journal article·2024-12

An experimental investigation on the influence of weave architectures on out-of-plane and in-plane impact properties of 3D woven fabric-reinforced composites

Soumya Chowdhury, Dushyant Dubey, Bijoya Kumar Behera

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 47
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Zachariah SA, Dayananda Pai K, Satish SB (2021) Multi-level hybridization in mitigating impact damages in advanced composites—a review on recent trends. Mater Today Proc 46:9059–9066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.38810.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.388 ↗
2. Casula G, Lenzi F, Vitiello C (2008) Thermoplastic composite materials for aerospace applications. AIP Conf Proc 1042:276–277. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.298903210.1063/1.2989032 ↗
3. Das S, Warren J, West D, Schexnayder SM (2016) Global carbon fiber composites supply chain competitiveness analysis. Technical report ORNL/SR-2016/100 | NREL/TP-6A50-6607110.2172/1333049 ↗
4. Adams DF, Miller AK (1975) An analysis of the impact behavior of hybrid composite materials. Mater Sci Eng 19:245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(75)90112-310.1016/0025-5416(75)90112-3 ↗
5. Maria M (2013) Advanced composite materials of the future in aerospace industry. INCAS Bull 5:139–150. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2013.5.3.1410.13111/2066-8201.2013.5.3.14 ↗
6. Timmis AJ, Hodzic A, Koh L, Bonner M, Soutis C, Schäfer AW et al (2015) Environmental impact assessment of aviation emission reduction through the implementation of composite materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0824-010.1007/s11367-014-0824-0 ↗
7. Marsh G (2007) Airbus takes on Boeing with reinforced plastic A350 XWB. Reinf Plast 51:26–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-3617(07)70383-110.1016/S0034-3617(07)70383-1 ↗
8. Andrew J, Arumugam V, structures KS-C, 2015 undefined. Compression after impact strength of repaired GFRP composite laminates under repeated impact loading. Elsevier n.d.
9. Katnam KB, Da Silva LFM, Young TM (2013) Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: a review of scientific challenges and opportunities. Prog Aerosp Sci 61:26–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAEROSCI.2013.03.00310.1016/J.PAEROSCI.2013.03.003 ↗
10. Andrew J, Srinivasan S, Structures AA-C, 2018 undefined. The role of adhesively bonded super hybrid external patches on the impact and post-impact response of repaired glass/epoxy composite laminates. Elsevier n.d.
11. Andrew JJ, Srinivasan SM, Arockiarajan A, Dhakal HN (2019) Parameters influencing the impact response of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite materials: a critical review. Compos Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11100710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111007 ↗
12. Vogelesang LB, Vlot A (2000) Development of fibre metal laminates for advanced aerospace structures. J Mater Process Technol 103:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00411-810.1016/S0924-0136(00)00411-8 ↗
13. Airoldi A, Cacchione B (2006) Modelling of impact forces and pressures in Lagrangian bird strike analyses. Int J Impact Eng 32:1651–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.011 ↗
14. Karagiozova D, Mines RAW (2007) Impact of aircraft rubber tyre fragments on aluminium alloy plates: II. Numerical simulation using LS-DYNA. Int J Impact Eng 34:647–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.004 ↗
15. Karagiozova D, Engineering RM-IJ of I, 2007 undefined. Impact of aircraft rubber tyre fragments on aluminium alloy plates: II—Numerical simulation using LS-DYNA. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.004 ↗
16. Behera B, Institute BD-TJ of TT, 2013 undefined. An experimental investigation into structure and properties of 3D-woven aramid and PBO fabrics. Taylor Fr n.d.10.1080/00405000.2013.805873 ↗
17. Behera BK, Dash BP (2014) An experimental investigation into the mechanical behaviour of 3D woven fabrics for structural composites. Fibers Polym 15:1950–1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1950-910.1007/s12221-014-1950-9 ↗
18. Kumar A, Bijoya D, Behera K, Dash AK, Behera BK (2018) Role of weave design on the mechanical properties of 3D woven fabrics as reinforcements for structural composites. J Text Inst 109:952–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2017.139378710.1080/00405000.2017.1393787 ↗
