journal article·2025-03

Structural and dielectric characteristics of CoFe2O4/nitrogen-enriched reduced graphene oxide composites via a one-pot solvothermal method

Pasupuleti Anil, V. V. Ravi Kanth Kumar, Bharath Chandran, N. Satyanarayana, R. Sai Prasad Goud

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (90)

Show source-provided references
1. Debnath S, Flores-Hansen C, Carneiro NF et al (2024) Nanoparticle-functionalized microsensors for room-temperature hydrogen detection. J Mater Sci 59:6436–6445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09555-y10.1007/s10853-024-09555-y ↗
2. Ismail I, Azis RS (2024) A review of magnetic nanocomposites for EMI shielding: synthesis, properties, and mechanisms. J Mater Sci 59:5293–5329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09527-210.1007/s10853-024-09527-2 ↗
3. Dos Santos CA, Perini JAL, Irikura K et al (2024) High efficiency of graphene/CoFe2O4 nanomaterial in the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 dissolved in water under solar irradiation simulator. J Mater Sci 59:1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-09289-310.1007/s10853-023-09289-3 ↗
4. Boucher C, Tang D, Zhitomirsky I, Rubel O (2024) Application of murexide as a capping agent for fabrication of magnetite anodes for supercapacitors: experimental and first-principle studies. J Mater Sci 59:5480–5497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09524-510.1007/s10853-024-09524-5 ↗
5. Wang Z, Ma Y, Zheng P et al (2024) ReaxFF molecular dynamics study of early oxidation of nickel nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 59:5414–5425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-09136-510.1007/s10853-023-09136-5 ↗
6. Lejček P, Školáková A (2023) Grain boundary configurational entropy: a challenge. J Mater Sci 58:10043–10057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08634-w10.1007/s10853-023-08634-w ↗
7. Jo K, Ryu J, Jo I, Lee H (2023) Orbital hybridization and polarization resistance of Cu-doped PrBaCo2O5+δ. J Mater Sci 58:10677–10685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08699-710.1007/s10853-023-08699-7 ↗
8. Tavar D, Sharma RK, Ashiq M et al (2023) rGO supported cobalt-manganese based nanocomposite with improved electrochemical water oxidation catalysis. J Mater Sci 58:11270–11285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08677-z10.1007/s10853-023-08677-z ↗
9. Durán A, Reguera E, Mendivil LF et al (2023) Negative magnetization in the medium-entropy Pr1/3Dy1/3Ho1/3CrO3 and PrCrO3 ceramics: comparative crystal structure, optic, dielectric and magnetic properties. J Mater Sci 58:15021–15034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08955-w10.1007/s10853-023-08955-w ↗
10. Lyu M, Liu Y, Cui X, Liang L (2024) Vanillin-based degradable thermosets with superior dielectric properties via regulation of imine cross-linked structure. J Mater Sci 59:4059–4071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-09303-810.1007/s10853-023-09303-8 ↗
11. Mandal D, Mandal K (2021) Tuning of structural, magnetic and dielectric properties of TFe2O4 (T = Mn, Fe Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) nano-hollow spheres: effect of cation substitution. J Alloy Compd 851:156898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15689810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156898 ↗
12. Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson DB et al (2004) Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M = Fe Co, Mn) Nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 126:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja038085210.1021/ja0380852 ↗
13. Moitra D, Chandel M, Ghosh BK et al (2016) A simple ‘in situ’ co-precipitation method for the preparation of multifunctional CoFe2O4 –reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites: excellent microwave absorber and highly efficient magnetically separable recyclable photocatalyst for dye degradation. RSC Adv 6:76759–76772. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA17384E10.1039/C6RA17384E ↗
14. Thomas N, Jithin PV, Sudheesh VD, Sebastian V (2017) Magnetic and dielectric properties of magnesium substituted cobalt ferrite samples synthesised via one step calcination free solution combustion method. Ceram Int 43:7305–7310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.03110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.031 ↗
15. Barba-Juan A, Vicente N, Mormeneo-Segarra A, Clausell-Terol C (2023) Microstructure-dependent magnetic permeability in ferrites from nanoparticles. Ceram Int 49:21530–21537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.28710.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.287 ↗
16. Wang W, Ding Z, Zhao X et al (2015) Microstructure and magnetic properties of MFe2O4 (M = Co, Ni, and Mn) ferrite nanocrystals prepared using colloid mill and hydrothermal method. J Appl Phys 117:17A328. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.491746310.1063/1.4917463 ↗
