Prediction of the compressive mechanical properties and reverse structural design of two-dimensional mesoscopic aluminum foam based on deep learning methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques · Advanced Neural Network Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Banhart J (2013) Light-metal foams-history of innovation and technological challenges. Adv Eng Mater 15(3):82–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20120021710.1002/adem.201200217 ↗
2. Garcia-Moreno F (2016) Commercial applications of metal foams: their properties and production. Materials 9(2):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma902008510.3390/ma9020085 ↗
3. Zhang JS, An YK, Ma HY (2022) Research progress in the preparation of aluminum foam composite structures. Metals 12(12):2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1212204710.3390/met12122047 ↗
4. Sun YL, Li QM (2018) Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: a review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling. Int J Impact Eng 112:74–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.006 ↗
5. Lefebvre LP, Banhart J, Dunand DC (2008) Porous metals and metallic foams: current status and recent developments. Adv Eng Mater 10(9):775–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20080024110.1002/adem.200800241 ↗
6. Duarte I, Vesenjak M, Krstulovic-Opara L, Anzel I, Ferreira Jose MF (2015) Manufacturing and bending behaviour of in situ foam-filled aluminium alloy tubes. Mater Des 66:532–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.08210.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.082 ↗
7. Cheng Y, Li YX, Chen X, Zhou X, Wang NZ (2018) Compressive properties and energy absorption of aluminium foams with a wide range of relative densities. J Mater Eng Perform 27(8):4016–4024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3514-410.1007/s11665-018-3514-4 ↗
8. Islam MA, Brown AD, Hazell PJ, Kader MA, Escobedo JP, Saadatfar M, Xu S, Ruan D, Turner M (2018) Mechanical response and dynamic deformation mechanisms of closed-cell aluminium alloy foams under dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng 114:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.12.01210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.12.012 ↗
9. Zhang XY, Tang LQ, Liu ZJ, Jiang ZY, Liu YP, Wu YD (2017) Yield properties of closed-cell aluminium foam under triaxial loadings by a 3D Voronoi model. Mech Mater 104:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.10.00710.1016/j.mechmat.2016.10.007 ↗
10. Chen JY, Zhang P, Cheng YS, Liu J (2020) On the crushing response of the functionally graded metallic foams based on 3D Voronoi model. Thin-Walled Struct 157:107085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.10708510.1016/j.tws.2020.107085 ↗
11. Bastawrows AF, Bart-Smith H, Evans AG (2000) Experimental analysis of deformation mechanisms in a closed-cell aluminium alloy foam. J Mech Phys Solids 48(2):301–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00035-610.1016/S0022-5096(99)00035-6 ↗
12. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
13. Hanssen AG, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M, Ilstad H (2002) Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams. Int J Mech Sci 44(2):359–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00091-110.1016/S0020-7403(01)00091-1 ↗
14. Cao XQ, Wang ZH, Ma HW, Zhao LM, Yang GT (2006) Effects of cell size on compressive properties of aluminum foam. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 16(2):351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60060-510.1016/S1003-6326(06)60060-5 ↗
15. Zhuang WM, Wang EM (2022) Simulation study on the effect of trapped gas on the dynamic compressive stress enhancement of aluminium foam. Mech Mater 169:104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.10431910.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104319 ↗
16. Vengatachalam B, Poh LH, Liu ZS, Qin QH, Swaddiwudhipong S (2019) Three dimensional modelling of closed-cell aluminium foams with predictive macroscopic behaviour. Mech Mater 136:103067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10306710.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103067 ↗
17. Chen YM, Das R, Battley M (2017) Effects of cell size and cell wall thickness variations on the strength of closed-cell foams. Int J Eng Sci 120:220–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.08.00610.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.08.006 ↗
18. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2017) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM 60(6):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/306538610.1145/3065386 ↗
19. Mu RH, Zeng XQ (2019) A review of deep learning research. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 13(4):1738–1764. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2019.04.00110.3837/tiis.2019.04.001 ↗
20. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia YQ, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: CVPR, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2015.729859410.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 ↗
21. Dong S, Wang P, Abbas KA (2021) Survey on deep learning and its applications. Comput Sci Rev 40:100379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.10037910.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100379 ↗
22. Liang H, Sun X, Sun YL, Gao Y (2017) Text feature extraction based on deep learning: a review. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-017-0993-110.1186/s13638-017-0993-1 ↗
23. Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 64:85–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.00310.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
24. Tian CW, Fei LK, Zheng WX, Xu Y, Zuo WM, Lin CW (2020) Deep learning on image denoising: an overview. Neural Netw 131:251–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.02510.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 ↗
25. Ball JE, Anderson DT, Chan CS (2017) Comprehensive survey of deep learning in remote sensing: theories, tools, and challenges for the community. J Appl Remote Sens 8(3):292. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.04260910.1117/1.JRS.11.042609 ↗
26. Modarres MH, Aversa R, Cozzini S, Ciancio R, Leto A, Brandino GP (2017) Neural network for nanoscience scanning electron microscope image recognition. Sci Rep 7:13282. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13565-z10.1038/s41598-017-13565-z ↗
27. DeCost BL, Lei B, Francis T, Holm EA (2019) High throughput quantitative metallography for complex microstructures using deep learning: a case study in ultrahigh carbon steel. Microsc Microanal 25(1):21–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S143192761801563510.1017/S1431927618015635 ↗
