The preparation of bimetallic cerium/copper organic framework-derived CeCuOx/C NH3-SCR catalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
The bimetallic Ce/Cu-MOF was synthesized by the room temperature hydrothermal method, and then the CeCuOx/C catalyst was obtained by in-situ pyrolysis method under nitrogen atmosphere. Moreover, their catalytic performance was studied in the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides using NH3 as the reductant (NH3-SCR). Meanwhile, the effect of pyrolysis temperature on the NH3-SCR performance was also explored. The results showed that the optimum pyrolysis temperature was 600 °C and the CeCuOx/C-600 catalyst displayed excellent low-temperature activity in the low temperature window (125–275 °C), with a maximum NOx conversion of 93.4% at 250 °C. It was because that the addition of cerium ions could create more oxygen vacancies as well as the synergistic effect between the bimetallic catalysts, promoting electron transfer and enhancing the redox performance. In addition, the crystallinity and small crystallite size could also affect the catalytic performance. NH3-SCR is the most commonly technology to eliminate NOx. Aiming at the unsatisfactory low-temperature NH3-SCR performance, the CeCuOx/C-600 catalysts was prepared by in-situ pyrolysis. It exhibited excellent low-temperature activity within the temperature range of 125–275 °C, and the maximum NOx conversion at 250 °C was 93.4%.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang L, Chen Y, Zhou HF, He SX (2020) NOx emissions in China: temporal variations, spatial patterns and reduction potentials. Atmos Pollut Res 11:1473–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.06.00310.1016/j.apr.2020.06.003 ↗
2. Wang G, Deng JG, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Duan L, Jiang JK, Hao JM (2020) Air pollutant emissions from coal-fired power plants in China over the past two decades. Sci Total Environ 741:140326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14032610.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140326 ↗
3. Gholami F, Tomas M, Gholami Z, Vakili M (2020) Technologies for the nitrogen oxides reduction from flue gas: a review. Sci Total Environ 714:136712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13671210.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136712 ↗
4. Han LP, Cai SX, Gao M, Hasegawa J, Wang PL, Zhang JP, Shi LY, Zhang DS (2019) Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 by using novel catalysts: state of the art and future prospects. Chem Rev 119:10916–10976. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0020210.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00202 ↗
5. Mohan S, Dinesha P, Kumar S (2020) NOx reduction behaviour in copper zeolite catalysts for ammonia SCR systems: a review. Chem Eng J 384:123253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12325310.1016/j.cej.2019.123253 ↗
6. Fu MF, Li CT, Lu P, Qu L, Zhang MY, Zhou Y, Yu MG, Fang Y (2014) A review on selective catalytic reduction of NOx by supported catalysts at 100–300 degrees C-catalysts, mechanism, kinetics. Catal Sci Technol 4:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cy00414g10.1039/c3cy00414g ↗
7. Liu CX, Wang HJ, Zhang ZY, Liu QL (2020) The latest research progress of NH3-SCR in the SO2 resistance of the catalyst in low temperatures for selective catalytic reduction of NOx. Catalysts 10:091034. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1009103410.3390/catal10091034 ↗
8. Xie SH, Tan W, Li YJ, Ma L, Ehrlich SN, Deng JG, Xu P, Gao F et al (2022) Copper single atom-triggered Niobia-Ceria catalyst for efficient low-temperature reduction of nitrogen oxides. ACS Catal 12:2441–2453. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c0566110.1021/acscatal.1c05661 ↗
9. Kondratowicz T, Horky O, Slang S, Dubnova L, Gajewska M, Chmielarz L, Capek L (2023) Hollow @CuMgAl double layered hydrotalcites and mixed oxides with tunable textural and structural properties, and thus enhanced NH3-NOx-SCR activity. Nanoscale Adv 5:3063–3074. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3na00125c10.1039/d3na00125c ↗
10. Chuhadiya S, Sharma R, Dhaka MS (2023) Concentration and LBL cycle evolution to the Cu-BTC metal organic framework: optimization as functional layer to the solar cell devices. Sol Energy 253:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.02.02310.1016/j.solener.2023.02.023 ↗
11. Chuhadiya S, Himanshu SD, Patel SL, Dhaka MS (2021) Metal organic frameworks as hybrid porous materials for energy storage and conversion devices: a review. Coord Chem Rev 446:214115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.21411510.1016/j.ccr.2021.214115 ↗
