Enhanced photocatalytic efficiency of flowerlike In-doped CdS microstructures for CO2 conversion and Cr(VI) reduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Amesimeku J, Zhao Y, Kun J, Gu J (2024) One-pot synthesis of MIL-101-NH2 (Cr) derivatives using GdmCl as a mediator for enhanced low CO2 concentration capture. J Mater Sci 59:14284-14294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-10058-z10.1007/s10853-024-10058-z ↗
2. Maruccia E, Piovano A, Lourenço MAO et al (2023) Revealing the competitive effect of N2 and H2O towards CO2 adsorption in N-rich ordered mesoporous carbons. Mater Today Sustain 21:100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.10027010.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100270 ↗
3. Shaikh NS, Shaikh JS, Márquez V et al (2023) New perspectives, rational designs, and engineering of tin (Sn)-based materials for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Mater Today Sustain 22:100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.10038410.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100384 ↗
4. Li Y-Y, Wei Z-H, Fan J-B, Li Z-J, Yao H-C (2019) Photocatalytic CO2reduction activity of Z-scheme CdS/CdWO4catalysts constructed by surface charge directed selective deposition of CdS. Appl Surf Sci 483:442-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.33310.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.333 ↗
5. Li J, Wang Y, Wang Y et al (2023) MXene Ti3C2 decorated g-C3N4/ZnO photocatalysts with improved photocatalytic performance for CO2 reduction. Nano Mater Sci. 5:237-245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2023.02.00310.1016/j.nanoms.2023.02.003 ↗
6. Wang Y, Cao Y, Wei S et al (2025) N-Bi covalently connected Z-scheme heterojunction by in situ anchoring BiOCl on triazine-based bromine-substituted covalent organic frameworks for the enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 and Cr(VI). Chem Eng J 505:159349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.15934910.1016/j.cej.2025.159349 ↗
7. Gong Y, Chen J, Ma D, Zhong J (2025) Green preparation of nitrogen vacancies enriched g-C3N4 for efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2 and Cr(VI). J Colloid Interface Sci 682:446-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.11.23710.1016/j.jcis.2024.11.237 ↗
8. Gong Y, Yang P, Chen J, Zhong J, Ma D (2024) Efficient photocatalytic CO2 and Cr(VI) reduction on carbon spheres/g-C3N4 composites with enriched nitrogen vacancies. Compos Commun 51:102109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2024.10210910.1016/j.coco.2024.102109 ↗
9. Liapun V, Hanif MB, Sihor M et al (2023) Versatile application of BiVO4/TiO2 S-scheme photocatalyst: photocatalytic CO2 and Cr(VI) reduction. Chemosphere 337:139397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.13939710.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139397 ↗
10. Ahmad I, Zou Y, Yan J et al (2023) Semiconductor photocatalysts: a critical review highlighting the various strategies to boost the photocatalytic performances for diverse applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 311:102830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2022.10283010.1016/j.cis.2022.102830 ↗
11. He X, Jin T, Wang M, Huang A, Li L (2025) Fabrication and characterization of hierarchically macroporous Al2O3 ceramic supported ZnO/ZnS photocatalyst. Ceram Int 51:1247-1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.11.10510.1016/j.ceramint.2024.11.105 ↗
12. Ullah H, Haneef Z, Ahmad A, Butler IS, Nasir Dara R, Rehman Z (2023) MoS2 and CdS photocatalysts for water decontamination: a review. Inorg Chem Commun 153:110775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2023.11077510.1016/j.inoche.2023.110775 ↗
13. Umaru D, Hafeez HY, Mohammed J, Suleiman AB, Ndikilar CE, Zakariyya Y (2023) A review of recent progress in solar fuel (hydrogen) generation via photocatalytic water-splitting of cadmium sulfide (CdS) based photocatalyst. Appl Surf Sci Adv 18:100520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.10052010.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100520 ↗
14. Nie W, Liu Z, Ruan M, Zhou J (2023) Piezo-potential induced redox of polyaniline and CdS/PANI heterostructures for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 52:555-566 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.30710.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.307 ↗
15. Alomar M, Liu Y, Chen W (2018) Surface decorated Zn0.15Cd0.85S nanoflowers with P25 for enhanced visible light driven photocatalytic degradation of Rh-B and stability. Appl Sci 8:327. https://doi.org/10.3390/app803032710.3390/app8030327 ↗
16. Sun B, Wang H, Wu J et al (2020) Designed synthesis of unique ZnS@CdS@ Cd0.5Zn0.5S-MoS2 hollow nanospheres for efficient visible-light-driven H2 evolution. CrystEngComm 22:2743-2755. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CE00064G10.1039/D0CE00064G ↗
17. Yu G, Geng L, Wu S, Yan W, Liu G (2015) Highly-efficient cocatalyst-free H2-evolution over silica-supported CdS nanoparticle photocatalysts under visible light. Chem Commun 51:10676-10679. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC02249E10.1039/C5CC02249E ↗
18. Dharmalingam P, Palani G, Apsari R et al (2022) Synthesis of metal oxides/sulfides-based nanocomposites and their environmental applications: a review. Mater Today Sustain 20:100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.10023210.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100232 ↗
19. QingáLu G (2009) Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by prolonging the lifetime of carriers in ZnO/CdS heterostructures Chem Commun 3452-3454.https://doi.org/10.1039/B904668B10.1039/B904668B ↗
20. Sasikala R, Shirole AR, Sudarsan V et al (2011) Improved photocatalytic activity of indium doped cadmium sulfide dispersed on zirconia. J Mater Chem 21:16566-1657310.1039/c1jm12531a ↗
