Review: bio-based photopolymers for additive manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of photopolymers for additive manufacturing (AM) applications, with particular attention to the 3D printing (3DP) processes for thermosetting polymeric materials and the main mechanisms and reactions involved during their photopolymerization process. The introduction highlights the principles and significance of photopolymeriza-tion in AM. It is followed by an exploration of free-radical (FRP) and cationic photopolymerization (CP), the two main mechanisms underpinning these pro-cesses. The focus then shifts to the AM technologies suitable for photopolymer processing. Photopolymer-based AM technologies, such as vat photopolymerization (VPP) and ink-jet (IJ) photopolymerization, are examined in detail. VPP has been widely studied for its ability to produce 3D-printed components with highly complex geometries and good final resolution by selectively curing liquid resin in a vat through targeted light-activated polymerization reactions. Similarly, IJ, which involves depositing droplets of photocurable resins in a controlled man-ner and curing them with light, offers precise material deposition, enabling the creation of more detailed and intricate structures. Finally, the review addresses the shift from monomers derived from fossil-based sources to those coming from bio-sources. This transition is driven by the harmful effects of using polymers derived from non-renewable resources and the increasing emphasis on sustain-able development. Research and development efforts aimed to use bio-based precursors are discussed in this context. The conclusions and outlook summarize the findings and offer perspectives on future research directions in photopolym-erization for AM, emphasizing innovations in bio-based precursors and advancements in AM technologies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Interactive and Immersive Displays
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Li W, Zhan Q, Yang P (2023) Facile approach for the synthesis of performance-advantaged degradable bio-based thermoset via ring-opening metathesis polymerization from epoxidized soybean oil. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 11:1200–1206. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0678710.1021/acssuschemeng.2c06787 ↗
2. Tan LJ, Zhu W, Zhou K (2020) Recent progress on polymer materials for additive manufacturing. Adv Funct Mater 30:1–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20200306210.1002/adfm.202003062 ↗
3. ISO/ASTM 52900:2015 (2017) Additive manufacturing—general principles—terminology (ISO/ASTM 52900:2015)
4. Setter R, Schmölzer S, Rudolph N et al (2023) Thermal stability and curing behavior of acrylate photopolymers for additive manufacturing. Polym Eng Sci 63:2180–2192. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2635510.1002/pen.26355 ↗
5. Frédéric C, Judy C, Benoit G et al (2023) Innovation trends in additive manufacturing
6. Wohlers Associates (2023) 3D Printing Industry 2024
7. Gebler M, Schoot AJM, Uiterkamp CV (2014) A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy 74:158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.03310.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033 ↗
8. James M, Michael C, Jacques B et al (2013) Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy
9. Prabhakar MM, Saravanan AK, Lenin AH et al (2020) A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials. Mater Today Proc 45:6108–611410.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.225 ↗
10. Fontana L, Giubilini A, Arrigo R et al (2022) Characterization of 3D printed polylactic acid by fused granular fabrication through printing accuracy, porosity, thermal and mechanical analyses. Polymers 14:3530. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1417353010.3390/polym14173530 ↗
11. Colucci G, Piano M, Lupone F et al (2023) Preparation and 3D printability study of bio-based PBAT powder for selective laser sintering additive manufacturing. Mater Today Chem. 33:101687 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2023.10168710.1016/j.mtchem.2023.101687 ↗
12. Pakkanen J, Manfredi D, Minetola P, Iuliano L (2017) About the use of recycled or biodegradable filaments for sustainability of 3D printing: state of the art and research opportunities. Smart Innov Syst Technol 68:776–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_7310.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_73 ↗
13. Wu H, Fahy WP, Kim S et al (2020) Recent developments in polymers/polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing. Prog Mater Sci 111:10063810.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100638 ↗