12. Peng Z, Li YH, Ruan PC, He ZX, Dai L, Liu SD, Wang L, Jun SC et al (2023) Metal-organic frameworks and beyond: the road toward zinc-based batteries. Coord Chem Rev 488:215190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2023.21519010.1016/j.ccr.2023.215190 ↗
13. Guo XR, Zhou LY, Liu XZ, Tan GJ, Yuan F, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A, Qi N, Liu JQ et al (2023) Fluorescence detection platform of metal-organic frameworks for biomarkers. Colloids Surf B-Biointerfaces 229:113455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.11345510.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113455 ↗
14. Chen WP, Liu M, Yang HP, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A, Lu CY, Pan Y, Liu JQ, Bai Z (2023) Recent advances of Fe(III)/Fe(II)-MPNs in biomedical applications. Pharmaceutics 15:051323. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1505132310.3390/pharmaceutics15051323 ↗
15. Adil K, Swirk K, Zaki A, Assen AH, Delahay G, Belmabkhout Y, Cadiau A (2022) Perspectives in adsorptive and catalytic mitigations of NOx using metal-organic frameworks. Energy Fuels 36:3347–3371. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c0363810.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c03638 ↗
16. Kokcam-Demir U, Goldman A, Esrafili L, Gharib M, Morsali A, Weingart O, Janiak C (2020) Coordinatively unsaturated metal sites (open metal sites) in metal-organic frameworks: design and applications. Chem Soc Rev 49:2751–2798. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00609e10.1039/c9cs00609e ↗
17. Ko SJ, Gao FY, Yao XL, Yi HH, Tang XL, Wang CZ, Liu HH, Luo N et al (2022) Synthesis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their application in the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. New J Chem 46:15758–15775. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nj02358j10.1039/d2nj02358j ↗
18. Shah SSA, Najam T, Wen M, Zang SQ, Waseem A, Jiang HL (2022) Metal-organic framework-based electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. Small Struct 3:00090. https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.20210009010.1002/sstr.202100090 ↗
19. Lopez-Molino J, Amo-Ochoa P (2020) Gas sensors based on copper-containing metal-organic frameworks, coordination polymers, and complexes. ChemPlusChem 85:1564–1579. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.20200042810.1002/cplu.202000428 ↗
20. Hao S, Liu YL, Yang J (2022) Construction of Cu-BTC by carboxylic acid organic ligand and its application in low temperature SCR denitration. Sci Total Environ 820:152984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15298410.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152984 ↗
21. Li CY, Shi Y, Zhang H, Zhao QD, Xue FH, Li XY (2016) Cu-BTC metal-organic framework as a novel catalyst for low temperature selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH3: promotional effect of activation temperature. Integr Ferroelectr 172:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2016.117738510.1080/10584587.2016.1177385 ↗
22. Liu ZZ, Shi Y, Li CY, Zhao QD, Li XY (2015) Electrochemical synthesis of Cu3(BTC)2-MOF for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Acta Phys Chim Sin 31:2366–2374. https://doi.org/10.3866/pku.Whxb20151014110.3866/pku.Whxb201510141 ↗
23. Yao Z, Qu DL, Guo YX, Yang YJ, Huang H (2019) Fabrication and characteristics of Mn@Cu3(BTC)2 for low-temperature catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2019:2935942. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/293594210.1155/2019/2935942 ↗
24. Jiang HX, Wang ST, Wang CX, Chen YF, Zhang MH (2018) Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 on Cu-BTC-derived catalysts: influence of modulation and thermal treatment. Catal Surv Asia 22:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10563-018-9242-910.1007/s10563-018-9242-9 ↗
25. Zhou QM, He KL, Wang XX, Lim KH, Liu PW, Wang WJ, Wang QY (2022) Investigation on the redox/acidic features of bimetallic MOF-derived CeMOx catalysts for low-temperature NH3-SCR of NOx. Appl Catal A-Gen 643:118796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2022.11879610.1016/j.apcata.2022.118796 ↗
26. Yang J, Yuling L, Penghe Z, Hao S, Chuanchuan D, Ruihao S, Feifei L (2022) Chemical thermodynamic and catalytic mechanism analysis of Cu-BTC-derived CuOx/C catalyst for selective catalytic reduction (SCR). Mol Catal 531:112710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2022.11271010.1016/j.mcat.2022.112710 ↗
27. Jiang HX, Wang CX, Wang HQ, Zhang MH (2016) Synthesis of highly efficient MnOx catalyst for low-temperature NH3-SCR prepared from Mn-MOF-74 template. Mater Lett 168:17–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.15010.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.150 ↗
