Mechanical degradations of Fe–C alloys induced by stress corrosion in supercritical CO2 environments: a study based on molecular dynamics simulation and machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Guevara-Carrion G, Ancherbak S, Mialdun A, Vrabec J, Shevtsova V (2019) Diffusion of methane in supercritical carbon dioxide across the Widom line. Sci Rep 9:8466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44687-110.1038/s41598-019-44687-1 ↗
2. Ehsan MM, Awais M, Lee S, Salehin S, Guan Z, Gurgenci H (2023) Potential prospects of supercritical CO2 power cycles for commercialisation: applicability, research status, and advancement. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 172:113044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.11304410.1016/j.rser.2022.113044 ↗
3. Gumus E (2024) sCO2 power cycle/reverse osmosis distillation system for water-electricity cogeneration in nuclear powered ships and submarines. Desalination 572:117126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.11712610.1016/j.desal.2023.117126 ↗
4. Rahman SNSA, Chai YH, Lam MK (2024) Taguchi approach for assessing supercritical CO2 (sCO2) fluid extraction of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) from Chlorella Vulgaris sp. microalgae. J Environ Manag 355:120447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.12044710.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120447 ↗
5. Magnin C, Islam Z, Elbakhshwan M, Brittan A, Thoma DJ, Anderson MH (2022) The performance of additively manufactured Haynes 282 in supercritical CO2. Mater Sci Eng A 841:143007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14300710.1016/j.msea.2022.143007 ↗
6. Nilofar SD, Sut S, Baskose I, Kargılı U, Orlando G, Zengin G (2024) Exploring the effects of post-distillation and post-supercritical CO2 extraction on chemical profile and biological activities of two Salvia species (S. chrysophylla and S. microstegia). Microchem J 198:110183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2024.11018310.1016/j.microc.2024.110183 ↗
7. Liu X, Hwang W, Park J et al (2018) Toward the multiscale nature of stress corrosion cracking. Nucl Eng Technol 50:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.10.01410.1016/j.net.2017.10.014 ↗
8. Yang X, Lin B, Zhang H et al (2024) Influence of stress on the corrosion behavior of Ti alloys: a review. J Alloys Compd 985:173346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17334610.1016/j.jallcom.2023.173346 ↗
9. López Freixes M, Peguet L, Warner T, Gault B (2024) Nanoscale perspective on the stress-corrosion cracking behavior of a peak-aged 7XXX-Al alloy. Corros Sci 229:111904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2024.11190410.1016/j.corsci.2024.111904 ↗
10. Cai F, Huang Y, Xu Y et al (2024) Study on hydrogen permeation and stress corrosion cracking behaviors of AISI 4135 high-strength steel with macrofouling adhesion in marine immersion zone. Electrochim Acta 484:144088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.14408810.1016/j.electacta.2024.144088 ↗
11. Sun D, Wang D, Li L, Gong K, Ren S, Xie F, Wu M (2023) Study on stress corrosion behavior and mechanism of X70 pipeline steel with the combined action of sulfate-reducing bacteria and constant load. Corros Sci 213:110968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2023.11096810.1016/j.corsci.2023.110968 ↗
12. Fujii T, Sawada T, Shimamura Y (2023) Nucleation of stress corrosion cracking in aluminum alloy 6061 in sodium chloride solution: Mechanical and microstructural aspects. J Alloys Compd 938:168583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16858310.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168583 ↗
13. Majchrowicz K, Brynk T, Wieczorek M, Miedzińska D, Pakieła Z (2019) Exploring the susceptibility of P110 pipeline steel to stress corrosion cracking in CO2-rich environments. Eng Fail Anal 104:471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.01610.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.016 ↗
14. JaC PG, Silva SC, Campos T (2022) Stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of armour layers in CO2 annulus environments—SSRT experimental simulation. Eng Fail Anal 139:106451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10645110.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106451 ↗
15. Wang W, Guang Y, Liu W, Shen K, Huffman M, Wang Q (2023) Experimental investigation of stress corrosion on supercritical CO2 transportation pipelines against leakage for CCUS applications. Energy Rep 9:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.17910.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.179 ↗
16. Sadeghi MA, Javidi M (2021) Investigation on stress corrosion cracking of API 5L X65 steel in CO2 corrosion medium. Mater Sci Eng A 824:141856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14185610.1016/j.msea.2021.141856 ↗
17. Sun C, Yan X, Sun J, Pang J, Zhao W, Lin X (2022) Unraveling the effect of O2, NO2 and SO2 impurities on the stress corrosion behavior of X65 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2 streams. Corros Sci 209:110729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11072910.1016/j.corsci.2022.110729 ↗
18. Huang X, Zhou L, Li Y, Du Z, Zhu Q, Han Z (2023) The synergistic effect of temperature, H2S/CO2 partial pressure and stress toward corrosion of X80 pipeline steel. Eng Fail Anal 146:107079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10707910.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107079 ↗
19. Chen M, Li W, Zhang H, Liu M, Zhang J, Li X, Han Y (2023) Recent ReaxFF MD studies on pyrolysis and combustion mechanisms of aviation/aerospace fuels and energetic additives. Energy Adv 2:54–72. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ya00285j10.1039/d2ya00285j ↗
