125409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12540910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125409 ↗
4. Dai X, Aydin S, Yardimci MY, Qiang REN, Lesage K, De Schutter G (2021) Rheology, early-age hydration and microstructure of alkali-activated GGBFS-Fly ash-limestone mixtures. Cement Concrete Comp 124:104244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10424410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104244 ↗
5. Ruan Y, Jamil T, Hu C, Gautam BP, Yu J (2022) Microstructure and mechanical properties of sustainable cementitious materials with ultra-high substitution level of calcined clay and limestone powder. Constr Build Mater 314:125416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12541610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125416 ↗
6. Diaz R, Colomines G, Peuvrel-Disdier E, Deterre R (2018) Thermo-mechanical recycling of rubber: relationship between material properties and specific mechanical energy. J Mater Process Tech 252:454–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.10.014 ↗
7. Saputra R, Walvekar R, Khalid M, Mubarak NM, Sillanpää M (2021) Current progress in waste tire rubber devulcanization. Chemosphere 265:129033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12903310.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129033 ↗
8. Kuang F, Long Z, Kuang D, Guo R, Sun J (2022) Experimental study on preparation and properties of low content rubberized geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 352:128980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12898010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128980 ↗
9. Qaidi SM, Mohammed AS, Ahmed HU et al (2022) Rubberized geopolymer composites: a comprehensive review. Ceram Int 48(17):24234–24259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.12310.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.123 ↗
10. Yangthong H, Wisunthorn S, Pichaiyut S, Nakason C (2019) Novel epoxidized natural rubber composites with geopolymers from fly ash waste. Waste Manag 87:148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.01310.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.013 ↗
11. Zhao J, Xie J, Wu J, Zhao C, Zhang B (2023) Workability, compressive strength, and microstructures of one-part rubberized geopolymer mortar. J Build Eng 68:106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10608810.1016/j.jobe.2023.106088 ↗
12. Li J, Cao S, Yilmaz E (2024) Reinforcing effects of polypropylene on energy absorption and fracturing of cement-based tailings backfill under impact loading. Int J Min Met Mater 31(4):650–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-023-2806-310.1007/s12613-023-2806-3 ↗
13. Chen X, Shi X, Zhou J, Yu Z (2019) Influence of polypropylene fiber reinforcement on tensile behavior and failure mode of tailings cemented paste backfill. IEEE Access 7:69015–69026. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.291948010.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919480 ↗
14. Alyousef R (2021) Sustainable use of waste polypropylene fibres to enhance the abrasion and skid resistance of two-stage concrete. Sustainability 13(9):5200. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1309520010.3390/su13095200 ↗
15. Hosseinzadeh H, Salehi AM, Mehraein M, Asadollahfardi G (2023) The effects of steel, polypropylene, and high-performance macro polypropylene fibers on mechanical properties and durability of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 386:131589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13158910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131589 ↗
16. Luhar S, ChaudharyS LI (2018) Thermal resistance of fly ash based rubberized geopolymer concrete. J Build Eng 19:420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.05.02510.1016/j.jobe.2018.05.025 ↗
17. Luhar S, Chaudhary S, Luhar I (2019) Development of rubberized geopolymer concrete: strength and durability studies. Constr Build Mater 204:740–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.18510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.185 ↗
18. Al-Sodani KAA (2022) Mix design, mechanical properties and durability of the rubberized geopolymer concrete: a review. Case Stud Constr Mat 17:e01480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0148010.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01480 ↗
19. Iqbal HW, Hamcumpai K, Nuaklong P, Jongvivatsakul P, Likitlersuang S, Pothisiri T, Chintanapakdee C, Wijeyewickrema AC (2024) Enhancing fire resistance in geopolymer concrete containing crumb rubber with graphene nanoplatelets. Constr Build Mater 426:136115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13611510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136115 ↗
