DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2024-01

Sustainable chemically modified poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/thermoplastic starch/poly(ε-caprolactone)/cellulose biocomposites: looking at the bulk through the surface

Aleksander Hejna, Mateusz Barczewski, Paulina Kosmela, Olga Mysiukiewicz, Agnieszka Tercjak, Adam Piasecki, Mohammad Reza Saeb, Marek Szostak

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 4
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Wu R (2022) An empirical investigation of the economic impacts of COVID-19: micro-level evidence from Europe. Int Rev Appl Econ 36:675–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2022.204096110.1080/02692171.2022.2040961 ↗
2. RameshKumar S, Shaiju P, O’Connor KE (2020) Bio-based and biodegradable polymers—State-of-the-art, challenges and emerging trends. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 21:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.12.00510.1016/j.cogsc.2019.12.005 ↗
3. Brockhaus S, Petersen M, Kersten W (2016) A crossroads for bioplastics: exploring product developers’ challenges to move beyond petroleum-based plastics. J Clean Prod 127:84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.00310.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.003 ↗
4. DeArmitt C, KevinD B (2001) Filled polypropylene: a cost-performance comparison of common fillers. Plast Addit Compd 3:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-391X(01)80252-X10.1016/S1464-391X(01)80252-X ↗
5. Srebrenkoska V, Bogoeva Gaceva G, Dimeski D (2014) Biocomposites based on polylactic acid and their thermal behavior after recycing. Maced J Chem Chem Eng 33:277–285. https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2014.47910.20450/mjcce.2014.479 ↗
6. Haina, Gul S, Awais M et al (2020) Recent trends in preparation and applications of biodegradable polymer composites. J Renew Mater 8:1305–1326. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2020.01003710.32604/jrm.2020.010037 ↗
7. Hejna A, Barczewski M, Kosmela P et al (2021) Mandarin peel as an auspicious functional filler for polymer composites. Maced J Chem Chem Eng 40:89–106
8. Shaghaleh H, Xu X, Wang S (2018) Current progress in production of biopolymeric materials based on cellulose, cellulose nanofibers, and cellulose derivatives. RSC Adv 8:825–842. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA11157F10.1039/C7RA11157F ↗
9. Platnieks O, Gaidukovs S, Barkane A et al (2020) Bio-based poly(butylene succinate)/microcrystalline cellulose/nanofibrillated cellulose-based sustainable polymer composites: thermo-mechanical and biodegradation studies. Polymers 12:1472. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1207147210.3390/polym12071472 ↗
10. Abdul Khalil HPS, Tye YY, Saurabh CK et al (2017) Biodegradable polymer films from seaweed polysaccharides: a review on cellulose as a reinforcement material. Express Polym Lett 11:244–265. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.2610.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.26 ↗
11. Motaung TE, Linganiso LZ (2018) Critical review on agrowaste cellulose applications for biopolymers. Int J Plast Technol 22:185–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12588-018-9219-610.1007/s12588-018-9219-6 ↗
12. Liu Y, Lv X, Bao J et al (2019) Characterization of silane treated and untreated natural cellulosic fibre from corn stalk waste as potential reinforcement in polymer composites. Carbohydr Polym 218:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.08810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.088 ↗
13. Szefer E, Leszczyńska A, Pielichowski K (2018) Modification of microcrystalline cellulose filler with succinic anhydride—effect of microwave and conventional heating. Compos Theory Pract 18:25–31
14. Borrero-López AM, Guzmán DB, González-Delgado JA et al (2021) Toward UV-triggered curing of solvent-free polyurethane adhesives based on castor oil. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:11032–11040. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0246110.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02461 ↗
15. Yang Y, Zhang L, Zhang J et al (2023) Reengineering waste boxwood powder into light and high-strength biodegradable composites to replace petroleum-based synthetic materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:4505–4515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c1984410.1021/acsami.2c19844 ↗
