In situ silver-doped antibacterial bioactive glass for bone regeneration application
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Elin B, Quentin M, Willliam W, Gristina AG (1989) In vitro and in vivo comparative colonization of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis on orthopaedic implant materials. Biomaterials 10:325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(89)90073-210.1016/0142-9612(89)90073-2 ↗
2. Chernousova S, Epple M (2013) Silver as antibacterial agent: ion, nanoparticle, and metal. Angew Chem-Int Edition 52:1636–1653. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20120592310.1002/anie.201205923 ↗
3. Morrison L, Zembower TR (2020) Antimicrobial resistance global report on surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 30:619–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2020.06.00410.1016/j.giec.2020.06.004 ↗
4. Iravani S, Varma RS (2019) Plants and plant-based polymers as scaffolds for tissue engineering. Green Chem 21:4839–4867. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9gc02391g10.1039/c9gc02391g ↗
5. Sánchez-Salcedo S, García A, González-Jiménez A, Vallet-Regí M (2022) Antibacterial effect of 3D printed mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds doped with metallic silver nanoparticles. Acta Biomater 155:654–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.04510.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.045 ↗
6. Ciraldo FE, Liverani L, Gritsch L et al (2018) Synthesis and characterization of silver-doped mesoporous bioactive glass and its applications in conjunction with electrospinning. Materials 11:692. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1105069210.3390/ma11050692 ↗
7. Sehgal RR, Carvalho E, Banerjee R (2016) Mechanically stiff, zinc cross-linked nanocomposite scaffolds with improved osteostimulation and antibacterial properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:13735–13747. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0274010.1021/acsami.6b02740 ↗
8. Caliari MV, Augusto M, Sá D et al (2018) Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility and structure of cobalt-releasing sol-gel bioactive glass. Ceram Int 44:20337–20347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.02210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.022 ↗
9. Iqbal N, Kadir MRA, Mahmood NH et al (2014) Characterization, antibacterial and in vitro compatibility of zinc-silver doped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles prepared through microwave synthesis. Ceram Int 40:4507–4513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.12510.1016/j.ceramint.2013.08.125 ↗
10. Pajares-Chamorro N, Wagley Y, Maduka CV et al (2021) Silver-doped bioactive glass particles for in vivo bone tissue regeneration and enhanced methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) inhibition. Mater Sci Eng, C 120:111693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11169310.1016/j.msec.2020.111693 ↗
11. Sergi R, Bellucci D, Cannillo V (2020) A review of bioactive glass/natural polymer composites: state of the art. Materials 13:5560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1323556010.3390/ma13235560 ↗
12. Adam SNFS, Osman AF, Shamsudin R (2018) Tensile properties, biodegradability and bioactivity of thermoplastic starch (TPS)/ bioglass composites for bone tissue engineering. Sains Malaysiana 47:1303–1310. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2018-4706-2710.17576/jsm-2018-4706-27 ↗
13. Nikolova MP, Chavali MS (2019) Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: a review. Bioactive Mater 4:271–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.00510.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005 ↗
14. Hench LL (2015) The future of bioactive ceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5425-310.1007/s10856-015-5425-3 ↗
15. Rau JV, Curcio M, Raucci MG et al (2019) Cu-releasing bioactive glass coatings and their in vitro properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:5812–5820. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1908210.1021/acsami.8b19082 ↗
16. Zhu N, Chatzistavrou X, Papagerakis P et al (2019) Silver-doped bioactive glass/chitosan hydrogel with potential application in dental pulp repair. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5:4624–4633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0081110.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00811 ↗
17. Hoppe A, Boccaccini AR (2015) Biological impact of bioactive glasses and their dissolution products. Front Oral Biol 17:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/00038169010.1159/000381690 ↗
18. Awaid M, Cacciotti I (2022) Bioactive glasses with antibacterial properties: Mechanisms, compositions, and applications. Bioactive Glasses Glass-Ceram Fundam Appl, pp 581–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119724193.ch2310.1002/9781119724193.ch23 ↗
