The effect of oxidative functionalization of carbon nanotubes on the morphological, optical, and photoelectrochemical properties of modified titanium dioxide photoanodes
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we demonstrate the influence of the oxidative treatment of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on the morphological, optical, and photoelectrochemical properties of CNTs-TiO2 photoanodes. CNTs were synthesized by a chemical vapor deposition method (CVD) and subsequently oxidized in a mixture of HNO3/H2SO4 to introduce nitrogen- and oxygen-containing functional groups. The oxidation time was varied (45, 90, and 180 min) to obtain CNTs with different oxidation levels (CNTs-ox). Pristine and oxidized CNTs were deposited on ITO and used as substrates to fabricate ITO/CNTs/TiO2 photoelectrodes by depositing a TiO2 thin layer using a CVD procedure. The extent of oxidation of the CNTs was found to directly influence the homogeneity and morphology of the TiO2 overlayer, its physical stability, and the optical and photoelectrochemical properties of the photoelectrodes. An optimum oxidative treatment was achieved for 90 min, leading to a CNTs-ox/TiO2 electrode with the best performance. Compared to shorter and longer times, this sample showed the smallest bandgap and the best homogeneity of TiO2 growth on the CNTs' surface. Optimal photoelectrochemical performance was also found for this sample (160 mu A/cm(2) at 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl) in KCl (0.1 M) electrolyte (100 mW/cm(2), Xenon arc lamp).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Hosseini SE, Wahid MA (2020) Hydrogen from solar energy, a clean energy carrier from a sustainable energy source. Int J Energy Res 44:4110–4131. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.493010.1002/er.4930 ↗
2. McFarland E (2022) Photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore
3. Yang W, Prabhakar RR, Tan J et al (2019) Strategies for enhancing the photocurrent, photovoltage, and stability of photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 48:4979–5015. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00997J10.1039/C8CS00997J ↗
4. Tang S, Qiu W, Xiao S et al (2020) Harnessing hierarchical architectures to trap light for efficient photoelectrochemical cells. Energy Environ Sci 13:660–684. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee02986a10.1039/c9ee02986a ↗
5. Ding X, Gao Y, Zhang L et al (2014) Visible light-driven water splitting in photoelectrochemical cells with supramolecular catalysts on photoanodes. ACS Catal 4:2347–2350. https://doi.org/10.1021/CS500518K/SUPPL_FILE/CS500518K_SI_001.PDF10.1021/CS500518K/SUPPL_FILE/CS500518K_SI_001.PDF ↗
6. Youngblood JW, Lee SHA, Kobayashi Y et al (2009) Photoassisted overall water splitting in a visible light-absorbing dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cell. J Am Chem Soc 131:926–927. https://doi.org/10.1021/JA809108Y/SUPPL_FILE/JA809108Y_SI_001.PDF10.1021/JA809108Y/SUPPL_FILE/JA809108Y_SI_001.PDF ↗
7. Zhao Y, Swierk JR, Megiatto JD et al (2012) Improving the efficiency of water splitting in dye-sensitized solar cells by using a biomimetic electron transfer mediator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:15612–15616. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1118339109/ASSET/D54F58A7-3F74-48B2-9A30-523CF13B9DE4/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/PNAS.1118339109EQ6.GIF10.1073/PNAS.1118339109/ASSET/D54F58A7-3F74-48B2-9A30-523CF13B9DE4/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/PNAS.1118339109EQ6.GIF ↗
8. Liao F, Shi Y, Dang Q et al (2022) Carbon dots dominated photoelectric surface in titanium dioxide nanotube/nitrogen-doped carbon dot/gold nanocomposites for improved photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Colloid Interface Sci 606:1274–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCIS.2021.08.13110.1016/J.JCIS.2021.08.131 ↗
9. Li S, Liu C, Chen P et al (2020) In-situ stabilizing surface oxygen vacancies of TiO2 nanowire array photoelectrode by N-doped carbon dots for enhanced photoelectrocatalytic activities under visible light. J Catal 382:212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2019.12.03010.1016/j.jcat.2019.12.030 ↗
10. Luo H, Dimitrov S, Daboczi M et al (2020) Nitrogen-doped carbon dots/TiO2 nanoparticle composites for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. ACS Appl Nano Mater 3:3371–3381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b0241210.1021/acsanm.9b02412 ↗
11. Wang H, Bai Y, Zhang H et al (2010) CdS quantum dots-sensitized TiO2 nanorod array on transparent conductive glass photoelectrodes. J Phys Chem C 114:16451–16455. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp104208z10.1021/jp104208z ↗
12. Selopal GS, Mohammadnezhad M, Besteiro LV et al (2020) Synergistic effect of plasmonic gold nanoparticles decorated carbon nanotubes in quantum dots/TiO2 for optoelectronic devices. Adv Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20200186410.1002/advs.202001864 ↗
