journal article·2024-02

Transfer learning for inverse design of tunable graphene-based meta-surfaces

Mehdi Kiani, Mahsa Zolfaghari, Jalal Kiani

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper outlines a new approach to designing tunable electromagnetic (EM) graphene-based metasurfaces using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). EM metasurfaces have previously been used to manipulate EM waves by adjusting the local phase of subwavelength elements within the wavelength scale, resulting in a variety of intriguing devices. However, the majority of these devices have only been capable of performing a single function, making it difficult to achieve multiple functionalities in a single design. Graphene, as an active material, offers unique properties, such as tunability, making it an excellent candidate for achieving tunable metasurfaces. The proposed procedure involves using two CNNs to design the passive structure of the graphene metasurfaces and predict the chemical potentials required for tunable responses. The CNNs are trained using transfer learning, which significantly reduced the time required to collect the training dataset. The proposed inverse design methodology demonstrates excellent performance in designing reconfigurable EM metasurfaces, which can be tuned to produce multiple functions, making it highly valuable for various applications. The results indicate that the proposed approach is efficient and accurate and provides a promising method for designing reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for future wireless communication systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Antenna Design and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen H-T, Taylor AJ, Yu N (2016) A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications. Rep Prog Phys 79(7):076401-1–076401-4010.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401 ↗
2. Li A, Singh S, Sievenpiper D (2018) Metasurfaces and their applications. Nanophotonics 7(6):989–101110.1515/nanoph-2017-0120 ↗
3. Chen P-Y, Alu A (2011) Mantle cloaking using thin patterned metasurfaces. Phys Rev B 84(20):205110-1–205110-1310.1103/PhysRevB.84.205110 ↗
4. Sounas DL, Fleury R, Alù A (2015) Unidirectional cloaking based on metasurfaces with balanced loss and gain. Phys Rev Appl 4(1):014005-1–014005-1110.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.014005 ↗
5. Zhao Y, Alù A (2011) Manipulating light polarization with ultrathin plasmonic metasurfaces. Phys Rev B 84(20):20542810.1103/PhysRevB.84.205428 ↗
6. Grady NK, Heyes JE, Chowdhury DR, Zeng Y, Reiten MT, Azad AK, Taylor AJ, Dalvit DA, Chen H-T (2013) Terahertz metamaterials for linear polarization conversion and anomalous refraction. Science 340(6138):1304–130710.1126/science.1235399 ↗
7. Monticone F, Estakhri NM, Alu A (2013) Full control of nanoscale optical transmission with a composite metascreen. Phys Rev Lett 110(20):203903-1–203903-510.1103/PhysRevLett.110.203903 ↗
8. Yu N, Genevet P, Kats MA, Aieta F, Tetienne J-P, Capasso F, Gaburro Z (2011) Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 334(6054):333–33710.1126/science.1210713 ↗
9. Landy NI, Sajuyigbe S, Mock JJ, Smith DR, Padilla WJ (2008) Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys Rev Lett 100(20):207402-1–207402-410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.207402 ↗
10. Tao H, Landy NI, Bingham CM, Zhang X, Averitt RD, Padilla WJ (2008) A metamaterial absorber for the terahertz regime: design, fabrication and characterization. Opt Express 16(10):7181–718810.1364/OE.16.007181 ↗
11. Chen H-T, Padilla WJ, Zide JM, Gossard AC, Taylor AJ, Averitt RD (2006) Active terahertz metamaterial devices. Nature 444(7119):597–60010.1038/nature05343 ↗
12. Chen K, Feng Y, Monticone F, Zhao J, Zhu B, Jiang T, Zhang L, Kim Y, Ding X, Zhang S et al (2017) A reconfigurable active Huygens’ metalens. Adv Mater 29(17):1606422-1–1606422-710.1002/adma.201606422 ↗