16. Wang L, Hu J, Liu Y et al (2020) Ionic liquids grafted cellulose nanocrystals for high-strength and toughness PVA nanocomposite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:38796–38804. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c1121710.1021/acsami.0c11217 ↗
17. Hejna A, Przybysz-Romatowska M, Kosmela P et al (2020) Recent advances in compatibilization strategies of wood-polymer composites by isocyanates. Wood Sci Technol 54:1091–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01203-310.1007/s00226-020-01203-3 ↗
18. Mohit H, Arul Mozhi Selvan V (2018) A comprehensive review on surface modification, structure interface and bonding mechanism of plant cellulose fiber reinforced polymer based composites. Compos Interfaces 25:629–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2018.144483210.1080/09276440.2018.1444832 ↗
19. Ferreira DP, Cruz J, Fangueiro R (2019) Surface modification of natural fibers in polymer composites. Green composites for automotive applications. Elsevier, pp 3–4110.1016/B978-0-08-102177-4.00001-X ↗
20. Yu S, Wang H-M, Xiong S-J et al (2022) Sustainable wood-based poly(butylene adipate- co -terephthalate) biodegradable composite films reinforced by a rapid homogeneous esterification strategy. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 10:14568–14578. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0433210.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04332 ↗
21. Barczewski M, Mysiukiewicz O, Hejna A et al (2021) The effect of surface treatment with isocyanate and aromatic carbodiimide of thermally expanded vermiculite used as a functional filler for polylactide-based composites. Polymers 13:890. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1306089010.3390/polym13060890 ↗
22. Hejna A, Kosmela P (2020) Insights into compatibilization of poly(ε-caprolactone)-based biocomposites with diisocyanates as modifiers of cellulose fillers. Mindanao J Sci Technol 18:221–24110.61310/mndimsp.0908.20 ↗
23. Xie X, Zhang C, Weng Y et al (2020) Effect of diisocyanates as compatibilizer on the properties of BF/PBAT composites by in situ reactive compatibilization. Crosslink Chain Ext Mater 13:806. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1303080610.3390/ma13030806 ↗
24. Tai NL, Adhikari R, Shanks R, Adhikari B (2017) Starch-polyurethane films synthesized using polyethylene glycol-isocyanate (PEG-iso): effects of molecular weight, crystallinity, and composition of PEG-iso on physiochemical characteristics and hydrophobicity of the films. Food Packag Shelf Life 14:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2017.10.00310.1016/j.fpsl.2017.10.003 ↗
25. Carvalho AJF, Curvelo AAS, Gandini A (2005) Surface chemical modification of thermoplastic starch: reactions with isocyanates, epoxy functions and stearoyl chloride. Ind Crops Prod 21:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.02710.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.027 ↗
26. Tai NL, Ghasemlou M, Adhikari R, Adhikari B (2021) Starch-based isocyanate- and non-isocyanate polyurethane hybrids: a review on synthesis, performance and biodegradation. Carbohydr Polym 265:118029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11802910.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118029 ↗
27. Paola Bracciale M, De Gioannis G, Falzarano M et al (2024) Disposable Mater-Bi® bioplastic tableware: characterization and assessment of anaerobic biodegradability. Fuel 355:129361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12936110.1016/j.fuel.2023.129361 ↗
28. Nainggolan H, Gea S, Bilotti E et al (2013) Mechanical and thermal properties of bacterial-cellulose-fibre-reinforced Mater-Bi ® bionanocomposite. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 4:325–329. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.4.3710.3762/bjnano.4.37 ↗
29. Puglia D, Tomassucci A, Kenny JM (2003) Processing, properties and stability of biodegradable composites based on Mater-Bi® and cellulose fibres. Polym Adv Technol 14:749–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.39010.1002/pat.390 ↗
30. Morreale M, Scaffaro R, Maio A, La Mantia FP (2008) Effect of adding wood flour to the physical properties of a biodegradable polymer. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.002 ↗
31. Scaffaro R, Morreale M, Lo RG, La Mantia FP (2009) Effect of the processing techniques on the properties of ecocomposites based on vegetable oil-derived Mater-Bi® and wood flour. J Appl Polym Sci 114:2855–2863. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3082210.1002/app.30822 ↗