14. Drummer D, Rietzel D, Kühnlein F (2010) Development of a characterization approach for the sintering behavior of new thermoplastics for selective laser sintering. Phys Proc 5:533–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.08110.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.081 ↗
15. Butt J, Bhaskar R (2020) Investigating the effects of annealing on the mechanical properties of FFF-printed thermoplastics. J Manuf Mater Process. 4(2):38–58. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp402003810.3390/jmmp4020038 ↗
16. Salih RM, Kadauw A, Zeidler H, Aliyev R (2023) Investigation of LCD 3D printing of carbon fiber composites by utilising central composite design. J Manuf Mater Process. 7(2):58–74. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp702005810.3390/jmmp7020058 ↗
17. Colucci G, Aluigi A, Tonin C, Bongiovanni R (2014) Photopolymerization of keratin-based thiol-ene coatings. Prog Org Coat 77:1104–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.03.00910.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.03.009 ↗
18. Colucci G, Sacchi F, Bondioli F, Messori M (2024) Fully bio-based polymer composites: preparation, characterization, and LCD 3D printing. Polymers 16:1272–128810.3390/polym16091272 ↗
19. Al Rashid A, Ahmed W, Khalid MY, Koç M (2021) Vat photopolymerization of polymers and polymer composites: processes and applications. Addit Manuf 47:102279
20. Check C, Chartoff R, Chang S (2015) Inkjet printing of 3D nano-composites formed by photopolymerization of an acrylate monomer. React Funct Polym 97:116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.09.00910.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.09.009 ↗
21. Xu X, Awad A, Robles-Martinez P et al (2021) Vat photopolymerization 3D printing for advanced drug delivery and medical device applications. J Control Release 329:743–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.00810.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.008 ↗
22. Pappas SP Photocrosslinking
23. Shaukat U, Rossegger E, Schlögl S (2022) A review of multi-material 3D printing of functional materials via vat photopolymerization. Polymers (Basel) 14:244910.3390/polym14122449 ↗
24. Guo N, Leu MC (2013) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8:215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0248-810.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
25. Sangermano M, Razza N, Crivello JV (2014) Cationic UV-curing: technology and applications. Macromol Mater Eng 299:775–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20130034910.1002/mame.201300349 ↗
26. Rasaki SA, Xiong D, Xiong S et al (2021) Photopolymerization-based additive manufacturing of ceramics: a systematic review. J Adv Ceram 10:442–47110.1007/s40145-021-0468-z ↗
27. Pezzana L, Melilli G, Guigo N et al (2021) Cationic UV curing of bioderived epoxy furan-based coatings: tailoring the final properties by in situ formation of hybrid network and addition of monofunctional monomer. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:17403–17412. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0693910.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06939 ↗
28. Dietlin C, Schweizer S, Xiao P et al (2015) Photopolymerization upon LEDs: New photoinitiating systems and strategies. Polym Chem 6:3895–3912. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5py00258c10.1039/c5py00258c ↗
29. Magazine R, van Bochove B, Borandeh S, Seppälä J (2022) 3D inkjet-printing of photo-crosslinkable resins for microlens fabrication. Addit Manuf. 50:1012534–102546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10253410.1016/j.addma.2021.102534 ↗
30. Yagci Y, Jockusch S, Turro NJ (2010) Photoinitiated polymerization: Advances, challenges, and opportunities. Macromolecules 43:6245–626010.1021/ma1007545 ↗
31. Lebedevaite M, Ostrauskaite J (2021) Influence of photoinitiator and temperature on photocross-linking kinetics of acrylated epoxidized soybean oil and properties of the resulting polymers. Ind Crops Prod. 161:113210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11321010.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113210 ↗
32. Fiedor P, Pilch M, Szymaszek P et al (2020) Photochemical study of a new bimolecular photoinitiating system for vat photopolymerization 3D printing techniques under visible light. Catalysts. 10:284–314. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1003028410.3390/catal10030284 ↗
33. Green (2010) Industrial photoinitiators a technical guide by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC10.1201/9781439827468 ↗
34. Sangermano M, Roppolo I, Chiappone A (2018) New horizons in cationic photopolymerization. Polymers (Basel) 10:13610.3390/polym10020136 ↗
