journal article·2024-10

Regulating the surface properties and interlamellar spacing of GO-based nanofiltration membrane for efficient water treatment

Liang Zhang, Piao Lan, YunQiang Chen, Zhou Chen, Yihong Lan, YuBin Hong, WeiGuang Lan

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 37
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Mariñas BJ, Mayes AM (2008) Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452(7185):301–310. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0659910.1038/nature06599 ↗
2. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2016) Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci Adv 2(2):e1500323. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.150032310.1126/sciadv.1500323 ↗
3. Rosa L, Chiarelli DD, Rulli MC, Dell’Angelo J, D’Odorico P (2020) Global agricultural economic water scarcity. Sci Adv 6(18):6031. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz603110.1126/sciadv.aaz6031 ↗
4. He C, Liu Z, Wu J, Pan X, Fang Z, Li J, Bryan BA (2021) Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nat Commun 12(1):4667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25026-310.1038/s41467-021-25026-3 ↗
5. van Vliet MTH, Jones ER, Flörke M, Franssen WHP, Hanasaki N, Wada Y, Yearsley JR (2021) Global water scarcity including surface water quality and expansions of clean water technologies. Environ Res Lett 16(2):024020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc310.1088/1748-9326/abbfc3 ↗
6. Yusuf A, Sodiq A, Giwa A, Eke J, Pikuda O, De Luca G, Di Salvo JL, Chakraborty S (2020) A review of emerging trends in membrane science and technology for sustainable water treatment. J Clean Prod 266:121867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12186710.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121867 ↗
7. Obotey Ezugbe E, Rathilal S (2020) membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: a Review. Membranes (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1005008910.3390/membranes10050089 ↗
8. Honarparvar S, Zhang X, Chen T, Alborzi A, Afroz K, Reible D (2021) Frontiers of membrane desalination processes for brackish water treatment: a review. Membranes. 11:24610.3390/membranes11040246 ↗
9. Othman NH, Alias NH, Fuzil NS, Marpani F, Shahruddin MZ, Chew CM, David Ng KM, Lau WJ, Ismail AF (2022) A review on the use of membrane technology systems in developing Countries. Membranes 12:3010.3390/membranes12010030 ↗
10. Shehata N, Egirani D, Olabi AG, Inayat A, Abdelkareem MA, Chae K-J, Sayed ET (2023) Membrane-based water and wastewater treatment technologies: Issues, current trends, challenges, and role in achieving sustainable development goals, and circular economy. Chemosphere 320:137993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.13799310.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137993 ↗
11. Strathmann H (2001) Membrane separation processes: Current relevance and future opportunities. AIChE J 47(5):1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69047051410.1002/aic.690470514 ↗
12. Park HB, Kamcev J, Robeson LM, Elimelech M, Freeman BD (2017) Maximizing the right stuff: the trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 356(6343):0530. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab053010.1126/science.aab0530 ↗
13. Dervin S, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC (2016) 2D nanostructures for water purification: graphene and beyond. Nanoscale 8(33):15115–15131. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR04508A10.1039/C6NR04508A ↗
14. Asif MB, Iftekhar S, Maqbool T, Pramanik BK, Tabraiz S, Sillanpää M, Zhang Z (2022) Two-dimensional nanoporous and lamellar membranes for water purification: reality or a myth? Chem Eng J 432:134335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13433510.1016/j.cej.2021.134335 ↗
15. Yan X, Cheng S, Ma C, Li J, Wang G, Yang C (2022) D-spacing controllable GO membrane intercalated by sodium tetraborate pentahydrate for dye contamination wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 422:126939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12693910.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126939 ↗
