Phyto- and zoomass-derived nanostructured carbon as efficient catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells: a review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Lazkano I, Nøstbakken L, Pelli M (2017) From fossil fuels to renewables: the role of electricity storage. Eur Econ Rev 99:113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.03.01310.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.03.013 ↗
2. Maurya PK, Mondal S, Kumar V, Singh SP (2021) Roadmap to sustainable carbon-neutral energy and environment: can we cross the barrier of biomass productivity? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:49327–49342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15540-810.1007/s11356-021-15540-8 ↗
3. Megia PJ, Vizcaino AJ, Calles JA, Carrero A (2021) Hydrogen production technologies: from fossil fuels toward renewable sources. A mini review. Energy Fuels 35:16403–16415. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c0250110.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02501 ↗
4. Raj B, Singh O (2012) Global trends of fossil fuel reserves and climate change in the 21st century. Foss Fuel Environ. https://doi.org/10.5772/3865510.5772/38655 ↗
5. Ebhota WS, Jen TC (2020) Fossil fuels environmental challenges and the role of solar photovoltaic technology advances in fast tracking hybrid renewable energy system. Int J Precis Eng Manuf—Green Technol 7:97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00101-910.1007/s40684-019-00101-9 ↗
6. Grubb M (1993) The costs of limiting fossil-fuel CO2 emissions: a survey and analysis. Annu Rev Energy Environ 18:397–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.18.1.39710.1146/annurev.energy.18.1.397 ↗
7. Valentine SV (2011) Emerging symbiosis: renewable energy and energy security. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:4572–4578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.09510.1016/j.rser.2011.07.095 ↗
8. Institute E (2023) Statistical review of world energy 2023. BP Energy Outlook 2023(70):8–20
9. Yue M, Lambert H, Pahon E et al (2021) Hydrogen energy systems: a critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 146:111180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.11118010.1016/j.rser.2021.111180 ↗
10. Zhao Z, Li M, Zhang L et al (2015) Design principles for heteroatom-doped carbon nanomaterials as highly efficient catalysts for fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Adv Mater 27:6834–6840. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150321110.1002/adma.201503211 ↗
11. Huang L, Zaman S, Tian X et al (2021) Advanced platinum-based oxygen reduction electrocatalysts for fuel cells. Acc Chem Res 54:311–322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0048810.1021/acs.accounts.0c00488 ↗
12. Zhang J, Xia Z, Dai L (2015) Carbon-based electrocatalysts for advanced energy conversion and storage. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.150056410.1126/sciadv.1500564 ↗
13. Ortiz-Herrera JC, Cruz-Martínez H, Solorza-Feria O, Medina DI (2022) Recent progress in carbon nanotubes support materials for Pt-based cathode catalysts in PEM fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:30213–30224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.21810.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.218 ↗
14. Vassilev S, Baxter D, Andersen L, Vassileva C (2010) An overview of the chemical composition of biomass, introduction and scope. IEA Bioenergy Task 32: 913–93310.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022 ↗
15. Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG, Baxter D (2014) Trace element concentrations and associations in some biomass ashes. Fuel 129:292–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.00110.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.001 ↗
16. Steinberger-Wilckens R (2017) Introduction to fuel cell basics. CISM Int Cent Mech Sci Courses Lect 574:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46146-5_110.1007/978-3-319-46146-5_1 ↗
17. Christenson CD (1997) Fuel cell system technologies and application issues. Energy Eng J Assoc Energy Eng 94:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01998595.1997.1053037010.1080/01998595.1997.10530370 ↗
18. Debe MK (2012) Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature 486:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1111510.1038/nature11115 ↗
19. Yu W, Porosoff MD, Chen JG (2013) ChemInform abstract: review of pt-based bimetallic catalysis: from model surfaces to supported catalysts. ChemInform. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.20130618010.1002/chin.201306180 ↗
20. Hall JL (1987) Cell components. Phytochemistry 26:1235–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(00)82398-510.1016/s0031-9422(00)82398-5 ↗
21. Rajalakshmi N, Imran Jafri R, Dhathathreyan KS (2017) Research advancements in low-temperature fuel cells. Electrocatal Low Temp Fuel Cells Fundam Recent Trends. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527803873.ch210.1002/9783527803873.ch2 ↗