35. Pierau L, Elian C, Akimoto J et al (2022) Bio-sourced monomers and cationic photopolymerization-The green combination towards eco-friendly and non-toxic materials Bio-sourced Monomers and Cationic Photopolymerization: the Green combination towards Eco-Friendly and Non-Toxic Materials. Prog Polym Sci 127:10151710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101517 ↗
36. Fouassier J, Burr D, Crivello JV (1994) Photochemistry and photopolymerization activity of diaryliodonium salts. J Macromol Sci Part A 31:677–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060132940934974810.1080/10601329409349748 ↗
37. Odian (2004) Principles of polymerization, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken10.1002/047147875X ↗
38. Kim YM, Kostanski LK, MacGregor JF (2003) Photopolymerization of 3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3′,4′-epoxycyclohexane carboxylate and tri (ethylene glycol) methyl vinyl ether. Polymer (Guildf) 44:5103–5109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00573-110.1016/S0032-3861(03)00573-1 ↗
39. Alammar A, Kois JC, Revilla-León M, Att W (2022) Additive manufacturing technologies: current status and future perspectives. J Prosthodont 31:4–1210.1111/jopr.13477 ↗
40. Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma QP et al (2021) A review of vat photopolymerization technology: materials, applications, challenges, and future trends of 3d printing. Polymers (Basel) 13:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1304059810.3390/polym13040598 ↗
41. Fiedor P, Ortyl J (2020) A new approach to micromachining: high-precision and innovative additive manufacturing solutions based on photopolymerization technology. Materials 13:1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1313295110.3390/ma13132951 ↗
42. Crivello JV, Reichmanis E (2014) Photopolymer materials and processes for advanced technologies. Chem Mater 26:533–548. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm402262g10.1021/cm402262g ↗
43. Allen NS (1996) Photoinitiators for UV and visible curing of coatings” mechanisms and properties10.1016/S1010-6030(96)04426-7 ↗
44. Nakamura Y, Ogihara T, Hatano S et al (2017) Control of the termination mechanism in radical polymerization by viscosity: selective disproportionation in viscous media. Chem Eur J 23:1299–1305. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20160465910.1002/chem.201604659 ↗
45. Li Q, Pan Z, Liang J et al (2023) Ceramic composites toughened by vat photopolymerization 3D printing technology. J Mater Sci Technol 146:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.10.03510.1016/j.jmst.2022.10.035 ↗
46. Chaudhary R, Fabbri P, Leoni E et al (2023) Additive manufacturing by digital light processing: a review. Progr Addit Manuf 8:331–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00336-010.1007/s40964-022-00336-0 ↗
47. Bao Y (2022) Recent trends in advanced photoinitiators for vat photopolymerization 3D printing. Macromol Rapid Commun 43:220020210.1002/marc.202200202 ↗
48. Sangermano M (2012) Advances in cationic photopolymerization. Pure Appl Chem 84:2089–210110.1351/PAC-CON-12-04-11 ↗
49. Crivello JV, Narayan R (1992) Epoxidized triglycerides as renewable monomers in photoinitiated cationic polymerization. Chem Mater 4(3):692–69910.1021/cm00021a036 ↗
50. Udagawa A, Yamamoto Y, Inoue Y, Chûjô R (1991) Dynamic mechanical properties of cycloaliphatic epoxy resins cured by ultra-violet-and heat-initiated cationic polymerizations. Polymer 32(15):2779–278410.1016/0032-3861(91)90108-U ↗
51. Villotte S, Gigmes D, Dumur F, Lalevée J (2020) Design of iodonium salts for UV or near-UV LEDs for photoacid generator and polymerization purposes. Molecules. 25:149–162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2501014910.3390/molecules25010149 ↗
52. Udagawa A, Yamamoto Y, Inoue Y, Chûjô R (1991) Physical properties and photoreactivity of cycloaliphatic epoxy resins cured by UV-induced cationic polymerization. Polym J 23(9):1081–109010.1295/polymj.23.1081 ↗
53. Guy N, Giani O, Blanquer S et al (2021) Photoinduced ring-opening polymerizations. Prog Org Coat 153:10615910.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106159 ↗
54. Fouassier JP, Lalevée J (2014) Photochemical production of interpenetrating polymer networks; simultaneous initiation of radical and cationic polymerization reactions. Polymers (Basel) 6:2588–2610. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym610258810.3390/polym6102588 ↗
55. Tasdelen MA, Lalevée J, Yagci Y (2020) Photoinduced free radical promoted cationic polymerization 40 years after its discovery. Polym Chem 11:1111–112110.1039/C9PY01903K ↗
56. Tehfe MA, Louradour F, Lalevée J, Fouassier JP (2013) Photopolymerization reactions: on the way to a green and sustainable chemistry. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 3:490–514. https://doi.org/10.3390/app302049010.3390/app3020490 ↗
