High-throughput electrochemical strategy for synthesis of iron-based nanostructures for electrocatalytic water splitting
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrochemical water splitting has drawn significant attention for hydrogen generation as a carbon-free energy carrier for the construction of a net-zero society. To scale up water electrolyzers, enormous efforts have been made to the development of high-throughput synthesis of the electrocatalysts based on abundance and non-toxic elements for both oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions. In this work, Fe-based nanostructures with a high Fe electrooxidation rate (up to 1 g cm−2 h−1) were prepared through a controlled and feasible electrosynthesis using pulse alternating current. The effect of electrolyte solution and post-annealing on composition/structural characteristics and electrochemical activity of the Fe-based nanostructures was depicted. The bi-phase sheet-like γ-Fe2O3/δ-FeOOH and cube-like γ-Fe2O3/α-FeOOH structures are formed in aqueous NaOH and NaCl solutions, respectively. The electrocatalytic activity of the synthesized structures was tailored by annealing up to 500 °C in air. The α-Fe2O3 catalyst synthesized in NaOH and NaCl demonstrated the overpotentials of 441 and 390 mV at 10 mA cm−2 in hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions, respectively. This work provides new and deep insights into the high-throughput electrosynthesis of low-cost catalysts for hydrogen and oxygen production from water splitting. Therefore, this work focuses on the rational design and research of Fe-based catalysts for electrochemical water splitting.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Subbaraman R, Tripkovic D, Chang K-C, Strmcnik D, Paulikas AP, Hirunsit P, Chan M, Greeley J, Stamenkovic V, Markovic NM (2012) Trends in activity for the water electrolyser reactions on 3d M(Ni Co, Fe, Mn) hydr(oxy)oxide catalysts. Nat Mater 11:550–557. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat331310.1038/nmat3313 ↗
2. Nguyen T-TH, Lee J, Bae J, Lim B (2018) Binary FeCo oxyhydroxide nanosheets as highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Chem Eur J 24:4724–4728. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20180002210.1002/chem.201800022 ↗
3. Guo B, Huo H, Zhuang Q, Ren X, Wen X, Yang B, Huang X, Chang Q, Li S (2023) Iron oxyhydroxide: structure and applications in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Adv Funct Mater 33:2300557. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20230055710.1002/adfm.202300557 ↗
4. Li C, Baek J-B (2020) Recent advances in noble metal (Pt, Ru, and Ir)-based electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Omega 5:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b0355010.1021/acsomega.9b03550 ↗
5. Kumaravel S, Karthick K, Sankar SS, Karmakar A, Madhu R, Bera K, Kundu S (2021) Current progressions in transition metal based hydroxides as bi-functional catalysts towards electrocatalytic total water splitting. Sustain Energy Fuels 5:6215–6268. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SE01193F10.1039/D1SE01193F ↗
6. O’Mullane AP (2020) Creating active interfaces as a strategy to improve electrochemical water splitting reactions. J Phys Energy 2:041001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7655/ab8c5f10.1088/2515-7655/ab8c5f ↗
7. Li H, Zhou Q, Liu F, Zhang W, Tan Z, Zhou H, Huang Z, Jiao S, Kuang Y (2019) Biomimetic design of ultrathin edge-riched FeOOH@Carbon nanotubes as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for water splitting. Appl Catal B 255:117755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11775510.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117755 ↗
8. Zhang L, Fan Q, Li K, Zhang S, Ma X (2020) First-row transition metal oxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts: regulation strategies and mechanistic understandings. Sustain Energy Fuels 4:5417–5432. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SE01087A10.1039/D0SE01087A ↗