17. Rondinone AJ, Samia ACS, Zhang ZJ (1999) Superparamagnetic relaxation and magnetic anisotropy energy distribution in CoFe2O4 spinel ferrite nanocrystallites. J Phys Chem B 103:6876–6880. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp991230710.1021/jp9912307 ↗
18. Zhang S, Jiao Q, Zhao Y et al (2014) Preparation of rugby-shaped CoFe2O4 particles and their microwave absorbing properties. J Mater Chem A 2:18033–18039. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA04286G10.1039/C4TA04286G ↗
19. Chand P, Vaish S, Kumar P (2017) Structural, optical and dielectric properties of transition metal (MFe2O4; M = Co, Ni and Zn) nanoferrites. Phys B 524:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2017.08.06010.1016/j.physb.2017.08.060 ↗
20. Satish M, Shashanka HM, Saha S et al (2023) Enhanced magnetostriction of Co–Ni-ferrite composites derived from hard (CoFe2O4) and soft (NiFe2O4) magnetostrictive phases. Ceram Int 49:22566–22575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.04.09310.1016/j.ceramint.2023.04.093 ↗
21. Shashanka HM, Anantharamaiah PN (2023) Ni–Ga and Mg–Ga co-substituted sintered CoFe2O4 ceramics: studies of their magnetic and magnetostrictive properties. Solid State Sci 140:107191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2023.10719110.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2023.107191 ↗
22. Anantharamaiah PN, Shashanka HM, Srinivasan S et al (2022) Structural, magnetic, and magnetostriction properties of flexible, nanocrystalline CoFe2O4 films made by chemical processing. ACS Omega 7:43813–43819. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c0494310.1021/acsomega.2c04943 ↗
23. Anantharamaiah PN, Joy PA (2019) Large enhancement in the magnetostriction parameters of the composite of CoFe2O4 and CoFe1.9Ga0.1O4. Mater Lett 236:303–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.11510.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.115 ↗
24. Liu Y, Chen Z, Zhang Y et al (2018) Broadband and lightweight microwave absorber constructed by in situ growth of hierarchical CoFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide porous nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:13860–13868. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0213710.1021/acsami.8b02137 ↗
25. Yuan H, Yan F, Li C et al (2018) Nickel nanoparticle encapsulated in few-layer nitrogen-doped graphene supported by nitrogen-doped graphite sheets as a high-performance electromagnetic wave absorbing material. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:1399–1407. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1555910.1021/acsami.7b15559 ↗
26. Shahzad F, Yu S, Kumar P et al (2015) Sulfur doped graphene/polystyrene nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos Struct 133:1267–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.036 ↗
27. Rowshanzamir S, Jafari M, Nozarian N, Parnian MJ (2024) Non-precious metal on zirconium oxide/nitrogen-doped graphene nanocomposite (M/ZrO2-NG) as electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Results Chem 7:101383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2024.10138310.1016/j.rechem.2024.101383 ↗
28. Guo H-L, Su P, Kang X, Ning S-K (2013) Synthesis and characterization of nitrogen-doped graphene hydrogels by hydrothermal route with Urea as reducing-doping agents. J Mater Chem A 1:2248–2255. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2TA00887D10.1039/C2TA00887D ↗
29. Akhtar AJ, Gupta A, Kumar Shaw B, Saha SK (2013) Unusual dielectric response in cobalt doped reduced graphene oxide. Appl Phys Lett 103:242902. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.484553610.1063/1.4845536 ↗
30. Khurana G, Kumar N, Kooriyattil S, Katiyar RS (2015) Structural, magnetic, and dielectric properties of graphene oxide/ZnxFe1−xFe2O4 composites. J Appl Phys 117:17E106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.490814610.1063/1.4908146 ↗
31. Ambikeswari N, Manivannan S (2021) Structural, magnetic, and dielectric properties of ultrafine nickel-substituted cobalt ferrite-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. J Electron Mater 50:6135–6148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-021-09130-010.1007/s11664-021-09130-0 ↗
32. Bharatiya D, Parhi B, Swain SK (2021) Preparation, characterization and dielectric properties of GO based ZnO embedded mixed metal oxides ternary nanostructured composites. J Alloy Compd 869:159274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15927410.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159274 ↗
33. Latif Z, Rehman AU, Amin N et al (2023) Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs): a source to bring change in the properties of Co–Ni–Gd-ferrite/GNP nanocomposites. RSC Adv 13:34308–34321. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA02080K10.1039/D3RA02080K ↗
34. Kiran TN (2022) Tailoring the electrical transport properties of ferromagnetic MnFe2O4 nanoferrite by graphene oxide: an experimental study. Mater Chem Phys 292:126844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12684410.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126844 ↗
