journal article·2024-06

Martensitic structure evolution during deformation and its correlation with solution temperature in metastable β titanium alloys

J. M. Zhang, X. W. Wu, Y. J. Wang, X. W. Zhang, M. J. Lai, J. S. Li

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we explore the evolution of martensitic structures during deformation and their correlation with solution temperature in a metastable β-type Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al alloy. After a solution treatment at 760 °C, microstructures consist of equiaxed β grains and primary α particles. Increasing the solution temperature to 780 °C minimally affects equiaxed β grain size (~4.1–4.7 μm) but significantly reduces the α phase volume fraction. The α particles become scarce and completely absent following solution treatments at 800 and 820 °C, where the β grain size grows to ~109.1 and ~151.3 μm, respectively. Thermally-induced martensite (TIM) α″ laths are formed in specimens solution-treated at 770 °C or higher, predominantly populating the β grains of the specific specimens solution-treated at 800 and 820 °C. All solution-treated specimens exhibit a double yielding phenomenon. For specimens solution-treated at 760–780 °C, this results primarily from the stress-induced martensitic transformation (SIMT) process, while for those solution-treated at 800 and 820 °C, it mainly arises from the martensite reorientation (MR) process. The triggering stress for the SIMT/MR process increases with increasing solution temperature. In early deformation stages, TIM α″ laths initially undergo the MR process, transforming into a favored α″ variant, and the SIMT process can occur concurrently. As deformation progresses, the α″ phase changes orientation continuously through deformation twinning, transforming into the favored α″ variant dictated by the evolving stress conditions. This study provides insights into martensitic structure evolution and its influence on mechanical properties in metastable β titanium alloys.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Banerjee D, Williams JC (2013) Perspectives on titanium science and technology. Acta Mater 61:844–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.04310.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.043 ↗
2. Sun F, Zhang JY, Marteleur M et al (2013) Investigation of early stage deformation mechanisms in a metastable β titanium alloy showing combined twinning-induced plasticity and transformation-induced plasticity effects. Acta Mater 61:6406–6417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.01910.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.019 ↗
3. Min X, Chen X, Emura S, Tsuchiya K (2013) Mechanism of twinning-induced plasticity in β-type Ti–15Mo alloy. Scripta Mater 69:393–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.027 ↗
4. Ahmed M, Wexler D, Casillas G, Ivasishin OM, Pereloma EV (2015) The influence of β phase stability on deformation mode and compressive mechanical properties of Ti–10V–3Fe–3Al alloy. Acta Mater 84:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.04310.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.043 ↗
5. Ellyson B, Klemm-Toole J, Clarke K, Field R, Kaufman M, Clarke A (2021) Tuning the strength and ductility balance of a TRIP titanium alloy. Scripta Mater 194:113641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.11364110.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.113641 ↗
6. Marteleur M, Sun F, Gloriant T, Vermaut P, Jacques PJ, Prima F (2012) On the design of new β-metastable titanium alloys with improved work hardening rate thanks to simultaneous TRIP and TWIP effects. Scripta Mater 66:749–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.04910.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.049 ↗
7. Grosdidier T, Philippe MJ (2000) Deformation induced martensite and superelasticity in a β-metastable titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 291:218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00921-710.1016/S0921-5093(00)00921-7 ↗
8. Grosdidier T, Combres Y, Gautier E, Philippe MJ (2000) Effect of microstructure variations on the formation of deformation-induced martensite and associated tensile properties in a β metastable Ti alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 31:1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-000-0105-310.1007/s11661-000-0105-3 ↗
9. Grosdidier T, Roubaud C, Philippe M-J, Combres Y (1997) The deformation mechanisms in the β-metastable β-Cez titanium alloy. Scripta Mater 36:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(96)00341-710.1016/S1359-6462(96)00341-7 ↗
10. Chen Z, Zhong D, Sun Q, Ma X (2021) Effect of α phase fraction on the dynamic mechanical behavior of a dual-phase metastable β titanium alloy Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al. Mater Sci Eng, A 816:141322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14132210.1016/j.msea.2021.141322 ↗
11. Chong Y, Gao S, Tsuji N (2021) A unique three-stage dependence of yielding behavior and strain-hardening ability in Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al alloy on phase fraction. Mater Sci Eng, A 821:141609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14160910.1016/j.msea.2021.141609 ↗
12. Li C, Wu X, Chen JH, van der Zwaag S (2011) Influence of α morphology and volume fraction on the stress-induced martensitic transformation in Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al. Mater Sci Eng, A 528:5854–5860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.10710.1016/j.msea.2011.03.107 ↗
13. Zhu C, Zhang X-y, Li C, Liu C, Zhou K (2022) A strengthening strategy for metastable β titanium alloys: synergy effect of primary α phase and β phase stability. Mater Sci Eng, A 852:143736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.14373610.1016/j.msea.2022.143736 ↗
