Study on interfacial microstructure and shear strength of hot-compression bonded Ti386/TC4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Kumar RR, Gupta RK, Sarkar A, Prasad MJNV (2022) Vacuum diffusion bonding of α-titanium alloy to stainless steel for aerospace applications: interfacial microstructure and mechanical characteristics. Mater Char 183:111607–11162110.1016/j.matchar.2021.111607 ↗
2. Wu Y, Wang T, Ren ZK et al (2022) Evolution mechanism of microstructure and bond strength based on interface diffusion and IMCs of Ti/steel clad plates fabricated by double-layered hot rolling. J Mater Pro Technol 310:11778010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117780 ↗
3. Assari AH, Eghbali B (2018) Solid state diffusion bonding characteristics at the interfaces of Ti and Al layers. J Alloys Compd 773:50–5810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.253 ↗
4. Cao M, Wang CJ, Deng KK et al (2021) Effect of interface on mechanical properties and formability of Ti/Al/Ti laminated composites. J Mater Res Technol 14:1655–166910.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.021 ↗
5. Jiang S, Peng RL, Jia N et al (2019) Microstructural and textural evolutions in multilayered Ti/Cu composites processed by accumulative roll bonding. J Mater Sci Technol 35:1165–117410.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.018 ↗
6. Jiang S, Peng RL, Hegedus Z et al (2021) Micromechanical behavior of multilayered Ti/Nb composites processed by accumulative roll bonding: an in-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction investigation. Acta Mater 205:11654610.1016/j.actamat.2020.116546 ↗
7. Zhang X, Yu Y, Liu B et al (2019) In-situ investigation of deformation behavior and fracture mechanism of laminated Al/Ti composites fabricated by hot rolling. J Alloys Compd 783:55–6510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.272 ↗
8. Wang MK, Luo ZA, Li D et al (2022) Investigation on the interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti alloy/HSLA steel clad plates fabricated by vacuum roll-cladding. Mater Sci Eng A 853:14377410.1016/j.msea.2022.143774 ↗
9. Tuppen SJ, Bache MR, Voice WE (2005) A fatigue assessment of dissimilar titanium alloy diffusion bonds. Int J Fatigue 27:651–65810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.11.004 ↗
10. Sun LX, Li MQ, Li L (2019) Characterization of crystal structure in the bonding interface between TC17 and TC4 alloys. Mater Character 153:169–17410.1016/j.matchar.2019.04.037 ↗
11. Yan QY, Fan QB, Yang SY et al (2022) Influential mechanisms on interface bonding of hot-rolled TB9/TC4 laminated composites. Mater Sci Eng A 853:14374910.1016/j.msea.2022.143749 ↗
12. Zhou Q, Liu R, Chen PW, Zhu L et al (2021) Microstructure characterization and tensile shear failure mechanism of the bonding interface of explosively welded titanium-steel composite. Mater Sci Eng A 820:14155910.1016/j.msea.2021.141559 ↗
13. Acarer M, Demir B, Dikici B, Salur E et al (2022) Microstructure, mechanical properties, and corrosion resistance of an explosively welded Mg-–Al composite. J Magnesium Alloys 10:1086–109510.1016/j.jma.2021.08.009 ↗
14. Wu BS, Dong HG, Li P et al (2022) Vacuum diffusion bonding of TC4 titanium alloy and T2 copper by a slow cooling heat treatment. J Mater Process Technol 305:11759510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117595 ↗
15. Li TL, Zhou FJ, Long LZ et al (2023) Fatigue crack growth and mechanical properties of laminated TC4/TB8 titanium alloys fabricated by diffusion bonding. Mater Character 200:11282510.1016/j.matchar.2023.112825 ↗
16. Yu C, Fu L, Xiao H et al (2021) Effect of carbon content on the microstructure and bonding properties of hot-rolling pure titanium clad carbon steel plates. Mater Sci Eng A 820:14157210.1016/j.msea.2021.141572 ↗
17. Guo S, Wang FR, Wang YQ, Xie GM et al (2023) Microstructural evolution and properties of Ti/Al clad plate fabricated by vacuum rolling and heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 882:14544510.1016/j.msea.2023.145445 ↗
18. Sun MY, Xu B, Xie BJ et al (2021) Leading manufacture of the large-scale weldless stainless steel forging ring: innovative approach by the multilayer hot-compression bonding technology. J Mater Sci Technol 71:84–8610.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.055 ↗
19. Xie BJ, Sun MY, Xu B et al (2020) Evolution of interfacial characteristics and mechanical properties for 316LN stainless steel joints manufactured by hot-compression bonding. J Mater Process Technol 283:11673310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116733 ↗
20. Zhu XJ, Xiong C, Yin JH et al (2023) Experimental study and modeling analysis of planar compression of composite corrugated, lattice and honeycomb sandwich plates. Comp Struct 308:11669010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116690 ↗