19. Gupta N, Santhiya D, Murugavel S et al (2018) Effects of transition metal ion dopants (Ag, Cu and Fe) on the structural, mechanical and antibacterial properties of bioactive glass. Colloids Surf A 538:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.11.02310.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.11.023 ↗
20. Qin X, Cao R, Zheng J et al (2020) A new strategy for synthesizing silver doped mesoporous bioactive glass fibers and their bioactivity, antibacterial activity and drug loading performance. RSC Adv 10:44835–44840. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra08656h10.1039/d0ra08656h ↗
21. Shuai C, Xu Y, Feng P et al (2019) Antibacterial polymer scaffold based on mesoporous bioactive glass loaded with in situ grown silver. Chem Eng J 374:304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.27310.1016/j.cej.2019.03.273 ↗
22. Akhtach S, Tabia Z, Bricha M, El Mabrouk K (2021) Structural characterization, in vitro bioactivity, and antibacterial evaluation of low silver-doped bioactive glasses. Ceram Int 47:29036–29046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.06610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.066 ↗
23. Souza L, Lopes JH, Encarnação D et al (2018) Comprehensive in vitro and in vivo studies of novel melt-derived Nb-substituted 45S5 bioglass reveal its enhanced bioactive properties for bone healing. Sci Rep 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31114-010.1038/s41598-018-31114-0 ↗
24. Faqhiri H, Hannula M, Kellomäki M et al (2019) Effect of melt-derived bioactive glass particles on the properties of chitosan scaffolds. J Funct Biomater 10:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb1003003810.3390/jfb10030038 ↗
25. Holzwarth U, Gibson N (2011) The Scherrer equation versus the “Debye-Scherrer equation.” Nat Nanotechnol 6:534. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.14510.1038/nnano.2011.145 ↗
26. Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27:2907–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
27. Kumar P, Kumar V, Kumar R et al (2020) Fabrication and characterization of ZrO2 incorporated SiO2–CaO–P2O5 bioactive glass scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 109:103854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10385410.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103854 ↗
28. Ryan EJ, Ryan AJ, González-Vázquez A et al (2019) Collagen scaffolds functionalised with copper-eluting bioactive glass reduce infection and enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 197:405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.031 ↗
29. Mitra I, Mukherjee S, Reddy Venkata PB et al (2016) Benzimidazole based Pt(II) complexes with better normal cell viability than cisplatin: Synthesis, substitution behavior, cytotoxicity, DNA binding and DFT study. RSC Adv 6:76600–76613. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra17788c10.1039/c6ra17788c ↗
30. Mesquita-guimarães J, Ramos L, Detsch R et al (2019) Evaluation of in vitro properties of 3D micro-macro porous zirconia scaffolds coated with 58S bioactive glass using MG-63 osteoblast-like cells. J Eur Ceram Soc 39:2545–2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.01.02910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.01.029 ↗
31. Mariappan CR, Ranga N (2017) Influence of silver on the structure, dielectric and antibacterial effect of silver doped bioglass-ceramic nanoparticles. Ceram Int 43:2196–2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.00310.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.003 ↗
32. Abodunrin OD, El Mabrouk K, Bricha M (2023) A review on borate bioactive glasses (BBG): effect of doping elements, degradation, and applications. J Mater Chem B 11:955–973. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb02505a10.1039/d2tb02505a ↗
33. Khalil M, Abbas V, Kayani ZN, Tariq U (2020) Optik E ff ect of Mg doping on structural, morphological, optical and thermal properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Optik 200:163428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.16342810.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163428 ↗
34. Cacciotti I (2017) Bivalent cationic ions doped bioactive glasses: the influence of magnesium, zinc, strontium and copper on the physical and biological properties. J Mater Sci 52:8812–8831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1010-010.1007/s10853-017-1010-0 ↗
35. Wetzel R, Blochberger M, Scheffler F et al (2020) Mg or Zn for Ca substitution improves the sintering of bioglass 45S5. Sci Rep 10:15964. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72091-710.1038/s41598-020-72091-7 ↗
36. Kumar P, Dehiya BS, Sindhu A et al (2020) Fabrication and characterization of silver nanorods incorporated calcium silicate scaffold using polymeric sponge replica technique. Mater Des 195:109026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10902610.1016/j.matdes.2020.109026 ↗
37. El-Rashidy AA, Waly G, Gad A et al (2018) Preparation and in vitro characterization of silver-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles fabricated using a sol-gel process and modified Stöber method. J Non-Cryst Solids 483:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.12.04410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.12.044 ↗