9. Tian H, Zhang X-B, Li Y-P, He Q, Tian N-N, Wu S-H, Han X (2023) Differences in the oxidizing species on the surface of metal-doped ferrihydrite and hematite in the alkaline S(IV)-O2 solution. ACS Earth Space Chem 7:278–288. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c0036310.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00363 ↗
10. Sayeed MA, Heron J, Love J, O’Mullane AP (2020) Activating iron based materials for overall electrochemical water splitting via the incorporation of noble metals. Chem Asian J 15:4339–4346. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.20200111310.1002/asia.202001113 ↗
11. Wang K, Du H, He S, Liu L, Yang K, Sun J, Liu Y, Du Z, Xie L, Ai W, Huang W (2021) Kinetically controlled, scalable synthesis of γ-FeOOH nanosheet arrays on nickel foam toward efficient oxygen evolution: the key role of in-situ-generated γ-NiOOH. Adv Mater 33:2005587. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200558710.1002/adma.202005587 ↗
12. Feng C, Faheem MB, Fu J, Xiao Y, Li C, Li Y (2020) Fe-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction: progress and perspectives. ACS Catal 10:4019–4047. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b0544510.1021/acscatal.9b05445 ↗
13. Zhang Y, Li J, Kornienko N (2021) Strategies for heterogeneous small-molecule electrosynthesis. Cell Rep Phys Sci 2:100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10068210.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100682 ↗
14. Sun Z-Q, Ma F-Y, Liu X-J, Wu H-H, Niu C-G, Su X-T, Liu J-M (2015) Large-scale synthesis and catalysis of oleic acid-coated Fe2O3 for co-liquefaction of coal and petroleum vacuum residues. Fuel Process Technol 139:173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.07.02510.1016/j.fuproc.2015.07.025 ↗
15. Hoque MdA, Ahmed MR, Rahman GT, Rahman MT, Islam MA, Khan MA, Hossain MK (2018) Fabrication and comparative study of magnetic Fe and α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles dispersed hybrid polymer (PVA + Chitosan) novel nanocomposite film. Results Phys 10:434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.06.01010.1016/j.rinp.2018.06.010 ↗
16. Gonzalez-Moragas L, Yu S-M, Murillo-Cremaes N, Laromaine A, Roig A (2015) Scale-up synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles by microwave-assisted thermal decomposition. Chem Eng J 281:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.06610.1016/j.cej.2015.06.066 ↗
17. Ritter TG, Phakatkar AH, Rasul MG, Saray MT, Sorokina LV, Shokuhfar T, Gonçalves JM, Shahbazian-Yassar R (2022) Electrochemical synthesis of high entropy hydroxides and oxides boosted by hydrogen evolution reaction. Cell Rep Phys Sci 3:100847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10084710.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100847 ↗
18. Kromer ML, Monzó J, Lawrence MJ, Kolodziej A, Gossage ZT, Simpson BH, Morandi S, Yanson A, Rodríguez-López J, Rodríguez P (2017) High-throughput preparation of metal oxide nanocrystals by cathodic corrosion and their use as active photocatalysts. Langmuir 33:13295–13302. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0246510.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02465 ↗
19. Garlyyev B, Watzele S, Fichtner J, Michalička J, Schökel A, Senyshyn A, Perego A, Pan D, El-Sayed HA, Macak JM, Atanassov P, Zenyuk IV, Bandarenka AS (2021) Electrochemical top-down synthesis of C-supported Pt nano-particles with controllable shape and size: mechanistic insights and application. Nano Res 14:2762–2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-3281-z10.1007/s12274-020-3281-z ↗
20. Hang BT, Anh TT (2021) Controlled synthesis of various Fe2O3 morphologies as energy storage materials. Sci Rep 11:5185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84755-z10.1038/s41598-021-84755-z ↗
21. Ulyankina A, Molodtsova T, Gorshenkov M, Leontyev I, Zhigunov D, Konstantinova E, Lastovina T, Tolasz J, Henych J, Licciardello N, Cuniberti G, Smirnova N (2021) Photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin in water at nano-ZnO prepared by pulse alternating current electrochemical synthesis. J Water Process Eng 40:101809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.10180910.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101809 ↗