57. Lalevée J, Dumur F, Tehfe MA et al (2012) Dye photosensitized cationic ring-opening polymerization: search for new dye skeletons. Polymer (Guildf) 53:4947–4954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.08.06710.1016/j.polymer.2012.08.067 ↗
58. Osswald TA, Menges G (2012) Material science of polymers for engineers. Hanser Publishers, Munich10.1007/978-1-56990-524-1 ↗
59. Noè C, Hakkarainen M, Sangermano M (2021) Cationic uv-curing of epoxidized biobased resins. Polymers (Basel) 13:1–16
60. Ribeiro I, Matos F, Jacinto C et al (2020) Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of additive manufacturing. Sustainability 12:929–951. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1203092910.3390/su12030929 ↗
61. Suleiman Z, Shaikholla S, Dikhanbayeva D et al (2022) Industry 4.0: clustering of concepts and characteristics. Cogent Eng 9:203426410.1080/23311916.2022.2034264 ↗
62. Calignano F, Manfredi D, Ambrosio EP et al (2017) Overview on additive manufacturing technologies. Proc IEEE 105:593–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.262509810.1109/JPROC.2016.2625098 ↗
63. Hegab H, Khanna N, Monib N, Salem A (2023) Design for sustainable additive manufacturing: a review. Sustain Mater Technol. 35:e00576 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e0057610.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00576 ↗
64. Zhang F, Zhu L, Li Z et al (2021) The recent development of vat photopolymerization: a review. Addit Manuf 48:102423
65. Chantarapanich N, Puttawibul P, Sitthiseripratip K et al (2013) Study of the mechanical properties of photo-cured epoxy resin fabricated by stereolithography process. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 35:91
66. Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H et al (2020) Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater 5:110–115
67. Piedra-Cascón W, Krishnamurthy VR, Att W, Revilla-León M (2021) 3D printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures of vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: a narrative review. J Dent 109:10363010.1016/j.jdent.2021.103630 ↗
68. Chartrain NA, Williams CB, Whittington AR (2018) A review on fabricating tissue scaffolds using vat photopolymerization. Acta Biomater 74:90–11110.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.010 ↗
69. Barkane A, Platnieks O, Jurinovs M et al (2021) Uv-light curing of 3d printing inks from vegetable oils for stereolithography. Polymers 13:1195–1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1308119510.3390/polym13081195 ↗
70. Al Rashid A, Khan SA, Al-Ghamdi GS, Koç M (2020) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment. Autom Constr 118:10326810.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268 ↗
71. Jackson A (2014) Makers: the new industrial revolution. J Des Hist 27:311–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/ept04810.1093/jdh/ept048 ↗
72. Gershenfeld N (2012) How to make almost anything: the digital fabrication revolution. Foreign Aff 91:43
73. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G et al (2018) Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos B Eng 143:172–19610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
74. Jusoh WNLW, Sajab MS, Abdul PM, Kaco H (2022) Recent advances in 3D bioprinting: a review of cellulose-based biomaterials ink. Polymers (Basel) 14:226010.3390/polym14112260 ↗
75. Lakkala P, Munnangi SR, Bandari S, Repka M (2023) Additive manufacturing technologies with emphasis on stereolithography 3D printing in pharmaceutical and medical applications: a review. Int J Pharm X. 5:100159–100175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.10015910.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100159 ↗
76. Mou YA, Koc M (2019) Dimensional capability of selected 3DP technologies. Rapid Prototyp J 25:915–924. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2019-006110.1108/RPJ-03-2019-0061 ↗
77. Bergoglio M, Reisinger D, Schlögl S et al (2023) Sustainable bio-based UV-cured epoxy vitrimer from castor oil. Polymers 15:1024–1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1504102410.3390/polym15041024 ↗
78. Negi S, Kumar Sharma R, Dhiman S (2013) Basics, applications and future of additive manufacturing technologies: a review. J Manuf Technol Res 5:75
79. Feng J, Guo Z (2016) Temperature-frequency-dependent mechanical properties model of epoxy resin and its composites. Compos B Eng 85:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.040 ↗
80. Santoliquido O, Colombo P, Ortona A (2019) Additive manufacturing of ceramic components by digital light processing: a comparison between the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” approaches. J Eur Ceram Soc 39:2140–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.01.04410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.01.044 ↗