16. Xing Y-L, Xu G-R, An Z-H, Liu Y-H, Xu K, Liu Q, Zhao H-L, Das R (2021) Laminated GO membranes for water transport and ions selectivity: mechanism, synthesis, stabilization, and applications. Sep Purif Technol 259:118192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11819210.1016/j.seppur.2020.118192 ↗
17. Du C, Liu G, Qu Z, Wang W, Yu D (2022) GO/TiO2-decorated electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride membrane prepared based on metal-polyphenol coordination network for oil–water separation and desalination. J Mater Sci 57(5):3452–3467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06824-y10.1007/s10853-021-06824-y ↗
18. Yang X, Wen Y, Li Y, Yan L, Tang CY, Ma J, Darling SB, Shao L (2023) Engineering in situ catalytic cleaning membrane via prebiotic-chemistry-inspired mineralization. Adv Mater 35(49):230662610.1002/adma.202306626 ↗
19. Guo J, Zhang Y, Yang F, Mamba BB, Ma J, Shao L, Liu S (2023) Ultra-permeable dual-mechanism-driven graphene oxide framework membranes for precision ion separations. Angew Chem 135(23):e20230293110.1002/ange.202302931 ↗
20. Zhang Y, Wang H, Guo J, Cheng X, Han G, Lau CH, Lin H, Liu S, Ma J, Shao L (2023) Ice-confined synthesis of highly ionized 3D-quasilayered polyamide nanofiltration membranes. Science 382(6667):202–20610.1126/science.adi9531 ↗
21. Chen L, Shi G, Shen J, Peng B, Zhang B, Wang Y, Bian F, Wang J, Li D, Qian Z, Xu G, Liu G, Zeng J, Zhang L, Yang Y, Zhou G, Wu M, Jin W, Li J, Fang H (2017) Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing. Nature 550(7676):380–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2404410.1038/nature24044 ↗
22. Zhao G, Hu R, Zhao X, He Y, Zhu H (2019) High flux nanofiltration membranes prepared with a graphene oxide homo-structure. J Membr Sci 585:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.02810.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.028 ↗
23. Dong L, Li M, Zhang S, Si X, Bai Y, Zhang C (2020) NH2-Fe3O4-regulated graphene oxide membranes with well-defined laminar nanochannels for desalination of dye solutions. Desalination 476:114227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.11422710.1016/j.desal.2019.114227 ↗
24. Liu T, Liu X, Graham N, Yu W, Sun K (2020) Two-dimensional MXene incorporated graphene oxide composite membrane with enhanced water purification performance. J Membr Sci 593:117431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11743110.1016/j.memsci.2019.117431 ↗
25. Qu H, Xiao X, Han Z, Hu M, Shen S, Yang L, Jia F, Wang T, Ye Z, Sun W, Wang Y, Huang L, Zhu Z, Servati P, Tang J, Chen J (2022) Graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane based on three-dimensional size-controllable metal-organic frameworks for water treatment. ACS Appl Nano Mater 5(4):5196–5207. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c0023410.1021/acsanm.2c00234 ↗
26. Guan J, You X, Shi B, Liu Y, Yuan J, Yang C, Pang X, Wu H, Shen J, Fan C, Long M, Zhang R, Jiang Z (2021) Engineering multi-pathway graphene oxide membranes toward ultrafast water purification. J Membr Sci 638:119706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11970610.1016/j.memsci.2021.119706 ↗
27. Zhang W, Xu H, Xie F, Ma X, Niu B, Chen M, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Long D (2022) General synthesis of ultrafine metal oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for ultrahigh-flux nanofiltration membrane. Nat Commun 13(1):471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28180-410.1038/s41467-022-28180-4 ↗
28. Ge G, Li L, Wang D, Chen M, Zeng Z, Xiong W, Wu X, Guo C (2021) Carbon dots: synthesis, properties and biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B 9(33):6553–6575. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TB01077H10.1039/D1TB01077H ↗
29. Alas MO, Alkas FB, Aktas Sukuroglu A, Genc Alturk R, Battal D (2020) Fluorescent carbon dots are the new quantum dots: an overview of their potential in emerging technologies and nanosafety. J Mater Sci 55(31):15074–15105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05054-y10.1007/s10853-020-05054-y ↗
30. Liu J, Li R, Yang B (2020) Carbon dots: a new type of carbon-based nanomaterial with wide applications. ACS Cent Sci 6(12):2179–2195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c0130610.1021/acscentsci.0c01306 ↗