22. Ulyankina A, Tsarenko A, Molodtsova T, Yatsenko A, Gorshenkov M, Kaichev V, Kuriganova A, Smirnova N (2023) Tungsten oxide nanopowders: pulse alternating current electrosynthesis, structure optimization and performance in a flow photocatalytic fuel cell. J Mater Sci 58:11187–11197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08697-910.1007/s10853-023-08697-9 ↗
23. Molodtsova T, Gorshenkov M, Kolesnikov E, Leontyev I, Kaichev V, Zhigunov D, Faddeev N, Kuriganova A, Smirnova N (2023) Fabrication of nano-In2O3 phase junction by pulse alternating current synthesis for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance: unravelling the role of synthetic conditions. Ceram Int 49:10986–10992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.29310.1016/j.ceramint.2022.11.293 ↗
24. Molodtsova T, Gorshenkov M, Saliev A, Vanyushin V, Goncharov I, Smirnova N (2021) One-step synthesis of γ-Fe2O3/Fe3O4 nanocomposite for sensitive electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide. Electrochim Acta 370:137723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13772310.1016/j.electacta.2021.137723 ↗
25. Molodtsova T, Gorshenkov M, Kubrin S, Saraev A, Ulyankina A, Smirnova N (2022) One-step access to bifunctional γ-Fe2O3/δ-FeOOH electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction and acetaminophen sensing. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 140:104569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2022.10456910.1016/j.jtice.2022.104569 ↗
26. Wang Y, Fan T, Li Y, Wu Z, Liu C (2024) A controllable fabrication strategy of anodic oxides film with dense, nano-porous and open-top ordered porous arrays morphology on 304 stainless steel in fluoride-based ethylene glycol electrolyte. Surf Interfaces 44:103601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10360110.1016/j.surfin.2023.103601 ↗
27. Kim G, Park YS, Yang J, Jang MJ, Jeong J, Lee J-H, Park H-S, Park Y, Choi SM, Lee J (2021) Effects of annealing temperature on the oxygen evolution reaction activity of copper-cobalt oxide nanosheets. Nanomaterials 11:657. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1103065710.3390/nano11030657 ↗
28. ShajaripourJaberi SY, Ghaffarinejad A, Khajehsaeidi Z (2021) The effect of annealing temperature, reaction time, and cobalt precursor on the structural properties and catalytic performance of CoS2 for hydrogen evolution reaction. Int J Hydrog Energy 46:3922–3932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.22410.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.224 ↗
29. Xiong F, Lv F, Tang C, Zhang P, Tan S, An Q, Guo S, Mai L (2020) In situ construction of amorphous hierarchical iron oxyhydroxide nanotubes via selective dissolution-regrowth strategy for enhanced lithium storage. Sci China Mater 63:1993–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-020-1337-510.1007/s40843-020-1337-5 ↗
30. Bellot-Gurlet L, Neff D, Réguer S, Monnier J, Saheb M, Dillmann P (2009) Raman studies of corrosion layers formed on archaeological irons in various media. J Nano Res 8:147–156. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JNanoR.8.14710.4028/www.scientific.net/JNanoR.8.147 ↗
31. Schwaminger SP, Fraga-García P, Selbach F, Hein FG, Fuß EC, Surya R, Roth H-C, Blank-Shim SA, Wagner FE, Heissler S, Berensmeier S (2017) Bio-nano interactions: cellulase on iron oxide nanoparticle surfaces. Adsorption 23:281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-016-9849-y10.1007/s10450-016-9849-y ↗
32. Testa-Anta M, Ramos-Docampo MA, Comesaña-Hermo M, Rivas-Murias B, Salgueiriño V (2019) Raman spectroscopy to unravel the magnetic properties of iron oxide nanocrystals for bio-related applications. Nanoscale Adv 1:2086–2103. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NA00064J10.1039/C9NA00064J ↗
33. Kim EH, Lee HS, Kwak BK, Kim B-K (2005) Synthesis of ferrofluid with magnetic nanoparticles by sonochemical method for MRI contrast agent. J Magn Magn Mater 289:328–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.09310.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.093 ↗