20. Arunkumar K, Muthukannan M, Ganesh AC (2021) Mitigation of waste rubber tire and waste wood ash by the production of rubberized low calcium waste wood ash based geopolymer concrete and influence of waste rubber fibre in setting properties and mechanical behavior. Environ Res 194:110661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.11066110.1016/j.envres.2020.110661 ↗
21. Zeyad AM, Bayraktar OY, Tayeh BA, Öz A, Özkan İGM, Kaplan G (2024) Impact of rice husk ash on physico-mechanical, durability and microstructural features of rubberized lightweight geopolymer composite. Constr Build Mater 427:136265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13626510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136265 ↗
22. Fedroff D, Ahmad S, Savas BZ (1996) Mechanical properties of concrete with ground waste tire rubber. Transport Res Rec 1532(1):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/036119819615320011010.1177/0361198196153200110 ↗
23. Hassan MK, Ibrahim MI, Shill SK, Al-Deen S (2024) Mechanical properties of rubberised geopolymer concrete. Materials 17(5):1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1705103110.3390/ma17051031 ↗
24. Duan D, Li F, Guo Z, Ma C (2024) Mechanical performance of crumbed rubber concrete subjected to high temperature. Struct Concrete. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20230105010.1002/suco.202301050 ↗
25. Kuang F, Long Z, Kuang D, Guo R, Sun J (2023) Experimental study on high temperatures performance of rubberized geopolymer mortar. J Build Eng 76:107091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10709110.1016/j.jobe.2023.107091 ↗
26. Deng Z, Yang Z, Pan X (2023) Synergetic effects of recycled crumb rubber and glass cullet on the engineering properties of geopolymer mortar. Cement Concrete Comp 137:104907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10490710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104907 ↗
27. Pham TM, Liu J, Tran P, Pang VL, Shi F, Chen W, Hao H, Tran TM (2020) Dynamic compressive properties of lightweight rubberized geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 265:120753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12075310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120753 ↗
28. Zhang J, Li J (2023) Constitutive relation of energy loss of rubber-tailings backfill treated with different temperatures. J Mining Strata Control Eng 5(4):043017. https://doi.org/10.13532/j.jmsce.cn10-1638/td.2023.04.00310.13532/j.jmsce.cn10-1638/td.2023.04.003 ↗
29. Wang X, Cheng C, Wang D (2024) Effect of rice husk ash on mechanical properties of rubber doped geopolymer recycled concrete. Case Stud Constr Mat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0340610.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03406 ↗
30. Yao N, Huang T, Zhang G, Lv L, Lin K, Liu Y, Ruan X (2024) Study on delamination characteristics and mechanical properties of cemented waste rock backfill with rubber aggregation. Constr Build Mater 438:137090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13709010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137090 ↗
31. Wang X, Silva MCE, Costa Pereira MF, Brás H, Paneiro G (2023) Strength behavior and deformability characteristics of paste backfill with the addition of recycled rubber. Int J Min Reclam Env 37(9):713–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2023.224529410.1080/17480930.2023.2245294 ↗
32. Youssf O, Elchalakani M, Hassanli R, Roychand R, Zhuge Y, Gravina RJ, Mills JE (2022) Mechanical performance and durability of geopolymer lightweight rubber concrete. J Build Eng 45:103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10360810.1016/j.jobe.2021.103608 ↗
33. Li J, Chen Z, Xiao F, Amirkhanian SN (2021) Surface activation of scrap tire crumb rubber to improve compatibility of rubberized asphalt. Resour Conserv Recy 169:105518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10551810.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105518 ↗
34. Hejna A, Korol J, Przybysz-Romatowska M, Zedler Ł, Chmielnicki B, Formela K (2020) Waste tire rubber as low-cost and environmentally-friendly modifier in thermoset polymers—a review. Waste Manag 108:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.03210.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.032 ↗
35. Lazorenko G, Kasprzhitskii A, Mischinenko V (2021) Rubberized geopolymer composites: effect of filler surface treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 9(4):105601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.03210.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.032 ↗
36. Yu J, Zheng H, Hou D, Zhang J, Xu W (2021) Silane coupling agent modification treatment to improve the properties of rubber–cement composites. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9(38):12899–12911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0378910.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03789 ↗