28. Bavykina A, Kolobov N, Khan IS, Bau JA, Ramirez A, Gascon J (2020) Metal-organic frameworks in heterogeneous catalysis: recent progress, new trends, and future perspectives. Chem Rev 120:8468–8535. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0068510.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00685 ↗
29. Shu H, Liu YL, Jia Y (2022) Synthesis of Cu-BTC by room temperature hydrothermal and its low temperature SCR denitration. J Mol Struct 1251:132046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.13204610.1016/j.molstruc.2021.132046 ↗
30. Masoomi MY, Morsali A, Dhakshinamoorthy A, Garcia H (2019) Mixed-metal MOFs: unique opportunities in metal-organic framework (MOF) functionality and design. Angew Chemie-Int Ed 58:15188–15205. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20190222910.1002/anie.201902229 ↗
31. Jacobsen J, Ienco A, D’amato R, Costantino F, Stock N (2020) The chemistry of Ce-based metal-organic frameworks. Dalton Trans 49:16551–16586. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0dt02813d10.1039/d0dt02813d ↗
32. Cai M, Bian X, Xie F, Wu WY, Cen P (2021) Preparation and performance of cerium-based catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides: a critical review. Catalysts 11:030361. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1103036110.3390/catal11030361 ↗
33. Lu M, Hou H, Wei CY, Guan XH, Wei W, Wang GS (2020) Preparation of quasi-MIL-101(Cr) loaded ceria catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx at low temperature. Catalysts 10:010140. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1001014010.3390/catal10010140 ↗
34. Shi JW, Wang Y, Duan RB, Gao C, Wang BR, He C, Niu CM (2019) The synergistic effects between Ce and Cu in CuyCe1-yW5Ox catalysts for enhanced NH3-SCR of NOx and SO2 tolerance. Catal Sci Technol 9:718–730. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cy01949e10.1039/c8cy01949e ↗
35. Wang SJ, Li ZZ, Duan FH, Hu B, He LH, Wang MH, Zhou N, Jia QJ et al (2019) Bimetallic cerium/copper organic framework-derived cerium and copper oxides embedded by mesoporous carbon: Label-free aptasensor for ultrasensitive tobramycin detection. Anal Chim Acta 1047:150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.09.06410.1016/j.aca.2018.09.064 ↗
36. Zhang L, Huang L, Qin YH, Chen BZ (2018) Structure and denitration performance of carbon-based catalysts prepared from Cu-BTC precursor. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 28:980–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(18)64734-x10.1016/s1003-6326(18)64734-x ↗
37. Hao S, Liu YL (2022) Constructing and synthesizing optimal Cu-BTC and its application in low-temperature denitration. J Mater Sci 57:1689–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06735-y10.1007/s10853-021-06735-y ↗
38. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A, Karimi-Shamsabadi M (2013) Decolorization of a binary azo dyes mixture using CuO incorporated nanozeolite-X as a heterogeneous catalyst and solar irradiation. Chem Eng J 228:631–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.03510.1016/j.cej.2013.05.035 ↗
39. Norouzi A, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A (2020) α-Fe2O3/Cu2O heterostructure: brief characterization and kinetic aspect of degradation of methylene blue. Physica B-Condens Matter 599:412422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2020.41242210.1016/j.physb.2020.412422 ↗
40. Yuliati L, Hamajima T, Hattori T, Yoshida H (2005) Highly dispersed Ce(III) species on silica and alumina as new photocatalysts for non-oxidative direct methane coupling. Chem Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/b507698f10.1039/b507698f ↗
41. Mendes AN, Zholobenko VL, Thibault-Starzyk F, Da Costa P, Henriques C (2016) On the enhancing effect of Ce in Pd-MOR catalysts for NOxCH4-SCR: a structure-reactivity study. Appl Catal B-Environ 195:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.00410.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.004 ↗
42. Jiang L, Ca YX, Jin MM, Zhu ZZ, Wang YH (2020) The influence of Ce or Mn doping on Cu-based catalysts for De-NOx with NH3-SCR. J Chem 2020:1462801. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/146280110.1155/2020/1462801 ↗
43. Wilken N, Nedyalkova R, Kamasamudram K, Li JH, Currier NW, Vedaiyan R, Yezerets A, Olsson L (2013) Investigation of the effect of accelerated hydrothermal aging on the Cu sites in a Cu-BEA catalyst for NH3-SCR applications. Top Catal 56:317–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-9973-910.1007/s11244-013-9973-9 ↗
44. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-111710.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
45. Dai WY, Li ZH, Li CC, Zhang CS, Wang F, Liu PP, Qiao HN (2023) Revealing the effects of preparation methods over Ce-MnOx catalysts for soot combustion: physicochemical properties and catalytic performance. J Ind Eng Chem 121:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2023.01.01310.1016/j.jiec.2023.01.013 ↗