32. Scaffaro R, Morreale M, Lo Re G, La Mantia FP (2009) Degradation of Mater-Bi®/wood flour biocomposites in active sewage sludge. Polym Degrad Stab 94:1220–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.04.02810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.04.028 ↗
33. Morreale M, Scaffaro R, Maio A, La Mantia FP (2008) Mechanical behaviour of Mater-Bi®/wood flour composites: a statistical approach. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1537–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.015 ↗
34. Lo RG, Morreale M, Scaffaro R, La Mantia FP (2013) Biodegradation paths of Mater-Bi®/kenaf biodegradable composites. J Appl Polym Sci 129:3198–3208. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3902710.1002/app.39027 ↗
35. Perez CJ, Alvarez VA (2016) Ternary composites based on HDPE and Mater-Bi reinforced with hemp fibres. J Therm Anal Calorim 124:499–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-5140-910.1007/s10973-015-5140-9 ↗
36. Perez CJ, Alvarez VA (2015) Non-isothermal crystallization of biodegradable polymer (MaterBi)/polyolefin (PP)/hemp fibres ternary composites. J Therm Anal Calorim 120:1445–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-4368-010.1007/s10973-014-4368-0 ↗
37. Haque M-U, Alvarez V, Paci M, Pracella M (2011) Processing, compatibilization and properties of ternary composites of Mater-Bi with polyolefins and hemp fibres. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42:2060–2069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.015 ↗
38. Lopez JP, Vilaseca F, Barberà L et al (2012) Processing and properties of biodegradable composites based on Mater-Bi® and hemp core fibres. Resour Conserv Recycl 59:38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.00610.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.006 ↗
39. Alvarez VA, Vázquez A (2006) Influence of fiber chemical modification procedure on the mechanical properties and water absorption of MaterBi-Y/sisal fiber composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:1672–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.005 ↗
40. Alvarez VA, Ruseckaite RA, Vázquez A (2006) Degradation of sisal fibre/Mater Bi-Y biocomposites buried in soil. Polym Degrad Stab 91:3156–3162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.07.01110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.07.011 ↗
41. Alvarez VA, Ruseckaite RA, Vázquez A (2007) Aqueous degradation of MATER BI Y—Sisal fibers biocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 20:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270570707838210.1177/0892705707078382 ↗
42. Borchani KE, Carrot C, Jaziri M (2019) Rheological behavior of short Alfa fibers reinforced Mater-Bi® biocomposites. Polym Test 77:105895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.05.01110.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.05.011 ↗
43. Elfehri Borchani K, Carrot C, Jaziri M (2015) Biocomposites of Alfa fibers dispersed in the Mater-Bi® type bioplastic: morphology, mechanical and thermal properties. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 78:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.023 ↗
44. Scaffaro R, Citarrella MC, Morreale M (2023) Green composites based on Mater-Bi® and Solanum lycopersicum plant waste for 3D printing applications. Polymers 15:325. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1502032510.3390/polym15020325 ↗
45. Scaffaro R, Maio A, Lopresti F (2018) Physical properties of green composites based on poly-lactic acid or Mater-Bi® filled with Posidonia Oceanica leaves. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 112:315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.024 ↗
46. Johnson RM, Tucker N, Barnes S (2003) Impact performance of miscanthus/Novamont Mater-Bi® biocomposites. Polym Test 22:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00084-310.1016/S0142-9418(02)00084-3 ↗
47. Hejna A, Barczewski M, Kosmela P et al (2022) Mater-Bi/Brewers’ spent grain biocomposites—novel approach to plant-based waste filler treatment by highly efficient thermomechanical and chemical methods. Materials 15:7099. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1520709910.3390/ma15207099 ↗
48. Hejna A (2020) Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Brewers’ spent grain composites—the impact of filler treatment on the mechanical performance. J Compos Sci 4:167. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs404016710.3390/jcs4040167 ↗
49. Hejna A, Marć M, Korol J (2021) Modification of cellulosic filler with diisocyanates—volatile organic compounds emission assessment and stability of chemical structure over time. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 36:353–372. https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2020-010410.1515/npprj-2020-0104 ↗