34. Li F, Du J, Li X, Shen J, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Sun L (2018) Integration of FeOOH and zeolitic imidazolate framework-derived nanoporous carbon as an efficient electrocatalyst for water oxidation. Adv Energy Mater 8:1702598. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170259810.1002/aenm.201702598 ↗
35. Ji X, Cheng C, Zang Z, Li L, Li X, Cheng Y, Yang X, Yu X, Lu Z, Zhang X, Liu H (2020) Ultrathin and porous δ-FeOOH modified Ni3S2 3D heterostructure nanosheets with excellent alkaline overall water splitting performance. J Mater Chem A Mater 8:21199–21207. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA07676G10.1039/D0TA07676G ↗
36. Zou J, Peleckis G, Lee C-Y, Wallace GG (2019) Facile electrochemical synthesis of ultrathin iron oxyhydroxide nanosheets for the oxygen evolution reaction. Chem Commun 55:8808–8811. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC02941A10.1039/C9CC02941A ↗
37. Cao D, Li H, Pan L, Li J, Wang X, Jing P, Cheng X, Wang W, Wang J, Liu Q (2016) High saturation magnetization of γ-Fe2O3 nano-particles by a facile one-step synthesis approach. Sci Rep 6:32360. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3236010.1038/srep32360 ↗
38. Liu B, Wang Y, Peng H-Q, Yang R, Jiang Z, Zhou X, Lee C-S, Zhao H, Zhang W (2018) Iron vacancies induced bifunctionality in ultrathin feroxyhyte nanosheets for overall water splitting. Adv Mater 30:1803144. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180314410.1002/adma.201803144 ↗
39. Chernova E, Botvin V, Galstenkova M, Mukhortova Y, Wagner D, Gerasimov E, Surmeneva M, Kholkin A, Surmenev R (2022) A comprehensive study of synthesis and analysis of anisotropic iron oxide and oxyhydroxide nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 12:4321. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1223432110.3390/nano12234321 ↗
40. Zhong L, Frandsen C, Mørup S, Hu Y, Pan C, Cleemann LN, Jensen JO, Li Q (2018) 57Fe-Mössbauer spectroscopy and electrochemical activities of graphitic layer encapsulated iron electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Appl Catal B 221:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.01410.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.014 ↗
41. De Grave E, BarreroMeneses C, Vandenberghe R, Costa G, San E (2002) Mössbauer spectra of α- and γ-polymorphs of FeOOH and Fe2O3: effects of poor crystallinity and of Al-for-Fe substitution. Clay Miner 37:591–606. https://doi.org/10.1180/000985502374006210.1180/0009855023740062 ↗
42. Viswanathan B, Techniques NDT (2001) Positron annihilation and Mössbauer techniques. In: Buschow KHJ, Cahn RW, Flemings MC, Ilschner B, Kramer EJ, Mahajan S, Veyssière P (eds) Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 6027–6029. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01062-710.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01062-7 ↗
43. Kuchma EA, Zolotukhin PV, Belanova AA, Soldatov MA, Kozakov AT, Kubrin SP, Polozhentsev OE, Medvedev PV, Soldatov AV (2022) Effect of synthesis conditions on local atomic structure and properties of low-toxic maghemite nanoparticles for local magnetic hyperthermia in oncology. J Nanopart Res 24:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-021-05393-010.1007/s11051-021-05393-0 ↗
44. Oh SJ, Cook DC, Townsend HE (1998) Characterization of iron oxides commonly formed as corrosion products on steel. Hyperfine Interact 112:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101107630850110.1023/A:1011076308501 ↗
45. de Grave E, Vandenberghe RE (1986) 57Fe Mössbauer effect study of well-crystallized goethite (α-FeOOH). Hyperfine Interact 28:643–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0206153010.1007/BF02061530 ↗
46. Morin FJ (1950) Magnetic susceptibility of α Fe2O3 and α Fe2O3 with added titanium. Phys Rev 78:819–820. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.78.819.210.1103/PhysRev.78.819.2 ↗
47. Özdemir Ö, Dunlop DJ, Berquó TS (2008) Morin transition in hematite: size dependence and thermal hysteresis. Geochem Geophy Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC00211010.1029/2008GC002110 ↗
48. Chuev MA, Mishchenko IN, Kubrin SP, Lastovina TA (2017) Novel insight into the effect of disappearance of the Morin transition in hematite nanoparticles. JETP Lett 105:700–705. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136401711004210.1134/S0021364017110042 ↗