22. Adiera N, Rosli H, Loh KS et al (2020) Review of chitosan-based polymers as proton exchange membranes and roles of chitosan-supported ionic liquids. Int J Mol Sci 21:63210.3390/ijms21020632 ↗
23. Viswanathan B, Scibioh MA (2007) Fuel cells: principles and applications. 494
24. Wroblowa HS, Yen-Chi-Pan RG (1976) Electroreduction of oxygen. J Electroanal Chem Interf Electrochem 69:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0728(76)80250-110.1016/s0022-0728(76)80250-1 ↗
25. Kaur P, Verma G, Sekhon SS (2019) Biomass derived hierarchical porous carbon materials as oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts in fuel cells. Prog Mater Sci 102:1–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.12.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.12.002 ↗
26. Borghei M, Lehtonen J, Liu L, Rojas OJ (2017) Advanced biomass-derived electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170369110.1002/adma.201703691 ↗
27. Lang P, Yuan N, Jiang Q et al (2020) Recent advances and prospects of metal-based catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Energy Technol 8:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20190098410.1002/ente.201900984 ↗
28. Antolini E (2007) Catalysts for direct ethanol fuel cells. J Power Sources 170:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.00910.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.009 ↗
29. Wang J, Ye H, Song Y (2018) In-situ reaction-growth of PtNiX nanocrystals on supports for enhanced electrochemical catalytic oxidation of ethanol via continuous flow microfluidic process. Electrochim Acta 278:149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.01310.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.013 ↗
30. Wang J, Song Y (2020) Magnetic field coupling microfluidic synthesis of Fe2Pt/C nanocatalysts for enhanced electrochemical catalytic oxidation of alcohol. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:13035–13044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.21810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.218 ↗
31. Ma J, Tong X, Wang J et al (2019) Rare-earth metal oxide hybridized PtFe nanocrystals synthesized via microfluidic process for enhanced electrochemical catalytic performance. Electrochim Acta 299:80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.13210.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.132 ↗
32. Tzelepis S, Kavadias KA (2022) Progress on platinum-based catalyst layer materials for H2-PEMFC. Energy Eng J Assoc Energy Eng 119:1745–1769. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2022.02098410.32604/ee.2022.020984 ↗
33. Tong X, Cherif M, Zhang G et al (2021) N, P-codoped graphene dots supported on N-doped 3D graphene as metal-free catalysts for oxygen reduction. ACS Appl Mater Interf 13:30512–30523. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c0314110.1021/acsami.1c03141 ↗
34. Zaman S, Huang L, Douka AI et al (2021) Oxygen reduction electrocatalysts toward practical fuel cells: progress and perspectives. Angew Chemie - Int Ed 60:17832–17852. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20201697710.1002/anie.202016977 ↗
35. Thompson ST, Papageorgopoulos D (2019) Platinum group metal-free catalysts boost cost competitiveness of fuel cell vehicles. Nat Catal 2:558–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0291-x10.1038/s41929-019-0291-x ↗
36. Hao Y, Wang X, Shen J et al (2016) One-pot synthesis of single-crystal Pt nanoplates uniformly deposited on reduced graphene oxide, and their high activity and stability on the electrocalalytic oxidation of methanol. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/14/14560210.1088/0957-4484/27/14/145602 ↗
37. Andreadis G, Tsiakaras P (2006) Ethanol crossover and direct ethanol PEM fuel cell performance modeling and experimental validation. Chem Eng Sci 61:7497–7508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.02810.1016/j.ces.2006.08.028 ↗
38. Li D, Wang C, Strmcnik DS, et al (2014) Functional links between Pt single crystal morphology and nanoparticles with different size and shape: the oxygen reduction reaction case. Energy Environ Sci 7:4061–4069. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE01564A10.1039/C4EE01564A ↗
39. Ganguly D, Ramanujam K, Ramaprabhu S (2021) Platinum nanoparticle decorated expired drug-derived N-doped Ketjenblack carbon as efficient catalyst for PEM fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 168:064517. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac0bef10.1149/1945-7111/ac0bef ↗
40. Antolini E (2010) Composite materials: An emerging class of fuel cell catalyst supports. Appl Catal B Environ 100:413–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.08.02510.1016/j.apcatb.2010.08.025 ↗
41. Cho KY, Yeom YS, Seo HY et al (2017) Fine-sized Pt nanoparticles dispersed on PdPt bimetallic nanocrystals with non-covalently functionalized graphene toward synergistic effects on the oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim Acta 257:412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.07510.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.075 ↗