81. De Beer MP, Van Der Laan HL, Cole MA et al (2019) Rapid, continuous additive manufacturing by volumetric polymerization inhibition patterning. Sci Adv 5:eaau872310.1126/sciadv.aau8723 ↗
82. Saygin V, Snapp K, Gongora AE et al (2023) Mechanical consequences of oxygen inhibition in vat polymerization. Adv Mater Technol 8(12):2202022–20202030. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20220202210.1002/admt.202202022 ↗
83. Lu P, Ahn D, Yunis R et al (2021) Wavelength-selective light-matter interactions in polymer science. Matter 4:2172–2229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.03.02110.1016/j.matt.2021.03.021 ↗
84. Tosto C, Pergolizzi E, Blanco I et al (2020) Epoxy based blends for additive manufacturing by liquid crystal display (LCD) printing: the effect of blending and dual curing on daylight curable resins. Polymers 12:1594–1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1207159410.3390/polym12071594 ↗
85. Bagheri A, Jin J (2019) Photopolymerization in 3D printing. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1:593–61110.1021/acsapm.8b00165 ↗
86. Pfaffinger M (2018) Hot lithography—new possibilities in polymer 3D printing. Laser Tech J 15:45–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/latj.20180002410.1002/latj.201800024 ↗
87. Dall’Argine C, Hochwallner A, Klikovits N et al (2020) Hot-lithography SLA-3D printing of epoxy resin. Macromol Mater Eng 305(10):2000325. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20200032510.1002/mame.202000325 ↗
88. Steyrer B, Busetti B, Harakály G et al (2018) Hot lithography vs. room temperature DLP 3D-printing of a dimethacrylate. Addit Manuf 21:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.01310.1016/j.addma.2018.03.013 ↗
89. Ahmadi M, Ehrmann K, Koch T et al (2024) From unregulated networks to designed microstructures: introducing heterogeneity at different length scales in photopolymers for additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 124:3978–4020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c0057010.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00570 ↗
90. Shah MA, Lee DG, Lee BY, Hur S (2021) Classifications and applications of inkjet printing technology: a review. IEEE Access 9:140079–14010210.1109/ACCESS.2021.3119219 ↗
91. Gouzman I, Atar N, Grossman E et al (2019) 3D printing of bismaleimides: from new ink formulation to printed thermosetting polymer objects. Adv Mater Technol 4:1900368. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20190036810.1002/admt.201900368 ↗
92. Shah MA, Lee DG, Hur S (2019) Design and characteristic analysis of a MEMS piezo-driven recirculating inkjet printhead using lumped element modeling. Micromachines 10:757–776. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1011075710.3390/mi10110757 ↗
93. Liu N, Sheng X, Zhang M et al (2022) Squeeze-type piezoelectric inkjet printhead actuating waveform design method based on numerical simulation and experiment. Micromachines 13:1695–1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1310169510.3390/mi13101695 ↗
94. Peng J, Huang J, Wang J (2021) Modelling of power-law fluid flow inside a piezoelectric inkjet printhead. Sensors 21:2441–2454. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2107244110.3390/s21072441 ↗
95. Gao M, Li L, Song Y (2017) Inkjet printing wearable electronic devices. J Mater Chem C Mater 5:2971–299310.1039/C7TC00038C ↗
96. Mau R, Seitz H (2023) Influence of the volatility of solvent on the reproducibility of droplet formation in pharmaceutical inkjet printing. Pharmaceutics 15:367–385. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1502036710.3390/pharmaceutics15020367 ↗
97. Zhang Y, Hu G, Liu Y et al (2022) Suppression and utilization of satellite droplets for inkjet printing: a review. Processes 10:93210.3390/pr10050932 ↗
98. Mattana G, Loi A, Woytasik M et al (2017) Inkjet-printing: a new fabrication technology for organic transistors. Adv Mater Technol 2:170006310.1002/admt.201700063 ↗
99. Escobedo P, Carvajal MA, Banqueri J et al (2019) Comparative study of inkjet-printed silver conductive traces with thermal and electrical sintering. IEEE Access 7:1909–1919. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.288711310.1109/ACCESS.2018.2887113 ↗
100. Zhang M, Chen J, Zhu J et al (2024) Hybrid manipulation of inkjet-printing deposition pattern of high particle concentration droplet by means of thermal and binary solvent effects. Int J Heat Mass Transf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.12522510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.125225 ↗