50. Hejna A, Marć M, Skórczewska K et al (2021) Insights into modification of lignocellulosic fillers with isophorone diisocyanate: structure, thermal stability and volatile organic compounds emission assessment. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 79:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01604-y10.1007/s00107-020-01604-y ↗
51. Ruggero F, Carretti E, Gori R et al (2020) Monitoring of degradation of starch-based biopolymer film under different composting conditions, using TGA, FTIR and SEM analysis. Chemosphere 246:125770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12577010.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125770 ↗
52. Salmén L, Bergström E (2009) Cellulose structural arrangement in relation to spectral changes in tensile loading FTIR. Cellulose 16:975–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9331-z10.1007/s10570-009-9331-z ↗
53. Wang FC, Feve M, Lam TM, Pascault J-P (1994) FTIR analysis of hydrogen bonding in amorphous linear aromatic polyurethanes. I. Influence of temperature. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 32:1305–1313. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1994.09032080110.1002/polb.1994.090320801 ↗
54. Morelli CL, Belgacem N, Bretas RES, Bras J (2016) Melt extruded nanocomposites of polybutylene adipate- co -terephthalate (PBAT) with phenylbutyl isocyanate modified cellulose nanocrystals. J Appl Polym Sci 133:43678. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4367810.1002/app.43678 ↗
55. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) New process of chemical grafting of cellulose nanoparticles with a long chain isocyanate. Langmuir 26:402–411. https://doi.org/10.1021/la902859510.1021/la9028595 ↗
56. França DC, Almeida TG, Abels G et al (2019) Tailoring PBAT/PLA/Babassu films for suitability of agriculture mulch application. J Nat Fibers 16:933–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.144109210.1080/15440478.2018.1441092 ↗
57. Celebi H, Ilgar M, Seyhan AT (2022) Evaluation of the effect of isocyanate modification on the thermal and rheological properties of poly(ε-caprolactone)/cellulose composites. Polym Bull 79:4941–4955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03753-310.1007/s00289-021-03753-3 ↗
58. Girouard NM, Xu S, Schueneman GT et al (2016) Site-selective modification of cellulose nanocrystals with isophorone diisocyanate and formation of polyurethane-CNC composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:1458–1467. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b1072310.1021/acsami.5b10723 ↗
59. Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2012) Biodegradable nanocomposites of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) and organically modified layered silicates. J Polym Environ 20:195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0408-z10.1007/s10924-011-0408-z ↗
60. Arjmand F, Barmar M, Barikani M (2012) Isocyanate modification of wood fiber in enhancing the performance of its composites with high density polyethylene. Polym Renew Resour 3:43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/20412479120030020210.1177/204124791200300202 ↗
61. Karmarkar A, Chauhan SS, Modak JM, Chanda M (2007) Mechanical properties of wood–fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of a novel compatibilizer with isocyanate functional group. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 38:227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.05.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2006.05.005 ↗
62. Aldas M, Rayón E, López-Martínez J, Arrieta MP (2020) A deeper microscopic study of the interaction between gum rosin derivatives and a Mater-Bi type bioplastic. Polymers 12:226. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1201022610.3390/polym12010226 ↗
63. Aldas M, Pavon C, Ferri JM et al (2021) Films based on Mater-Bi® compatibilized with pine resin derivatives: optical, barrier, and disintegration properties. Polymers 13:1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1309150610.3390/polym13091506 ↗
64. Fu Y, Wu G, Bian X et al (2020) Biodegradation behavior of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and their blend in freshwater with sediment. Molecules 25:3946. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2517394610.3390/molecules25173946 ↗