42. Jha N, Mohana AL, Shaijumon MM et al (2008) Pt–Ru/multi-walled carbon nanotubes as electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.07.06410.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.07.064 ↗
43. Shao Y, Yin G, Gao Y (2007) Understanding and approaches for the durability issues of Pt-based catalysts for PEM fuel cell. J Power Sour 171:558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.004 ↗
44. Stevens DA, Hicks MT, Haugen GM, Dahn JR (2005) Ex situ and in situ stability studies of PEMFC catalysts effect of carbon type and humidification on degradation of the carbon. J Electrochem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.209736110.1149/1.2097361 ↗
45. Sharma S, Pollet BG (2012) Support materials for PEMFC and DMFC electrocatalysts—a review. J Power Sour 208:96–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.01110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.011 ↗
46. Dicks AL (2006) The role of carbon in fuel cells. J Power Sour 156:128–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.05410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.054 ↗
47. Chang H, Joo SH, Pak C (2007) Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous carbon for fuel cell applications. J Mater Chem 17:3078–3088. https://doi.org/10.1039/b700389g10.1039/b700389g ↗
48. Yu PT, Gu W, Zhang J, et al (2009) Carbon-support requirements for highly durable fuel cell operation. Polym Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durab. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85536-3_310.1007/978-0-387-85536-3_3 ↗
49. Du L, Shao Y, Sun J, et al (2016) Advanced catalyst supports for PEM fuel cell cathodes10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.016 ↗
50. (2016) Reduction linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrays with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction. 323:760–76410.1126/science.1168049 ↗
51. Paul R, Dai Q, Hu C, Dai L (2019) Ten years of carbon-based metal-free electrocatalysts. Carbon Energy 1(1):19–3110.1002/cey2.5 ↗
52. Tang X, Liu D, Wang YJ et al (2021) Research advances in biomass-derived nanostructured carbons and their composite materials for electrochemical energy technologies. Prog Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10077010.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100770 ↗
53. Ali M, Riaz R, Anjum AS et al (2021) Microwave-assisted ultrafast in-situ growth of N-doped carbon quantum dots on multiwalled carbon nanotubes as an efficient electrocatalyst for photovoltaics. J Colloid Interface Sci 586:349–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.09810.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.098 ↗
54. Saikia M, Das T, Dihingia N et al (2020) Formation of carbon quantum dots and graphene nanosheets from different abundant carbonaceous materials. Diam Relat Mater 106:107813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2020.10781310.1016/j.diamond.2020.107813 ↗
55. Yang DP, Li Z, Liu M et al (2019) Biomass-derived carbonaceous materials: recent progress in synthetic approaches, advantages, and applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:4564–4585. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0603010.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06030 ↗
56. Kim D, Yoshikawa K, Park KY (2015) Characteristics of biochar obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose for renewable energy. Energies 8:14040–14048. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8121241210.3390/en81212412 ↗
57. Dhyani V, Bhaskar T (2017) A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.03510.1016/j.renene.2017.04.035 ↗
58. dos Santos MC, Maynart MC, Aveiro LR, et al (2017) Carbon-based materials: recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. Elsevier Ltd10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09262-6 ↗
59. Berge ND, Kammann C, Ro K, Libra J (2013) Technology: biochar production , carbon sequestration, and waste conversion10.1002/9781118622179.ch8 ↗
60. Liang Z, Wen Q, Wang X et al (2016) Chemically stable and reusable nano zero-valent iron/graphite-like carbon nitride nanohybrid for efficient photocatalytic treatment of Cr(VI) and rhodamine B under visible light. Appl Surf Sci 386:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.01010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.010 ↗
61. Pustahija L, Kern W (2023) Surface functionalization of (pyrolytic) carbon—an overview10.3390/c9020038 ↗
62. Hernández-Montoya V, Bonilla-Petriciolet A (2012) Lignocellulosic precursors used in the synthesis of activated carbon: characterization techniques and applications in the wastewater treatment. BoD–Books on Demand10.5772/3346 ↗
63. Yu Y, Ruan YZ (2007) Activated alumina adsorbent developed from waste aluminum sludge. Key Eng Mater 336–338:1886–1888. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.336-338.188610.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.336-338.1886 ↗
