Prediction of creep properties of Co–10Al–9W superalloys with machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Sauza DJ, Dunand DC, Seidman DN (2019) Microstructural evolution and high-temperature strength of a γ (fcc)/γ′ (L12) Co–Al–W–Ti–B superalloy. Acta Mater 174:427–43810.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.058 ↗
2. Sato J, Omori T, Oikawa K, Ohnuma I, Kainuma R, Ishida K (2006) Cobalt-base high-temperature alloys. Science 312:90–9110.1126/science.1121738 ↗
3. Wang C, Ali MA, Gao S, Goerler JV, Steinbach I (2019) Combined phase-field crystal plasticity simulation of P-and N-type rafting in Co-based superalloys. Acta Mater 175:21–3410.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.063 ↗
4. Ju YF, Long HL, Qin QQ, Wang SH, Shan Y, Li YS (2023) Creep property and rafting kinetics of Co-based monocrystal superalloys with antiphase boundaries of γʹ phase. Mater Sci Eng A 880:14528310.1016/j.msea.2023.145283 ↗
5. Xue F, Zenk CH, Freund LP, Hoelzel M, Neumeier S, Göken M (2018) Double minimum creep in the rafting regime of a single-crystal Co-base superalloy. Scr Mater 142:129–13210.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.039 ↗
6. Mughrabi H (2014) The importance of sign and magnitude of γ/γ′ lattice misfit in superalloys—with special reference to the new γ′-hardened cobalt-base superalloys. Acta Mater 81:21–2910.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.005 ↗
7. Li YP, Liu Y, Luo SH, Wang Z, Wang K, Huang ZW, Zhao HF, Jiang L (2020) Neural network model for correlating microstructural features and hardness properties of nickel-based superalloys. J Mater Res Technol 9:14467–1447710.1016/j.jmrt.2020.10.042 ↗
8. Liu P, Huang H, Antonov S, Wen C, Xue D, Chen H, Li LF, Feng Q, Omori J, Su YJ (2020) Machine learning assisted design of γ′-strengthened Co-base superalloys with multi-performance optimization. Npj Comput Mater 6(1):6210.1038/s41524-020-0334-5 ↗
9. Fu C, Chen YD, Li LF, Antonov S, Feng Q (2020) Evaluation of service conditions of high pressure turbine blades made of DS Ni-base superalloy by artificial neural networks. Mater Today Commun 22:10083810.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100838 ↗
10. Jiang Y, Ali MA, Roslyakova I, Bürger D, Eggeler G, Steinbach I (2023) 3D phase-field simulations to machine-learn 3D information from 2D micrographs. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 31:03500510.1088/1361-651X/acc089 ↗
11. Montes de Oca Zapiain D, Stewart JA, Dingreville R (2021) Accelerating phase-field-based microstructure evolution predictions via surrogate models trained by machine learning methods. Npj Comput Mater 7(1):310.1038/s41524-020-00471-8 ↗
12. Shi SJ, Yan ZW, Li YS, Wang D, An ZH, Sha G, Wang Y, Zhao Y (2021) Precipitation kinetics and morphology evolution of the Co3(Al, W) phase in a medium supersaturation Co–Al–W alloy. J Mater Sci 56:2597–2611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05379-810.1007/s10853-020-05379-8 ↗
13. Wang D, Li YS, Shi SJ, Tong XW, Yan ZW (2020) Phase-field simulation of γ′ precipitates rafting and creep property of Co-base superalloys. Mater Des 196:10907710.1016/j.matdes.2020.109077 ↗
14. Wang D, Li YS, Shi SJ, Zhang XY, Yan ZW (2021) Crystal plasticity phase-field simulation of creep property of Co-base single crystal superalloy with pre-rafting. Comput Mater Sci 199:11076310.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110763 ↗
15. Lu S, Antonov S, Li LF, Feng Q (2018) Two steady-state creep stages in Co-Al-W-base single-crystal superalloys at 1273 K/137 MPa. Metall Mater Trans A 49:4079–408910.1007/s11661-018-4776-z ↗
16. Gu YF, Cui C, Ping D, Harada H, Fukuda T, Fujioka J (2009) Creep behavior of new kinds of Ni-Co-base superalloys. Mater Sci Eng A 510:250–25510.1016/j.msea.2008.04.128 ↗
17. Nakagawa YG, Weatherly GC (1972) The stability of lamellar structures. Metall Trans 3:3223–322910.1007/BF02661337 ↗
18. Yang M, Zhang J, Wei H, Zhao Y, Gui W, Su H, Jin T, Liu L (2018) Study of γ′ rafting under different stress states—a phase-field simulation considering viscoplasticity. J Alloys Compd 769:453–46210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.317 ↗
19. Vapnik V (1999) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, Berlin
20. Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on computational learning theory, pp 144−15210.1145/130385.130401 ↗
21. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511801389 ↗
22. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press, Cambridge
23. Gu JX, Wang ZH, Kuen J, Ma LY, Shahroudy A, Shuai B, Liu T, Wang X et al (2018) Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognit 77:354–37710.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 ↗
24. Yamashita R, Nishio M, Do RKG, Togashi K (2018) Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 9:611–62910.1007/s13244-018-0639-9 ↗
25. Kline DM, Berardi VL (2005) Revisiting squared-error and cross-entropy functions for training neural network classifiers. Neural Comput Appl 14:310–31810.1007/s00521-005-0467-y ↗
26. Nielsen MA (2015) Neural networks and deep learning. Determination press, San Francisco
27. Altay O, Gurgenc T, Ulas M, Özel C (2020) Prediction of wear loss quantities of ferro-alloy coating using different machine learning algorithms. Friction 8:107–11410.1007/s40544-018-0249-z ↗
28. Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Statist Soc B 58(1):267–28810.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
29. Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970) Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12(1):55–6710.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 ↗
30. Modaresi F, Araghinejad S, Ebrahimi K (2018) A comparative assessment of artificial neural network, generalized regression neural network, least-square support vector regression, and K-nearest neighbor regression for monthly streamflow forecasting in linear and nonlinear conditions. Water Resour Manag 32:243–25810.1007/s11269-017-1807-2 ↗
31. Kohli S, Godwin GT, Urolagin S (2020) Sales prediction using linear and KNN regression. In: Advances in machine learning and computational intelligence: proceedings of ICMLCI. Springer, Singapore, pp 321−32910.1007/978-981-15-5243-4_29 ↗
32. Loh WY (2011) Classification and regression trees. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 1(1):14–2310.1002/widm.8 ↗
33. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–3210.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
34. Vijayakumar V, Case M, Shirinpour S, He B (2017) Quantifying and characterizing tonic thermal pain across subjects from EEG data using random forest models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64:2988–299610.1109/TBME.2017.2756870 ↗
35. Yu K, Guo X, Liu L, Li J, Wang H, Ling Z, Wu X (2020) Causality-based feature selection: methods and evaluations. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 53:1–3610.1145/3409382 ↗
36. Camps-Valls G, Martín-Guerrero JD, Rojo-Alvarez JL, Soria-Olivas E (2004) Fuzzy sigmoid kernel for support vector classifiers. Neurocomputing 62:501–50610.1016/j.neucom.2004.07.004 ↗
37. Nwachukwu U, Obaied A, Horst OM, Ali MA, Steinbach I, Roslyakova I (2022) Microstructure property classification of nickel-based superalloys using deep learning. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 30:02500910.1088/1361-651X/ac3217 ↗
38. Rodriguez JD, Perez A, Lozano JA (2009) Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32:569–57510.1109/TPAMI.2009.187 ↗