13. Sahai S, Ikram A, Rai S et al (2017) Quantum dots sensitization for photoelectrochemical generation of hydrogen: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.13410.1016/j.rser.2016.09.134 ↗
14. Zhou T, Chen S, Li L et al (2020) Carbon quantum dots modified anatase/rutile TiO2 photoanode with dramatically enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Appl Catal B. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATB.2020.11877610.1016/J.APCATB.2020.118776 ↗
15. Tao J, Sun Z, Cheng Y et al (2017) Enhanced photoelectrochemical properties of nanocrystalline TiO2 electrode by surface sensitization with CuxO quantum dots. Sci Rep 7:5291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05645-x10.1038/s41598-017-05645-x ↗
16. Díaz FJP, del Río RS, Rodriguez PEDS (2022) Plasmonic photocatalysts for water splitting, pp 117–17310.1007/978-981-16-7285-9_5 ↗
17. Warren SC, Thimsen E (2012) Plasmonic solar water splitting. Energy Environ Sci 5:5133–5146. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee02875h10.1039/c1ee02875h ↗
18. Lee J, Mubeen S, Ji X et al (2012) Plasmonic photoanodes for solar water splitting with visible light. Nano Lett 12:5014–5019. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl302796f10.1021/nl302796f ↗
19. Gellé A, Moores A (2017) Water splitting catalyzed by titanium dioxide decorated with plasmonic nanoparticles. Pure Appl Chem 89:1817–1827. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2017-071110.1515/pac-2017-0711 ↗
20. Valenti M, Jonsson MP, Biskos G et al (2016) Plasmonic nanoparticle-semiconductor composites for efficient solar water splitting. J Mater Chem A Mater 4:17891–17912. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta06405a10.1039/c6ta06405a ↗
21. Zhang X, Wang X, Yi X et al (2020) Metal-reduced WO 3–x electrodes with tunable plasmonic resonance for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl Energy Mater 3:3569–3576. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c0008610.1021/acsaem.0c00086 ↗
22. Zhang Z, Zhang L, Hedhili MN et al (2013) Plasmonic gold nanocrystals coupled with photonic crystal seamlessly on TiO2 nanotube photoelectrodes for efficient visible light photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Lett 13:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl302920210.1021/nl3029202 ↗
23. Ghobadi TGU, Ghobadi A, Soydan MC et al (2020) Strong light-matter interactions in Au plasmonic nanoantennas coupled with Prussian blue catalyst on BiVO4 for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chemsuschem 13:2577–2588. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20200029410.1002/cssc.202000294 ↗
24. Rai S, Ikram A, Sahai S et al (2017) CNT based photoelectrodes for PEC generation of hydrogen: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:3994–4006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.02410.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.024 ↗
25. Reza MS, Ahmad NBH, Afroze S et al (2022) Hydrogen production from water splitting through photocatalytic activity of carbon-based materials. Chem Eng Technol10.1002/ceat.202100513 ↗
26. Jumeri FA, Lim HN, Zainal Z et al (2014) Titanium dioxide-reduced graphene oxide thin film for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Ceram Int 40:15159–15165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.13010.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.130 ↗
27. Wang B, Sun Q, Liu S, Li Y (2013) Synergetic catalysis of CuO and graphene additives on TiO2 for photocatalytic water splitting. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:7232–7240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.03810.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.038 ↗
28. Bellamkonda S, Thangavel N, Hafeez HY et al (2019) Highly active and stable multi-walled carbon nanotubes-graphene-TiO2 nanohybrid: an efficient non-noble metal photocatalyst for water splitting. Catal Today 321–322:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.10.02310.1016/j.cattod.2017.10.023 ↗
29. Esmaili H, Kowsari E, Ramakrishna S et al (2022) Sensitization of TiO2 nanoarrays by a novel palladium decorated naphthalene diimide functionalized graphene nanoribbons for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Mater Today Chem 24:100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCHEM.2022.10090010.1016/J.MTCHEM.2022.100900 ↗
30. Ullah F, Bashiri R, Muti Mohamed N et al (2022) Exploring graphene quantum dots@TiO2 rutile (0 1 1) interface for visible-driven hydrogen production in photoelectrochemical cell: density functional theory and experimental study. Appl Surf Sci 576:151871. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2021.15187110.1016/J.APSUSC.2021.151871 ↗
31. Zhou S, Liu S, Su K, Jia K (2020) Graphite carbon nitride coupled S-doped hydrogenated TiO2 nanotube arrays with improved photoelectrochemical performance. J Electroanal Chem 862:114008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11400810.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114008 ↗