28. Shen CG, Wang CC, Huang MH, Xu N, van der Zwaag S, Xu W (2021) A generic high-throughput microstructure classification and quantification method for regular SEM images of complex steel microstructures combining EBSD labeling and deep learning. J Mater Sci Technol 93:191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.00910.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.009 ↗
29. Wang CC, Zhu KY, Hedstrom P, Li Y, Xu W (2022) A generic and extensible model for the martensite start temperature incorporating thermodynamic data mining and deep learning framework. J Mater Sci Technol 128:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.04.01410.1016/j.jmst.2022.04.014 ↗
30. Papanikolaou S (2020) Microstructural inelastic fingerprints and data-rich predictions of plasticity and damage in solids. Comput Mech 66(1):141–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01845-x10.1007/s00466-020-01845-x ↗
31. Liu ZL, Wu CT, Koishi M (2019) A deep material network for multiscale topology learning and accelerated nonlinear modeling of heterogeneous materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:1138–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.09.02010.1016/j.cma.2018.09.020 ↗
32. Hiraide K, Hirayama K, Endo K, Muramatsu M (2021) Application of deep learning to inverse design of phase separation structure in polymer alloy. Comput Mater Sci 190:110278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11027810.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110278 ↗
33. Yang C, Kim Y, Ryu S, Gu GX (2020) Prediction of composite microstructure stress-strain curves using convolutional neural networks. Mater Des 189:108509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10850910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509 ↗
34. Liu XH, Yan ZL, Zhong Z (2021) Predicting elastic modulus of porous La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta cathodes from microstructures via FEM and deep learning. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(42):22079–22091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.03310.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.033 ↗
35. Hangai Y, Ozawa S, Okada K, Tanaka Y, Amagai K, Suzuki R (2023) Machine learning estimation of plateau stress of aluminum foam using X-ray computed tomography images. Materials 16(5):1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1605189410.3390/ma16051894 ↗
36. Strek AM, Dudzik M, Machniewicz T (2022) Specifications for modelling of the phenomenon of compression of closed-cell aluminium foams with neural networks. Materials 15(3):1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1503126210.3390/ma15031262 ↗
37. Zhuang WM, Wang EM, Zhang HL (2023) Prediction of compressive mechanical properties of three-dimensional mesoscopic aluminium foam based on deep learning method. Mech Mater 182:104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.10468410.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104684 ↗
38. Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 8(6):679–698. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1986.476785110.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 ↗
39. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2020) Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM 63(11):139–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/342262210.1145/3422622 ↗
40. Kader MA, Hazell PJ, Islam MA, Ahmed S, Hossain MM, Escobedo JP, Saadatfar M (2021) Strain-rate dependency and impact dynamics of closed-cell aluminium foams. Mater Sci Eng Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 818:141379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14137910.1016/j.msea.2021.141379 ↗
41. Vinnik DA, Zhivulin VE, Uchaev DA et al (2021) Effect of titanium substitution and temperature variation on structure and magnetic state of barium hexaferrites. J Alloys Compd 859:158365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15836510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158365 ↗
42. Henaish AM, Darwish MA, Hemeda OM et al (2023) Structure and optoelectronic properties of ferroelectric PVA–PZT nanocomposites. Opt Mater 138:113402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2022.11340210.1016/j.optmat.2022.113402 ↗
43. Trukhanov AV, Tishkevich DI, Podgornaya SV et al (2022) Impact of the nanocarbon on magnetic and electrodynamic properties of the ferrite/polymer composites. Nanomaterials 12(5):868. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1205086810.3390/nano12050868 ↗
44. Tishkevich DI, Vorobjova AI, Shimanovich DL et al (2019) Formation and corrosion properties of Ni-based composite material in the anodic alumina porous matrix. J Alloys Compd 804:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.00110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.001 ↗
45. Vorobjova A, Tishkevich D, Shimanovich D et al (2020) Electrochemical behaviour of Ti/Al2O3/Ni nanocomposite material in artificial physiological solution: prospects for biomedical application. Nanomaterials 10(1):173. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1001017310.3390/nano10010173 ↗
46. Vorobjova AI, Tishkevich DI, Outkina EA et al (2022) A study of Ta2O5 nanopillars with Ni tips prepared by porous anodic alumina through-mask anodization. Nanomaterials 12(8):1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1208134410.3390/nano12081344 ↗
47. Trukhanov SV, Trukhanov AV, Turchenko VA et al (2016) Crystal structure and magnetic properties of the BaFe12−xInxO19 (x = 0.1–1.2) solid solutions. J Magn Magn Mater 417:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.05210.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.052 ↗
48. Troyanchuk IO, Khalyavin DD, Trukhanov SV, Szymczak H (1999) Magnetic phase diagrams of the manganites Ln1−xBaxMnOs (Ln=Nd, Sm). J Phys Condens Matter 11(44):8707–8717. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/11/44/30910.1088/0953-8984/11/44/309 ↗
49. Trukhanov AV, Grabchikov SS, Solobai AA, Tishkevich DI, Trukhanov SV, Trukhanova EL (2017) AC and DC-shielding properties for the Ni80Fe20/Cu film structures. J Magn Magn Mater 443:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.05310.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.053 ↗
50. Trukhanov SV (2003) Magnetic and magnetotransport properties of La1−xBaxMnO3−x/2 perovskite manganites. J Mat Chem 13(2):347–352. https://doi.org/10.1039/b208664f10.1039/b208664f ↗
51. Trukhanov SV (2005) Investigation of stability of ordered manganites. J Exp Theor Phys 101(3):513–520. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.210322010.1134/1.2103220 ↗