19. Behera BK, Jain M, Tripathi L, Choudhury S (2022) Low-velocity impact behaviour of textile-reinforced composite sandwich panels. Sandw Compos Fabr Charact. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003143031-12/LOW-VELOCITY-IMPACT-BEHAVIOUR-TEXTILE-REINFORCED-COMPOSITE-SANDWICH-PANELS-BEHERA-MANYA-JAIN-LEKHANI-TRIPATHI-SOUMYA-CHOWDHURY10.1201/9781003143031-12/LOW-VELOCITY-IMPACT-BEHAVIOUR-TEXTILE-REINFORCED-COMPOSITE-SANDWICH-PANELS-BEHERA-MANYA-JAIN-LEKHANI-TRIPATHI-SOUMYA-CHOWDHURY ↗
20. Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera BK (2020) Modelling and simulation of compression behaviour of 3D woven hollow composite structures using FEM analysis. Text Leather Rev 3:6–1810.31881/TLR.2020.03 ↗
21. Bilisik K (2011) Multiaxis three dimensional (3D) woven fabric. Adv Mod Woven Fabr Technol. https://doi.org/10.5772/1653010.5772/16530 ↗
22. Bilisik K (2012) Multiaxis three-dimensional weaving for composites: a review. Text Res J 82:725–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051751143501310.1177/0040517511435013 ↗
23. Zhang C (2003) Characterization and modeling of 3D woven composites. https://www.proquest.com/openview/90c814c66835a2c35b939d3ee6a2e0d9/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
24. Mouritz AP, Bannister MK, Falzon PJ, Leong KH (1999) Review of applications for advanced three-dimensional fibre textile composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 30:1445–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
25. Cherif C (2016) Textile materials for lightweight constructions: technologies–methods–materials–properties. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46341-310.1007/978-3-662-46341-3 ↗
26. Olhan S, Antil B, Behera, BK, Chowdhury, S (2024) Low-velocity impact and quasi-static post-impact compression analysis of woven structural composites for automotive: Influence of fibre types and architectural structures. Compos. Struct 118676.10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118676 ↗
27. Paul P, Ahirwar M, Behera BK (2022) Acoustic behaviour of needle punched nonwoven structures produced from various natural and synthetic fibers. Appl Acoust 199:109043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.10904310.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109043 ↗
28. Khatkar V, Vijayalakshmi AGS, Manjunath RN, Olhan S, Behera BK (2020) Experimental investigation into the mechanical behavior of textile composites with various fiber reinforcement architectures. Mech Compos Mater 56:367–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-020-09888-010.1007/s11029-020-09888-0 ↗
29. Dubey D, Singh SP & Behera BK (2024) Mechanical, thermal, and microstructural analysis of 3D printed short carbon fiber-reinforced nylon composites across diverse infill patterns. Prog Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00731-910.1007/s40964-024-00731-9 ↗
30. Technická univerzita v Liberci. Textilní fakulta, Nihon Sen’i Kikai Gakkai. 47th Textile Research Symposium 2019: June 17–19, 2019, Liberec, Czech Republic: book of abstracts. 2019.
31. Tan KT, Watanabe N, Iwahori Y (2012) Impact damage resistance, response, and mechanisms of laminated composites reinforced by through-thickness stitching. Int J Damage Mech 21:51–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951039707010.1177/1056789510397070 ↗
32. Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera BK (2020) Modeling and simulation of impact behavior of 3D woven solid structure for ballistic application. J Ind Text 51:6065S-6086S. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372098046710.1177/1528083720980467 ↗
33. Khokar N (2001) 3D-weaving: theory and practice. J Text Inst 92:193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040500010865957010.1080/00405000108659570 ↗
34. Dash B, Proceedings BB-MT, 2015 undefined. A study on structure property relationship of 3D woven composites. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.283 ↗
35. Dash BP, Behera BK, Mishra R, Militky J (2013) Modeling of internal geometry of 3D woven fabrics by computation method. J Text Inst 104:312–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2012.72085010.1080/00405000.2012.720850 ↗
36. Gereke T, Cherif C (2019) A review of numerical models for 3D woven composite reinforcements. Compos Struct 209:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.08510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.085 ↗
37. Lässig R, Eisenhut M, Mathias A, Schulte RT, Peters F, Kühmann T et al (2012) Serienproduktion von hochfesten Faserverbundbauteilen. Industrial-ProductionDe 72
38. Callus PJ, Mouritz AP, Bannister MK, Leong KH (1999) Tensile properties and failure mechanisms of 3D woven GRP composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 30:1277–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00033-010.1016/S1359-835X(99)00033-0 ↗