65. Mohd Sabee MMS, Ahmad Tajuddin NNI, Ku Ishak KM et al (2022) Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate, polycaprolactone, and poly(lactic acid) fabricated via fused deposition modeling and conventional molding. J Appl Polym Sci 139:e52973. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5297310.1002/app.52973 ↗
66. Law K-Y (2014) Definitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity: getting the basics right. J Phys Chem Lett 5:686–688. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz402762h10.1021/jz402762h ↗
67. Andresen M, Johansson L-S, Tanem BS, Stenius P (2006) Properties and characterization of hydrophobized microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 13:665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9072-110.1007/s10570-006-9072-1 ↗
68. Tsou C-H, Ma Z-L, Yang T et al (2022) Reinforced distiller’s grains as bio-fillers in environment-friendly poly(ethylene terephthalate) composites. Polym Bull 80:6137–6158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-022-04318-810.1007/s00289-022-04318-8 ↗
69. Ly B, Thielemans W, Dufresne A et al (2008) Surface functionalization of cellulose fibres and their incorporation in renewable polymeric matrices. Compos Sci Technol 68:3193–3201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.018 ↗
70. Aldas M, Ferri JM, Lopez-Martinez J et al (2020) Effect of pine resin derivatives on the structural, thermal, and mechanical properties of Mater-Bi type bioplastic. J Appl Polym Sci 137:48236. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4823610.1002/app.48236 ↗
71. Nayak SK (2010) Biodegradable PBAT/starch nanocomposites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 49:1406–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2010.49639710.1080/03602559.2010.496397 ↗
72. Mofokeng JP, Luyt AS (2015) Morphology and thermal degradation studies of melt-mixed poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) biodegradable polymer blend nanocomposites with TiO2 as filler. Polym Test 45:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.05.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.05.007 ↗
73. Hejna A, Sulyman M, Przybysz M et al (2020) On the correlation of lignocellulosic filler composition with the performance properties of poly(ε-caprolactone) based biocomposites. Waste Biomass Valorization 11:1467–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0485-510.1007/s12649-018-0485-5 ↗
74. Mahmood H, Moniruzzaman M, Iqbal T, Yusup S (2017) Effect of ionic liquids pretreatment on thermal degradation kinetics of agro-industrial waste reinforced thermoplastic starch composites. J Mol Liq 247:164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.10610.1016/j.molliq.2017.09.106 ↗
75. Hejna A, Korol J, Kosmela P et al (2021) By-products from food industry as a promising alternative for the conventional fillers for wood–polymer composites. Polymers 13:893. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1306089310.3390/polym13060893 ↗
76. Kim H-S, Kim S, Kim H-J, Yang H-S (2006) Thermal properties of bio-flour-filled polyolefin composites with different compatibilizing agent type and content. Thermochim Acta 451:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2006.09.01310.1016/j.tca.2006.09.013 ↗
77. Hejna A (2021) Clays as inhibitors of polyurethane foams’ flammability. Materials 14:4826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1417482610.3390/ma14174826 ↗
78. Pagno V, Módenes AN, Dragunski DC et al (2020) Heat treatment of polymeric PBAT/PCL membranes containing activated carbon from Brazil nutshell biomass obtained by electrospinning and applied in drug removal. J Environ Chem Eng 8:104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.10415910.1016/j.jece.2020.104159 ↗
79. Ning N, Fu S, Zhang W et al (2012) Realizing the enhancement of interfacial interaction in semicrystalline polymer/filler composites via interfacial crystallization. Prog Polym Sci 37:1425–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.12.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.12.005 ↗
80. Botta L, Titone V, Mistretta MC et al (2021) PBAT based composites reinforced with microcrystalline cellulose obtained from softwood almond shells. Polymers 13:2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1316264310.3390/polym13162643 ↗
81. Kale RD, Gorade VG, Madye N et al (2018) Preparation and characterization of biocomposite packaging film from poly(lactic acid) and acylated microcrystalline cellulose using rice bran oil. Int J Biol Macromol 118:1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.07610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.076 ↗