37. Lazorenko G, Kasprzhitskii A, Mischinenko V (2021) Rubberized geopolymer composites: effect of filler surface treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 9(4):105601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.10560110.1016/j.jece.2021.105601 ↗
38. Gillani SAA, Riaz MR, Hameed R, Qamar A, Toumi A, Turatsinze A (2023) Fracture energy of fiber-reinforced and rubberized cement-based composites: a sustainable approach towards recycling of waste scrap tires. Energ Environ-Uk 34(5):1509–1523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x22108922310.1177/0958305x221089223 ↗
39. Nguyen TH, Toumi A, Turatsinze A (2010) Mechanical properties of steel fibre reinforced and rubberised cement-based mortars. Mater Design 31(1):641–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.00610.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.006 ↗
40. Huang JK, Jiang PW, Qian YD, Cheng P, Lou R, Luo X (2023) Research on mechanical property and impact performance of composite rubber hybrid fiber concrete. Arab J Sci Eng 48(4):4339–4355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-06984-210.1007/s13369-022-06984-2 ↗
41. Fazli A, Stevanovic T, Rodrigue D (2022) Recycled HDPE/natural fiber composites modified with waste tire rubber: a comparison between injection and compression molding. Polymers-Basel 14(15):3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1415319710.3390/polym14153197 ↗
42. Xiong C, Li Q, Lan T, Li H, Xing F (2020) Sustainable use of recycled carbon fiber reinforced polymer and crumb rubber in concrete: mechanical properties and ecological evaluation. J Clean Prod 279:123624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12362410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123624 ↗
43. Abd-Elaty MAA, Ghazy MF, Khalifa OH (2022) Mechanical and thermal properties of fibrous rubberized geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 354:129192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12919210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129192 ↗
44. Rajaei S, Shoaei P, Shariati M, Ameri F, Musaeei HR, Behforouz B, de Brito J (2021) RETRACTED: rubberized alkali-activated slag mortar reinforced with polypropylene fibres for application in lightweight thermal insulating materials. Constr Build Mater 270:121430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12143010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121430 ↗
45. Momotaz H, Rahman MM, Karim MR, Zhuge Y, Ma X, Levett P (2024) Changes in flexural, tensile and impact characteristics of kerb concrete due to the addition of tyre-derived aggregates and polypropylene fibres. J Build Eng 83:108438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10843810.1016/j.jobe.2024.108438 ↗
46. Test method for fluidity of cement mortar (GB/T 2419-2005). https://www.chinesestandard.net/Related.aspx/GBT2419-2005
47. Metal and Non-metal Mine Backfill Engineering Technology Standard (GB/T51450-2022). https://www.chinesestandard.net/Related.aspx/GBT51450-2022
48. Testing Method for Compressive Strength and Flexural Strength of Cement Mortar (GB/T 17671-2021). https://www.chinesestandard.net/Related.aspx/GBT17671-2021
49. Standard for test methods of cngineering rock mass (GB/T 50266-2013). https://www.chinesestandard.net/Related.aspx/GBT50266-2013
50. Mhaya AM, Shahidan S, Goel A, Huseien GF (2024) Effect of metakaolin content and shape design on strength performance of lightweight rubberized geopolymer mortars incorporated slag-waste glass powders. Constr Build Mater 432:136500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13650010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136500 ↗
51. Dong R (2023) functional modification on the surface of carbon fiber and its effect on the interfacial properties of rubber composites[D]. Beijing University of Chemical Technology 2023. https://doi.org/10.26939/d.cnki.gbhgu.2023.00131410.26939/d.cnki.gbhgu.2023.001314 ↗
52. Abbas YM, Alsaif A (2024) Enhanced nonlinear models for critical compressive stress-strain characteristics of rubberized concrete: comprehensive experimental data and robust evaluation methodology. Constr Build Mater 433:136691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13669110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136691 ↗
53. DU C, ZHU M, YI F, Tao H, Sun D (2024) Effect of basalt fiber surface modification on the mechanical properties of concrete[J/OL]. J Build Mater 1–12. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1764.TU.20231211.1514.008
54. Martinelli E, Caggiano A, Xargay H (2015) An experimental study on the post-cracking behaviour of Hybrid Industrial/Recycled Steel Fibre-Reinforced Concrete. Constr Build Mater 94:290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.007 ↗