39. Chou S, Chen HC, Wu CC (1992) BMI resin composites reinforced with 3D carbon-fibre fabrics. Compos Sci Technol 43:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(92)90002-K10.1016/0266-3538(92)90002-K ↗
40. Chou S, Chen HC, Chen HE (1992) Effect of weave structure on mechanical fracture behavior of three-dimensional carbon fiber fabric reinforced epoxy resin composites. Compos Sci Technol 45:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(92)90119-N10.1016/0266-3538(92)90119-N ↗
41. Chou TW, Ito M, Kostar TD (1996) Effects of yarn undulation on the stress and deformation of textile structural composites. Am Soc Mech Eng Aerosp Div AD 52:11–14
42. Dubey D, Singh SP, Behera BK (2024) A review on recent advancements in additive manufacturing techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408924127586010.1177/09544089241275860 ↗
43. Dubey D, Singh SP, Behera BK (2024) Review: additive manufacturing of fiber-reinforced composites. J Mater Sci 59:12219–12256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09925-610.1007/s10853-024-09925-6 ↗
44. Dubey D, Chowdhury S, Khatkar V, Singh SP, Behera BK (2024) Dynamic mechanical analysis of additively manufactured continuous Kevlar fiber-reinforced nylon composites across variable fiber orientations. Mater Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATLET.2024.13770410.1016/J.MATLET.2024.137704 ↗
45. Castanie B, Bouvet C, Ginot M (2020) Review of composite sandwich structure in aeronautic applications. Compos Part C Open Access. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10000410.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004 ↗
46. Shyr TW, Pan YH (2003) Impact resistance and damage characteristics of composite laminates. Compos Struct 62:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-4 ↗
47. Umer R, Alhussein H, Zhou J, Cantwell WJ (2017) The mechanical properties of 3D woven composites. JournalsSagepubCom 51:1703–1716. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831668118710.1177/0021998316681187 ↗
48. Fawcet A, Oakes G (2006) Boeing composite airframe damage tolerance and service experience. In: Proceedings of FAA composite damage tolerance maintenance workshop, pp 1–32
49. Zhu X, Chen W, Liu L, Xu K, Luo G, Zhao Z (2023) Experimental investigation on high-velocity impact damage and compression after impact behavior of 2D and 3D textile composites. Compos Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11625610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116256 ↗
50. Bahei-El-Din Y, technology MZ-C science and, 2003 undefined. Impact-induced deformation fields in 2D and 3D woven composites. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00021-6 ↗
51. Davies GAO, Olsson R (2004) Impact on composite structures. Aeronaut J 108:541–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000192400000038510.1017/S0001924000000385 ↗
52. Davies G, Zhang X (1995) Impact damage prediction in carbon composite structures. Int J Impact Eng 16:149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y ↗
53. Davies GAO, Hitchings D, Zhou G (1996) Impact damage and residual strengths of woven fabric glass/polyester laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27:1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-835X(96)00083-810.1016/1359-835X(96)00083-8 ↗
54. Zhang D, Sun Y, Chen L, Pan N (2013) A comparative study on low-velocity impact response of fabric composite laminates. Mater Des 50:750–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.04410.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.044 ↗
55. Zhang X (1998) Impact damage in composite aircraft structures-experimental testing and numerical simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 212:245–259. https://doi.org/10.1243/095441098153241410.1243/0954410981532414 ↗
56. Belingardi G, Vadori R (2002) Low velocity impact tests of laminate glass-fiber-epoxy matrix composite material plates. Int J Impact Eng 27:213–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00040-910.1016/S0734-743X(01)00040-9 ↗
57. Boria S, Scattina A, Structures GB-C, 2017 undefined. Impact behavior of a fully thermoplastic composite. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.083 ↗
58. Sutherland LS (2018) A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: part IV—scaling, strain rate and marine-type laminates. Compos Struct 200:929–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.052 ↗
59. Sutherland L, Technology CS-CS and, 1999 undefined. Impact tests on woven-roving E-glass/polyester laminates. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00023-8 ↗
60. Sutherland L, Technology CS-CS and, 1999 undefined. Effects of laminate thickness and reinforcement type on the impact behaviour of E-glass/polyester laminates. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00080-9 ↗