21. Arun V, Manikandan V, AlSalhi MS et al (2022) An efficient optical properties of Sn doped ZnO/CdS based solar light driven nanocomposites for enhanced photocatalytic degradation applications. Chemosphere 300:134460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13446010.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134460 ↗
22. Mehmood I, Shah AH, Khan SA et al (2022) Effect of Mg-doped CdS co-sensitization on performance of CuInSe2 quantum dot sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem Solids 162:11050210.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110502 ↗
23. Kandy MM, Gaikar VG (2018) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using CdS nanorods on porous anodic alumina support. Mater Res Bull 102:440-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.02.05410.1016/j.materresbull.2018.02.054 ↗
24. Liu B-J, Torimoto T, Yoneyama H (1998) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using surface-modified CdS photocatalysts in organic solvents. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 113:93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(97)00318-310.1016/S1010-6030(97)00318-3 ↗
25. Cheng M, Yang S, Chen R, Zhu X, Liao Q, Huang Y (2018) Visible light responsive CdS sensitized TiO2 nanorod array films for efficient photocatalytic reduction of gas phase CO2. Mol Catal 448:185-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2018.01.00510.1016/j.mcat.2018.01.005 ↗
26. Ahmad Beigi A, Fatemi S, Salehi Z (2014) Synthesis of nanocomposite CdS/TiO2 and investigation of its photocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction to CO and CH4 under visible light irradiation. J CO2 Util 7:23-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2014.06.00310.1016/j.jcou.2014.06.003 ↗
27. Song G, Xin F, Chen J, Yin X (2014) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 in cyclohexanol on CdS–TiO2 heterostructured photocatalyst. Appl Catal A Gen 473:90-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.12.03510.1016/j.apcata.2013.12.035 ↗
28. Zhu Z, Qin J, Jiang M, Ding Z, Hou Y (2017) Enhanced selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction into CO over Ag/CdS nanocomposites under visible light. Appl Surf Sci 391:572-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.14810.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.148 ↗
29. Liu Y, Deng L, Sheng J et al (2019) Photostable core-shell CdS/ZIF-8 composite for enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Appl Surf Sci 498:143899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14389910.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143899 ↗
30. Tarek M, Rezaul Karim KM, Sarkar SM et al (2019) Hetero-structure CdS–CuFe2O4 as an efficient visible light active photocatalyst for photoelectrochemical reduction of CO2 to methanol. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:26271-26284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.07410.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.074 ↗
31. Wei Z-H, Wang Y-F, Li Y-Y, Zhang L, Yao H-C, Li Z-J (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity of Z-scheme CdS/BiVO4 nanocomposite with thinner BiVO4 nanosheets. J CO2 Util 28:15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.09.00810.1016/j.jcou.2018.09.008 ↗
32. Kandy MM, Gaikar VG (2019) Enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using CdS/Mn2O3 nanocomposite photocatalysts on porous anodic alumina support with solar concentrators. Renew Energy 139:915-923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.00210.1016/j.renene.2019.03.002 ↗
33. Lingampalli SR, Ayyub MM, Magesh G, Rao CNR (2018) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by employing ZnO/Ag1-xCux/CdS and related heterostructures. Chem Phys Lett 691:28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2017.10.04810.1016/j.cplett.2017.10.048 ↗
34. Zhao G, Zhou W, Sun Y et al (2018) Efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction over Co(II) species modified CdS in aqueous solution. Appl Catal B 226:252-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.05410.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.054 ↗
35. Ijaz S, Ehsan MF, Ashiq MN, Karamat N, He T (2016) Preparation of CdS@ CeO2 core/shell composite for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 under visible-light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 390:550-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.09810.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.098 ↗
36. Ijaz S, Ehsan MF, Ashiq MN, Karamt N, Najam-ul-Haq M, He T (2016) Flower-like CdS/CdV2O6 composite for visible-light photoconversion of CO2 into CH4. Mater Des 107:178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.03110.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.031 ↗
37. Wei Y, Jiao J, Zhao Z et al (2015) Fabrication of inverse opal TiO2-supported Au@ CdS core–shell nanoparticles for efficient photocatalytic CO2 conversion. Appl Catal B 179:422-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.04110.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.041 ↗
38. Li S, Wang Q, Yan X et al (2019) Al2O3 support triggering highly efficient photoreduction of CO2 with H2O on noble-metal-free CdS/Ni9S8/Al2O3. Appl Catal B 240:174-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.06010.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.060 ↗
39. Stokker-Cheregi F, Nedelcea A, Filipescu M et al (2011) High temperature growth of InN on various substrates by plasma-assisted pulsed laser deposition. Appl Surf Sci 257:5312-5314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.14710.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.147 ↗