32. Su J, Zhu L, Chen G (2016) Ultrasmall graphitic carbon nitride quantum dots decorated self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays with highly efficient photoelectrochemical activity. Appl Catal B 186:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.05010.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.050 ↗
33. Fan X, Wang T, Gao B et al (2016) Preparation of the TiO2/graphic carbon nitride core-shell array as a photoanode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Langmuir 32:13322–13332. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0310710.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03107 ↗
34. Su J, Zhu L, Geng P, Chen G (2016) Self-assembly graphitic carbon nitride quantum dots anchored on TiO2 nanotube arrays: an efficient heterojunction for pollutants degradation under solar light. J Hazard Mater 316:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.00410.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.004 ↗
35. Patil SS, Johar MA, Hassan MA et al (2018) Anchoring MWCNTs to 3D honeycomb ZnO/GaN heterostructures to enhancing photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Appl Catal B 237:791–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.04710.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.047 ↗
36. Ahmed AM, Mohamed F, Ashraf AM et al (2020) Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting activity of carbon nanotubes@TiO2 nanoribbons in different electrolytes. Chemosphere 238:124554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12455410.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124554 ↗
37. Prasadam VP, Flores AMH, Audinot JN, Bahlawane N (2022) CNT-ZnO core-shell photoanodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Coatings 12:47. https://doi.org/10.3390/COATINGS12010047/S110.3390/COATINGS12010047/S1 ↗
38. Delekar SD, Dhodamani AG, More KV et al (2018) Structural and optical properties of nanocrystalline TiO2 with multiwalled carbon nanotubes and its photovoltaic studies using Ru(II) sensitizers. ACS Omega 3:2743–2756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b0131610.1021/acsomega.7b01316 ↗
39. Mohammadnezhad M, Selopal GS, Wang ZM et al (2020) Role of carbon nanotubes to enhance the long-term stability of dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Photonics 7:653–664. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b0143110.1021/acsphotonics.9b01431 ↗
40. Yang J, Ganesan P, Ishihara A, Nakashima N (2019) Carbon nanotube-based non-precious metal electrode catalysts for fuel cells, water splitting and zinc-air batteries. ChemCatChem 11:5929–5944. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.20190178510.1002/cctc.201901785 ↗
41. Chen P, Wang L, Wang P et al (2015) CNT-TiO2−δ composites for improved co-catalyst dispersion and stabilized photocatalytic hydrogen production. Catalysts 5:270–285. https://doi.org/10.3390/CATAL501027010.3390/CATAL5010270 ↗
42. Zolfaghari-Isavandi Z, Shariatinia Z (2018) Fabrication of CdS quantum dot sensitized solar cells using nitrogen functionalized CNTs/TiO2 nanocomposites. Diam Relat Mater 81:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2017.11.00410.1016/j.diamond.2017.11.004 ↗
43. Suwazono Y, Murayoshi T, Nagai H, Sato M (2021) Facile fabrication of single-walled carbon nanotube/anatase composite thin film on quartz glass substrate for translucent conductive photoelectrode. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1112335210.3390/nano11123352 ↗
44. Le AQH, Nguyen NNT, Tran HD et al (2022) A TiO2@MWCNTs nanocomposite photoanode for solar-driven water splitting. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 13:1520–1530. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.13.12510.3762/bjnano.13.125 ↗
45. Campos Guaglianoni W, Garcia AP, Basegio TM et al (2021) Influence of CVD parameters on Co-TiO2/CNT properties: a route to enhance energy harvesting from sunlight. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 18:1297–1306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.1377310.1111/ijac.13773 ↗
46. Olivares F, Peón F, Henríquez R, del Río RS (2022) Strategies for area-selective deposition of metal nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes and their applications: a review. J Mater Sci 57:2362–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06710-710.1007/s10853-021-06710-7 ↗
47. Cañete-Rosales P, Ortega V, Álvarez-Lueje A et al (2012) Influence of size and oxidative treatments of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on their electrocatalytic properties. Electrochim Acta 62:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.04310.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.043 ↗
48. Yang K, Han H, Pan X et al (2008) The effect of chemical treatment on the crystallinity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem Solids 69:222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.08.06910.1016/j.jpcs.2007.08.069 ↗