35. Routray KL, Saha S, Behera D (2020) Nanosized CoFe2O4-graphene nanoplatelets with massive dielectric enhancement for high frequency device application. Mater Sci Eng, B 257:114548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2020.11454810.1016/j.mseb.2020.114548 ↗
36. Wang X, Lu Y, Zhu T et al (2020) CoFe2O4/N-doped reduced graphene oxide aerogels for high-performance microwave absorption. Chem Eng J 388:124317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12431710.1016/j.cej.2020.124317 ↗
37. Zong M, Huang Y, Zhao Y et al (2013) Facile preparation, high microwave absorption and microwave absorbing mechanism of RGO–Fe3O4 composites. RSC Adv 3:23638. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra43359e10.1039/c3ra43359e ↗
38. Anju YRS, Pötschke P et al (2021) High-performance, lightweight, and flexible thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites with Zn2+-substituted CoFe2O4 nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide as shielding materials against electromagnetic pollution. ACS Omega 6:28098–28118. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c0419210.1021/acsomega.1c04192 ↗
39. Jiao X, Qiu Y, Zhang L, Zhang X (2017) Comparison of the characteristic properties of reduced graphene oxides synthesized from natural graphites with different graphitization degrees. RSC Adv 7:52337–52344. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA10809E10.1039/C7RA10809E ↗
40. Shashanka HM, Saha S, Haritha K et al (2023) Aluminum and zinc co-substituted cobalt ferrite: structural, magnetic, and magnetostrictive properties. J Phys Chem C 127:11218–11230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0136110.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01361 ↗
41. Iqbal Z, Tanweer MS, Alam M (2023) Reduced graphene oxide-modified spinel cobalt ferrite nanocomposite: synthesis, characterization, and its superior adsorption performance for dyes and heavy metals. ACS Omega 8:6376–6390. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c0663610.1021/acsomega.2c06636 ↗
42. Saha S, Das N, Chakra P et al (2019) Role of graphene on structural, dielectric and magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 30:14464–14479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01816-w10.1007/s10854-019-01816-w ↗
43. Hosterman BD (2011) Raman Spectroscopic Study of Solid Solution Spinel Oxides. University of Nevada, Las Vegas. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1087. https://doi.org/10.34917/247613110.34917/2476131 ↗
44. Kıvrak B, Şergun A, Karaaslan M, Akyol M (2023) PANI-coated YIG/CFO hybrid composites as advanced electromagnetic wave absorber through X-band. J Alloy Compd 958:170345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17034510.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170345 ↗
45. Ansari SM, Sinha BB, Phase D et al (2019) Particle size, morphology, and chemical composition controlled CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with tunable magnetic properties via oleic acid based solvothermal synthesis for application in electronic devices. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2:1828–1843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b0200910.1021/acsanm.8b02009 ↗
46. Bera P, Lakshmi RV, Prakash BH et al (2020) Solution combustion synthesis, characterization, magnetic, and dielectric properties of CoFe2O4 and Co0.5M0.5Fe2O4(M = Mn, Ni, and Zn). Phys Chem Chem Phys 22:20087–20106. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP03161E10.1039/D0CP03161E ↗
47. Wegener W, Scheerlinck D, Legrand E et al (1974) Inelastic neutron scattering study of acoustical magnons in MnFe2O4. Solid State Commun 15:345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(74)90773-X10.1016/0038-1098(74)90773-X ↗
48. Chua CK, Pumera M (2015) Monothiolation and reduction of graphene oxide via one-pot synthesis: hybrid catalyst for oxygen reduction. ACS Nano 9:4193–4199. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0043810.1021/acsnano.5b00438 ↗
49. Datt G, Sen Bishwas M, Manivel Raja M, Abhyankar AC (2016) Observation of magnetic anomalies in one-step solvothermally synthesized nickel–cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. Nanoscale 8:5200–5213. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR06791J10.1039/C5NR06791J ↗
50. Modafferi V, Santangelo S, Fiore M et al (2019) Transition metal oxides on reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites: evaluation of physicochemical properties. J Nanomater 2019:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/170321810.1155/2019/1703218 ↗
51. Lu Z-J, Bao S-J, Gou Y-T et al (2013) Nitrogen-doped reduced-graphene oxide as an efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction in fuel cells. RSC Adv 3:3990. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra22161j10.1039/c3ra22161j ↗
52. Anantharamaiah PN, Joy PA (2016) Enhancing the strain sensitivity of CoFe2O4at low magnetic fields without affecting the magnetostriction coefficient by substitution of small amounts of Mg for Fe. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:10516–10527. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP00369A10.1039/C6CP00369A ↗