40. Lu Q, Gu K, Tong Y, Liu Y, Zhang M (2019) Half metallic ferromagnetism of Mn-doped indium nitride nanoparticles. Mater Lett 245:170-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.00110.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.001 ↗
41. Butt S, Shah NA, Nazir A, Ali Z, Maqsood A (2014) Influence of film thickness and In-doping on physical properties of CdS thin films. J Alloys Compd 587:582-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.22110.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.221 ↗
42. Prabhu M, Marikkannan M, Pandian MS, Ramasamy P, Ramachandran K (2022) Effect of zinc and indium doping in chalcogenide (CdS/Te) nanocomposites towards dye-sensitized solar cell applications. J Phys Chem Solids 168:110802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.11080210.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110802 ↗
43. Haunsbhavi K, Barthwal S, Shivaramu NJ et al (2024) Effect of doping (Sn and In) on CdS thin films for ammonia sensing at room temperature. Sens Actuators A 376:115567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.11556710.1016/j.sna.2024.115567 ↗
44. Bagheri R, Kafashan H (2024) Structural and optical properties of In-doped CdS nanostructures: a comprehensive study. Ceram Int 50:37041-37056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.09310.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.093 ↗
45. Chang Y-C, Chen T-J, Hsu P-C (2025) Nitrogen-doped carbon dots/indium-doped zinc sulfide heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic seawater splitting. J Environ Chem Eng 13:115414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.11541410.1016/j.jece.2025.115414 ↗
46. Habibi M, Habibi-Yangjeh A, Akinay Y, Khataee A (2023) Oxygen vacancy-rich CeO2 decorated with Cu3BiS3 nanoparticles: outstanding visible-light photocatalytic performance towards tetracycline degradation. Chemosphere 340:139828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.13982810.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139828 ↗
47. Sin JC, Lam SM, Zeng H et al (2023) Construction of visible light-driven Eu-doped BiOBr hierarchical microflowers for ameliorated photocatalytic 2,4-dichlorophenol and pathogens decomposition with synchronized hexavalent chromium reduction. Mater Today Sustain 22:100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.10034010.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100340 ↗
48. Fida H, Guo S, Zhang G (2015) Preparation and characterization of bifunctional Ti–Fe kaolinite composite for Cr(VI) removal. J Colloid Interface Sci 442:30-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.02310.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.023 ↗
49. Chavan GT, Pawar ST, Prakshale VM et al (2017) Direct synthesis of quaternary Cd (Zn, S) Se thin films: effects of composition. Mater Sci Semicond Process 71:447-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.09.00510.1016/j.mssp.2017.09.005 ↗
50. Alomar M, Liu Y, Chen W, Fida H (2019) Controlling the growth of ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets/CdS nanoparticles by two-step solvothermal synthesis for enhancing photocatalytic activities under visible light. Appl Surf Sci 480:1078-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.01410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.014 ↗
51. Wang L, Zheng P, Zhou X, Xu M, Liu X (2019) Facile fabrication of CdS/UiO-66-NH2 heterojunction photocatalysts for efficient and stable photodegradation of pollution. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 376:80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.03.00110.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.03.001 ↗
52. Wu L, Yu JC, Fu X (2006) Characterization and photocatalytic mechanism of nanosized CdS coupled TiO2 nanocrystals under visible light irradiation. J Mol Catal A Chem 244:25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2005.08.04710.1016/j.molcata.2005.08.047 ↗
53. Han B, Liu S, Zhang N, Xu Y-J, Tang Z-R (2017) One-dimensional CdS@ MoS2 core-shell nanowires for boosted photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. Appl Catal B Environ 202:298-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.02310.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.023 ↗
54. Sasikala R, Gaikwad AP, Sudarsan V, Gupta N, Bharadwaj SR (2013) Cubic phase indium doped cadmium sulfide dispersed on zinc oxide: enhanced photocatalytic activity for hydrogen generation from water. Appl Catal A Gen 464–465:149-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.03710.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.037 ↗
55. Kundu S, Kumar A (2019) Low concentration ammonia sensing performance of Pd incorporated indium tin oxide. J Alloys Compd 780:245-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.20110.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.201 ↗
56. Hemmati-Eslamlu P, Habibi-Yangjeh A, Akinay Y, Cetin T (2023) Novel g-C3N4 nanorods/Cu3BiS3 nanocomposites: outstanding photocatalysts with pn heterojunction for impressively detoxification of water under visible light. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 443:114862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.11486210.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.114862 ↗
57. Xu Z, Yue W, Li C et al (2023) Rational synthesis of Au–CdS composite photocatalysts for broad-spectrum photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. ACS Nano 17:11655-11664. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c0209210.1021/acsnano.3c02092 ↗
58. Fida H, Guo S, Zhang G (2025) Mechanistic insights into the superior performance of Fe–Mn-montmorillonite in simultaneous Cr(VI) and methylene blue removal. J Environ Chem Eng 13:117824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.11782410.1016/j.jece.2025.117824 ↗