31. Tang W, Zhang Z, Li Y (2021) Applications of carbon quantum dots in lubricant additives: a review. J Mater Sci 56(21):12061–12092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06032-810.1007/s10853-021-06032-8 ↗
32. Li S, Zhou S, Xu H, Xiao L, Wang Y, Shen H, Wang H, Yuan Q (2016) Luminescent properties and sensing performance of a carbon quantum dot encapsulated mesoporous silica/polyacrylonitrile electrospun nanofibrous membrane. J Mater Sci 51(14):6801–6811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9967-710.1007/s10853-016-9967-7 ↗
33. Pramanik G, Neburkova J, Vanek V, Jani M, Kindermann M, Cigler P (2019) Using polymers to enhance the carbon nanomaterial biointerface, carbon nanomaterials for bioimaging, bioanalysis, and therapy. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 15–4210.1002/9781119373476.ch2 ↗
34. Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, Sinitskii A, Sun Z, Slesarev A, Alemany LB, Lu W, Tour JM (2010) Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4(8):4806–4814. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100636810.1021/nn1006368 ↗
35. Zhou J, Yang Y, Zhang C-Y (2013) A low-temperature solid-phase method to synthesize highly fluorescent carbon nitride dots with tunable emission. Chem Commun 49(77):8605–8607. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC42266F10.1039/C3CC42266F ↗
36. Zheng K, Li S, Chen Z, Chen Y, Hong Y, Lan W (2021) Highly stable graphene oxide composite nanofiltration membrane. Nanoscale 13(22):10061–10066. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR01823J10.1039/D1NR01823J ↗
37. Naik VM, Bhosale SV, Kolekar GB (2022) A brief review on the synthesis, characterisation and analytical applications of nitrogen doped carbon dots. Anal Methods 14(9):877–891. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AY02105B10.1039/D1AY02105B ↗
38. Qi C, Wang H, Yang A, Wang X, Xu J (2021) Facile fabrication of highly fluorescent n-doped carbon quantum dots using an ultrasonic-assisted hydrothermal method: optical properties and cell imaging. ACS Omega 6(48):32904–32916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c0490310.1021/acsomega.1c04903 ↗
39. Zhao P, Jin B, Zhang Q, Peng R (2021) High-quality carbon nitride quantum dots on photoluminescence: effect of carbon sources. Langmuir 37(5):1760–1767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0296610.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02966 ↗
40. Wei Y, Zhang Y, Gao X, Yuan Y, Su B, Gao C (2016) Declining flux and narrowing nanochannels under wrinkles of compacted graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes. Carbon 108:568–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.05610.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.056 ↗
41. Liang B, Zhan W, Qi G, Lin S, Nan Q, Liu Y, Cao B, Pan K (2015) High performance graphene oxide/polyacrylonitrile composite pervaporation membranes for desalination applications. J Mater Chem A 3(9):5140–5147. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06573E10.1039/C4TA06573E ↗
42. Hung W-S, Tsou C-H, De Guzman M, An Q-F, Liu Y-L, Zhang Y-M, Hu C-C, Lee K-R, Lai J-Y (2014) Cross-linking with diamine monomers to prepare composite graphene oxide-framework membranes with varying d-spacing. Chem Mater 26(9):2983–2990. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm500787310.1021/cm5007873 ↗
43. Du Y-C, Huang L-J, Wang Y-X, Yang K, Zhang Z-J, Wang Y, Kipper MJ, Belfiore LA, Tang J-G (2020) Preparation of graphene oxide/silica hybrid composite membranes and performance studies in water treatment. J Mater Sci 55(25):11188–11202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04774-510.1007/s10853-020-04774-5 ↗
44. Sheng F, Li X, Li Y, Afsar NU, Zhao Z, Ge L, Xu T (2022) Cationic covalent organic framework membranes for efficient dye/salt separation. J Membr Sci 644:120118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.12011810.1016/j.memsci.2021.120118 ↗
45. Lin H, Mehra N, Li Y, Zhu J (2020) Graphite oxide/boron nitride hybrid membranes: the role of cross-plane laminar bonding for a durable membrane with large water flux and high rejection rate. J Membr Sci 593:117401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11740110.1016/j.memsci.2019.117401 ↗