64. Chen J, Xiao G, Duan G et al (2021) Structural design of carbon dots/porous materials composites and their applications. Chem Eng J 421:127743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12774310.1016/j.cej.2020.127743 ↗
65. Liu N, Chen X, Zhang J, Schwank JW (2014) A review on TiO2-based nanotubes synthesized via hydrothermal method: formation mechanism, structure modification, and photocatalytic applications. Catal Today 225:34–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.09010.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.090 ↗
66. Mustafa R, Asmatulu E (2020) Preparation of activated carbon using fruit, paper and clothing wastes for wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 35:101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.10123910.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101239 ↗
67. Deng J, Li M, Wang Y (2016) Biomass-derived carbon: synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Green Chem 18:4824–4854. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6gc01172a10.1039/c6gc01172a ↗
68. Wett B, Aichinger P, Hell M et al (2020) Operational and structural A-stage improvements for high-rate carbon removal. Water Environ Res 92:1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.135410.1002/wer.1354 ↗
69. Rakov DA, Chen F, Ferdousi SA et al (2020) Engineering high energy density sodium battery anodes for improved cycling with superconcentrated ionic liquid electrolytes. Nat Mater 19(10):1096–110110.1038/s41563-020-0673-0 ↗
70. Yu S, Dong X, Zhao P et al (2022) Decoupled temperature and pressure hydrothermal synthesis of carbon sub-micron spheres from cellulose. Nat Commun 13:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31352-x10.1038/s41467-022-31352-x ↗
71. Dutta S, Bhaumik A, Wu KCW (2014) Hierarchically porous carbon derived from polymers and biomass: effect of interconnected pores on energy applications. Energy Environ Sci 7:3574–3592. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee01075b10.1039/c4ee01075b ↗
72. Guan J, Zhang Z, Ji J et al (2017) Hydrothermal synthesis of highly dispersed Co3O4 nanoparticles on biomass-derived nitrogen-doped hierarchically porous carbon networks as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. ACS Appl Mater Interf 9:30662–30669. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0853310.1021/acsami.7b08533 ↗
73. Zhang Y, Liu S, Zheng X et al (2017) Biomass organs control the porosity of their pyrolyzed carbon. Adv Funct Mater 27:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20160468710.1002/adfm.201604687 ↗
74. Holton OT, Stevenson JW (2013) The role of platinum in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Platin Met Rev 57:259–271. https://doi.org/10.1595/147106713X67122210.1595/147106713X671222 ↗
75. Luo M, Zhao Z, Zhang Y et al (2019) PdMo bimetallene for oxygen reduction catalysis. Nature 574:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1603-710.1038/s41586-019-1603-7 ↗
76. Tian X, Zhao X, Su YQ, et al (2019) Engineering bunched Pt-Ni alloy nanocages for efficient oxygen reduction in practical fuel cells. Science. 366:850–856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw749310.1126/science.aaw7493 ↗
77. Halder A, Sharma S, Hegde MS, Ravishankar N (2009) Controlled attachment of ultrafine platinum nanoparticles on functionalized carbon nanotubes with high electrocatalytic activity for methanol oxidation. J Phys Chem C 113:1466–1473. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807257410.1021/jp8072574 ↗
78. Chen J, Wang M, Liu B et al (2006) Platinum catalysts prepared with functional carbon nanotube defects and its improved catalytic performance for methanol oxidation. J Phys Chem B 110:11775–11779. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp061045a10.1021/jp061045a ↗
79. Liu H, Cao Y, Wang F et al (2014) Pig bone derived hierarchical porous carbon-supported platinum nanoparticles with superior electrocatalytic activity towards oxygen reduction reaction. Electroanalysis 26:1831–1839. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.20140018010.1002/elan.201400180 ↗
80. Tamasauskait-Tamasuinaite L, Balčiunaite A, Vaiciukevičiene A et al (2012) Investigation of nanostructured platinum-nickel supported on the titanium surface as electrocatalysts for alkaline fuel cells. J Power Sources 208:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.079 ↗
81. Kharwar YP, Akula S, Sahu AK, Ramanujam K (2020) Highly durable Pt-based catalyst supported on carbon derived from tamarind seeds for oxygen reduction reaction in PEM fuel cell. J Electrochem Soc 167:104515. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab9c7c10.1149/1945-7111/ab9c7c ↗
82. Varathan P, Akula S, Moni P, Sahu AK (2020) Natural aloe vera derived Pt supported N-doped porous carbon: a highly durable cathode catalyst of PEM fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:19267–19279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.05610.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.056 ↗