13. Li A, Luo Z, Wakatsuchi H, Kim S, Sievenpiper DF (2017) Nonlinear, active, and tunable metasurfaces for advanced electromagnetics applications. IEEE Access 5:27439–2745210.1109/ACCESS.2017.2776291 ↗
14. Kiani M, Tayarani M, Momeni A, Rajabalipanah H, Abdolali A (2020) Self-biased tri-state power-multiplexed digital metasurface operating at microwave frequencies. Opt Express 28(4):5410–542210.1364/OE.385524 ↗
15. Kiani M, Momeni A, Tayarani M, Ding C (2020) Spatial wave control using a self-biased nonlinear metasurface at microwave frequencies. Opt Express 28(23):35128–3514210.1364/OE.408622 ↗
16. Hashemi MRM, Yang S-H, Wang T, Sepúlveda N, Jarrahi M (2016) Electronically-controlled beam-steering through vanadium dioxide metasurfaces. Sci Rep 6(1):35439-1–35439-810.1038/srep35439 ↗
17. Decker M, Kremers C, Minovich A, Staude I, Miroshnichenko AE, Chigrin D, Neshev DN, Jagadish C, Kivshar YS (2013) Electro-optical switching by liquid-crystal controlled metasurfaces. Opt Express 21(7):8879–888510.1364/OE.21.008879 ↗
18. Fallahi A, Perruisseau-Carrier J (2012) Design of tunable biperiodic graphene metasurfaces. Phys Rev B 86(19):195408-1–195408-910.1103/PhysRevB.86.195408 ↗
19. Ju L, Geng B, Horng J, Girit C, Martin M, Hao Z, Bechtel HA, Liang X, Zettl A, Shen YR et al (2011) Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamaterials. Nat Nanotechnol 6(10):630–63410.1038/nnano.2011.146 ↗
20. Grigorenko AN, Polini M, Novoselov K (2012) Graphene plasmonics. Nat Photon 6(11):749–75810.1038/nphoton.2012.262 ↗
21. Chen C-F, Park C-H, Boudouris BW, Horng J, Geng B, Girit C, Zettl A, Crommie MF, Segalman RA, Louie SG et al (2011) Controlling inelastic light scattering quantum pathways in graphene. Nature 471(7340):617–62010.1038/nature09866 ↗
22. Torabi ES, Fallahi A, Yahaghi A (2017) Evolutionary optimization of graphene-metal metasurfaces for tunable broadband terahertz absorption. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 65(3):1464–146710.1109/TAP.2016.2647580 ↗
23. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–44410.1038/nature14539 ↗
24. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 25
25. Voulodimos A, Doulamis N, Doulamis A, Protopapadakis E et al (2018) Deep learning for computer vision: a brief review. In: Computational intelligence and neuroscience 201810.1155/2018/7068349 ↗
26. Nadkarni PM, Ohno-Machado L, Chapman WW (2011) Natural language processing: an introduction. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18(5):544–55110.1136/amiajnl-2011-000464 ↗
27. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE, Pereira F, Burges C, Bottou L, Weinberger K (2012) Advances in neural information processing systems
28. Kipf TN, Welling M (2016) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907
29. Hashemi A, Makse H (2023) Visiting distant neighbors in graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10960
30. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, Dunham I, Ferran E, Lee G, Li B, Madabhushi A, Shah P, Spitzer M et al (2019) Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18(6):463–47710.1038/s41573-019-0024-5 ↗
31. Kononenko I (2001) Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif Intell Med 23(1):89–10910.1016/S0933-3657(01)00077-X ↗
32. Campbell SD, Jenkins RP, O’Connor PJ, Werner D (2020) The explosion of artificial intelligence in antennas and propagation: how deep learning is advancing our state of the art. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 63(3):16–2710.1109/MAP.2020.3021433 ↗
33. Kiani J, Camp C, Pezeshk S, Khoshnevis N (2020) Application of pool-based active learning in reducing the number of required response history analyses. Comput Struct 241:106355-1–106355-1510.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106355 ↗
34. Raccuglia P, Elbert KC, Adler PD, Falk C, Wenny MB, Mollo A, Zeller M, Friedler SA, Schrier J, Norquist AJ (2016) Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature 533(7601):73–7610.1038/nature17439 ↗