46. Zhou F, Tien HN, Xu WL, Chen J-T, Liu Q, Hicks E, Fathizadeh M, Li S, Yu M (2017) Ultrathin graphene oxide-based hollow fiber membranes with brush-like CO2-philic agent for highly efficient CO2 capture. Nat Commun 8(1):2107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02318-110.1038/s41467-017-02318-1 ↗
47. Yang L, Jia F, Juan Z, Yu D, Sun L, Wang Y, Huang L, Tang J (2022) Bioinspired graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes with ultrafast water transport and selectivity for water treatment. FlatChem 36:100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2022.10045010.1016/j.flatc.2022.100450 ↗
48. Wang J, Wang Y, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Liu J, Van der Bruggen B (2017) Construction of TiO2@graphene oxide incorporated antifouling nanofiltration membrane with elevated filtration performance. J Membr Sci 533:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.03.04010.1016/j.memsci.2017.03.040 ↗
49. Safarpour M, Khataee A (2015) Vahid Vatanpour Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane modified by reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 with improved desalination performance. J Membr Sci 489:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.01010.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.010 ↗
50. Shao D-D, Wang L, Yan X-Y, Cao X-L, Shi T, Sun S-P (2021) Amine–carbon quantum dots (CQDs–NH2) tailored polymeric loose nanofiltration membrane for precise molecular separation. Chem Eng Res Des 171:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2021.04.03110.1016/j.cherd.2021.04.031 ↗
51. Van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C (2003) Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ Pollut 122(3):435–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00308-110.1016/S0269-7491(02)00308-1 ↗
52. Peñate B, García-Rodríguez L (2012) Current trends and future prospects in the design of seawater reverse osmosis desalination technology. Desalination 284:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.01010.1016/j.desal.2011.09.010 ↗
53. Richard Bowen W, Wahab Mohammad A (1998) Diafiltration by nanofiltration: prediction and optimization. AIChE J 44(8):1799–1812. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69044081110.1002/aic.690440811 ↗
54. Kim S, Ozaki H, Kim J (2006) Effect of pH on the rejection of inorganic salts and organic compound using nanofiltration membrane. Korean J Chem Eng 23(1):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0270568810.1007/BF02705688 ↗
55. Zeng W-J, Li C, Feng Y, Zeng S-H, Fu B-X, Zhang X-L (2021) Carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs-COOH)-intercalated graphene oxide membranes for highly efficient treatment of organic wastewater. J Water Process Eng 40:101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.10190110.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101901 ↗
56. Wei Y, Zhu Y, Jiang Y (2019) Photocatalytic self-cleaning carbon nitride nanotube intercalated reduced graphene oxide membranes for enhanced water purification. Chem Eng J 356:915–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.10810.1016/j.cej.2018.09.108 ↗
57. Zhou S, Feng X, Zhu J, Song Q, Yang G, Zhang Y, Van der Bruggen B (2021) Self-cleaning loose nanofiltration membranes enabled by photocatalytic Cu-triazolate MOFs for dye/salt separation. J Membr Sci 623:119058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11905810.1016/j.memsci.2021.119058 ↗
58. Zhang Peng et al (2019) Novel “loose” GO/MoS2 composites membranes with enhanced permeability for effective salts and dyes rejection at low pressure. J Membr Sci 574:112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.04610.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.046 ↗
59. Fan X, Cai C, Gao J, Han X, Li J (2020) Hydrothermal reduced graphene oxide membranes for dyes removing. Sep Purif Technol 241:116730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11673010.1016/j.seppur.2020.116730 ↗
60. Guan K, Zhao D, Zhang M, Shen J, Zhou G, Liu G, Jin W (2017) 3D nanoporous crystals enabled 2D channels in graphene membrane with enhanced water purification performance. J Membr Sci 542:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.05510.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.055 ↗