journal article·2025-01

Machine learning analysis for melt pool geometry prediction of direct energy deposited SS316L single tracks

Gowtham Nimmal Haribabu, Jeyapriya Thimukonda Jegadeesan, R. V. S. Prasad, Bikramjit Basu

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Among the metal additive manufacturing techniques, directed energy deposition (DED) is least investigated, particularly in the context of machine learning (ML)-based process-structure correlation. To address this aspect, we performed the planned experiments for continuous deposition of single tracks of austenitic stainless steel (SS316L) by varying the process parameters. Based on extensive analysis of the melt pool quality in terms of defect morphology, the process map for DED of SS316L was created. This can help in decision-making regarding process parameter selection. Within the limitation of a small dataset, a number of statistical learning algorithms with tuned hyperparameters were trained to predict the geometrical parameters of single tracks (width, depth, height, track area, melt pool area). Based on an extensive evaluation of the performance metrics and residual error analysis, the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model was found to consistently predict all of the geometrical parameters better than other ML algorithms, with a statistically acceptable coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE). An attempt has been made to rationalise the superior performance of GPR in low data regime, over linear regression or gradient boosting machine (GBM) in reference to the underlying statistical framework. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Barui S, Chatterjee S, Mandal S et al (2017) Microstructure and compression properties of 3D powder printed Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds with designed porosity: experimental and computational analysis. Mater Sci Eng C 70:812–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.04010.1016/j.msec.2016.09.040 ↗
2. Fayazfar H, Salarian M, Rogalsky A et al (2018) A critical review of powder-based additive manufacturing of ferrous alloys: process parameters, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Des 144:98–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.01810.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.018 ↗
3. DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of metallic components–process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 92:112–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
4. Yuan B, Guss GM, Wilson AC et al (2018) Machine-learning-based monitoring of laser powder bed fusion. Adv Mater Technol 3(12):1800136. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20180013610.1002/admt.201800136 ↗
5. Yeung H, Yang Z, Yan L (2020) A meltpool prediction based scan strategy for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 35:101383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10138310.1016/j.addma.2020.101383 ↗
6. Gaikwad A, Giera B, Guss GM et al (2020) Heterogeneous sensing and scientific machine learning for quality assurance in laser powder bed fusion–a single-track study. Addit Manuf 36:101659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10165910.1016/j.addma.2020.101659 ↗
7. Haferkamp L, Spierings A, Rusch M et al (2021) Effect of Particle size of monomodal 316L powder on powder layer density in powder bed fusion. Prog Addit Manuf 6:367–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-020-00152-410.1007/s40964-020-00152-4 ↗
8. Zhang B, Jaiswal P, Rai R, Nelaturi S (2018) Additive manufacturing of functionally graded material objects: a review. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 18(4):041002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403968310.1115/1.4039683 ↗
9. Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S et al (2016) Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials 83:127–14110.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
10. Liu Z, He B, Lyu T, Zou Y (2021) A review on additive manufacturing of titanium alloys for aerospace applications: directed energy deposition and beyond Ti-6Al-4V. JOM 73:1804–181810.1007/s11837-021-04670-6 ↗
11. Zhakeyev A, Wang P, Zhang L et al (2017) Additive manufacturing: unlocking the evolution of energy materials. Adv Sci 4(10):1700187. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20170018710.1002/advs.201700187 ↗
12. Leal R, Barreiros FM, Alves L et al (2017) Additive manufacturing tooling for the automotive industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:1671–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0239-810.1007/s00170-017-0239-8 ↗
13. Ren K, Chew Y, Zhang YF et al (2020) Thermal field prediction for laser scanning paths in laser aided additive manufacturing by physics-based machine learning. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 362:112734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.11273410.1016/j.cma.2019.112734 ↗
14. Yan W, Lin S, Kafka OL et al (2018) Data-driven multi-scale multi-physics models to derive process–structure–property relationships for additive manufacturing. Comput Mech 61:521–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z ↗