82. Shin BY, Il LS, Shin YS et al (2004) Rheological, mechanical and biodegradation studies on blends of thermoplastic starch and polycaprolactone. Polym Eng Sci 44:1429–1438. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2013910.1002/pen.20139 ↗
83. Huang H-X, Zhang J-J (2009) Effects of filler-filler and polymer-filler interactions on rheological and mechanical properties of HDPE-wood composites. J Appl Polym Sci 111:2806–2812. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2933610.1002/app.29336 ↗
84. Nuryawan A, Alamsyah EM (2018) A review of isocyanate wood adhesive: a case study in Indonesia. Applied adhesive bonding in science and technology. InTech
85. Barczewski M, Mysiukiewicz O (2018) Rheological and processing properties of poly(lactic acid) composites filled with ground chestnut shell. Polymer Korea 42:267–274. https://doi.org/10.7317/pk.2018.42.2.26710.7317/pk.2018.42.2.267 ↗
86. Wang H, Yang X, Fu Z et al (2017) Rheology of nanosilica-compatibilized immiscible polymer blends: formation of a “heterogeneous network” facilitated by interfacially anchored hybrid nanosilica. Macromolecules 50:9494–9506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0214310.1021/acs.macromol.7b02143 ↗
87. Wu D, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Zhou W (2008) Phase behavior and its viscoelastic response of polylactide/poly(ε-caprolactone) blend. Eur Polym J 44:2171–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.04.02310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.04.023 ↗
88. Utracki LA (1988) Viscoelastic behavior of polymer blends. Polym Eng Sci 28:1401–1404. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76028210910.1002/pen.760282109 ↗
89. Mohammadi M, Yousefi AA, Ehsani M (2012) Thermorheological analysis of blend of high- and low-density polyethylenes. J Polym Res 19:9798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-011-9798-910.1007/s10965-011-9798-9 ↗
90. Coombs SJ, Kanso MA, Giacomin AJ (2020) Cole-Cole relation for long-chain branching from general rigid bead–rod theory. Phys Fluids 32:093106. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.002440210.1063/5.0024402 ↗
91. Alvarez VA, Terenzi A, Kenny JM, Vázquez A (2004) Melt rheological behavior of starch-based matrix composites reinforced with short sisal fibers. Polym Eng Sci 44:1907–1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2019310.1002/pen.20193 ↗
92. Aid S, Eddhahak A, Ortega Z et al (2017) Experimental study of the miscibility of ABS/PC polymer blends and investigation of the processing effect. J Appl Polym Sci 134:44975. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4497510.1002/app.44975 ↗
93. Lu M, Liao J, Gulgunje PV et al (2021) Rheological behavior and fiber spinning of polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/Carbon nanotube (CNT) dispersions at high CNT loading. Polymer 215:123369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12336910.1016/j.polymer.2020.123369 ↗
94. Li Y, Han C, Bian J et al (2012) Rheology and biodegradation of polylactide/silica nanocomposites. Polym Compos 33:1719–1727. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2230610.1002/pc.22306 ↗
95. Azizi H, Ghasemi I (2009) Investigation on the dynamic melt rheological properties of polypropylene/wood flour composites. Polym Compos 30:429–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2057310.1002/pc.20573 ↗
96. Luan L, Wu W, Wagner MH (2011) Rheological behavior of lubricating systems in polypropylene/seaweed composites. J Appl Polym Sci 121:2143–2148. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3394010.1002/app.33940 ↗
97. van Gurp M, Palmen J (1998) Time-Tempearture Superposition for Polymeric Blends. Rheology Bulletin 67:5–8
98. Balkan O, Ezdeşir A (2012) Rheological behaviors of glass bead- and wollastonite-filled polypropylene composites modified with thermoplastic elastomers. Polym Compos 33:1162–1187. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2224510.1002/pc.22245 ↗
99. Kracalik M (2018) New approach for investigation of reinforcement in polymer nanocomposites using oscillatory shear flow data. Epitoanyag J Silic Based Compos Mater 70:42–47. https://doi.org/10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2018.910.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2018.9 ↗
100. Cailloux J, Santana OO, Franco-Urquiza E et al (2013) Sheets of branched poly(lactic acid) obtained by one step reactive extrusion calendering process: melt rheology analysis. Express Polym Lett 7:304–318. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.2710.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.27 ↗