49. Mishchenko I, Chuev M, Kubrin S, Lastovina T, Polyakov V, Soldatov A (2018) Continual model of magnetic dynamics for antiferromagnetic particles in analyzing size effects on Morin transition in hematite nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 20:141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4248-910.1007/s11051-018-4248-9 ↗
50. Miao H, Li J, Lin Y, Liu X, Zhang Q, Fu J (2011) Characterization of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles prepared by transformation of α-FeOOH. Chin Sci Bull 56:2383–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4559-z10.1007/s11434-011-4559-z ↗
51. Delgado D, Hefter G, Minakshi M (2013) Hydrogen generation. In: Ferreira G (ed) Alternative energies: updates on progress. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40680-5_710.1007/978-3-642-40680-5_7 ↗
52. Zeng M, Li Y (2015) Recent advances in heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A Mater 3:14942–14962. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA02974K10.1039/C5TA02974K ↗
53. Suryanto BHR, Wang Y, Hocking RK, Adamson W, Zhao C (2019) Overall electrochemical splitting of water at the heterogeneous interface of nickel and iron oxide. Nat Commun 10:5599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13415-810.1038/s41467-019-13415-8 ↗
54. Oener SZ, Bergmann A, Cuenya BR (2023) Designing active oxides for a durable oxygen evolution reaction. Nat Synth. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-023-00376-610.1038/s44160-023-00376-6 ↗
55. Al-Naggar AH, Shinde NM, Kim J-S, Mane RS (2023) Water splitting performance of metal and non-metal-doped transition metal oxide electrocatalysts. Coord Chem Rev 474:214864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21486410.1016/j.ccr.2022.214864 ↗
56. Wang Z, Goddard WA, Xiao H (2023) Potential-dependent transition of reaction mechanisms for oxygen evolution on layered double hydroxides. Nat Commun 14:4228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40011-810.1038/s41467-023-40011-8 ↗
57. Wu H, Yang T, Du Y, Shen L, Ho GW (2018) Identification of facet-governing reactivity in hematite for oxygen evolution. Adv Mater 30:1804341. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180434110.1002/adma.201804341 ↗
58. Zhuang Z, Giles SA, Jenness GR, Abbasi R, Chen X, Wang B, Vlachos DG, Yan Y (2021) Oxygen evolution on iron oxide nanoparticles: the impact of crystallinity and size on the overpotential. J Electrochem Soc 168:034518. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abef4710.1149/1945-7111/abef47 ↗
59. Ali RN, Naz H, Zhu X, Xiang J, Hu G, Xiang B (2019) Synthesis, characterization and applications of pH controlled Fe2O3 nanoparticles for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater Res Express 6:025516. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaf0dd10.1088/2053-1591/aaf0dd ↗
60. Martindale BCM, Reisner E (2016) Bi-functional iron-only electrodes for efficient water splitting with enhanced stability through in situ electrochemical regeneration. Adv Energy Mater 6:1502095. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20150209510.1002/aenm.201502095 ↗
61. Fan X, Liu Y, Chen S, Shi J, Wang J, Fan A, Zan W, Li S, Goddard WA, Zhang X-M (2018) Defect-enriched iron fluoride-oxide nanoporous thin films bifunctional catalyst for water splitting. Nat Commun 9:1809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04248-y10.1038/s41467-018-04248-y ↗
62. Chakraborty B, Beltrán-Suito R, Hausmann JN, Garai S, Driess M, Menezes PW (2020) Enabling iron-based highly effective electrochemical water-splitting and selective oxygenation of organic substrates through in situ surface modification of intermetallic iron stannide precatalyst. Adv Energy Mater 10:2001377. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200137710.1002/aenm.202001377 ↗
63. Yang H, Gong L, Wang H, Dong C, Wang J, Qi K, Liu H, Guo X, Xia BY (2020) Preparation of nickel–iron hydroxides by microorganism corrosion for efficient oxygen evolution. Nat Commun 11:5075. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18891-x10.1038/s41467-020-18891-x ↗