53. Kumar Y, Sharma A, Ahmed MdA et al (2018) Morphology-controlled synthesis and enhanced energy product (BH)max of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. New J Chem 42:15793–15802. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ02177E10.1039/C8NJ02177E ↗
54. Biesinger MC, Payne BP, Grosvenor AP et al (2011) Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl Surf Sci 257:2717–2730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.05110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
55. Mathew T (2002) Cu–Co synergism in Cu1−xCoxFe2O4—catalysis and XPS aspects. J Catal 210:405–417. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.371210.1006/jcat.2002.3712 ↗
56. Fantauzzi M, Secci F, Sanna Angotzi M et al (2019) Nanostructured spinel cobalt ferrites: Fe and Co chemical state, cation distribution and size effects by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. RSC Adv 9:19171–19179. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA03488A10.1039/C9RA03488A ↗
57. Li Z, Li X, Zong Y et al (2017) Solvothermal synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene decorated by superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their applications as enhanced synergistic microwave absorbers. Carbon 115:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.03610.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.036 ↗
58. Quan L, Qin FX, Estevez D et al (2017) Magnetic graphene for microwave absorbing application: towards the lightest graphene-based absorber. Carbon 125:630–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.10110.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.101 ↗
59. Wang X, Liao J, Du R et al (2021) Achieving super-broad effective absorption bandwidth with low filler loading for graphene aerogels/raspberry-like CoFe2O4 clusters by N doping. J Colloid Interface Sci 590:186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.01.06910.1016/j.jcis.2021.01.069 ↗
60. Chang Y-S, Chen F-K, Tsai D-C et al (2021) N-doped reduced graphene oxide for room-temperature NO gas sensors. Sci Rep 11:20719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99883-910.1038/s41598-021-99883-9 ↗
61. Silva FGD, Depeyrot J, Campos AFC et al (2019) Structural and magnetic properties of spinel ferrite nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19:4888–4902. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2019.1687710.1166/jnn.2019.16877 ↗
62. Fesenko O, Yatsenko L (eds) (2017) Nanophysics, nanomaterials, interface studies, and applications: selected. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials (NANO 2016), August 24–27, 2016, Lviv, Ukraine. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42704-610.1007/978-3-031-42704-6 ↗
63. Manna K, Srivastava SK (2017) Fe3O4 @carbon@polyaniline trilaminar core-shell composites as superior microwave absorber in shielding of electromagnetic pollution. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:10710–10721. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0268210.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02682 ↗
64. Anantharamaiah PN, Joy PA (2015) Magnetic and magnetostrictive properties of aluminium substituted cobalt ferrite synthesized by citrate-gel method. J Mater Sci 50:6510–6517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9211-x10.1007/s10853-015-9211-x ↗
65. Jonscher AK (1977) The ‘universal’ dielectric response. Nature 267:673–679. https://doi.org/10.1038/267673a010.1038/267673a0 ↗
66. Chen DG, Tang XG, Liu QX et al (2013) Impedance response and dielectric relaxation in co-precipitation derived ferrite (Ni, Zn)Fe2O4 ceramics. J Appl Phys 113:214110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.480954110.1063/1.4809541 ↗
67. Verma K, Kumar A, Varshney D (2012) Dielectric relaxation behaviour of AxCo1−xFe2O4 (A = Zn, Mg) mixed ferrites. J Alloy Compd 526:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.08910.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.089 ↗
68. Kumar Verma H, Srivastava RC, Shekhar Joshi C (2024) Synthesis of nickel-cobalt ferrite/graphene oxide nanocomposites. J Magn Magn Mater 599:172081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.17208110.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172081 ↗
69. Li L-Z, Zhong X-X, Wang R et al (2017) Structural, magnetic and electrical properties in Al-substitued NiZnCo ferrite prepared via the sol–gel auto-combustion method for LTCC technology. RSC Adv 7:39198–39203. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA06413F10.1039/C7RA06413F ↗
70. Koops CG (1951) On the dispersion of resistivity and dielectric constant of some semiconductors at audiofrequencies. Phys Rev 83:121–124. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.83.12110.1103/PhysRev.83.121 ↗
71. Wagner KW (1913) Zur Theorie der unvollkommenen Dielektrika. Ann Phys 345:817–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.1913345050210.1002/andp.19133450502 ↗
72. Maxwell JC (1873) A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Clarendon Press series, Oxford University Press