49. Wepasnick KA, Smith BA, Schrote KE et al (2011) Surface and structural characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes following different oxidative treatments. Carbon N Y 49:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.03410.1016/j.carbon.2010.08.034 ↗
50. Wang L, Feng S, Zhao J et al (2010) A facile method to modify carbon nanotubes with nitro/amino groups. Appl Surf Sci 256:6060–6064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.12010.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.120 ↗
51. Wang Y, Malhotra SV, Owens FJ, Iqbal Z (2005) Electrochemical nitration of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 407:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2005.03.05010.1016/j.cplett.2005.03.050 ↗
52. Olivares F, Segura del Río R, Reyes J et al (2021) Enhanced photoconversion efficiency of hybrid TiO2/nox-MWCNT/Si photoanode for water splitting in neutral medium. Mater Lett 285:129128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12912810.1016/j.matlet.2020.129128 ↗
53. Cárdenas-Triviño G, Segura RA, Reyes-Gasga J (2004) Palladium nanoparticles from solvated atoms—stability and HRTEM characterization. Colloid Polym Sci 282:1206–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-004-1060-010.1007/s00396-004-1060-0 ↗
54. Segura RA, Hevia S, Häberle P (2011) Growth of carbon nanostructures using a Pd-based catalyst. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11:10036–10046. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.499810.1166/jnn.2011.4998 ↗
55. Esquivel-Peña V, Bastos-Arrieta J, Muñoz M et al (2019) Metal nanoparticle–carbon nanotubes hybrid catalysts immobilized in a polymeric membrane for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol. SN Appl Sci 1:347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0357-z10.1007/s42452-019-0357-z ↗
56. Datsyuk V, Kalyva M, Papagelis K et al (2008) Chemical oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y 46:833–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.01210.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.012 ↗
57. He G, Li X, Jiang Y et al (2020) Bioinspired hierarchical interface design for improved mechanical and safety properties in energetic polymer composites. J Mater Sci 55:15726–15740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05130-310.1007/s10853-020-05130-3 ↗
58. Bekyarova E, Itkis ME, Ramesh P et al (2009) Chemical modification of epitaxial graphene: spontaneous grafting of aryl groups. J Am Chem Soc 131:1336–1337. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja805732710.1021/ja8057327 ↗
59. Kolanowska A, Wa P, Zie W et al (2019) Selective carboxylation versus layer-by-layer unsheathing of multi-walled carbon nanotubes: new insights from the reaction with boiling nitrating mixture †. RSC Adv 9:37608–37613. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra08300f10.1039/c9ra08300f ↗
60. Santangelo S, Messina G, Faggio G et al (2012) Effect of sulphuric-nitric acid mixture composition on surface chemistry and structural evolution of liquid-phase oxidised carbon nanotubes. J Raman Spectrosc 43:1432–1442. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.409710.1002/jrs.4097 ↗
61. Saito R, Hofmann M, Dresselhaus G et al (2011) Raman spectroscopy of graphene and carbon nanotubes. Adv Phys 60:413–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2011.58225110.1080/00018732.2011.582251 ↗
62. Kolanowska A, Wasik P, Ziȩba W, Terzyk AP (2019) Selective carboxylation: versus layer-by-layer unsheathing of multi-walled carbon nanotubes: new insights from the reaction with boiling nitrating mixture. RSC Adv 9:37608–37613. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra08300f10.1039/c9ra08300f ↗
63. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Saito R, Jorio A (2005) Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes. Phys Rep 409:47–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.00610.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.006 ↗
64. Gogoi D, Namdeo A, Golder AK, Peela NR (2020) Ag-doped TiO2 photocatalysts with effective charge transfer for highly efficient hydrogen production through water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:2729–2744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.12710.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.127 ↗
65. Yao Y, Li G, Ciston S et al (2008) Photoreactive TiO2/carbon nanotube composites: synthesis and reactivity. Environ Sci Technol 42:4952–4957. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800191n10.1021/es800191n ↗
66. Ahn JY, Kim JHJH, Moon KJ et al (2013) Incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes into TiO2 nanowires for enhancing photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells via highly efficient electron transfer. Sol Energy 92:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.02.03110.1016/j.solener.2013.02.031 ↗
67. Makuła P, Pacia M, Macyk W (2018) How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV–Vis spectra. J Phys Chem Lett 9:6814–6817. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0289210.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892 ↗