61. de Moura MFSF, Gonçalves JPM (2004) Modelling the interaction between matrix cracking and delamination in carbon-epoxy laminates under low velocity impact. Compos Sci Technol 64:1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2003.08.008 ↗
62. Yudhanto A, Wafai H, Lubineau G, Goutham S, Mulle M, Yaldiz R et al (2019) Revealing the effects of matrix behavior on low-velocity impact response of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic laminates. Compos Struct 210:239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.04010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.040 ↗
63. Naik NK, Sekher YC (1998) Damage in laminated composites due to low velocity impact. J Reinf Plast Compos 17:1232–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844980170140110.1177/073168449801701401 ↗
64. Ying S, Mengyun T, Zhijun R, Baohui S, Li C (2017) An experimental investigation on the low-velocity impact response of carbon-aramid/epoxy hybrid composite laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos 36:422–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441668089310.1177/0731684416680893 ↗
65. Fan J, Guan Z, Cantwell WJ (2011) Modeling perforation in glass fiber reinforced composites subjected to low velocity impact loading. Polym Compos 32:1380–1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2116110.1002/pc.21161 ↗
66. Baucom JN, Zikry MA (2003) Evolution of failure mechanisms in 2D and 3D woven composite systems under quasi-static perforation. J Compos Mater 37:1651–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830303517810.1177/0021998303035178 ↗
67. Neogi SD, Karmakar A, Chakravorty D (2011) Impact response of simply supported skewed hypar shell roofs by finite element. J Reinf Plast Compos 30:1795–1805. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441141886510.1177/0731684411418865 ↗
68. Aktaş M, Balcıoğlu H, Aktaş A, Türker E, Structures MD-C, 2012 undefined. Impact and post impact behavior of layer fabric composites. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.008 ↗
69. Cromer K, Gillespie JW Jr, Keefe M (2012) Effect of multiple non-coincident impacts on residual properties of glass/epoxy laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos 31:815–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441244822110.1177/0731684412448221 ↗
70. Dehkordi M, Nosraty H, Shokrieh M, Design GM-M&, 2010 undefined. Low velocity impact properties of intra-ply hybrid composites based on basalt and nylon woven fabrics. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.033 ↗
71. Mathivanan N, Design JJ-M&, 2010 undefined. Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of woven glass fiber epoxy matrix composite laminates of EP3 grade. Elsevier n.d.
72. Mishra A, Structures NN-C, 2010 undefined. Failure initiation in composite structures under low-velocity impact: Analytical studies. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.024 ↗
73. Kim J, Technology MS-CS and, 2000 undefined. Impact and delamination failure of woven-fabric composites. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-9 ↗
74. Belingardi G, Engineering RV-IJ of I, 2002 undefined. Low velocity impact tests of laminate glass-fiber-epoxy matrix composite material plates. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00040-9 ↗
75. Bibo GA, Hogg PJ (1996) The role of reinforcement architecture on impact damage mechanisms and post-impact compression behaviour. J Mater Sci 31:1115–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0035309110.1007/BF00353091 ↗
76. Aktaş M, Atas C, İçten B, Structures RK-C, 2009 undefined. An experimental investigation of the impact response of composite laminates. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.003 ↗
77. Baucom J, and MZ-CPAAS, 2005 undefined. Low-velocity impact damage progression in woven E-glass composite systems. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.07.008 ↗
78. Naik NK, Borade SV, Arya H, Sailendra M, Prabhu SV (2002) Experimental studies on impact behaviour of woven fabric composites: effect of impact parameters. J Reinf Plast Compos 21:1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168440202101529410.1177/0731684402021015294 ↗
79. Naik NK, Shrirao P (2004) Composite structures under ballistic impact. Compos Struct 66:579–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.006 ↗
80. Naik NK, Azad SNM, Prasad PD, Thuruthimattam BJ (2001) Stress and failure analysis of 3D orthogonal interlock woven composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 20:1485–1523. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316840177267911010.1177/073168401772679110 ↗