15. Lu Y, Yang Z, Eddy D, Krishnamurty S (2018) Self-improving additive manufacturing knowledge management. In proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference 1B-2018:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC20188599610.1115/DETC201885996 ↗
16. Guan X, Zhao YF (2020) Modeling of the laser powder–based directed energy deposition process for additive manufacturing: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:1959–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05027-010.1007/s00170-020-05027-0 ↗
17. Costa L, Felde I, Réti T et al (2002) A simplified semi-empirical method to select the processing parameters for laser clad coatings. Mater Sci Forum 414–415:385–394. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.414-415.38510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.414-415.385 ↗
18. Patalas-Maliszewska J, Feldshtein E, Devojno O et al (2020) Single tracks as a key factor in additive manufacturing technology-analysis of research trends and metal deposition behavior. Materials 13(5):1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1305111510.3390/ma13051115 ↗
19. Carrozza A, Mazzucato F, Aversa A et al (2021) Single scans of Ti-6Al-4V by directed energy deposition: a cost and time effective methodology to assess the proper process window. Met Mater Int 27:3590–3602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00930-310.1007/s12540-020-00930-3 ↗
20. Lim JS, Oh WJ, Lee CM, Kim DH (2021) Selection of effective manufacturing conditions for directed energy deposition process using machine learning methods. Sci Rep 11:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03622-z10.1038/s41598-021-03622-z ↗
21. Akbari P, Ogoke F, Kao NY et al (2022) MeltpoolNet: melt pool characteristic prediction in metal additive manufacturing using machine learning. Addit Manuf 55:102817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10281710.1016/j.addma.2022.102817 ↗
22. El Cheikh H, Courant B, Branchu S et al (2012) Analysis and prediction of single laser tracks geometrical characteristics in coaxial laser cladding process. Opt Lasers Eng 50:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.10.01410.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.10.014 ↗
23. Feenstra DR, Molotnikov A, Birbilis N (2021) Utilisation of artificial neural networks to rationalise processing windows in directed energy deposition applications. Mater Des 198:109342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10934210.1016/j.matdes.2020.109342 ↗
24. Tahmasebi P, Kamrava S, Bai T, Sahimi M (2020) Machine learning in geo- and environmental sciences: from small to large scale. Adv Water Res 142:103619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.10361910.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103619 ↗
25. Wiemken TL, Kelley RR (2020) Machine learning in epidemiology and health outcomes research. Annu Rev Public Health 41:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-09443710.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094437 ↗
26. Quiñonero J, Quiñonero-Candela Q, Rasmussen CE, De CM (2005) A unifying view of sparse approximate Gaussian process regression.
27. Mamat M, Samad SA (2010) Performance of radial basis function and support vector machine in time series forecasting. In: 2010 international conference on intelligent and advanced systems, ICIAS 201010.1109/ICIAS.2010.5716201 ↗
28. Friedman JH (2002) Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput Stat Data Anal 38:367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-210.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 ↗
29. Mckinney W (2011) pandas: a foundational python library for data analysis and statistics. Python High Performance Science Computer
30. Bax B, Rajput R, Kellet R, Reisacher M (2018) Systematic evaluation of process parameter maps for laser cladding and directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf 21:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.04.002 ↗
31. Wu X, Zhu B, Zeng X et al (1996) Critical state of laser cladding with powder auto-feeding. Surf Coat Technol 79:200–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0257-8972(95)02452-210.1016/0257-8972(95)02452-2 ↗
32. de Oliveira U, Ocelík V, De Hosson JTM (2005) Analysis of coaxial laser cladding processing conditions. Surface Coat Technol 197:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.02910.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.029 ↗
33. Ocelík V, de Oliveira U, de Boer M, de Hosson JTM (2007) Thick Co-based coating on cast iron by side laser cladding: analysis of processing conditions and coating properties. Surface Coat Technol 201:5875–5883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.04410.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.044 ↗
34. Ansari M, Shoja Razavi R, Barekat M (2016) An empirical-statistical model for coaxial laser cladding of NiCrAlY powder on Inconel 738 superalloy. Optics Laser Technol 86:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.06.01410.1016/j.optlastec.2016.06.014 ↗
35. Freund Y, Schapire RE (1995) A desicion-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting BT-computational learning theory. In: Vitányi P (ed). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 23–3710.1007/3-540-59119-2_166 ↗