38. Palakurthy S, Azeem A, Venugopal Reddy K (2019) In vitro evaluation of silver doped wollastonite synthesized from natural waste for biomedical applications. Ceram Int 45:25044–25051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.16910.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.169 ↗
39. El-Kady AM, Ali AF, Rizk RA, Ahmed MM (2012) Synthesis, characterization and microbiological response of silver doped bioactive glass nanoparticles. Ceram Int 38:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.15810.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.158 ↗
40. Samudrala R, Abdul Azeem P, Penugurti V, Manavathi B (2017) Cytocompatibility studies of titania-doped calcium borosilicate bioactive glasses in-vitro. Mater Sci Eng C 77:772–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.24510.1016/j.msec.2017.03.245 ↗
41. Shendage SS, Gaikwad K, Kachare K et al (2024) In vitro and in vivo study of copper-doped bioactive glass for bone regeneration application. Mater Chem Phys 313:128789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.12878910.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128789 ↗
42. Cacciotti I (2019) Multisubstituted hydroxyapatite powders and coatings: the influence of the codoping on the hydroxyapatite performances. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 16:1864–1884. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.1322910.1111/ijac.13229 ↗
43. Naseri S, Lepry WC, Maisuria VB et al (2019) Development and characterization of silver-doped sol-gel-derived borate glasses with anti-bacterial activity. J Non-Cryst Solids 505:438–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.11.02610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.11.026 ↗
44. Bohner M, Lemaitre J (2009) Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution? Biomaterials 30:2175–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.008 ↗
45. Luo G, Ma Y, Cui X et al (2017) 13–93 bioactive glass/alginate composite scaffolds 3D printed under mild conditions for bone regeneration. RSC Adv 7:11880–11889. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra27669e10.1039/c6ra27669e ↗
46. Li HC, Wang DG, Chen CZ (2015) Effect of zinc oxide and zirconia on structure, degradability and in vitro bioactivity of wollastonite. Ceram Int 41:10160–10169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.11710.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.117 ↗
47. Zamani D, Moztarzadeh F, Bizari D (2019) Alginate-bioactive glass containing Zn and Mg composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 137:1256–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.18210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.182 ↗
48. Ji L, Wang W, Jin D et al (2015) In vitro bioactivity and mechanical properties of bioactive glass nanoparticles/polycaprolactone composites. Mater Sci Eng C 46:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.04110.1016/j.msec.2014.09.041 ↗
49. El-Rashidy AA, Waly G, Gad A et al (2018) Antibacterial activity and biocompatibility of zein scaffolds containing silver-doped bioactive glass. Biomed Mater 13:065006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aad8cf10.1088/1748-605X/aad8cf ↗
50. Li HC, Wang DG, Chen CZ et al (2016) Influence of different amount of Na2O additive on the structure, mechanical properties and degradability of bioactive wollastonite. Ceram Int 42:1439–1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.08810.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.088 ↗
51. Shendage SS, Ingole VH, Rasal A et al (2024) Sustainable development of a bioactive material from recycled rice husk and eggshell for bone regeneration application. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 12:2598–2610. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c0629010.1021/acssuschemeng.3c06290 ↗
52. Nawaz A, Bano S, Yasir M et al (2020) Ag and Mn-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles incorporated into the chitosan/gelatin coatings deposited on PEEK/bioactive glass layers for favorable osteogenic differentiation and antibacterial activity. Mater Adv 1:1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00325e10.1039/d0ma00325e ↗
53. Heras C, Jiménez-holguín J, Doadrio AL et al (2020) Multifunctional antibiotic- and zinc-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds to fight bone infection. Acta Biomater 114:395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.04410.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.044 ↗
54. Zhang X, Liu Z, Shen W, Gurunathan S (2016) Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, properties, applications, and therapeutic approaches. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms1709153410.3390/ijms17091534 ↗