46. Senobari S, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A (2018) A comprehensive study on the enhanced photocatalytic activity of CuO-NiO nanoparticles: designing the experiments. J Mol Liq 261:208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.02810.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.028 ↗
47. Derikvandia H, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A (2017) Increased photocatalytic activity of NiO and ZnO in photodegradation of a model drug aqueous solution: effect of coupling, supporting, particles size and calcination temperature. J Hazard Mater 321:629–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.05610.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.056 ↗
48. Amani-Beni Z, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A (2018) NiO nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode as a novel sulfasalazine sensor. Anal Chim Acta 1031:47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.00210.1016/j.aca.2018.06.002 ↗
49. Song KL, Guo KY, Lv YX, Ma DD, Cheng YH, Shi JW (2023) Rational regulation of reducibility and acid site on Mn-Fe-BTC to achieve high low-temperature catalytic denitration performance. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c2054510.1021/acsami.2c20545 ↗
50. Li CY, Shi Y, Yu FY, Chu Q, Sun XY (2020) Preparation of metal-organic framework Cu+/Ni-MOF catalyst with enhanced catalytic activity for selective catalytic reduction of NOx. Ferroelectrics 565:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2020.176171510.1080/00150193.2020.1761715 ↗
51. Zhu JX, Li JF, Chu BX, Liu SQ, Fu SY, Qin QJ, Dong LH, Li B (2023) Excitation of catalytic performance on MOFs derivative carrier by residual carbon for low-temperature NH3-SCR reaction. Mol Catal 535:112859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2022.11285910.1016/j.mcat.2022.112859 ↗
52. Zhang Y, Zhao L, Duan J, Bi SN (2020) Insights into deNOx processing over Ce-modified Cu-BTC catalysts for the CO-SCR reaction at low temperature by in situ DRIFTS. Sep Purif Technol 234:116081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.11608110.1016/j.seppur.2019.116081 ↗
53. Yao XJ, Zhang L, Li LL, Liu LC, Cao Y, Dong X, Gao F, Deng Y et al (2014) Investigation of the structure, acidity, and catalytic performance of CuO/Ti0.95Ce0.05O2 catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 at low temperature. Appl Catal B-Environ 150:315–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.12.00710.1016/j.apcatb.2013.12.007 ↗
54. Yan QH, Gao YS, Li YR, Vasiliades MA, Chen SN, Zhang C, Gui RR, Wang Q et al (2019) Promotional effect of Ce doping in Cu4Al1Ox: LDO catalyst for low-T practical NH3-SCR: steady-state and transient kinetics studies. Appl Catal B-Environ 255:117749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11774910.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117749 ↗
55. Shan Y, Liu YX, Li Y, Yang W (2020) A review on application of cerium-based oxides in gaseous pollutant purification. Sep Purif Technol 250:117181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11718110.1016/j.seppur.2020.117181 ↗
56. Damma D, Ettireddy PR, Reddy BM, Smirniotis PG (2019) A Review of low temperature NH3-SCR for removal of NOx. Catalysts 9:040349. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal904034910.3390/catal9040349 ↗
57. Shi Z, Peng Q, Jiaqiang E, Xie B, Wei J, Yin R, Fu G (2023) Mechanism, performance and modification methods for NH3-SCR catalysts: a review. Fuel 331:125885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12588510.1016/j.fuel.2022.125885 ↗
58. Ramalho PSF, Soares O, Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR (2023) Catalytic reduction of NO over copper supported on activated carbon. Catal Today 418:114044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2023.11404410.1016/j.cattod.2023.114044 ↗
59. Zhang TX, Zhang YQ, Ning P, Wang HM, Ma YP, Xu SY, Liu M, Zhang QL et al (2021) The property tuning of NH3-SCR over iron-tungsten catalyst: role of calcination temperature on surface defect and acidity. Appl Surf Sci 538:147999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14799910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147999 ↗
60. Liang YQ, Li R, Liang RC, Li ZH, Jiang XQ, Jiang JX (2023) Positive effect of Ce modification on low-temperature NH3-SCR performance and hydrothermal stability over Cu-SSZ-16 catalysts. Catalysts 13:040742. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1304074210.3390/catal13040742 ↗
61. Chen JF, Zhan YY, Zhu JJ, Chen CQ, Lin XY, Zheng Q (2010) The synergetic mechanism between copper species and ceria in NO abatement over Cu/CeO2 catalysts. Appl Catal A-Gen 377:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.02710.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.027 ↗