21. Peng YY, Li C, Guo QY et al (2023) Vacuum diffusion bonding between Ni3Al-based superalloy and S31042 steel by surface self-nanocrystallization treatment. Mater Character 202:11303110.1016/j.matchar.2023.113031 ↗
22. Zhang C, Li MQ, Li H (2018) Diffusion behavior at void tip and its contributions to void shrinkage during solid-state bonding. J Mater Sci Technol 34:1449–145410.1016/j.jmst.2017.12.001 ↗
23. Li WD, Liang YX, Bai Y et al (2023) Cu-Cu low-temperature diffusion bonding by spark plasma sintering: void closure mechanism and mechanical properties. J Mater Sci Technol 139:210–22310.1016/j.jmst.2022.08.031 ↗
24. Sun LX, Li MQ (2019) Interfacial voids, microstructure and shear strength of TC4/TC17 bond. J Mater Process Technol 270:265–27310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.004 ↗
25. Xiu L, Wu JF et al (2015) Atomic diffusion behavior in W/Cu diffusion bonding process. J Fusion Energy 34:769–77310.1007/s10894-015-9884-9 ↗
26. Li H, Yang C, Sun LX, Li MQ (2017) Hot press bonding of γ-TiAl and TC17 at a low bonding temperature by imposing plastic deformation and post heating. Mater Lett 187:4–610.1016/j.matlet.2016.10.057 ↗
27. Vigraman T, Narayanasamy R, Ravindran D (2012) Microstructure and mechanical property evaluation of diffusion-bonded joints made between SAE 2205 steel and AISI 1035 steel. Mater Des 35:156–16910.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.063 ↗
28. Zhang C, Li H, Li MQ (2016) Detailed evolution mechanism of interfacial void morphology in diffusion bonding. J Mater Sci Technol 32:259–26410.1016/j.jmst.2015.12.002 ↗
29. Li H, Yang C, Sun SX, Li MQ (2017) Influence of pressure on interfacial microstructure evolution and atomic diffusion in the hot-press bonding of Ti-33Al-3V to TC17. J Alloys Compd 720:131–13810.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.239 ↗
30. Ren SF, Bai XL, Liu S et al (2024) Interface healing mechanism of fine-grained Ni–Co-based superalloy during hot-compression bonding. J Mater Sci Technol 173:45–5310.1016/j.jmst.2023.06.040 ↗
31. Wang JQ, Liu WF, Xu B et al (2023) Effects of grain size and nano-oxide particles on the healing mechanism of hot compression bonding Fe-9Cr-1.5W-0.3Ti alloy. J Mater Res Technol 24:971–98310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.017 ↗
32. Sun LX, Li MQ, Li H (2018) Interface characteristics and recrystallization mechanism of dissimilar titanium bonds. J Mater Sci 53:5380–538810.1007/s10853-017-1950-4 ↗
33. Zhang JY, Sun MY, Xu B et al (2019) Evolution of the interfacial microstructure during the plastic deformation bonding of copper. Mater Sci Eng A 746:1–1010.1016/j.msea.2018.12.119 ↗
34. Xie BJ, Yu ZX, Jiang HY et al (2022) Effects of surface roughness on interfacial dynamic recrystallization and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-3Nb-2Zr-1Mo alloy joints produced by hot-compression bonding. J Mater Sci Technol 96:199–21110.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.085 ↗
35. Liu WF, Yuan JJ, Li S et al (2024) Ti386/TC4 clad plate manufactured by hot rolling and solution-aging treatment. Mater Lett 354:13539010.1016/j.matlet.2023.135390 ↗
36. Ning YQ, Luo X, Liang HQ et al (2015) Competition between dynamic recovery and recrystallization during hot deformation for TC18 titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 635:77–8510.1016/j.msea.2015.03.071 ↗
37. Zhang D, Dong XJ, Xu Y et al (2023) Dynamic recrystallization mechanism of Ti-6554 alloy during high-temperature deformation. J Alloys Compd 959:17053410.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170534 ↗
38. Geisler A, Sadeghifar M, Morin JB et al (2023) Void closure during open die forging of large size martensitic stainless-steel ingots: an experimental-analytical-numerical study. Inter J Mater Form 16:1110.1007/s12289-022-01735-y ↗
39. Ferguson B, Ramulu M (2020) Surface tracking of diffusion bonding void closure and its application to titanium alloys. Inter J Mater Form 13:517–53110.1007/s12289-019-01489-0 ↗
40. Ma RF, Li MQ, Li H, Yu WX (2012) Modeling of void closure in diffusion bonding process based on dynamic conditions. Sci China Technol Sci 55:2420–243110.1007/s11431-012-4927-1 ↗
41. Zhang C, Li H, Li MQ (2016) Detailed analysis of surface asperity deformation mechanism in diffusion bonding of steel hollow structural components. App Surf Sci 371:407–41410.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.039 ↗
42. Kizuka T (1998) Atomic process of point contact in gold studied by time-resolved high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 81:4448–445110.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4448 ↗
43. Zhang JY, Xu B, Tariq NH et al (2020) Microstructure evolutions and interfacial bonding behavior of Ni-based superalloys during solid state plastic deformation bonding. J Mater Sci Technol 46:1–1110.1016/j.jmst.2019.11.015 ↗
44. Cram DG, Fang XY, Zurob HS et al (2012) The effect of solute on discontinuous dynamic recrystallization. Acta Materia 60:6390–640410.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.021 ↗