14. Neelakantan S, San Martin D, Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo PEJ, van der Zwaag S (2009) Plasticity induced transformation in a metastable β Ti-1023 alloy by controlled heat treatments. Mater Sci Technol 25:1351–1358. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328408X38577310.1179/174328408X385773 ↗
15. Li C, Chen JH, Wu X, Wang W, van der Zwaag S (2012) Tuning the stress induced martensitic formation in titanium alloys by alloy design. J Mater Sci 47:4093–4100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6263-z10.1007/s10853-012-6263-z ↗
16. Bhattacharjee A, Bhargava S, Varma VK, Kamat SV, Gogia AK (2005) Effect of β grain size on stress induced martensitic transformation in β solution treated Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al alloy. Scripta Mater 53:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.03910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.039 ↗
17. Cai M-H, Lee C-Y, Lee Y-K (2012) Effect of grain size on tensile properties of fine-grained metastable β titanium alloys fabricated by stress-induced martensite and its reverse transformations. Scripta Mater 66:606–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.015 ↗
18. Lee HJ, Kim JH, Park CH et al (2023) Twinning-induced plasticity mechanism of α″-martensitic titanium alloy. Acta Mater 248:118763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11876310.1016/j.actamat.2023.118763 ↗
19. Bertrand E, Castany P, Yang Y, Menou E, Gloriant T (2016) Deformation twinning in the full-α″ martensitic Ti–25Ta–20Nb shape memory alloy. Acta Mater 105:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.00110.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.001 ↗
20. Elmay W, Berveiller S, Patoor E, Gloriant T, Prima F, Laheurte P (2017) Texture evolution of orthorhombic α″ titanium alloy investigated by in situ X-ray diffraction. Mater Sci Eng, A 679:504–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.07210.1016/j.msea.2016.10.072 ↗
21. Dumas O, Malet L, Kwaśniak P, Prima F, Godet S (2023) Reorientation Induced Plasticity (RIP) in high-strength titanium alloys: an insight into the underlying mechanisms and resulting mechanical properties. Acta Mater 246:118679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11867910.1016/j.actamat.2023.118679 ↗
22. Qian B, Lilensten L, Zhang J et al (2021) On the transformation pathways in TRIP/TWIP Ti–12Mo alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 822:141672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14167210.1016/j.msea.2021.141672 ↗
23. Chen N, Kou H, Wu Z et al (2021) Stress-induced α″ martensitic phase transformation and martensitic twinning in a metastable β titanium alloy. J Alloys Compd 859:157809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15780910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157809 ↗
24. Ping DH, Yamabe-Mitarai Y, Cui CY, Yin FX, Choudhry MA (2008) Stress-induced α″ martensitic (110) twinning in β-Ti alloys. Appl Phys Lett 93:151911. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.300229510.1063/1.3002295 ↗
25. Cai S, Schaffer JE, Ren Y (2015) Deformation of a Ti-Nb alloy containing α″-martensite and omega phases. Appl Phys Lett 106:131907. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.491696010.1063/1.4916960 ↗
26. Zhang X, Wang W, Sun J, Gao Y, Pennycook SJ (2022) Enhanced twinning-induced plasticity effect by novel {315}α″/{332}β correlated deformation twins in a Ti-Nb alloy. Int J Plast 148:103132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.10313210.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103132 ↗
27. Castany P, Yang Y, Bertrand E, Gloriant T (2016) Reversion of a parent {130}<310> martensitic twinning system at the origin of {332}<113> β twins observed in metastable β titanium alloys. Phys Rev Lett 117:245501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.24550110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.245501 ↗
28. Qian B, Yang M, Lilensten L, Vermaut P, Sun F, Prima F (2022) In-situ observations of a hierarchical twinning–detwinning process in stress-induced α″-martensite of Ti-12Mo alloy. Mater Res Lett 10:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2021.201396710.1080/21663831.2021.2013967 ↗
29. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
30. Lai MJ, Li T, Raabe D (2018) omega phase acts as a switch between dislocation channeling and joint twinning- and transformation-induced plasticity in a metastable beta titanium alloy. Acta Mater 151:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.05310.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.053 ↗
31. Mantri SA, Choudhuri D, Alam T et al (2018) Tuning the scale of α precipitates in β-titanium alloys for achieving high strength. Scripta Mater 154:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.04010.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.040 ↗
32. Lee SW, Lee HJ, Kim JH, Park CH, Hong J-K, Yeom J-T (2021) Effect of prior β grain size on the martensitic transformation of titanium alloys. Mater Charact 182:111525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11152510.1016/j.matchar.2021.111525 ↗
33. Tan G, Liu Y (2004) Comparative study of deformation-induced martensite stabilisation via martensite reorientation and stress-induced martensitic transformation in NiTi. Intermetallics 12:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2003.11.00810.1016/j.intermet.2003.11.008 ↗
34. Ma X, Li F, Cao J et al (2018) Strain rate effects on tensile deformation behaviors of Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al alloy undergoing stress-induced martensitic transformation. Mater Sci Eng, A 710:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.05710.1016/j.msea.2017.10.057 ↗