55. Pajares-chamorro N, Shook J, Hammer ND, Chatzistavrou X (2019) Resurrection of antibiotics that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus resists by silver-doped bioactive glass-ceramic microparticles. Acta Biomater 96:537–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.01210.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.012 ↗
56. Naresh P, Narsimlu N, Srinivas C et al (2020) Ag2O doped bioactive glasses: an investigation on the antibacterial, optical, structural and impedance studies. J Non-Cryst Solids 549:120361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12036110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120361 ↗
57. Gurunathan S, Lee K, Kalishwaralal K et al (2009) Antiangiogenic properties of silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials 30:6341–6350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.008 ↗
58. Fayaz AM, Balaji K, Girilal M et al (2010) Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their synergistic effect with antibiotics: a study against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 6:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2009.04.00610.1016/j.nano.2009.04.006 ↗
59. Vale AC, Pereira PR, Barbosa AM et al (2018) Optimization of silver-containing bioglass nanoparticles envisaging biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 94:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.09.02710.1016/j.msec.2018.09.027 ↗
60. Choudhary R, Kumar S, Bulygina I et al (2021) Biomineralization, dissolution and cellular studies of silicate bioceramics prepared from eggshell and rice husk. Mater Sci Eng C 118:111456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11145610.1016/j.msec.2020.111456 ↗
61. Wang H, Zhao B, Dong W et al (2020) A dual-targeted platform based on graphene for synergistic chemo- photothermal therapy against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and their biofilms. Chem Eng J 393:124595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12459510.1016/j.cej.2020.124595 ↗
62. Das SK, Parandhaman T, Dey MD (2021) Biomolecule-assisted synthesis of biomimetic nanocomposite hydrogel for hemostatic and wound healing applications. Green Chem 23:629–669. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0gc03010d10.1039/d0gc03010d ↗
63. Mirza S, Zia I, Jolly R et al (2018) Synergistic combination ofnatural bioadhesive bael fruit gum and chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite: a ternary bioactive nanohybrid for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 119:215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.12810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.128 ↗
64. Zia I, Mirza S, Jolly R et al (2018) Trigonella foenum graecum seed polysaccharide coupled nano hydroxyapatite-chitosan: a ternary nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 124:88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.05910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.059 ↗
65. Chen D, Shen H, He Y et al (2015) Synergetic effects of hBMSCs and hPCs in osteogenic differentiation and their capacity in the repair of critical-sized femoral condyle defects. Mol Med Rep 11:1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.288310.3892/mmr.2014.2883 ↗
66. Dashnyam K, Jin GZ, Kim JH et al (2017) Promoting angiogenesis with mesoporous microcarriers through a synergistic action of delivered silicon ion and VEGF. Biomaterials 116:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.05310.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.053 ↗
67. Kang K, Lim D, Choi I et al (2011) Vascular tube formation and angiogenesis induced by polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated silver nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett 205:227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.05.103310.1016/j.toxlet.2011.05.1033 ↗
68. Merckx G, Tay H, Lo Monaco M et al (2020) Chorioallantoic membrane assay as model for angiogenesis in tissue engineering: focus on stem cells. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 26:519–539. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.004810.1089/ten.teb.2020.0048 ↗
69. Henry JP, Bordoni B (2023) Histology, osteoblasts. StatPearls, Treasure Island, pp 1–18
70. Kashte S, Dhumal R, Chaudhary P et al (2021) Bone regeneration in critical-size calvarial defect using functional biocompatible osteoinductive herbal scaffolds and human umbilical cord Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Mater Today Commun 26:102049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10204910.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102049 ↗
71. Dreanca A, Muresan-Pop M, Taulescu M et al (2021) Bioactive glass-biopolymers-gold nanoparticle based composites for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 123:11200610.1016/j.msec.2021.112006 ↗
72. Zare Jalise S, Baheiraei N, Bagheri F (2018) The effects of strontium incorporation on a novel gelatin/bioactive glass bone graft: in vitro and in vivo characterization. Ceram Int 44:14217–14227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.02510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.025 ↗