20. Song L, Zhang T-C, Zhang Y, Chen B-C, Wu M, Zhou S-Q, Mei Z (2023) Simulations on the oxidation of Al-Mg alloy nanoparticles using the ReaxFF reactive force field. Mater Today Commun 35:106180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10618010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106180 ↗
21. Zhang W, Sun J, Ding D, Hou D (2023) Nanoscale insights on the stress corrosion mechanism of calcium-silicate-hydrate. J Build Eng 80:107991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10799110.1016/j.jobe.2023.107991 ↗
22. Liu X, Kim S-Y, Lee SH, Lee B (2021) Atomistic investigation on initiation of stress corrosion cracking of polycrystalline Ni60Cr30Fe10 alloys under high-temperature water by reactive molecular dynamics simulation. Comp Mater Sci 187:110087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.11008710.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110087 ↗
23. Huang Y, Liu Z, Song M, Zhang M, Hu C, Wang Q, Deng H (2023) Atomistic insights into stress corrosion cracking of α-Fe in supercritical water: the coupling effect of hydrogen embrittlement and intergranular corrosion. Comp Mater Sci 218:111991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11199110.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111991 ↗
24. Elgack O, Almomani B, Syarif J, Elazab M, Irshaid M, Al-Shabi M (2023) Molecular dynamics simulation and machine learning-based analysis for predicting tensile properties of high-entropy FeNiCrCoCu alloys. J Mater Res Technol 25:5575–5585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.02310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.023 ↗
25. Veeresham M, Jain R, Lee U, Park N (2023) Machine learning approach for predicting yield strength of nitrogen-doped CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloys at selective thermomechanical processing conditions. J Mater Res Technol 24:2621–2628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.14610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.146 ↗
26. Bhandari U, Rafi MR, Zhang C, Yang S (2021) Yield strength prediction of high-entropy alloys using machine learning. Mater Today Commun 26:101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10187110.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101871 ↗
27. Cetin A, Atali G, Erden C, Ozkan SS (2024) Assessing the performance of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for predicting electro-erosion wear in cryogenic treated electrodes of mold steels. Adv Eng Inform 61:102468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.10246810.1016/j.aei.2024.102468 ↗
28. Hyodo K, Munetoh S, Tsuchiyama T, Takaki S (2020) Empirical interatomic potential for Fe-N binary system based on Finnis-Sinclair potential. Comp Mater Sci 174:109500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10950010.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109500 ↗
29. Wang B, Sak-Saracino E, Gunkelmann N, Urbassek HM (2014) Molecular-dynamics study of the α↔γ phase transition in Fe–C. Comp Mater Sci 82:399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.06910.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.069 ↗
30. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
31. Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18:015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
32. Aryanpour M, Van Duin ACT, Kubicki JD (2010) Development of a reactive force field for iron−oxyhydroxide systems. J Phys Chem A 114:6298–6307. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp101332k10.1021/jp101332k ↗
33. Dormohammadi H, Pang Q, Árnadóttir L, Burkan Isgor O (2018) Atomistic simulation of initial stages of iron corrosion in pure water using reactive molecular dynamics. Comp Mater Sci 145:126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.12.04410.1016/j.commatsci.2017.12.044 ↗
34. Subbaraman R, Deshmukh SA, Sankaranarayanan SKRS (2013) Atomistic insights into early stage oxidation and nanoscale oxide growth on Fe(100), Fe(111) and Fe(110) surfaces. J Phys Chem C 117:5195–5207. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp312514m10.1021/jp312514m ↗
35. Chia C-L, Avendaño C, Siperstein FR, Filip S (2017) Liquid adsorption of organic compounds on hematite α-Fe2O3 using ReaxFF. Langmuir 33:11257–11263. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0237410.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02374 ↗
36. Huber ML, Lemmon EW, Bell IH, Mclinden MO (2022) The NIST REFPROP database for highly accurate properties of industrially important fluids. Ind Eng Chem Res 61:15449–15472. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0142710.1021/acs.iecr.2c01427 ↗
37. Guo H, Wang Y, Tan L, Lu Z, Bai L (2023) Corrosion behaviors of iron in a supercritical CO2 environment: a molecular dynamics study. J Mater Sci 58:14758–14772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08948-910.1007/s10853-023-08948-9 ↗
38. Li R, Wang H, Miao C, Ni Y, Zhang Z (2024) Experimental and numerical study on the degradation law of mechanical properties of stress-corrosion steel wire for bridge cables. J Constr Steel Res 212:108294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.10829410.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108294 ↗
39. Noble WS (2006) What is a support vector machine? Nat Biotechnol 24:1565–1567. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1206-156510.1038/nbt1206-1565 ↗
40. Breiman L (2001) Random Forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
41. Tolstikhin IO, Houlsby N, Kolesnikov A, Beyer L, Zhai X, Unterthiner T, Yung J, Steiner A, Keysers D, Uszkoreit J, Lucic M (2021) Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 6(34):24261–24272
42. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
43. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830