35. Paradkar AG, Kamat SV, Gogia AK, Kashyap BP (2007) Various stages in stress–strain curve of Ti–Al–Nb alloys undergoing SIMT. Mater Sci Eng, A 456:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.15610.1016/j.msea.2006.11.156 ↗
36. Furuhara T, Annaka S, Tomio Y, Maki T (2006) Superelasticity in Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al alloys with nitrogen addition. Mater Sci Eng, A 438–440:825–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.08410.1016/j.msea.2006.02.084 ↗
37. Miyazaki S, Otsuka K, Wayman CM (1989) The shape memory mechanism associated with the martensitic transformation in Ti–Ni alloys—II. Variant coalescence and shape recovery. Acta Metall 37:1885–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(89)90073-410.1016/0001-6160(89)90073-4 ↗
38. Lee SW, Oh JM, Kim JH, Park CH, Hong J-K, Yeom J-T (2021) Demonstration of martensite reorientation-induced plasticity by ultra-high strength titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 807:140878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14087810.1016/j.msea.2021.140878 ↗
39. Chai YW, Kim HY, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S (2009) Self-accommodation in Ti–Nb shape memory alloys. Acta Mater 57:4054–4064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.05110.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.051 ↗
40. Rastogi A, Sarkar R, Neelakantan S (2023) Transitions among martensitic phases during continuous deformation in metastable β Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al alloy. J Alloys Compd 964:171320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17132010.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171320 ↗
41. Lai MJ, Tasan CC, Raabe D (2016) On the mechanism of 332 twinning in metastable β titanium alloys. Acta Mater 111:173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.04010.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.040 ↗
42. Polmear I, StJohn D, Nie J-F, Qian M (2017) Titanium alloys. In: Polmear I, StJohn D, Nie J-F, Qian M (eds) Light alloys, 5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 369–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-099431-4.00007-510.1016/B978-0-08-099431-4.00007-5 ↗
43. Banumathy S, Mandal RK, Singh AK (2009) Structure of orthorhombic martensitic phase in binary Ti–Nb alloys. J Appl Phys 106:093518. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.325596610.1063/1.3255966 ↗
44. Celada-Casero C, Sietsma J, Santofimia MJ (2019) The role of the austenite grain size in the martensitic transformation in low carbon steels. Mater Des 167:107625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10762510.1016/j.matdes.2019.107625 ↗
45. Wang J, Van Der Zwaag S (2001) Stabilization mechanisms of retained austenite in transformation-induced plasticity steel. Metall Mater Trans A 32:1527–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0240-510.1007/s11661-001-0240-5 ↗
46. Zhang Y, Liu H, Yi D et al (2018) Stress-induced α″ phase in a beta Ti–19Nb–1.5Mo–4Zr–8Sn alloy. Mater Charact 140:247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.01910.1016/j.matchar.2018.04.019 ↗
47. Dumas O, Malet L, Hary B, Prima F, Godet S (2021) Crystallography and reorientation mechanism upon deformation in the martensite of an α-α’ Ti-6Al-4V dual-phase microstructure exhibiting high work-hardening rate. Acta Mater 205:116530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11653010.1016/j.actamat.2020.116530 ↗
48. Miyazaki S, Kimura S, Otsuka K, Suzuki Y (1984) The habit plane and transformation strains associated with the martensitic transformation in Ti-Ni single crystals. Scr Metall 18:883–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(84)90254-010.1016/0036-9748(84)90254-0 ↗
49. Rastogi A, Neelakantan S (2023) Enhanced thermo-mechanical processing through stress-induced martensitic transformation and its effect on grain refinement in metastable β titanium alloys. Scripta Mater 226:115222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11522210.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115222 ↗
50. Ballor J, Li T, Prima F, Boehlert CJ, Devaraj A (2022) A review of the metastable omega phase in beta titanium alloys: the phase transformation mechanisms and its effect on mechanical properties. Int Mater Rev 68:26–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2022.203640110.1080/09506608.2022.2036401 ↗
51. Jones NG, Dashwood RJ, Jackson M, Dye D (2009) β Phase decomposition in Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr. Acta Mater 57:3830–3839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.03110.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.031 ↗
52. Liu Y, Galvin SP (1997) Criteria for pseudoelasticity in near-equiatomic NiTi shape memory alloys. Acta Mater 45:4431–4439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00144-410.1016/S1359-6454(97)00144-4 ↗
53. Liu Y, Tan GS (2000) Effect of deformation by stress-induced martensitic transformation on the transformation behaviour of NiTi. Intermetallics 8:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-9795(99)00079-510.1016/S0966-9795(99)00079-5 ↗
54. Wei S, Zhu G, Tasan CC (2021) Slip-twinning interdependent activation across phase boundaries: an in-situ investigation of a Ti-Al-V-Fe (α+β) alloy. Acta Mater 206:116520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11652010.1016/j.actamat.2020.116520 ↗
55. Xiao JF, Shang XK, Zhang JQ et al (2023) Revealing the martensitic variant selection in metastable beta titanium alloy Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al under heterogeneous deformation. Mater Sci Eng, A 876:145181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.14518110.1016/j.msea.2023.145181 ↗