81. Naik N, Sekher Y, Technology SM-CS and, 2000 undefined. Damage in woven-fabric composites subjected to low-velocity impact. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00183-9 ↗
82. Shah SZH, Megat-Yusoff PSM, Karuppanan S, Choudhry RS, Ud Din I, Othman AR et al (2021) Compression and buckling after impact response of resin-infused thermoplastic and thermoset 3D woven composites. Compos Part B Eng 207:108592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10859210.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108592 ↗
83. Wang M, Cao M, Wang H, Siddique A, Gu B, Sun B (2017) Drop-weight impact behaviors of 3-D angle interlock woven composites after thermal oxidative aging. Compos Struct 166:239–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.046 ↗
84. Cao W, Zhang J, Sun B, Gu B (2019) X-ray tomography and numerical study on low-velocity impact damages of three-dimensional angle-interlock woven composites. Compos Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11152510.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111525 ↗
85. Tuo H, Lu Z, Ma X, Zhang C, Chen S (2019) An experimental and numerical investigation on low-velocity impact damage and compression-after-impact behavior of composite laminates. Compos Part B Eng 167:329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.043 ↗
86. El-Dessouky HM, Saleh MN (2018) 3D woven composites: from weaving to manufacturing. Recent Dev. F. Carbon Fibers, InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.7431110.5772/intechopen.74311 ↗
87. Saleh MN, El-Dessouky HM, Saeedifar M, De Freitas ST, Scaife RJ, Zarouchas D (2019) Compression after multiple low velocity impacts of NCF, 2D and 3D woven composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10557610.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105576 ↗
88. Laible RC (1982) Ballistic materials and penetration mechanics. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 3:190. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-198206000-0002010.1097/00000433-198206000-00020 ↗
89. Roylance D, Wilde A, Tocci G (1973) Ballistic impact of textile structures. Text Res J 43:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175730430010510.1177/004051757304300105 ↗
90. Yang C, Tran P, Ngo T, Mendis P, Humphries W (2014) Effect of textile architecture on energy absorption of woven fabrics subjected to ballistic impact. In: Grant P, Steven QL, Leo Z (eds) Applied mechanics and materials, vol 553. Trans Tech Publications, Wollerau, pp 757–762. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.553.75710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.553.757 ↗
91. Potluri P, Hogg P, Arshad M, Jetavat D, Jamshidi P (2012) Influence of fibre architecture on impact damage tolerance in 3D woven composites. Appl Compos Mater 19:799–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10443-012-9256-910.1007/S10443-012-9256-9 ↗
92. Baucom JN, Zikry MA, Rajendran AM (2006) Low-velocity impact damage accumulation in woven S2-glass composite systems. Compos Sci Technol 66:1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.005 ↗
93. Ji C, Sun B, Qiu Y, Gu B (2007) Impact damage of 3D orthogonal woven composite circular plates. Appl Compos Mater 14:343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-008-9050-x10.1007/s10443-008-9050-x ↗
94. Dau F, Dano M, Structures YD-K-C, 2016 undefined. Experimental investigations and variability considerations on 3D interlock textile composites used in low velocity soft impact loading. Elsevier n.d.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.034 ↗
95. Karahan M, Karahan N (2014) Effect of weaving structure and hybridization on the low-velocity impact behavior of woven carbon-epoxy composites. Fibres Text Eastern Europe 22:109–115
96. Jang BZ, Chen LC, Wang CZ, Lin HT, Zee RH (1989) Impact resistance and energy absorption mechanisms in hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 34:305–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(89)90002-X10.1016/0266-3538(89)90002-X ↗
97. Marom G, Drukker E, Weinberg A, Banbaji J (1986) Impact behaviour of carbon/Kevlar hybrid composites. Composites 17:150–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(86)90253-310.1016/0010-4361(86)90253-3 ↗
98. Mallick PK, Broutman LJ (1975) Impact behavior of hybrid composites. In: SPI reinforcing fibers for composites institute annual conference proceedings
99. Park R, Jang J (1998) Stacking sequence effect of aramid-UHMPE hybrid composites by flexural test method. Polym Test 16:549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(97)00018-410.1016/S0142-9418(97)00018-4 ↗
100. Kim JK, Sham ML (2000) Impact and delamination failure of woven-fabric composites. Compos Sci Technol 60:745–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-9 ↗