35. Kiani J, Camp C, Pezeshk S (2019) On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves. Comput Struct 218:108–12210.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004 ↗
36. Peurifoy J, Shen Y, Jing L, Yang Y, Cano-Renteria F, DeLacy BG, Joannopoulos JD, Tegmark M, Soljačić M (2018) Nanophotonic particle simulation and inverse design using artificial neural networks. Sci Adv 4(6):4206-1–4206-710.1126/sciadv.aar4206 ↗
37. Nadell CC, Huang B, Malof JM, Padilla WJ (2019) Deep learning for accelerated all-dielectric metasurface design. Opt Express 27(20):27523–2753510.1364/OE.27.027523 ↗
38. Liu Z, Zhu D, Rodrigues SP, Lee K-T, Cai W (2018) Generative model for the inverse design of metasurfaces. Nano Lett 18(10):6570–657610.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03171 ↗
39. Qiu T, Shi X, Wang J, Li Y, Qu S, Cheng Q, Cui T, Sui S (2019) Deep learning: a rapid and efficient route to automatic metasurface design. Adv Sci 6(12):1900128-1–1900128-1210.1002/advs.201900128 ↗
40. Zhang Q, Liu C, Wan X, Zhang L, Liu S, Yang Y, Cui TJ (2019) Machine-learning designs of anisotropic digital coding metasurfaces. Adv Theory Simul 2(2):180013210.1002/adts.201800132 ↗
41. Naseri P, Hum SV (2021) A generative machine learning-based approach for inverse design of multilayer metasurfaces. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 69(9):5725–573910.1109/TAP.2021.3060142 ↗
42. Kiani M, Kiani J, Zolfaghari M (2022) Conditional generative adversarial networks for inverse design of multifunctional metasurfaces. Adv Photon Res 3(11):220011010.1002/adpr.202200110 ↗
43. An S, Zheng B, Tang H, Shalaginov MY, Zhou L, Li H, Kang M, Richardson KA, Gu T, Hu J et al (2021) Multifunctional metasurface design with a generative adversarial network. Adv Opt Mater 9(5):200143310.1002/adom.202001433 ↗
44. Koppens FH, Chang DE, García de Abajo FJ (2011) Graphene plasmonics: a platform for strong light-matter interactions. Nano Lett 11(8):3370–337710.1021/nl201771h ↗
45. Amin M, Siddiqui O, Abutarboush H, Farhat M, Ramzan R (2021) A thz graphene metasurface for polarization selective virus sensing. Carbon 176:580–59110.1016/j.carbon.2021.02.051 ↗
46. Rouhi K, Rajabalipanah H, Abdolali A (2019) Multi-bit graphene-based bias-encoded metasurfaces for real-time terahertz wavefront shaping: From controllable orbital angular momentum generation toward arbitrary beam tailoring. Carbon 149:125–13810.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.034 ↗
47. Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z (2016) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2818–282610.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
48. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2017) Deep learning (adaptive computation and machine learning series). Cambridge Massachusetts, pp 321–359
49. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li L-J, Li K, Fei-Fei L (2009) Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.520684810.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗
50. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ (2017) Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 4700–470810.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
51. Howard AG, Zhu M, Chen B, Kalenichenko D, Wang W, Weyand T, Andreetto M, Adam H (2017) Mobilenets: efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861
52. You H, Du L, Xu X, Zhao J (2024) Deep learning methods for solving non-uniqueness of inverse design in photonics. Opt Commun 554:130122-1–130122-910.1016/j.optcom.2023.130122 ↗
53. Liu D, Tan Y, Khoram E, Yu Z (2018) Training deep neural networks for the inverse design of nanophotonic structures. ACS Photon 5(4):1365–136910.1021/acsphotonics.7b01377 ↗
54. Cui TJ, Qi MQ, Wan X, Zhao J, Cheng Q (2014) Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light Sci Appl 3(10):218–21810.1038/lsa.2014.99 ↗