73. Hajlaoui ME, Dhahri R, Hnainia N et al (2019) Conductivity and giant permittivity study of Zn0.5Ni0.5Fe2O4 spinel ferrite as a function of frequency and temperature. RSC Adv 9:32395–32402. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA06589J10.1039/C9RA06589J ↗
74. Kumar KS, Pittala S, Sanyadanam S, Paik P (2015) A new single/few-layered graphene oxide with a high dielectric constant of 10 6: contribution of defects and functional groups. RSC Adv 5:14768–14779. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA10800K10.1039/C4RA10800K ↗
75. Govindasamy T, Mathew NK, Asapu VK et al (2023) High-performance EMI shielding effectiveness of Fe3O4–3D rPC nanocomposites: a systematic optimization in the X-band region. Phys Chem Chem Phys 25:30501–30515. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP04679F10.1039/D3CP04679F ↗
76. Rayssi Ch, El Kossi S, Dhahri J, Khirouni K (2018) Frequency and temperature-dependence of dielectric permittivity and electric modulus studies of the solid solution Ca0.85Er0.1Ti1−xCo4x/3O3 (0 ≤ x+ ≤ 0.1). RSC Adv 8:17139–17150. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA00794B10.1039/C8RA00794B ↗
77. Slatineanu T, Iordan AR, Oancea V et al (2013) Magnetic and dielectric properties of Co–Zn ferrite. Mater Sci Eng, B 178:1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2013.06.01410.1016/j.mseb.2013.06.014 ↗
78. Sharma J, Parashar J, Saxena VK et al (2015) Study of dielectric properties of nanocrystalline cobalt ferrite upto microwave frequencies. Macromol Symp 357:38–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20140018310.1002/masy.201400183 ↗
79. Rahmouni H, Smari M, Cherif B et al (2015) Conduction mechanism, impedance spectroscopic investigation and dielectric behaviour of La0.5Ca0.5−xAgxMnO3 manganites with compositions below the concentration limit of silver solubility in perovskites (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.2). Dalton Trans 44:10457–10466. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5DT00444F10.1039/C5DT00444F ↗
80. Liu P, Yao Z, Zhou J (2015) Controllable synthesis and enhanced microwave absorption properties of silane-modified Ni0.4Zn0.4Co0.2Fe2O4 nanocomposites covered with reduced graphene oxide. RSC Adv 5:93739–93748. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA18668D10.1039/C5RA18668D ↗
81. Yadav RS, Kuřitka I, Vilcakova J et al (2017) Impact of grain size and structural changes on magnetic, dielectric, electrical, impedance and modulus spectroscopic characteristics of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized by honey mediated sol–gel combustion method. Adv Nat Sci: Nanosci Nanotechnol 8:045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6254/aa853a10.1088/2043-6254/aa853a ↗
82. Melagiriyappa E, Jayanna HS, Chougule BK (2008) Dielectric behaviour and ac electrical conductivity study of Sm3+ substituted Mg–Zn ferrites. Mater Chem Phys 112:68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.05.01410.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.05.014 ↗
83. Bagri A, Mattevi C, Acik M et al (2010) Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nature Chem 2:581–587. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.68610.1038/nchem.686 ↗
84. Johari P, Shenoy VB (2011) Modulating optical properties of graphene oxide: role of prominent functional groups. ACS Nano 5:7640–7647. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn202732t10.1021/nn202732t ↗
85. Srinivasamurthy KM, El-Denglawey A, Manjunatha K et al (2022) Observation of dielectric dispersion and relaxation behaviour in Ni2+-substituted cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. J Mater Chem C 10:3418–3428. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC05980G10.1039/D1TC05980G ↗
86. Atif M, Idrees M, Nadeem M et al (2016) Investigation on the structural, dielectric and impedance analysis of manganese substituted cobalt ferrite i.e., Co1–xMnxFe2O4(0.0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4). RSC Adv 6:20876–20885. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA20621A10.1039/C5RA20621A ↗
87. Barsoukov E, Macdonald JR (2005) Impedance spectroscopy: theory, experiment, and applications, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/047171624310.1002/0471716243 ↗
88. Lakshmana Rao T, Pradhan MK, Goutam UK et al (2019) Substitution induced magnetic phase transitions and related electrical conduction mechanisms in LaFeO3 nanoparticle. J Appl Phys 126:064104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.509798110.1063/1.5097981 ↗
89. Shashanka HM, Singh DN, Chelvane JA, Anantharamaiah PN (2024) Gallium induced effect on magnetic, magnetostrictive and electrical properties of sintered NiFe2O4. Inorg Chem Commun 161:112029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2024.11202910.1016/j.inoche.2024.112029 ↗
90. Satish M, Shashanka HM, Saha S et al (2023) Role of Cu-substitution on microstructural, magnetic, magnetostrictive and dielectric properties of sintered NiFe2O4. J Magn Magn Mater 585:171113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17111310.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171113 ↗