83. Dhelipan M, Arunchander A, Sahu AK, Kalpana D (2017) Activated carbon from orange peels as supercapacitor electrode and catalyst support for oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Saudi Chem Soc 21:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2016.12.00310.1016/j.jscs.2016.12.003 ↗
84. Liu H, Cao Y, Wang F, Huang Y (2014) Nitrogen-doped hierarchical lamellar porous carbon synthesized from the fish scale as support material for platinum nanoparticle electrocatalyst toward the oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:819–825. https://doi.org/10.1021/am403432h10.1021/am403432h ↗
85. Gao S, Fan H, Zhang S (2014) Nitrogen-enriched carbon from bamboo fungus with superior oxygen reduction reaction activity. J Mater Chem A 2:18263–18270. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta03558e10.1039/c4ta03558e ↗
86. Liu Z, Wang F, Li M, Ni ZH (2016) N, S and P-ternary doped carbon nano-pore/tube composites derived from natural chemicals in waste sweet osmanthus fruit with superior activity for oxygen reduction in acidic and alkaline media. RSC Adv 6:37500–37505. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra08371d10.1039/c6ra08371d ↗
87. Guo Z, Xiao Z, Ren G et al (2016) Natural tea-leaf-derived, ternary-doped 3D porous carbon as a high-performance electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Res 9:1244–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1020-210.1007/s12274-016-1020-2 ↗
88. Li M, Xiong Y, Liu X et al (2015) Iron and nitrogen co-doped carbon nanotube@hollow carbon fibers derived from plant biomass as efficient catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J Mater Chem A 3:9658–9667. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta00958h10.1039/c5ta00958h ↗
89. Wang R, Wang H, Zhou T et al (2015) The enhanced electrocatalytic activity of okara-derived N-doped mesoporous carbon for oxygen reduction reaction. J Power Sour 274:741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.04910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.049 ↗
90. Zhang J, Wu S, Chen X et al (2014) An animal liver derived non-precious metal catalyst for oxygen reduction with high activity and stability. RSC Adv 4:32811–32816. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra06495j10.1039/c4ra06495j ↗
91. Maruyama J, Okamura J, Miyazaki K, Abe I (2007) Two-step carbonization as a method of enhancing catalytic properties of hemoglobin at the fuel cell cathode. J Phys Chem C 111:6597–6600. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp071451+10.1021/jp071451+ ↗
92. Wang H, Zhang Z, Yang Y et al (2015) A Co-N-doped carbonized egg white as a high-performance, non-precious metal, electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. J Solid State Electrochem 19:1727–1733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-015-2798-710.1007/s10008-015-2798-7 ↗
93. Li R, Zheng FY, Zhang X et al (2020) Phosphorus and iron doped nitrogen-containing carbon derived from biomass for oxygen reduction under various pH conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:28651–28663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.17810.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.178 ↗
94. Tong J, Wang W, Li Q et al (2017) Composite of FeCo alloy embedded in biocarbon derived from eggshell membrane with high performance for oxygen reduction reaction and supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta 248:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.12510.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.125 ↗
95. Zhang Z, Li H, Yang Y et al (2015) Cow dung-derived nitrogen-doped carbon as a cost effective, high activity, oxygen reduction electrocatalyst. RSC Adv 5:27112–27119. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra01987g10.1039/c5ra01987g ↗
96. Alhumaimess MS (2020) Metal–organic frameworks and their catalytic applications. J Saudi Chem Soc 24:461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2020.04.00210.1016/j.jscs.2020.04.002 ↗
97. de Andrés F, Ríos Á (2021) Carbon dots—separative techniques: tools-objective towards green analytical nanometrology focused on bioanalysis. Microchem J 161:105773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.10577310.1016/j.microc.2020.105773 ↗
98. Wang Y, Zhu M, Li Y et al (2018) Heteroatom-doped porous carbon from methyl orange dye wastewater for oxygen reduction. Green Energy Environ 3:172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2017.06.00510.1016/j.gee.2017.06.005 ↗
99. Zhang Z, Yang S, Li H et al (2019) Sustainable carbonaceous materials derived from biomass as metal-free electrocatalysts. Adv Mater 31:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180571810.1002/adma.201805718 ↗
100. Zhang J, Zhou H, Liu X et al (2016) Keratin-derived S/N co-doped graphene-like nanobubble and nanosheet hybrids for highly efficient oxygen reduction. J Mater Chem A 4:15870–15879. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta06212a10.1039/c6ta06212a ↗