55. Zheng L, Yu Q, Wei J, Yu L, Liu L (2008) Surface modification of pulverized waste rubber and its effecton the properties of portland cement mortar. J WuhanUniversity Technol 01:52–54
56. Zhang C, Han S, Hua Y (2018) Flexural performance of reinforced self-consolidating concrete beams containing hybrid fibers. Constr Build Mater 174:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.075 ↗
57. Candau N, Zimny A, Vives E, Maspoch ML (2023) Elastocaloric waste/natural rubber materials with various crosslink densities. Polymers-Basel 15(11):2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1511256610.3390/polym15112566 ↗
58. Chen Z, Li L, Xiong Z (2019) Investigation on the interfacial behaviour between the rubber-cement matrix of the rubberized concrete. J Clean Prod 209:1354–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.30510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.305 ↗
59. Zhang X, Geng J, Hu G et al (2024) Toughening characteristics of rubber granule-improved alkali-activated slag-stabilized aeolian sand. Constr Build Mater 438:137059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13705910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137059 ↗
60. Khaloo A, Daneshyar A, Rezaei B, Fartash A (2022) Fiber bridging in polypropylene-reinforced high-strength concrete: an experimental and numerical survey. Struct Concrete 23(1):457–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20200077910.1002/suco.202000779 ↗
61. MA H, BAI Y, CHEN B, Ge L, Bai Y, Zhang F (2024) Influence of water-cement ratio and rubber admixture on uniaxial compressive mechanical properties and energy evolution law of mortar[J/OL]. Mater Rep 1–12. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1078.TB.20240202.1726.006.html
62. Zhang J, Ai C, Li Y, Zeng J, Qiu D (2017) Brittleness evaluation index based on energy variation in the whole process of rock failure. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 36(06):1326–1340. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.083910.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.0839 ↗
63. Chen X, Shi X, Zhou J, Yu Z (2019) Influence of polypropylene fiber reinforcement on tensile 1behavior and failure mode of tailings cemented paste backfill. IEEE Access 7:69015–69026. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.291948010.1109/access.2019.2919480 ↗
64. Li J, Zhang X, Pang S et al (2024) Failure mechanism of a green substratum filling material based on digital scatter analysis. Constr Build Mater 418:135288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13528810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135288 ↗
65. Guo N, Shi Y, Hu Z, Yang Z (2023) Shear behaviour of sand–rubber mixtures: interpretation from energy transformation and force chain evolution. Geotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.23.0004310.1680/jgeot.23.00043 ↗
66. Sun Q, Cai C, Zhang S, Tian S, Li B, Xia Y, Sun Q (2019) Study of localized deformation in geopolymer cemented coal gangue-fly ash backfill based on the digital speckle correlation method. Constr Build Mater 215:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.20810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.208 ↗
67. Dai X, Aydin S, Yardimci MY, Qiang REN, Lesage K, De Schutter G (2021) Rheology, early-age hydration and microstructure of alkali-activated GGBFS-Fly ash-limestone mixtures. Constr Build Mater 124:104244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10424410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104244 ↗
68. Zhuang P (2023) Study on micromechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag[D]. Guangzhou University 2023. https://doi.org/10.27040/d.cnki.ggzdu.2023.00009010.27040/d.cnki.ggzdu.2023.000090 ↗
69. Lloyd RR, Provis JL, Van Deventer JS (2009) Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 2: the gel binder. J Mater Sci 44(2):620–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3078-z10.1007/s10853-008-3078-z ↗
70. He Q, Liu H, Zhang G, Li J, Wan H, Liu P, Li Y (2024) Preparation and properties of foamed lightweight soil with large content of limestone powder. Concrete 07:204–208
71. Li Z (2012) Research progress on the effect of limestone powder as mineral admixture on concrete properties in China. Sichuan Build Mater 38(03):19–21
72. Zhang L, Zhang Y, Cao S (2016) Study on the properties of alkali-excited slag-limestone silt mortar. China Concrete Cement Prod 11:6–8. https://doi.org/10.19761/j.1000-4637.2016.11.00210.19761/j.1000-4637.2016.11.002 ↗
73. Hunt H, Indraratna B, Qi Y (2023) Ductility and energy absorbing behaviour of coal wash–rubber crumb mixtures. Int J Rail Transp 11(4):508–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2022.209553910.1080/23248378.2022.2095539 ↗